Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    North American integration slides beyond probability

    http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/ElFinanc ... sortby=ASC

    North American integration slides beyond probability
    News - Domingo 11 de junio (8:45 hrs.)



    • De Gaulle and Adenauer shared foresight[/*:m:2ynghzjy]
    • Mexico and the USA move apart[/*:m:2ynghzjy]
    • Booming oil prices did not help[/*:m:2ynghzjy]
    • Immigration accord out of the question[/*:m:2ynghzjy]
    • Integration becomes a dirty word[/*:m:2ynghzjy]


    El Financiero en línea



    México City, June 11th.- Integration is a short word. Yet, to have it written, embodying a multinational political, economic and cultural consensus, is a long and complex task. The transition from a manuscript to an action timetable requires a unique kind of statesmanship concocted with a grain of wizardry.


    It took Europe about 40 years to reach its present status as a fully integrated region. Led by the late French President Charles De Gaulle and German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, the European economic integration process began moving on April, 1951.


    It got off the ground with the implementation of the European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS) as proposed by French ideologue Robert Schuman. Signed by West Germany, Belgium, France, Holland, Italy and Luxemburg, this treaty was the first step toward European economic integration.


    Six years later, the six nations approved Jean Monnet’s proposal to create the Economic European Community. This organization set the stage for the establishment in 1991 of the European Union (EU).


    European nations have come a long way. Except for new members from Eastern Europe, they look alike. The French and German economies are much larger than others, but their overall features are the same.


    Unlike Canada, the United States and Mexico which represent two different worlds.

    For many years in the past, the American Way of Life has sounded like magic to most Mexicans. It still does. A short distance away, The American Dream has been always so close and yet so far. The way things appear now, it may have turned into the impossible dream.


    For a while, globalization was pitched as a mandatory shortcut to prosperity; it was dressed up as the answer to fulfill Mexico’s yearnings for real social, economic and political betterment.


    National and foreign champions of development hailed free trade as the groundwork for full-fledged integration in North America. A regional common market –it was assured—would bring Canada, the United States and Mexico closer together. The Distant Neighbors stuff would be no longer used to depict the relationship among the three nations.


    With the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in place, Mexico would shortly resemble its two associates up north. With common interests and objectives, the three countries would sit down, talk and do business as equals. Once in the mainstream of world-class progress, Mexico could set its sights on integration.


    At first glance, NAFTA was the initial stage of a far-reaching and long-lasting deal. However, 11 years after the trilateral trade accord became effective, its overall priorities seem about to hit the skids. A series of political, financial and economic events --occurred in the meantime—have sparked controversies that often jerked the United States and Mexico in opposite directions.


    Regional integration proved delusory and fit only for professional daydreamers. During a 10-year period, Mexico has been unable to match the pace of advance set by its top business partners. On the contrary, while the United States and Canada move forward, Mexico steps backward.


    Under four consecutive administrations, the Mexican government and big-time entrepreneurs have successfully pushed substantive reforms in the nation's economic structures. Highlights of the neoliberal doctrine, adopted since 1982, feature free access to local markets and divestiture of major utilities. Growth rates, however, underscore a deep slump.


    Rather than narrowing, the gap between Mexico and its two North American trade partners has broadened. Stagnation remains stubbornly rooted as Mexico's economic policies apparently preclude a turnaround that could improve the lot of some 40 million people living below the poverty line.


    The situation reached the kindling point after statistics showed that over the past five years, some 2.5 million Mexican illegal aliens entered U.S. territory in search of work and eventual integration. To have one million Latins taking the streets in California, Illinois, New York, Texas and Colorado, Arizona and Georgia, among other states, put the icing on the cake.

    Such a massive and well organized demonstration prompted a harsh response from the Establishment. After three weeks of quiet, the White House announced the deployment of 6,000 National Guard Groups and confirm plans to build a 500-mile curtain along the Mexico border. Regardless of the benefits U.S. businessmen reap from abundant, cheap labor, the increasing stream of Mexican undocumented immigrants has become national security issue.


    Within the framework of NAFTA, Mexico has failed to perform the job expected –and even taken for granted-- from a well-equipped and resourceful associate. Cash was not the matter. Hard currency has flowed hugely into the nation’s treasury, according to the figures released quarterly by Mexico’s Federal Reserve Bank (BdeM).


    A recent report issued by the Mexican Fed indicates that during the present administration, oil revenues amounted to 280.3 billion dollars. That is, a 54% increase over the same period in the Zedillo government (1994-2000). Last year, Pemex, the state-owned oil monopoly, posted all-time high profits amounting to 48 billion dollars well above results presented oil giants like Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron –Texaco.


