Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member mapwife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    2,697

    Napolitano: Sanctions law needs clarification on worker ques

    Published: 11.21.2007

    Napolitano: Sanctions law needs clarification on worker question
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    PHOENIX – Governor Janet Napolitano says the state's employer sanctions law should be revised to clarify what hirings are covered.
    Napolitano says she signed the legislation in the belief that its prohibition on hiring illegal immigrants applies only to people hired after January 1st and not to people already employed. But she also says the law's wording on that question isn't very clear.
    The law's chief legislative sponsor has said it applies only to new hirings. But a lawyer for business interests challenging the law in federal court recently argued that it applies to previously hired employees as well.

    http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/printDS/212783
    Illegal aliens remain exempt from American laws, while they DEMAND American rights...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    Oh, dear.

    So is it true that it does not apply to contract laborers?

    If it only applies to those hired after Jan 1st - then how much can we bet EVERY employee hired after Jan 1st will be 'contract labor'.

    If this is true, how much can we bet even the ones working now as employees will suddenly become 'contract' on Jan. 1st?

    Of course, here in Texas, most of them are contract labor already.

    I'm wondering if this governor thought she was signing a bill that had no teeth, but it is somehow working and the powers that be out there are afraid?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member CitizenJustice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,314
    I haven't been able to figure out why she signed it in the first place, as she has battled FOR the ILLEGAL ALIENS!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    That's why I wonder if she didn't either think or , in fact, sign an empty bill. A show and tell bill.

    If, in fact, it excludes contract labor - it is only a partial bill anyway. If it's like Texas, it would only cover a small number of illegal employees.

    If it doesn't go into effect until January 1st, even those who are actually employees will become contract labor on Jan 1.

    So, if that is the case, she signed nothing really.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •