Thread: La Raza calls ALIPAC a White Supremacist Extremist group

"Lisa Navarrete, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy organization, called ALIPAC an extremist group and equated taking their immigration policy proposals seriously with taking advice on affirmative action from a white supremacist group."

Of course the definition of "La Raza" is "THE RACE"; does this group qualify as a "supremacist group"????

Predictable For a LACK of valid arguments the Pro-ILLEGAL Elitists, Elitist Politicians, Elitist Political Contributors, ILLEGAL EMPLOYERS, and other Special Interest Groups benefiting from the ILLEGALS always fall back on attacking anyone who disagrees attempting to label them as racists or as in this case a "supremacist group" just hoping to place the United States Citizen on the defensive as a side tracking maneuver in an attempt to defend the real issue of their ILLEGALS invading the United States.

Laraza is an extremist mexican supremecist group. Don't be fooled by laraza using the terms latino or hispanic, they are strictly in it for mexicans only. Case in point..chicano studies is not about latinos/hispanics..it's all about and for mexicans.

"We take our orders from the Constitution, and we've been doing it the same way since 1790," O'Neil said.

Is every government official a flaming liar? They have not be "doing it the same way since 1790" the race, nationality, and many other questions are all recent additions.

Bowman wrote:
Quote:
"We take our orders from the Constitution, and we've been doing it the same way since 1790," O'Neil said.

"Is every government official a flaming liar? They have not be "doing it the same way since 1790" the race, nationality, and many other questions are all recent additions."

Reply:
Below are the original questions asked in the 1790 Census:

1790 Census Findings

(edit)

QUESTIONS ASKED ON THE 1790 CENSUS

Name of the head of each household.

How many free white males age 16 and older.

How many free white males under age 16.

How many free white females.

How many of all other free persons.

How many slaves.

http://www.censusfinder.com/1790-census.htm

Go below to view a "public service announcement" made by Karl Rove in which he states that these original 6 questions, written by James Madison, are "practically the same" as those being asked on the 2010 Census!

A 2010 Census Message From Karl Rove
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyZSbbBjMvA

There is a direct email contact for to Commerce Secretary Locke on the website of the Dept. of Commerce, of which the Census Bureau is a Division. This almost totally false announcement was made and is being distributed with taxpayer funds.

added:
You Are Here: Department of Commerce › Contact Us

Mail
U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20230

Phone
Main: (202) 482-2000

E-mail
Secretary Locke: TheSec@doc.gov

Originally Posted by Texas2step

QUESTIONS ASKED ON THE 1790 CENSUS

Name of the head of each household.

How many free white males age 16 and older.

How many free white males under age 16.

How many free white females.

How many of all other free persons.

How many slaves.

The number of free and slave was mandated by the Constitution, since slave persons only counted as 3/5ths of a free person for Congressional districting/apportionment reasons. That was eliminated by the 14th Amendment.

But I also notice they ask about "free white" people, as I recall there were "unfree whites", indentured servants that I guess were considered slaves and only counted for 3/5th of a vote.

Blancos! Qien? Nosotros?

Lisa Navarrete, vice president of the National Council of La Raza...
Gheen "is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist," she said.

Liar. Counting illegal aliens already is showing up in the polling places and voting districts. La Raza, LULAC, et al are just mad because we know that they are out to gain over-representation by diminishing the non-Hispanic voters or by gaining an unjustified number of voting districts or council seats. Ethnic gerrymandering.

I also know what they do at redistricting meetings and they must have some high Census data numbers to brow beat everyone into giving Hispanics more representation than they deserve. They believe illegal aliens deserve representation!!!

Assuming illegals who are counted don't show up to vote, they still get a city councilman elected with less than half the votes(sometimes far less than that) it requires the other candidates running for city council need to win their seats. It's hardest felt at the local and state levels.

"We take our orders from the Constitution, and we've been doing it the same way since 1790," O'Neil said.

Oh no you are not. There are no Census takers walking door to door with books collecting the data from every home, they didn't mail Census questionnaires to their door steps, they didn't waste money by mailing out 4 pieces of mail to one residence in two languages in one Census year... Has O'Neil ever seen the 1790 Census? I have.

Dixie

Race has nothing to do with it. It's all about assimilation.

Besides, what is la raza but a hispanic supremacist extremist group? The level of irony is at an all-time high when a group called "The Race," that spouts all the racist garbage they do, calls ALIPAC racist. Unbelievable.

When they don't have an argument, they play the race card. They're so precitable.

Originally Posted by patbrunz

Besides, what is la raza but a hispanic supremacist extremist group? The level of irony is at an all-time high when a group called "The Race," that spouts all the racist garbage they do, calls ALIPAC racist. Unbelievable.

Yep, they insist on a 30 to 1 immigration advantage for Latin Americans over everyone else in the world, they demand benefits for Latino illegal aliens that legal immigrants and Americans don't receive, they fund Mecha whose motto is: "For LaRaza everything", and when you point all this out they call us "racist"? They have changed the term to mean "someone not giving everything they own to the Superior Cosmic Race". At least the Mexica Movement is honest about their goals which are extreme preferential treatment for Latinos, LaRaza has the same goals but tries to obsfucate them.

When they don't have an argument, they play the race card. They're so preditable.

Why are racists even allowed to pull the race card?

We need to e-mail Abby Sewell this article, with Lisa Navarrete CC'd!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-116352.html