Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    LA: Senate rejects changes in bill requiring state contracto

    Senate rejects changes in bill requiring state contractors to check workers' immigration status

    Published: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 8:50 PM Updated: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 8:55 PM

    By Ed Anderson, The Times-Picayune


    The author of a bill to penalize contractors who do not use a federal program to verify the legal status of employees hired to work on public projects got the Senate Wednesday to reject extensive changes made to his bill in the House.

    At the request of Sen. Neil Riser, R-Columbia, senators voted 36-1 to throw his Senate Bill 66 into a six-member House-Senate conference committee to work out a possible compromise between differing versions adopted by the two chambers. If a compromise bill can be reached, both chambers will have to vote on it.

    The only vote against Riser's request to send the bill to a compromise committee was cast by Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, D-New Orleans.

    Riser said the main problem senators have with the House version's language is that any company that does not use the federal "E-Verify" program could not only lose the public contract and be barred from bidding on another one for three years, but also could face financial penalties if the job has to be rebid.

    Riser's bill is designed to make contractors working on local, parish or state projects hire legal immigrants or American citizens.

    Riser said he is optimistic he can resolve problems with the bill before the session ends next week.

    He said that some senators told him they thought language inserted in the bill by the House may have gone too far. The language called for a contractor to be "liable for any additional costs incurred by a public entity" caused by the cancellation of a contract -- such as delays in rebidding and hiring a new contractor.

    Riser said some senators told him they do not feel comfortable with a new program being used to check the immigration status of workers, a program that is not completely foolproof.

    "They are concerned about the penalty provisions since this is new legislation and a new way of doing business," Riser said.

    The bill requires a contractor to submit an affidavit to the public agency that hires it stating it will use the verification system for the life of the project. The affidavit must be submitted as part of the bidding process to get the contract.

    A similar bill by Rep. John Bel Edwards, D-Amite, is awaiting a final Senate vote.

    www.nola.com
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,832
    Another sellout in a state senate trying to protect illegal aliens and the businesses that hire them.

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member USPatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    SW Florida
    Posts
    3,827
    There seems to be a pattern happening in every States across the country that tries to pass E-Verify laws.

    Some Republicans lied to us in 2010 elections and now are making every excuse in the book to keep Illegals working by hook,crook or stealth. Whats even worse they apparently think we all are stupid and will continue to re-elect them.

    At least the Dems are honest.
    "A Government big enough to give you everything you want,is strong enough to take everything you have"* Thomas Jefferson

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    He said that some senators told him they thought language inserted in the bill by the House may have gone too far. The language called for a contractor to be "liable for any additional costs incurred by a public entity" caused by the cancellation of a contract -- such as delays in rebidding and hiring a new contractor.
    What a pathetic excuse! Basic UCC law would already likely already hold the contractor "liable" for any additional costs caused by the cancellation of a contract, especially if it were the result of the contractor breaking the law. Of course the contractors who rely on illegal invader labor to supplement their work force do not like that language! No doubt, they have made their displeasure well know to their “representatives.â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •