Thread: THOUSANDS SIGN PETITION ASKING TRUMP TO LET WHITE FARMERS IN SOUTH AFRICA MIGRATE TO

The important facts from this article are:

1. there has been no expropriation yet
2. none of the people in the photos lost their land because of the proposed amendment to the Constitution
3. the Amendment to expropriate land hasn't even passed, only a Review process to report back to the committee by August 30 of this year
4. the homeless Afrianers in the photos have more than likely lost their land to foreclose by the banks, because of the drought, and that's why someone is calling for them to be accepted into the US as "refugees". Sorry, no.
5. 2/3 of the land in South Africa is already owned by the government, the British did this.
6. even if they decide to take more land, no one will lose their home or flat, industry or business.

See? I trust the black majority of South Africa to do the right things in the right way. No white person needs to be handing over their land, home, flat, industry or business in exchange for their life. They may be required to hand it over to a bank, though if they get foreclosed upon.

"4. the homeless Afrianers in the photos have more than likely lost their land to foreclose by the banks, because of the drought, and that's why someone is calling for them to be accepted into the US as "refugees". Sorry, no."

-------------------------------

I AGREE...SORRY...NO!

NO MORE REFUGEES FROM ANYWHERE!

GO PICK ANOTHER COUNTRY TO GO TO.

WE NEED TO START DEPORTING THE ONES WE HAVE BACK TO SAFE ZONE ON THEIR SOIL...

TRUMP YOU PROMISED...NOW GET THEM OUT OF HERE!

AND START DEPORTING A QUOTA OF 5,000 TPS PER WEEK

START GOING AFTER THE VISA OVERSTAYS...DEPORT THEM TOO!

What we want and what we get are two different matters is seems. The number for 2018 is 45,000.
Refugee admissions down for first part of fiscal 2018: report

BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 01/08/18 08:28 AM EST

Numbers of refugees admitted to the U.S. dropped below that of recent years during the first three months of fiscal 2018, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The newspaper reported that the U.S. admitted about 5,000 refugees during that time. That number is less than that of similar periods in recent years — and more than 20,000 less than in the first three months of fiscal 2017.

If that pace of refugee admissions continues, the U.S. will admit fewer than the 45,000 cap that President Trump set earlier this year.

“Our job is to balance the need to protect legitimate refugees with the need to protect our security,” said Jennifer Higgins, associate director for refugee, asylum and international operations at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, according to the newspaper.

During the first three months of fiscal 2017, the U.S. admitted more than 25,000 refugees. In the first three months of fiscal 2016, the country admitted more than 13,000.

Eric Schwartz, president of Refugees International, who ran the refugee program at the State Department during the Obama administration, said the low refugee admission numbers are "enormously discouraging and dispiriting."

"It is another reflection of this administration's march away from the principle of humanity," he said.

Officials announced earlier this year that Trump would allow no more than 45,000 refugees into the U.S. during fiscal 2018.

The decreased number of refugees let into the U.S. during October, November and December came after policies set forth by the Trump administration, including various travel bans.

Late last year, the Supreme Court granted the Trump administration's request to fully reinstate the third version of his travel ban.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and a federal district court in Maryland had said Trump could only block the entry of nationals from the six majority-Muslim countries in the ban — Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad — if they lacked a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. The high court’s decision now puts those rulings on hold.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...o-recent-years

TRUMP PROMISED TO PUT THEM IN SAFE ZONE ON THEIR SOIL.

DROP THE NUMBER TO ZERO...WE DO NOT WANT ANY OF THEM!!!

START SENDING THEM BACK AND TAKE NO MORE!

Originally Posted by Beezer

TRUMP PROMISED TO PUT THEM IN SAFE ZONE ON THEIR SOIL.

DROP THE NUMBER TO ZERO...WE DO NOT WANT ANY OF THEM!!!

START SENDING THEM BACK AND TAKE NO MORE!

Realistically, zero is not going to happen. It appears that the refugees that we are taking from S.A. now are really their illegal immigrants from surrounding countries, like Somalia, or what they consider to be undesirable.

Here is one from 2015. LGBT from the Democratic Republic of Congo admitted as SA.

Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society can’t find enough housing in San Fran for gay ‘refugees’ (from South Africa)

Posted by Ann Corcoran on July 30, 2015

Ho hum! So we are bringing refugees from the highly touted welcoming-to-all “Rainbow Nation” of South Africa, dropping them off in San Francisco and now whining about how there isn’t enough housing for them. Maybe one of the well-paid staffers at the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) might welcome this gay refugee to their home!

A long sob story at the Bay Area Reporter:

Isn’t HIAS PAID to take care of the refugees it resettles? Why is San Francisco gay refugee saying this: “In the U.S. I am facing homelessness,” Mayema told the Bay Area Reporter in a recent interview. “I don’t want to end up on the streets.”

“Our biggest challenge in helping these people is to find housing for them,” said Amy Weiss, the director of refugee and immigrant services at Jewish Family and Children’s Services of the East Bay. “They come with no employment history and no housing history. San Francisco is hard enough to find housing if you have an income. It is a huge problem for us and for them and to anybody resettling refugees.”

The agency is believed to be the only one in the country that has developed a specific program to work with LGBT refugees. It began four years ago when a number of Iranian LGBT refugees, who had fled to Turkey, needed help resettling in the U.S.

Since then the agency has worked with a number of LGBT refugees, mostly gay men from Africa and the Middle East. In November Junior Mayema arrived from Capetown, South Africa, where he had fled five years ago from the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Then look at this, even the UN High Commissioner for Refugees refers to the attack (the star of this story claimed he suffered) as an “alleged attack.” So, he was resettled in America even though it was never proven he was attacked in S. Africa?

UNHCR staff, after learning about Mayema’s alleged attack, referred his case for resettlement last summer. Four months later, according to the account, he was granted refugee status and, in November, arrived in the Bay Area where he received assistance from the Jewish agency and a local church-sponsored group in acclimating to his new surroundings.

And, by the way, as we admit hundreds of refugees from the supposedly welcoming country of South Africa, you can bet there are few if any persecuted white people in the group. I wonder if a white person pretended to be gay or lesbian and said he or she was attacked, could they get in to the US from South Africa?

The sob story goes on and on, continue reading here. It is largely a play for more taxpayer money!

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wor...-south-africa/

Why are we taking in these gay people? How many have AIDS...that WE now have to pay for!

I consider them ALL to be "undesirable" and do not want any more coming here.

Bill Whittle on Whose Is It?




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv7pu_YZCrg

It looks like we were still packing in people from Afghanistan in 2017. This is where the refugees are coming from now and the numbers...from the State Department's website. I would not have a problem with substituting a few Afrikaners for the Afghani's that are flooding in, it would be a bit more "diverse". Like it or not, the government is going to continue to admit refugees regardless of what is said. IMO Department of State
Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration
Office of Admissions - Refugee Processing Center
Special Immigrant Visa (SIV)* Arrivals
by Nationality
All Nationalities
October 01, 2017 through March 05, 2018
FY 2018
	Number of Individuals												Cumulative Total		% of Total
Nationality	Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Cases	Inds	Arrived Inds
Afghanistan	1,875	2,005	982	1,176	955	24	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,746	7,017	95.51%
Iraq	59	108	69	48	46	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	97	330	4.49%
Total	1,934	2,113	1,051	1,224	1,001	24	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,843	7,347	100.0%
*Please note SIV recipients only include those who have elected and received U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) Reception and Placement (R&P) benefits.

http://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals/

Department of StateBureau of Population, Refugees, and MigrationOffice of Admissions - Refugee Processing CenterRefugee Arrivals by Nationality
For the Reporting Period of October 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018

Number of Cases: 3,566
Number of Individuals Individuals: 8,635
Nationality

Afghanistan
Case#119
Individuals 238

Algeria
Cases:1
Individuals 1

For the following, the first number represents the number of cases and the second is the number of individuals admitted by case

