Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    R.I.: Panel hears two bills on E-Verify program

    Panel hears two bills on E-Verify program

    01:00 AM EDT on Wednesday, March 24, 2010

    By Richard C. Dujardin

    Journal Staff Writer

    PROVIDENCE –– Two competing bills relating to the E-Verify employment system that tries to weed out undocumented workers drew advocates for both sides at a hearing before the House Committee on Labor Tuesday night.

    One bill would make the E-Verify system mandatory for all Rhode Island firms with more than two employees, regardless of whether the firms have any contracts with the state. The other would reverse Governor Carcieri’s order of two years ago requiring firms to use the system as a condition of doing business with the state.

    As has been the case for each of the other years where the use of the electronic database has come before lawmakers, advocates of the system argued that the E-Verify system was a common-sense approach that would help prevent unscrupulous employers from hiring illegal undocumented workers while assuring that jobs go to people in the state who are here legally.

    Opponents argued that even with a 96-percent rate of accuracy, the system is not accurate enough to prevent otherwise legal residents from being denied jobs because of mistakes that they said can take weeks to correct.

    Rep. Jon D. Brien, the Woonsocket Democrat who is behind the bill to expand the E-Verify system to every employer with two or more employees, characterized the proposal as a “jobs bill that will help to ensure that jobs go to those who are work eligible.â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    Not if they increase the penalties at the same time.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •