Thread: Refugee Crisis in Syria Raises Fears in South Carolina

DUNCAN, S.C. — The worried citizens gathered in the high school cafeteria, about 200 strong. Patriotic songs played on the stereo, a man in a blue blazer from the John Birch Society hovered by a well-stocked literature table, and Lauren L.

Martel, a lawyer from Hilton Head, told the crowd that 25 Syrian refugees were already living among them.

“The U.N. calls it ‘refugee resettlement’ — the Muslims call it hijra, migration,” said another speaker, Jim McMillan, a local businessman. “They don’t plan to assimilate, they don’t plan to take on our culture. They plan to change the way of American life.”

The United States government has pledged toincrease the number of worldwide refugeesallowed in the country each year from 70,000 to 100,000 by the year 2017; earlier this month, the Obama administration said it would take in at least

10,000 Syrian refugees over the next year. But the anger and anxiety here show just how hard this might be in some parts of the country.

None of Syria’s four million refugees have been resettled in this part of South Carolina in the last year, according to the State Department. Since May, a Christian nonprofit group, World Relief, has placed 32 refugees in the region, but most of

them were Christians fleeing troubled countries like Myanmar and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

​Even so, in South Carolina’s Upstate region, as its conservative northwest corner is known, the crisis has divided those who want to welcome new waves of huddled masses from those who question the federal government’s ability to weed

out Muslim extremists. Some critics, echoing concerns in towns across the country, fear the newcomers will burden local government agencies or alter the character of their communities.

The criticism here has encompassed both sober-minded questions about local school funding and warnings about global conspiracies. It began this spring when the Baltimore-based World Relief, one of nine nonprofit agencies that work

with the federal government to resettle refugees, prepared to open its new office in Spartanburg, a city of 37,000 close to a major BMW auto plant.

Lynn Isler, a stay-at-home mother, was among those who pushed back. She created a short-lived Facebook page that warned of the “perfect storm that the Syrian refugees will bring.” She has also warned that Communists had infiltrated

some elements of the Christian Evangelical movement that supports refugee resettlement.

Elected officials have weighed in as well. Representative Trey Gowdy, a Republican whose district is part of the Upstate region and who leads the House select committee investigating the attack on the American diplomatic compound in

Benghazi, Libya, has complained that the federal government did not sufficiently coordinate with local officials before allowing the current crop of refugees to arrive.

State Senator Lee Bright, who represents Greenville and Spartanburg Counties, has called for “open hearings” on the resettlement effort, echoing the concerns of some fellow Republicans who say it is difficult to perform background checks

on Syrian refugees, given the chaos that has engulfed their country. Many critics point to the congressional testimony of Michael Steinbach, assistant director of counterterrorism for the F.B.I., who told a House committee in February that

Syria lacked systems that could provide information to evaluate refugees.

At the meeting in the cafeteria Sunday evening at James F. Byrnes High School in Duncan, a small city near Spartanburg, State Representative Mike Burns, a Republican from Greenville County, spoke more broadly of immigration

policies that were threatening traditional American culture.

“This immigration fiasco that we’re in the middle of is going to take away the very things that we’re dear about,” Mr. Burns said.

Evan Mulch, the field coordinator for the John Birch Society, the right-wing group, told the crowd the resettlements were “part of the New World Order game plan.” Another speaker worried that the refugees would stress the state’s

already stretched Social Services Department.

The United States, Ms. Martel said, is “a Judeo-Christian nation.”

“We are not a Muslim nation, and those two things cannot coexist,” she added.

During a question-and-answer session, a woman asked if the refugees could be sent home on “troop ships.” A man asked if they could be sent on a plane to Saudi Arabia. When he was told that they could not, his frustration mounted.

“Do we shoot them?” he asked, to laughter and applause. “Come on! I mean, this is crazy.”

Jason Lee, 41, a Southern Baptist preacher who is the director of World Relief’s Spartanburg office, said he had been surprised by the vehement resistance. In the mid-2000s, when he helped Somali refugees adjust to new lives in

Kentucky, there were very few local complaints.

“The fear-mongering seems really different,” Mr. Lee said.

The situation here has been troubling enough that Anne C. Richard, the assistant secretary of state for population, refugees and migration, traveled to the Spartanburg area in late August to meet with skeptics and to try to correct

what she called “misinformation” about the local program.

In a telephone interview on Tuesday, Ms. Richard said that the concern about bringing in “bad actors” from the Middle East had some merit. She alluded to the case of two Iraqi refugees who settled in Bowling Green, Ky., and were

charged in 2011 with trying to send weapons and money to a Qaeda affiliate in Iraq.

But she said that screening procedures had improved since then. She also said that the vast majority of the three million refugees brought to the United States since 1975 — including 19,000 Iraqis who were resettled in the 2014 fiscal year —

have integrated peacefully. (The United States has taken in about 1,500 refugees from Syria since the start of the conflict there more than four years ago.)

