Thread: Migrant children face test in Dallas immigration court

Migrant children face test in Dallas immigration court

Rex C. Curry/Special Contributor

Immigration attorney Paul Zoltan, with portraits of his Hungarian great-grandparents in his office, says his teen client would have become a “predator or prey” in El Salvador.

By DIANNE SOLÍS AND DAVID TARRANT
Staff Writers
Published: 19 July 2014 10:54 PM
Updated: 19 July 2014 11:35 PM

Related

• Official: Sharp drop in child migrants at Rio Grande

In a packed Dallas immigration courtroom, Elsy García sits next to her 16-year-old brother, José. She last saw him when he was 9, when she fled their home in Usulutan in southern El Salvador.

Now José is facing deportation. His case is confusing. His sister, a 28-year-old mother of three U.S.-born children, is now his guardian. She fears she will fail him. They have no attorney.

Yet Judge Michael Baird tells her she’s not named as her brother’s legal custodian. Someone she doesn’t know is listed on the document. “You did the right thing coming back with him today,” Judge Baird finally says.

Many like José came on their own or paid a smuggler. Their journeys often involved dashes through gang-controlled Honduran neighborhoods, cramped bus rides along Mexican roads or a trip of terror atop a cargo train. Now, after being apprehended, these young people have ended up in court to face their biggest test — one that can determine whether they stay in the U.S.

What happens in Baird’s courtroom lies at the heart of a heated debate over how the U.S. government should handle the recent surge of juvenile migrants.

The latest order from President Barack Obama’s administration: Prioritize and speed up hearings on removal of these unaccompanied minors, whose apprehensions total 57,000 so far this fiscal year.

Immigration courts have a record backlog of 375,500 cases — both juveniles and adults from all countries, said Juan Osuna, director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the U.S. Department of Justice. The numbers have doubled since 2008.

“We are facing the largest caseload that the [EOIR] has ever seen,” said Osuna, testifying on Capitol Hill two weeks ago.

Texas immigration courts are among the nation’s busiest. Since 2005, Texas judges have presided over a quarter of the nation’s deportation cases involving juveniles, according to data analyzed by the Syracuse University-based Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC, a national research center.

Texas immigration courts are also among the nation’s toughest. In Texas, two-thirds of immigrants, including adults and juveniles, are ordered deported, according to TRAC. The national average is about 50 percent.

To deal with the current crisis of juvenile migrants, the Obama administration asked Congress for $3.7 billion, including funding to add 40 more judges for the nation’s 59 immigration courts.

But a prominent federal judge warned it would be a mistake to rush minors through immigration court. “Those are the cases that take longer,” said Dana Leigh Marks, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges.

“You have to be more solicitous of the person and allow the person to find an attorney. They are particularly vulnerable individuals,” Marks said. “You have to spend more time to make sure they understand the procedures and the rights. How do you do that with frightened children?”

Baird’s courtroom
Located on an upper floor of a downtown federal building, Baird’s windowless, fluorescent-lit courtroom is tucked into a corner of a hallway crowded with immigrants from some of the most dangerous places in the world.

The courtroom is a tidy place: beige walls, dark blue carpeting and a raised desk where the black-robed judge sits in a tall leather chair.

Behind Baird are an American flag and the bronze seal of the Justice Department, whose motto, Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur, is Latin for “Who Pursues for Lady Justice.”

About once a week, the judge presides over the juvenile immigration docket in Dallas. “All of you are here today because the government wants to remove you from the country,” he tells the juveniles one recent morning.

He reads them their rights. It is a short conversation. You can have legal representation if you want, the judge tells them, but you don’t have the right to a free lawyer. An interpreter with a booming voice repeats the message in rapid-fire, confident Spanish.

At the end of one bench, a boy in a red T-shirt squeezes up against his mother. He looks 9 but is actually 14. He watches an older boy slouching at the respondent’s table facing Baird.

