Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By vivalamigra
  • 1 Post By vivalamigra
  • 1 Post By artist

Thread: Paul Ryan’s First Act as Speaker of the House: Protect Obama's Muslim Refugees

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    59,590

    Paul Ryan’s First Act as Speaker of the House: Protect Obama's Muslim Refugees

    ALIPAC Note: Any Republican, like Paul Ryan, that says the Syrian refugee program should be "paused" instead of "stopped" is working to protect Obama and his refugee program instead of responding to a majority of Americans that want the program permanently ended.

    ---

    Paul Ryan’s First Major Act as Speaker of the House: Block Any Amendments to Flawed Refugee Resettlement Bill





    by Alex Swoyer18 Nov 2015Washington, DC

    House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul’s (R-TX) American Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act – which he claims “puts in place a robust vetting process for refugees” – is under heavy scrutiny as it heads for a vote on the House floor Thursday. Members of both the Republican Party and Democratic Party have criticized it—President Obama has even threatened a veto of it if it ever reaches his desk, while several Republicans believe it’s simply a show vote that won’t fix the problem. Now it’s official, as of late Wednesday evening: House GOP leadership is blocking any amendments from being offered to the bill as the legislation is rushed to the House floor.
    “The Committee granted, by record vote of 7-3, a closed rule for H.R. 4038,” the House Rules Committee, which is chaired by
    Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX)
    65


    but influenced by the Speaker’s office, said in a “Notice of Action” to members’ offices at 8 p.m. on Wednesday evening. “The rule provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the bill,” the Rules memo continued. “The rule provides that the bill shall be considered as read. The rule waives all points of order against provisions in the bill. The rule provides one motion to recommit.”
    While it’s technically the House Rules Committee taking this action, the Speaker of the House has substantial influence over the outcome.
    Despite all of the talk that the process in the House would open up under Ryan in the wake of now former House Speaker
    Rep. John Boehner (R-OH)
    32%




    —who resigned from Congress after being driven out of the Speakership by members of his own party furious with his lack of openness in legislative process—Ryan has, on his first major move as Speaker, shut down the process entirely. It’s unclear if it will ever get better. McCaul’s bill contains several holes and doesn’t fix the problem—it simply requires more paperwork from the administration, and still lets refugees into the U.S. from Syria, according to sources close to Breitbart News.
    McCaul’s bill requires: (1) “The FBI director must certify the background investigation of each refugee” and (2) “the secretary of homeland security, FBI director and the director of national intelligence must unanimously concur that each refugee is not a security threat to the United states and make a certification to Congress.”
    According to the House Majority Leader’s office, McCaul’s legislation “constitutes an effective pause until we are certain that no refugee from Iraq and Syria who is a threat will be allowed in the country.”
    However, Breitbart News has learned that many conservatives are skeptical, saying McCaul’s bill doesn’t stop the flow of refugees from Syria into the United States, something the American public supports.
    As Breitbart News’s Matthew Boyle reported:
    But despite McCaul’s and the committee’s tough-sounding rhetoric, the bill—several congressional aides and the actual text of the legislation confirm—simply requires one new step for Syrian and Iraqi refugee admittance and resettlement: That the Director of National Intelligence, the director of the FBI and the Secretary of Homeland Security approve any such refugees beforehand. Each of those people work for President Obama at the pleasure of the president.
    “That’s like asking Janet Napolitano to verify the border is secure,” one GOP aide told Breitbart News. “Of course they are going to approve them without hesitation.”
    When asked about these concerns, the McCaul aide said that the extraordinary review process for every refugee will gum up the works and essentially grind the program to a halt.
    “Our point here is this is going to have an immediate effect of a pause on the president to do what we have wanted to do all along—to make sure that the vetting process itself is appropriate,” the aide said. “Again, this bill is not designed to stop all refugees from coming into the United States period. The problem that we have identified is we haven’t been able to confidently vet these individuals.”
    But another congressional GOP aide from an office highly skeptical of the package told Breitbart News if anyone expects three top officials who serve at the pleasure of the president to rebuff Obama’s wishes they’re kidding themselves.
    “If you believe that, I’ve got some oceanfront property in Arizona,” the aide said.
    Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX)
    67%




    was one of several members of Congress that moved to offer amendments – which were all blocked by House Rules Chairman Pete Sessions (R-TX) – that would have placed a six-month moratorium on allowing refugees into the United States. Babin’s amendment would have also required a Government Accountability Office “study within 90 days of the economic impact of refugees on state and local governments.”
    “This would be an amendment to the bill that we are talking about on the floor,” Babin told to the House Rules Committee late Wednesday evening. “There are still too many unknowns with [McCaul’s] bill in its current form.”
    Several Republican lawmakers backed Babin’s amendment including:
    Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA)
    100%




    , Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL)
    81%




    , Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC)
    96%




    , Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC)
    95%




    , Rep. Lou Barletta (R-PA)
    38%




    , Rep. Loudermilk (R-GA), Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA)
    64%




    , Rep. Jody Hice (R-GA)
    67%




    , Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL)
    88%




    , Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC)
    87%




    , Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX)
    96%




    , Rep. John Culberson (R-TX)
    60%




    , Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA)
    67%




    and Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC)
    67%




    . Breitbart News predicted more than a month ago that if elected Speaker of the House, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) would block any conservative amendments to curb immigration.
    On October 11th, Breitbart News’s Julia Hahn reported:
    If Heilemann and Beck’s analyses [about Ryan’s history for supporting open borders immigration policies] are correct… it would also mean that conservative lawmakers will be blocked from any attempt to advance legislative campaigns to curb immigration or to coordinate any public messaging designed to give voice to the concerns of working class Americans whose schoolhouses, jobsites and emergency rooms have been transformed by massive immigration.
    For instance, Congressman Brian Babin recently offered legislation to halt all refugee resettlement – a bill sponsored by Rules Chairman Pete Sessions and Homeland Chairman
    Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX)
    63%




