Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714

    Judge temporarily forbids deportation of New Bedford immigra

    Judge temporarily forbids deportation of New Bedford immigrants
    By Jesse Harlan Alderman, Associated Press Writer | April 6, 2007

    BOSTON --A Massachusetts judge issued a temporary restraining order on Friday barring federal officials from deporting a large bloc of illegal immigrants snared in a New Bedford factory raid last month and now held at Texas detention centers.

    U.S. District Court Judge Richard Stearns granted the emergency request from lawyers for the detained immigrants, who argued that about 110 of 360 workers arrested may have agreed to waive an appeal of their deportation order under duress or with improper translators.

    The restraining order lasts for 10 days and does not apply to detainees that already had been ordered deported before they were arrested in the March 6 raid at the Michael Bianco Inc. factory that makes equipment and apparel for the U.S. military. Stearns' order also requires the government to turn over a list of all names and locations of immigrants held outside of Massachusetts who have voluntarily agreed to deportation, and requires the government to allow lawyers to meet with those detainees to make sure they fully understand their rights.

    Attorneys for the detainees argue that federal immigration officials tried to hurry the deportation process and separate the former Massachusetts workers from their lawyers and families by taking many of them to holding centers in Port Isabel, near Harlingen, Texas, and to El Paso, in some cases hours after the raid.

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have continually said they have not denied legal counsel to any of the detainees.

    "We believe the information required by the Court's order will demonstrate that ICE is and remains committed to the due process of all immigration status violators in ICE custody," spokesman Marc Raimondi said in an e-mail. "It's important to remember that the illegal aliens arrested during the New Bedford enforcement action have always had access to legal materials, legal services and their consulates."

    Spokeswoman Christina DiIorio-Sterling said the U.S. Attorney's office would not comment on the judge's order because it involves pending litigation.

    Bernard J. Bonn III, an attorney for the detainees, said the judge may be disenchanted by the government's haste in ordering the mostly indigenous Central American factory workers to leave the country.

    "I think he was troubled by the government not being more flexible in this," Bonn said.

    At the emergency hearing Friday, Stearns chided the assistant U.S. attorney and ICE lawyers for their unwillingness to turn over the names of detainees involved in deportation proceedings.

    "I'm a little baffled by the position of the government on this," Stearns said.

    Mark Grady, an assistant U.S. attorney, argued that the names were not released because of privacy concerns. He said the government was not trying to cut corners in the deportation process. The removal of many immigrants to Texas was the result of limited bed space in Massachusetts, he said.

    "Instead of those in New Bedford, you'd simply have the next 250 aliens in Massachusetts shipped to Texas," Grady said.

    Bonn said a delegation of lawyers from Massachusetts will travel to Texas to interview detainees who waived their right to appeal. He said he expects many will change their mind after meeting with attorneys fluent in Spanish and connected to their families back in New Bedford. Some relatives of the detainees came to watch the hearing wearing red and green indigenous dresses.

    The lawyers could then file appeals or request new deportation hearings, Bonn said.

    "We think among those, we will find many people who did not understand the process," he said. "That was clear from talking to many people at the hearing today who felt their family members were coerced. We're not talking about Abu-Ghraib type of coercion, but we're talking about people who were scared and did not understand the situation."



    © Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
    http://www.boston.com
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    34,925
    WOE WOE!!!. Deportation is a Civil matter and the illegal aliens are not entitled to an attorney, like in a criminal case.

    I think this judge is overstepping and not following the law. How can he demand something when they don't have to have an attorney? What happend to a quick and speedy trial?

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    WOE WOE!!!. Deportation is a Civil matter and the illegal aliens are not entitled to an attorney, like in a criminal case.

    I think this judge is overstepping and not following the law. How can he demand something when they don't have to have an attorney? What happend to a quick and speedy trial?

    Dixie
    WOW, I didn't know they had no right to a lawyer in a civil matter!! Then they should just hurry them on through deportation once they know they are illegal!
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    April
    Guest
    Once again entering



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •