Thread: The State Thrives On Hate, Genocide and Racism

The State Thrives On Hate, Genocide and Racism

Steve Watson | November 02 2005

Dr. Kamau Kambon. a Raleigh, N.C., activist, book store owner, and former professor at North Carolina State Universityrecently advocated the "extermination of white people" while speaking at a Pro-black Media Forum at Howard Law School, in an event that was covered in its entirety by C-SPAN.

The so called Doctor commented that whites have an "international plantation" for blacks, making "every white person on earth a plantation master." He continued, "You're either supporting white people in their process of death, or you're for African liberation."

Brit Hume reported for Fox that Kambon stated to the audience that white people "’have retina scans, they have what they call racial profiling, DNA banks and they're monitoring our people to try to prevent the one person from coming up with the one idea.

"’And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people because that, in my estimation, is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet to solve this problem. White people want to kill us... they want to kill you because that is part of their plan.’"

How is it that such racist hate can be broadcast in its entirety on a national television channel and no one batters an eyelid?

This is one example of how a so called "hate crimes" bill will be of no use to anyone other than the government overlords who choose when and where and who to use it against.

You cannot selectively enforce a hate law, nor can you take down everyone who says something that someone somewhere may consider offensive. Either way any sort of legislation would be a hammer blow to the First Amendment and to free speech as a whole.

The federal government argues that there is a need for such extreme legislation because there is currently an "epidemic of hate" against people of "differing" race, religion. Gender, sexual orientation, etc. Yet they do not seem to care when Dr Kambon goes on live television and broadcasts an entire diatribe about exterminating every white person on the face of the planet.

Yet one might argue that Dr Kambon may not be under threat from the hate crimes bill. Should an overarching definition of "hate crime" be determined by an ADL/federal definition that 'hate' equals bias against federally-protected groups, then such groups that claim to be defending their heritage may fall into that category. The bill states that a "hate crime" would be defined by actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.

It's hard to imagine but Dr Kambon could very well argue that he is speaking in defence of his heritage.

We have highlighted recently that the MECHA, motto is, “Everything for the race, for those outside the race nothing,� and La Raza, means “The Race� in Spanish. These Mexican groups have overtly racist ideologies, yet they claim they are defending their national origin and the media does nothing to expose them for what they are.

These groups that openly promote hatred but seem to get away with it because they "hate" those in the majority.

At the root of this lies the fact that the cabal in control of government in the US profits from keeping us at each others throats. Whether it be over race, gender or sexual orientation, the powers that be have a long history of influencing the opinion of the country towards division and seclusion.

If they were to introduce a hate crimes bill they would undoubtedly use it not to encourage diversity and tolerance of other cultures, but to highlight and heighten social degradation, racial tension and cultural division. That is how they perform best in controlling the people, divide and conquer.

So who is the real villain here? Is it Dr Kambon with his avocation of race based genocide? Is it the federal Government, lying to us about "hate epidemics" and pushing a bill directly in violation of the US constitution? Or is it the mainstream media for selectively choosing what does and does not constitute hate, falling firmly on the side of whatever is politically correct no matter how mindless it may be?

The answer may be all three but one thing above all is clear, we are the ones talking common sense here, not the academics, not the government, not the mainstream media. We are the ones having to fight tooth and nail to protect our freedoms and our hard earned rights. That has always been the case and we have to make sure it always will be.

Why is it that the world seems to be spinning backwards?