Armenia 17, 41

Bangladesh 2 ,2

Belarus 30, 96

Bhutan 776, 1,884

Burma 519, 1,240

Burundi 23, 59

Cameroon 1, 1

Central African Republic 4, 11

Chad 1, 1

China 5, 5

Colombia 22, 37

Dem. Rep. Congo 635, 1,968

Djibouti 1, 1

Eritrea 352, 648

Ethiopia 79 143

Guatemala 8 ,10

Guinea 5, 9

Honduras 5, 7

India 1, 1

Iran 20, 31

Iraq 54 ,96

Ivory Coast 2 ,5

Kazakhstan 5 ,9

Kenya 2, 2

Korea, North 2, 2

Kyrgyzstan 3, 4

Moldova 47 ,114

Nepal 11, 11

Pakistan 81, 137

Philippines 1, 1

Republic of South Sudan 3, 11

Russia 68, 196

Rwanda 15 33

Saudi Arabia 1, 1

Senegal 2, 2

Somalia 91, 177

Sri Lanka (Ceylon) 10, 23

Sudan 16, 51

Syria 18, 38

Uganda 13, 13

Ukraine 325, 1,021

Uzbekistan 5, 15

Vietnam 10, 23
https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...83.5.18%29.pdf

Originally Posted by Beezer

Why are we taking in these gay people? How many have AIDS...that WE now have to pay for!

I consider them ALL to be "undesirable" and do not want any more coming here.

Prior to 2010, federal immigration law prohibited people with HIV from entering the country. Effective January 4, 2010, HIV was no longer a bar to entry into the United States for visitation or immigration purposes. This means that HIV status alone cannot be a reason for excluding, removing, or deporting a person from the United States.

I agree, Beezer, accepting those infected with AIDS is beyond ridiculous!

From Anne Corcoran - refugee resettlement watch. 2017. It seems that the refugee admissions from South Africa are actually illegal immigrants to S.A. that they don't want - primarily Somalians.

436 ‘refugees’ came to US from S. Africa (so far) this fiscal year, zero are South Africans

Posted by Ann Corcoran on June 7, 2017

So who are they? They are 436 economic migrants, mostly from elsewhere in Africa (and some Asians and Middle Easterners), that the country of South Africa does not want in their country!
So presto! They are turned in to ‘refugees’ destined for Anytown, USA!

South Africa xenophobic riots. They can’t call them race riots because the violence is (local) black on (foreigner) black. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/south-afric...report-1496588

Communist-inspired*** country is crumbling!

There is no way (that I know of) to find the actual breakdown of nationalities, but check my South Africa archiveand you will see how the highly touted “rainbow nation” is having problems with other Africans, including Somalis, who bought the rainbow nation propaganda hook, line and sinker, and migrated there for a better life.

The black South Africans want none of it, thus from time to time riots flare up.

How do I know how many came in to the US from South Africa this fiscal year? I went to Wrapsnet and looked up processing country figures. By the 5th of each month, the Refugee Processing Center tells us how many refugees were processed in to the US from countries around the world so far that fiscal year. I told you about it here. (Imagine too the potential for fraud in some of these locations!)

So today I went here at Wrapsnet and see we admitted 436 ‘refugees’ from October 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 (FY17) from South Africa.

They are really phony refugees and mostly economic migrants because S. Africa, as a civilized country with a functioning government, is a country that should have granted legitimate refugees asylum. Then I went to the Interactive Reports and searched for how many with South African nationality were admitted this fiscal year and found that the answer is zip, zero, nada!

In case you were wondering, as one of my readers was recently, the answer is: NO we do not admit South African persecuted white people through the US Refugee Admissions Program.

In fact, I don’t expect in my lifetime to see the UN High Commissioner for Refugees selecting white (European origin) refugees for resettlement to the US! LOL! I predict they will abandon the UNHCR when the day comes to move European Christian refugees (Germans, French, Dutch, Brits) out of Europe to America.

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg fell for the Commie apartheid propaganda too!

*** I’ve written a few times about the South African Constitution (here is one post) that, believe it or not, our Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said was a “really great piece of work.”
Since World War II several other models have emerged that offer more specific and contemporary guarantees of rights and liberties, she said, pointing to South Africa’s constitution, which she called a “really great piece of work” for its embrace of basic human rights and guarantee of an independent judiciary.

I think those African migrants who flooded to South Africa for a better life, only to be beaten and killed by their fellow blacks, believed it too! Now, they become our problem?

https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wor...outh-africans/