Ms. Richard said many Americans had long supported refugee resettlement programs. “It’s an American tradition, and a lot of Americans get that,” she said. In many parts of the country, including South Carolina, the Syrian crisis has

elicited calls for compassion and offers of help: On Sept. 13, hundreds of people gathered in University City, a suburb of St. Louis, to ask the federal government to accept “as many Syrian refugees as possible” in the area, according to

the St. Louis chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

This week, the mayors of 18 American cities, including Bill de Blasio of New York and Eric Garcetti of Los Angeles, sent a letter to President Obama urging him “to increase still further the number of Syrian refugees the United States will

accept for resettlement.” The mayors asserted that the United States had a “robust screening and background check” system in place for refugees, who, they said, “have helped build our economies, enliven our arts and culture,

and enrich our neighborhoods.”

But even before the Syrian crisis dominated headlines worldwide, resettlement agencies had noted a rise in anti-refugee sentiment in parts of the United States, said Melanie Nezer, vice president of policy and advocacy at HIAS, a Jewish

nonprofit that works with refugees. In the last two decades, they have increasingly placed people in smaller communities to try to avoid the high cost of living in traditional immigrant magnets like New York and Los Angeles. At the same

time, unemployment and tight budgets have prompted some local governments to fight the placement of refugees.

In South Carolina, a number of influential Upstate religious leaders have embraced the refugee program. The Rev. D.J. Horton, senior pastor of Anderson Mill Road Baptist Church, said dozens from his flock of 2,300 had already completed

refugee support training. “It’s very hard to read your Bible, especially your New Testament, and refuse refuge to people who are vulnerable,” he said.

Mr. Lee said World Relief has proposed to the State Department resettling as many as 116 refugees in the Upstate region in the next year. He did not rule out the possibility that Syrians might be resettled in the area in the future. For now, he

said, his group had resettled just one Muslim family of four, from Iraq, and a former Iraqi translator for United States security companies who has renounced his religion.

The former translator met with a reporter on Monday and asked that his name not be used, for fear of attracting attention from anti-refugee activists. He said his reception in the United States had been warm, but he had been careful not to

mention he is an Iraqi: Among Americans, he said, “Suicider, killer — this is the stereotype of Iraq.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/26/us...ml?ref=us&_r=0

Well, South Carolina can thank Mr. Gang of Eight, their own Lindsey Graham for this disaster.

Lindsey Graham calls on U.S. to accept refugees
Mary Troyan, USA Today 5:48 p.m. EDT September 8, 2015

WASHINGTON — The U.S. should start accepting refugees from war-torn countries in the Middle East, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said Tuesday, becoming one of the few presidential candidates to commit to an open-door policy.

Graham said he plans to meet with colleagues to discuss emergency funding to address the growing migrant crisis in Europe.

"We should take our fair share. We are good people," Graham said after a speech at the National Press Club. "I don't think the average American has any idea what it's like to live in the Mideast right now."

Graham criticized politicians and others in the U.S. and Europe who refuse to help alleviate the growing humanitarian crisis.

"I don't see how you can lead the free world and turn your back on people who are seeking it," Graham said. Turning away families fleeing violence is to "take the Statue of Liberty and tear it down ... because we don't mean it anymore."

The Obama administration is opening the door to the possibility of allowing more Syrian refugees into the U.S.

"The administration is actively considering a range of approaches to be more responsive to the global refugee crisis, including with regard to refugee resettlement," Peter Boogaard, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said Monday.

That statement represents an evolving re-assessment of the situation by the Obama administration following graphic images from across Europe and the Middle East: A 3-year-old Syrian boy washed up on a Turkish beach after drowning, thousands of refugees trying desperately to leave a Hungarian train station, and a truck along an Austrian highway where 71 refugees were abandoned and left to die.

Such incidents have prompted European nations — most recently France, England and tiny Vatican City — to step up their commitments to provide shelter for refugees. On Monday, Germany's vice chancellor said that country — Europe's largest economy — could absorb 500,000 refugees a year for several years.

Graham did not give a number on how many refugees the U.S. should accept. He compared the current crisis to the 1939 voyage of a German ocean liner holding hundreds of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Germany. The ship was turned away by the U.S. and Cuba and eventually returned to Europe, where many of the passengers were killed by the Nazis.

"And 70 years later we're having the same response," Graham said. "We should take our fair share but the goal is not to take refugees, it's to destroy the evil from which they flee."

The White House insists the U.S. is contributing to the relief effort financially. Since the crisis erupted in 2011, the country has sent $4 billion to neighboring countries, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.

Graham's address at the National Press Club focused mostly on the pending nuclear agreement with Iran, which now has enough support in Congress to defeat GOP efforts aimed at scuttling it.

Graham said he'll still push for additional sanctions on Iran until U.S. hostages are released. He also wants to reimpose current sanctions before they expire and block funding for the International Atomic Energy Agency until it discloses details of inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities that would be required under the pending nuclear deal.

Also Tuesday, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley joined other Republican governors in a letter to President Obama saying they plan to maintain state-level sanctions against Iran, even if the nuclear deal takes effect.

Haley signed a law last year that prevents the state from investing funds or contracting with companies that have invested at least $20 million in Iran's energy sectors.

Contributing: Gregory Korte, USA TODAY

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...gees/71895498/

I can understand deeply their worry to have thousands of beheader in my hoods