    As oil prices keep booming and cash keeps rolling in. The report also notes, however, that up to 80% of the fiscal surpluss has been used for mounting and –the BdeM’s chairman Guillermo Ortiz contends— wasteful government operating expenses. No wonder Halliburton is ready to gain a foothold in Pemex and manage the corporation's revenues soundly. The prospects of Halliburton getting its act together inside Pemex should help U.S. and Mexican money changers appreciate the rewards of dealing with a country like Mexico.


    Undocumented migrants working in the United States also chipped in with 70 billion dollars during the same period. Oddly, the BdeM sustains a tight money supply policy that keeps the economy strapped.


    Curiously, too, foreign debt is the lighter burden nowadays. Liabilities abroad have boiled down to around 65 billion dollars, according to published reports. Critical financial woes –BdeM has pointed out-- derive from domestic debt commitments such the Banking Bailout Fund Package (IPAB) and the Private Investment for Infrastructure Development Program (Pidiregas).


    Set up by ex President Zedillo and orchestrated by Ortiz as Secretary of the Treasury, the banking bailout alone accounts for approximately 130 billion dollars while private investors collect dividends on a 90-billion-dollar invoice. Meeting these commitments, Ortiz has insisted lately, compromises the nation's economic growth over the short and the long terms.


    The bottom line here is that the Bush administration demands economic expansion south of the border before bilateral differences can be ironed out. Meanwhile, the American president has put border militarization under way and hardliners spell out a series of stiffer actions.


    Long sought after by the Fox government, a comprehensive immigration accord with the United States is out of the question. Integration returned to where it belongs: Wonderland. The Bush recipe holds, however: Free trade. (Amos Olvera Palomino)


    Amos Olvera Palomino

    Mexican Syndicate – editorial coordinator
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Darlene's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,200
    Best news I've heard in a long time, but we still can't let our guard down.

    That would be just what the fools on the hill want.

    Anyone for amnesty still must go.

  3. #3
    Senior Member curiouspat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA. area!
    Posts
    3,341
    The bottom line here is that the Bush administration demands economic expansion south of the border before bilateral differences can be ironed out.
    I don't believe it. Actions speak louder than words, and look what he's been doing.
    TIME'S UP!
    **********
    Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!

  4. #4
    Senior Member BobC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    854
    There has been ZERO public discussion about "integrating" our three nations. This is what bugs the hell out of me. Everyone I know is talking about how suddenly half of Mexico is living here, not assimilating and not speaking English, but so far I haven't met a single person who knew what the hell I was talking about when I brought up the North American Integration Project. People seem to sense that something enormous is happening, but can't quite figure it out. It's a plan.

    My former boss is a Canadian working here legally in the US, and I told him about this project, and he didn't believe me. Once I showed him all the documention, he informed me "That will never happen--Canadians are very proud and protective of their culture and want it to be seperate." Unfortunately for him--he doesn't understand that it is already happening and it's being done behind all of our backs.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    185
    I hear you Bob, I scour the news for info and commentary on the Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement, and don't find ANY mention of it in major media markets. Other than a few Canadian references, articles by Jerome Corsi, and boards such as this one I find little reference to the Elephant in the middle of the room.

  6. #6
    Senior Member curiouspat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA. area!
    Posts
    3,341
    BobC and LunaLun,

    I agree. When I try to discuss, as you say with documentation of the SPP, nobody has heard of it.

    Canadians are very proud and protective of their culture and want it to be seperate
    Americans are, also, and look what's being done by the Globalists.
    TIME'S UP!
    **********
    Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!

  7. #7
    Senior Member xanadu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    958
    As oil prices keep booming and cash keeps rolling in. The report also notes, however, that up to 80% of the fiscal surpluss has been used for mounting and ...wasteful government operating expenses. ...

    Undocumented migrants working in the United States also chipped in with 70 billion dollars during the same period. Oddly, the BdeM sustains a tight money supply policy that keeps the economy strapped.
    I do mean to be sarcastic... HAS anyone checked Fox's freezer?
    "Liberty CANNOT be preserved without general knowledge among people" John Adams (August 1765)

  8. #8
    Senior Member curiouspat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA. area!
    Posts
    3,341
    Yep, Xanadu, you're right. Follow the money! Do you think he might do as Castro "promised to do". That if anyone found that he was rich, he'd 'leave office"????
    TIME'S UP!
    **********
    Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!

  9. #9
    Senior Member BobC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    854
    Have you all seen the movie "Blade Runner?" I swear to God if this new senate bill goes through we will be moving closer and closer to that movie in real life. No unifying culture, no common language, overpopulation, uglier crime, desolate cities. I think Ted Kennedy is the devil.

  10. #10
    Senior Member curiouspat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA. area!
    Posts
    3,341
    Have any of you read the old 'sci-fi' book, "MAKE ROOM, MAKE ROOM" Sure seems possible now.
    TIME'S UP!
    **********
    Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •