Good points GP.

I've read that Rubio's staff has been monitoring conservative talk radio to see if and how much time hosts are discussing this. There has been much going on with all the Obama scandals, but Rush and other major hosts are stepping up to the plate, especially now after Rubio has totally flip flopped on his "border security first" pledge and has gone all in for mass amnesty first (and foremost) with his new pal Chuck Schumer.

For example, Laura Ingraham has been stellar opposing the Rubio/Schumer amnesty, as well as Mark Levin -- both of whom strongly supported Rubio when he ran for the Senate. Other more local hosts are discussing and opposing this as well (with the predictable exceptions such as Hugh Hewitt and Michael Medved).

Pundits Michelle Malkin, Daniel Horowitz (Red State) & Ann Coulter are strongly opposed to the Rubio/Schumer amnesty, as well as major well-regarded conservative institutions and publications such as the Heritage Foundation, Eagle Forum and National Review.

Political writers Conn Carroll (Washington Examiner) and Byron York (Washington Examiner) are also skeptical of the Rubio/Schumer amnesty. Reporters from the Daily Caller are also reporting honestly on this topic, unlike the lazy, biased reporters in the Associated Press and rest of the MSM.

And we know the American Legion is opposed to amnesty, such as what the Gang of Eight is peddling.

Will this be enough to stop this terribly flawed amnesty scheme being pushed by the extremely well-funded special interests and their puppets who comprise almost the entire political elite of both parties? I don't know, but I hope so.

(Feel free to add anyone or group I missed.)