Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Michael Chertoff: We don't outsource our security

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... ERTOFF.TMP

    NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    Chertoff visits ports, levees
    Homeland security chief speaks about thwarted Dubai deal, state's preparedness

    - John Wildermuth and Greg Lucas, Chronicle Political Writers
    Saturday, March 18, 2006



    The nation's homeland security chief said Friday that a Dubai company's proposed takeover of operations at six U.S. ports would have had no effect on the safety of the country's waterfronts despite the political opposition to the deal.

    "We don't outsource our security," Michael Chertoff, head of the Department of Homeland Security, said to the Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco.

    The Coast Guard reviews all the security plans and has the final say on what ships and cargo are allowed in the United States -- regardless of who operates the ports, he said.

    "We have a layered defense in depth," Chertoff said. Before it leaves the harbor, and often before it leaves a foreign port, "all cargo is thoroughly screened and vetted and, if necessary, physically inspected."

    None of that would have changed had Dubai Ports World, a United Arab Emirates-owned company, taken over operations from a British firm at six U.S. ports including New York. The deal was scuttled after intense opposition from Congress.

    Chertoff, during a morning visit to the busy Port of Oakland, saw a demonstration of the towering radiation portal monitors that every outbound cargo container has to pass through.

    Oakland was the first U.S. port to screen all cargo for radiation, but the rest of the country soon will be following suit, the secretary said.

    Earlier in the day, Chertoff inspected the state's aging levees with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. He then flew from Sacramento on a Coast Guard helicopter, which gave him a look at the Bay Area refineries and the mothball fleet on Suisun Bay before landing in Oakland. After his visit, he boarded the Coast Guard cutter Pike for a waterside view of the port and a trip to San Francisco.

    Chertoff visited California at Schwarzenegger's request after meeting with the Republican governor two weeks ago in Washington, D.C.

    Schwarzenegger wanted Chertoff to see firsthand the need to swiftly repair and strengthen the Central Valley's 1,600 miles of levees to avert -- in a natural disaster such as an earthquake -- flooding like hit New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

    But while Chertoff vowed to treat the rehabilitation and strengthening of the levees as a high priority, he stopped short of saying the federal government would declare a state of emergency, as Schwarzenegger has done on the state level.

    Generally a federal emergency declaration deals with an event that's either happened or will happen in a few days, the secretary said.

    Chertoff's reluctance to guarantee federal help for the levees didn't sit well with Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles.

    "California needs money from the Bush administration for levee repairs, not a photo op," Núñez said in a statement. "Secretary Chertoff doesn't appear to have learned anything from Katrina by coming to California empty-handed."

    Chertoff heard more complaints when his speech to the Commonwealth Club at the Hotel Nikko in San Francisco was interrupted twice by hecklers critical of the Bush administration. Both were removed from the ballroom by security personnel.

    The secretary warned against expecting too much of government, which will always need time to respond to any emergency.

    Hurricane Katrina, for example, completely overwhelmed the capabilities of the state and federal government, he said. It devastated an area the size of Great Britain, forced one of the biggest evacuations in U.S. history and left more debris than 1992's Hurricane Andrew and the Sept. 11 attacks combined.

    "The burden of emergency response will never be placed entirely on the government,'' Chertoff said. "Able-bodied individuals who are capable of providing for their own rescue must do so."

    He stressed the need for people to prepare for the inevitable natural disaster so they don't have to depend on instant help from the government. Web sites such as Homeland Security's www.ready.gov and San Francisco's www.72hours.org provide the type of emergency preparedness information people need.

    "Relief isn't going to happen in an hour," Chertoff said. "For the first 24 to 48 hours, people may have to be quite self-reliant."

    Homeland security is always a series of tradeoffs, whether it's dealing with disasters or terrorists, the secretary said.

    "We can't eliminate every disaster or threat. We can't eliminate all risks," he said. "Not without destroying the country, our civil liberties or our quality of life."

    It's impossible to promise that the government "can make sure that some bad person never gets into a building," Chertoff said. "To deliver on that promise, I would have to make this country unlivable."

    People have to understand that there are always hard choices that have to be made, and sometimes none of the choices are good ones, he said.

    "We're trying to build a (security) system we can live with, because it's clear to me we're going to have to live with this for a long time," Chertoff said. "If I wanted to be able to declare victory and go home, this is absolutely the wrong job."
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    This man is the worst most transparent lying sack of crap that ever held an appointed government position.

    They haven't just outsourced our security they've outsourced our whole nation.

    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    backseatdriver97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    102
    We don't outsource our security," Michael Chertoff, head of the Department of Homeland Security, said to the Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco

    Maybe we should outsource our security at the borders because everyone knows (illegals especially) that the borders are wide open! Who does this guy think he's fooling?? He tries to make it sound like the DHS is doing such an outstanding job. It is all lip-service. Hey, Mr. Chertoff! You are supposedly the head of the Dept of Homeland Security. Secure our Homeland! While you guys spin your wheels to make it look like you're doing something (which you're not) our Country continues to be destroyed by illegals.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399
    The secretary warned against expecting too much of government


    This is the first honest statement ever to come out of the mouth of this beatty-eyed mouthpiece for the Bush administration.

    Another favorite quote:

    "I have not heard a report of thousands of people in the convention center who don't have food and water." –Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, on NPR's "All Things Considered," Sept. 1, 2005
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    had_enuf!

    GOOD ONE!!

    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    239
    Homeland security is always a series of tradeoffs, whether it's dealing with disasters or terrorists, the secretary said.
    No kidding?
    I always wonder why, after a terrorist attack 5 years ago, the KEY to protecting us from terrorism, is to saddle our defense agency, with crap that has NOTHING to do with terrorism.


    -Hurricane clean-up, and CYA after the fact.

    -Bird Flu vectors ,and bird migration patterns.

    -Lobbying for criminal amnesties.


    You give the HSD the job of handling out welfare, in effect, and all it's other jobs become secondary.

    HSD looks like a liberal entitlement program now. HS is a series of tradeoffs????????? Does that mean efforts to fight terrorism, take a back seat to Katrina handouts??? I think it does.


    What do you do when those tasked with defending us have failed?

    Apparently, you EXPAND their responsibilities, and shuffle agents AWAY from what they do best, to make them do stuff they know nothing about.

    AND increase their budget by a zillion dollars.

    Having one man in charge of all these things means he is in charge of nothing.

    -pa













    [/quote]

  7. #7
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008
    Meanwhile, over here at http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ ... 744239.htm
    the headline reads

    Dept. of Homeland IT Insecurity
    The agency protecting the U.S. against threats gets an "F" when it comes to safeguarding its own IT systems.


    The Bush Administration motto: "Trust Us".
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •