Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Sen. Jeff Sessions Pushes To Block Illegal Immigration Via Airports

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Sen. Jeff Sessions Pushes To Block Illegal Immigration Via Airports

    12 Apr 2016

    Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) is pushing an amendment to a routine airline-regulation bill that would facilitate a computer network to reveal whether tourists, guest-workers and other legal visitors have properly gone home once their visas expire.

    Congress has mandated the implementation of fraud-resistant computerized “biometric entry-exit system” for more than a decade, but the exit portion of the system is still not operational at any port of exit.

    Various experts say roughly 40 percent of the 11 million to 13 million illegal immigrants living in the United States arrived legally, but did not depart when their visas expired. In 2015, roughly 500,000 foreigners overstayed their visas, according to federal data.

    On Monday, Sessions (R-AL), who is the chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, filed an amendment to the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act that would push for the development of a biometric entry-exit system at airports in the U.S.

    According to the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, Sessions’ amendment would overcome a significant hurdle to implementation of the biometric entry-exit system at the nation’s airports: the assistance of the airline industry.

    Potential airline objections were diminished with a revenue-securing provision included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016.

    As the subcommittee noted in a memo obtained by Breitbart News, earlier this year, Deputy Assistant Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) John Wagner testified before the subcommittee that the greatest barrier to implementation “is the infrastructure. Our ports of entry were not built for exit processing. Unlike for arrivals, there’s no exclusive and dedicated space for departure controls, so where the biometric collection takes place is critical.”

    Sessions’ amendment is distinct from earlier legislation for the entry-exit system, according to the subcommittee, because it is a mandate for cooperation with the airports and airlines.

    “Specifically, the amendment would provide that no funds from the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act may be obligated or expended ‘for the physical modification of any existing air navigation facility that is a port of entry, or for the construction of a new air navigation facility intended to be a port of entry, unless the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the owner or sponsor of the facility has entered into an agreement that guarantees the installation and implementation of the [biometric exit system] at such facility not later than two years after the date of enactment of the Act,’” the subcommittee memo reads.

    The Sessions approach ensures that that the space for Customs and Border Protection’s biometric exit efforts are airport-specific and not “a one-size-fits-all” approach, said the memo.

    “Rather, the amendment allows CBP and each airport that serves as a port of entry to create a solution that works specific to the needs of CBP and the limitations of each individual airport,’ the memo reads. “What it does require, however, is an agreement that guarantees that the system be installed and implemented at the airport within two years.”

    According to the subcommittee, the amendment has been endorsed by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and NumbersUSA.

    “The 9/11 Commission recommended an entry-exit system as an ‘essential investment in our national security,'” the subcommittee added in its memo. “Had this system been in place before 9/11, we would have had a better chance of detecting the plotters before they struck.”
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    More great work from Sen. Sessions! I hope this passes and O----- signs. Call him to thank him. 202-224-4124
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member artclam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    This won't really accomplish much. DHS already maintains a Non Immigrant Information System (NIIS) which is updated from commercial carrier manifests when a non-immigrant leaves the country. Carriers check for I-94s when non-immigrants leave the country. If you don't have one they will report you. The only thing this might prevent is people who are leaving from impersonating other people.

    NIIS Privacy Act Notice

    I-94 information

Similar Threads

    By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2014, 12:41 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-29-2014, 05:09 PM
  3. U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions on Immigration Negotiations
    By jp_48504 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 12:19 AM
  4. Jeff Sessions on illegal immigration today
    By TyRANTosaur in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-24-2007, 01:25 AM
  5. Jeff Sessions: No immigration bill better than bad one
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-25-2006, 03:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts