Thread: Sorry, La Raza: NAACP will hold 2010 convention in KC

Sorry, National Council of La Raza: NAACP will hold 2010 convention in Kansas City

The National Council of La Raza recently decided not to hold their convention in Kansas City, Missouri because the mayor of that city refused to remove someone who was a member of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps from their parks board. As could be expected, the Kansas City Star was on the wrong side, and Janet Murguia of the NCLR tried to mislead over this issue. The parks board member was later apparently harrassed by illegal immigration supporters, and subsequently resigned.

One of the threats from both the NCLR and the NAACP was that the NAACP would join in solidarity with the NCLR and not hold their convention there as well. However, they've just now announced that they will, in fact, be holding it in that city: http://www.kansascity.com/382/story/544241.html

http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/007565.html

sorry, why did the parks board member resigned?

NAACP National Headquarters

Mailing Address: 4805 Mt. Hope Drive, Baltimore MD 21215
Toll Free: (877) NAACP-98
Local: (410) 580-5777

i tihnk these people need a phone call to say thank you for now bowing down to the hispanic illegal alien loving la raza

Originally Posted by alamb

sorry, why did the parks board member resigned?

she resigned from the pressure of the open borders groups some of whome actually showed up at her front door and threatened her.
in the end she said that she was not getting any support from the mayor and that HIS WIFE said some negative things about her too

Good for the NAACP!

So much for the rainbow coalition, I hope Americans of all races continue to separate themselves from LaRaza.

And the poor woman was working in a volunteer position too! La Raza is happy that get got an American Patriot fired. They are the real traitors to this country!

One of the threats from both the NCLR and the NAACP was that the NAACP would join in solidarity with the NCLR and not hold their convention there as well. However, they've just now announced that they will, in fact, be holding it in that city

Is this because they feel they won by getting rid of the woman? If that's the case then why say good for the NAACP?

Originally Posted by MontereySherry

One of the threats from both the NCLR and the NAACP was that the NAACP would join in solidarity with the NCLR and not hold their convention there as well. However, they've just now announced that they will, in fact, be holding it in that city

Is this because they feel they won by getting rid of the woman? If that's the case then why say good for the NAACP?

I meant good for the NAACP in having their convention in KC. Ms. Stemler stepped down, she was not fired. Laraza did not get their way, there is a difference.

OK, but I bet LaRaza feels they got their way. I wish we could all get together and protest at LaRaza's convention.