Thread: More Cities to Get Counterterror Money

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=1 ... d=10235907

Published Thursday | January 31, 2008
More Cities to Get Counterterror Money
By EILEEN SULLIVAN and DEVLIN BARRETT Associated Press Writers
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - More cities across the country are considered at high risk of a terrorist attack, according to a new list of funding priorities from the Homeland Security Department.

Last year the department made 45 cities or regions eligible for a competitive counterterrorism grant program. This year, the list has been expanded to 60 areas that can apply for the nearly $782 million available, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.

The urban area grants are one of the department's most popular - and most intensely debated - programs. The department divides the regions at highest risk of a terrorist attack into two tiers. The seven highest-risk areas - including Los Angeles, New York and Washington - will be competing for about $430 million this year. The remaining 53 will compete for about $352 million. The department plans to release the list Friday.

The list has grown and shrunk in recent years, based on decisions the department says are not the result of specific threats or concerns but that reflect an overall analysis of threat data.

Some regions on the list in the past were dropped more recently. For instance, Albany, N.Y., was put back on the list this year after being dropped in 2003.

Other regions added to the list this year are: Rochester, N.Y.; Syracuse, N.Y.; Austin and Round Rock, Texas; Baton Rouge, La.; Bridgeport, Stamford and Norwalk, Conn.; the Hartford, Conn., region; Louisville and Jefferson County in Kentucky and an area across the Ohio River in Indiana; Nashville, Davidson County and Murfreesboro, Tenn.; Richmond, Va.; Riverside, San Bernardino and Ontario, Calif.; Salt Lake City; San Juan, Caguas and Guaynabo, Puerto Rico; and Toledo, Ohio.

Every year, the list pleases and angers elected officials based on which cities are added or dropped. But this year, Congress insisted that the department include more cities.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee, said he is thrilled that cities from his state will receive counterterrorism money. Last year, there were no cities from his state on the urban area list.

Lieberman's counterpart in the House, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., is also pleased with the department's funding decisions, even though only a small area in Mississippi, near Memphis, is included.

But Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., criticized the department for spreading the money too widely.

"Strict criteria should be implemented to ensure that only high-threat cities" get money from the program, Lowey said.

Last year, Congress did pass a law allowing for as many as 100 cities to be judged worthy of such anti-terror funds, but said any grant money should be based solely on risk assessment.

Mayors of the biggest U.S. cities have long claimed the list should be pared down to funnel more dollars to those places at greatest risk; and mayors of mid-sized cities insist terrorists don't ignore them, and neither should the government.

Also Friday, the department is expected to announce transit and port security grants. New York and New Jersey will receive $43 million in port security grants, the highest of any port area across the country.

The Los Angeles-Long Beach port will get $36 million, and Houston and Galveston, Texas will get about $31 million. Connecticut, New York and New Jersey will get more than $150 million for transit security, while Washington will get about $39 million.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, said the funding to New York for port and transit has increased significantly in recent years, an indication the government is listening to lawmakers' concerns.

"Last year was the best year by far we ever had for funding, and now we're going higher," King said. "This is a real recognition by the department that New York is clearly the best when it comes to providing homeland security protection at the local, state and city level."

On Monday, President Bush is expected to ask, as part of his final budget request, for a total of $2.2 billion to help states and cities protect against terrorist attacks.


Bush will also ask for more than $12 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, a 19 percent increase over what Congress appropriated for these programs in 2008. This money would go toward building a fence along the southwest border and enforcing immigration laws, such as deporting illegal immigrants and holding businesses accountable for hiring people who are in the country illegally.

Illegal immigration has been a hot topic in both the Democratic and Republican presidential campaigns. Last year Congress failed to pass a comprehensive immigration bill.

(This version CORRECTS to show that Congress passed a bill allowing, not mandating, increase in cities.)

If we have even one high risk for "terrorism" city, why do we have open borders?

I resent tax money being used in this manner. What do these cities do to "secure" themselves with all of this money?

Have you ever talked to someone that works for Homeland Security? I have, she is insane, can't raise her kid, does go to work even 50% of the time, has no degree that would qualify her to work in any kind of security or high level job.


Our government is way to big if they have money like this to throw around.

How about some tax relief.