The teen, with a faux-hawk hairstyle, gray T-shirt, black jeans and sneakers, looks stylish and cool except for an uncertainty in his wide eyes.

“No,” he replies softly when asked if he has an attorney.

“Sí,” he says with a nod when asked if he needs time to hire one.

The children in the Dallas courtroom are all classified as unaccompanied minors — meaning they arrived without a parent.

Typically, unaccompanied minors are trying to reunite with a relative already living in the U.S.

Deportation hearings involving minors can take several years because of the backlog. But the Obama administration now wants such cases moved to the top of court dockets. In the recent past, the Justice Department focused on speeding up the removal of those with criminal records.

Legislation introduced last week by two Texas lawmakers, Sen. John Cornyn, the deputy GOP leader, and Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Laredo Democrat, would make it possible to deport Central American immigrant children within days of their apprehension.

Unaccompanied minors from countries other than Mexico and Canada are not subject to expedited removal from the country now. Expedited removal means that someone who is in the U.S. illegally can be quickly deported without any court appearance or judicial review.

The unaccompanied minors in the Dallas courtroom are all from Central America — El Salvador, Guatemala or Honduras — where violence, poverty and false beliefs that U.S. authorities treat minors leniently have fueled the crisis at the border.

Across the nation’s immigration courts, children show up without lawyers more than half the time, according to a recent report by TRAC, which looked at 100,000 juvenile cases since 2005. This makes a huge difference.

In about half of the cases in which juveniles have an attorney, the court has allowed them to stay in the U.S., according to the data. In cases in which juveniles did not have a lawyer, 9 out of 10 were ordered deported.

For children from Central America, a deportation order can mean returning to violence or even death in their birth country, said Paul Zoltan, a Dallas immigration attorney.

Recently, Zoltan represented a teen from El Salvador applying for a special immigrant juvenile status. The boy’s father abandoned him a few months after his birth, which made the boy more vulnerable to gangs. He left home to live with an aunt in Texas.

“Like so many others like him, he was sent north because he was either going to become predator or prey,” Zoltan said.

That’s why many advocates for the immigrant children are alarmed at efforts to move these cases more quickly through the court system.

On July 9, a coalition of organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, filed a class-action lawsuit for the failure of the federal government to provide juveniles in immigration court with legal representation.

A sister and brother
In Baird’s courtroom, José Garcia’s hearing ends with the court giving him and his sister time to find a lawyer. But Elsy wonders how much she can do.

Like so many male teens who end up on the juvenile docket, José is fleeing gangs, his sister says later. La Mara Salvatrucha, a gang with roots in Los Angeles’ immigrant neighborhoods, made it clear it wanted her brother. Their mother decided to place José with a smuggler who took him north to Dallas.

But if he files an asylum claim, he could face difficulties. Immigrants are eligible for asylum if they can prove fear of persecution on one or more of five grounds: race, nationality, religion, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.

Especially hard to prove is social group persecution — such as teenagers targeted for gang recruitment.

“U.S. law makes a distinction on those who have humanitarian claims,” said Marc Rosenblum, an immigration specialist at the Migration Policy Institute. “Even if a gang member is going into your house and saying, ‘I am going to kill you if you don’t do X, Y and Z,’ that won’t make you eligible necessarily for asylum relief.”

José arrived in Texas last year and started high school in the Dallas area. Elsy said she knows the odds for her brother aren’t good. Without an attorney, José stands little chance of staying in Texas. “They say it is really difficult and you have to have evidence,” Elsy said.

She doesn’t want to fail her mother. “The situation [in El Salvador] is so difficult,” she said in Spanish. “Imagine kids only 12 smoking drugs and getting in gangs. The mothers send their kids here because they fear for the lives of their sons.

“If you don’t join, they’ll kill you.”

dsolis@dallasnews.com;
dtarrant@dallasnews.com

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/metro...tion-court.ece