    . Such a bill might never be brought to the floor under a Ryan Speakership. Nor would a plethora of enforcement ideas developed by anti-amnesty lawmakers including Mo Brooks, Rep. Steve King (R-IA)
    79%




    , Dave Brat, Louie Gohmert, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA)
    69%




    , Rep. John Fleming (R-LA)
    84%




    , and Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
    74%




    . Yet many are pushing Ryan to grab the gavel.
    Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security
    Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)
    21%




    criticized McCaul’s bill, saying it was “wrong procedurally” and “wrong on the substance.” Lofgren said Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) promised to change the process in the House, “yet in one of the first major pieces of legislation…there’s been no mark up” on the legislation.
    She called McCaul’s bill a “knee jerk reaction,” to the terrorist attack in Paris, adding that it “focuses only on Iraq and Syria” and not on Nigeria regarding Boko Haram or other countries with ties to terrorism.
    After several members from his own party offered amendments to McCaul’s bill, Sessions suggested that these amendments can be considered at a later date through the appropriations process.
    If the bill passes the House vote on Thursday, it then moves to the Senate.
    The legislation’s future remains entirely uncertain, as it’s unknown at this time whether or not the Senate will take it up for a vote. The legislation – even if passed by Congress – could be vetoed by President Obama, as he’s threatened to do.
    If there’s going to be a real fight from Congress against Obama’s refugee resettlement plan, that would come on the spending bill that must be passed to fund the government in early December.


    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ttlement-bill/
    Last edited by ALIPAC; 11-19-2015 at 11:35 AM.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    59,590
    This article linked to by today's ALIPAC Press Release
    http://www.alipac.us/f8/activists-go...lement-325601/
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member vivalamigra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    104
    Yep, a big smokescreen. A fraud. Farce. Con job. We know the RINO's were behind it, but the real embarrassment is that so-called "conservatives" fell in line. DEMOCRATS voted for this bill, knowing full well it's utterly meaningless. The FBI has already said these Muslims cannot be vetted. So, there will be no vetting; just rubber stamping.
    Judy likes this.
    Viva La Migra! [Hooray for the Border Patrol!] Viva Ramos! Viva Campean!* Good Riddance to El Presidente Jorge Boosh!

  4. #4
    Senior Member vivalamigra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    104
    Paul RINO's Yes Man on the Rules Committee, Pete Sessions [RINO - TX] did the dirty work. No amendments. Pass something to fool the rubes. Absolute Boob Bait. The Democrats didn't even try to stop this..Nancy Botox allowed "vulnerable" members in so-called "purple states" to vote for it. Oh...they ranted and raved about how it's "racist" yada..yada. But, in the end they know they have Barry Insane on their side and any bureaucrat who doesn't toe the Open Borders line by rubber-stamping the petitions will be disciplined - fired or reduced in Civil Service rank.
    Judy likes this.
    Viva La Migra! [Hooray for the Border Patrol!] Viva Ramos! Viva Campean!* Good Riddance to El Presidente Jorge Boosh!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    4,042
    Ryan will not support any cuts to muslim refugees - In an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News, Ryan declared that considering an applicant’s religion would not be “appropriate” and would be fundamentally un-American— insisting “that’s not who we are.”
    Isn't that hypocritical - ONLY MUSLIMS ARE CHOSEN FOR REFUGEE STATUS! Is that "appropriate"? Isn't the UN Refugee head a muslim? He could be part of the agenda to spread islam everywhere and our dodo's are too.

    Ryan should explain why 97% are muslim - how are they chosen. The cost to resettle here is 2x as much as settling them in a safe zone in their muslim countries. But, then they won't achieve their goal of allowing sharia law here in the USA. That is not assimilating and following our constitution as req'd by law to emigrate here.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ion-thats-not/

    Also in July '15
    "the State Dept, john kerry denied visas for persecuted Assyrian Christians. Although, more than 100,000 visas have already been granted this year to Muslims not facing persecution".
    “Donors in the private sector have offered complete funding for the airfare and the resettlement in the United States of these Iraqi Christians… but the State Department—while admitting 4,425 Somalis to the United States in just the first six months of 2015, and possibly even accepting members of ISIS through the Syrian and Iraqi refugee program, all paid for by tax dollars, [said] they ‘would not support a special category to bring Assyrian Christians into the United States.'” –Faith J.H. McDonnell
    https://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com...an-christians/
    Last edited by artist; 11-20-2015 at 10:20 PM.
    Judy likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. Freedom Caucus split over Paul Ryan as Speaker of the House
    By johnwk in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-24-2015, 11:36 AM
  2. Paul Ryan wins House Freedom Caucus support in speaker bid
    By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-22-2015, 12:40 PM
  3. Freedom Caucus Is Key to Paul Ryan House Speaker Decision
    By JohnDoe2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-21-2015, 01:00 PM
  4. Mike Allen: White House Would Like Paul Ryan As Speaker
    By Judy in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-13-2015, 10:25 AM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-10-2015, 12:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •