Thread: Traffic stop leads to immigrant' rights suit against trooper

Traffic stop leads to immigrant's rights suit against trooper
By Jonathan Saltzman
Globe Staff / August 1, 2008
Helder T. Assumpcao says he was driving his van with three friends on a summer afternoon in 2005 when a state trooper pulled over the Brazilian-born carpenter and unleashed a torrent of profanity-laced, anti-immigrant abuse.

Assumpcao, a legal permanent resident of the United States, says in a federal lawsuit that State Police Trooper Gerard T. McGreal gave him a $100 ticket in Medford that stated he had failed to register his 2000 Ford van, which had two ladders and wooden boards strapped to the roof, as a commercial vehicle.

Assumpcao explained that it was his personal vehicle and that his friends were helping him paint his house, he said. Spewing expletives, McGreal called them liars and illegal aliens and had the van towed, forcing Assumpcao's friends to walk home, Assumpcao said.

The trooper denied mistreating the group in a memorandum to his commanding officer, Major Kevin J. Kelly. But after an internal investigation of the July 28, 2005, incident, Kelly sustained the complaint although he rejected Assumpcao's claim that his civil rights were violated.

On July 23, Assumpcao filed a civil rights suit in US District Court in Boston, saying that McGreal harassed him because he is an immigrant and that the trooper's actions caused him anguish and sleepless nights. He is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination previously found probable cause that McGreal violated Assumpcao's rights, the suit said.

"Trooper McGreal's behavior was extreme and outrageous, exceeding all norms of decency and civility," said the 17-page complaint against McGreal and Colonel Mark F. Delaney, superintendent of the State Police.

The suit said a Somerville District Court assistant clerk magistrate agreed that Assumpcao's van was not a commercial vehicle and dismissed the ticket.

State Police spokesman David Procopio said last week the department does not comment on pending litigation. He declined to discuss whether McGreal was disciplined, citing department policy.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a pro-immigrant advocacy group, said his organization is hearing allegations like Assumpcao's against police departments elsewhere in the United States.

"We're seeing this across the country, where officers are taking immigration law - which they don't know anything about - into their own hands," said Noorani, the former head of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, who is not involved in the lawsuit.

Massachusetts has considered giving state troopers a role in enforcing immigration law.

In December 2007, more than two years after the incident, then-Governor Mitt Romney signed a controversial agreement with federal authorities to allow specially trained Massachusetts state troopers to arrest suspected illegal immigrants and charge them with violating US immigration laws.

Romney's successor, Deval Patrick, rescinded the agreement the following month, saying it would have taken troopers from their core duties. Patrick announced a plan to train a dozen correction officers in two state prisons to enforce immigration laws.

Assumpcao, who lives in Everett, said he was driving his van on Route 16 in Medford around 3 p.m. when McGreal began following him in a cruiser. After pulling the van over, the trooper said Assumpcao should have commercial plates, Assumpcao said.

Assumpcao said he did not own a business or need commercial plates. Incredulous, the trooper pointed to the ladders on the roof and said, "With all of these and all of you?" according to Assumpcao.

The trooper then asked the passengers for identification. One of them gave McGreal a nongovernmental identification card he had purchased legally to carry instead of a passport, the suit said. The trooper then angrily yelled, "This is fake," and tossed it into a wooded area by the road.

The suit did not specify whether the three passengers were in the country legally. A spokeswoman for Ropes & Gray, the law firm that helped bring the suit, declined to comment. Assumpcao could not be reached.

The trooper then called a tow truck that took away the van and brought Assumpcao home. But his three friends had to walk home, said the suit.

In a Sept. 26, 2005, memorandum to his commanding officer, McGreal acknowledged inquiring about the immigration status of the people in the van but said he treated everyone politely and did nothing wrong. He said it was Assumpcao who became agitated.

A State Police sergeant who initially investigated the matter concluded that McGreal did nothing wrong, but Major Kelly rejected the finding. He wrote Assumpcao on Dec. 12, 2005, that McGreal's remarks were "inappropriate" and added he hoped Assumpcao's future encounters with the State Police were "more positive."

Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at jsaltzman@globe.com

© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.


http://www.boston.com/news/local/articl ... t_trooper/

What else it is it these foreign-born non-citizens and illegals do when they get in trouble, except blame the American law enforcement when they get questioned about anything?

The trooper then asked the passengers for identification. One of them gave McGreal a nongovernmental identification card he had purchased legally to carry instead of a passport, the suit said. The trooper then angrily yelled, "This is fake," and tossed it into a wooded area by the road.

"Non-governmental identification?" If he was going to 'purchase' identification, why would he not purchase a governmental issued identification like a drivers license or id card? Sounds suspicious to me, especially since here in California, "non-governmental identification" is the type of identification these pro-illegal invader groups sell to illegals.

Love how this artice brushes over that part of the story like purchasing non-governmental identification is quite the norm and would present no reason at all for an officer be suspicious...

This whole situation comes down to who do you want to believe. I say give them all a lie detector test and be done with it.

Originally Posted by vortex

What else it is it these foreign-born non-citizens and illegals do when they get in trouble, except blame the American law enforcement when they get questioned about anything?

I noticed that you made a distinction between "foreign-born non-citizens" and illegals, then lumped them all together. I believe by the former, since a clear distinction of status was made, you were referring to LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. There is a world of difference between the two. If you had any inkling what Legal immigrants go through to be in this country, and the pride the vast majority have in this country, you would retract that statement. Legal immigration has ALWAYS been an important part of American culture. Knowing this, the illegals are constantly trying to blur the line between Legal Immigrants and Illegal Aliens. For those of us who want our laws to be enforced, blurring this line could be detrimental to our cause. ALIPAC stands for AMERICANS for LEGAL IMMIGRATION. Those who are against all immigrants only strengthen the accusations of xenophobia and racism. Our current laws do not allow Legal Immigrants immediate citizenship. There are waiting periods followed by years of qualifications. That does not make these people anti-US or anti-law enforcement because they have not yet reached the point where they can apply for citizenship. Many of them are more American than we are. Before making statements that the other side can use against us, might I suggest a little thought and/or research be put into your comments?

Originally Posted by NoBueno

The trooper then asked the passengers for identification. One of them gave McGreal a nongovernmental identification card he had purchased legally to carry instead of a passport, the suit said. The trooper then angrily yelled, "This is fake," and tossed it into a wooded area by the road.

"Non-governmental identification?" If he was going to 'purchase' identification, why would he not purchase a governmental issued identification like a drivers license or id card? Sounds suspicious to me, especially since here in California, "non-governmental identification" is the type of identification these pro-illegal invader groups sell to illegals.

Love how this artice brushes over that part of the story like purchasing non-governmental identification is quite the norm and would present no reason at all for an officer be suspicious...

I agree, a non government ID is not anything I would trust. It means absolutely nothing.

cayla99 wrote:

I agree, a non government ID is not anything I would trust. It means absolutely nothing.

It could have been one of those cards the Mexican Consulate issues to illegal aliens.

I agree, a non government ID is not anything I would trust. It means absolutely nothing.

It could have been one of those cards the Mexican Consulate issues to illegal aliens.

Or one of those "ID" cards you can get at a flea market....

Originally Posted by cayla99

Originally Posted by vortex

What else it is it these foreign-born non-citizens and illegals do when they get in trouble, except blame the American law enforcement when they get questioned about anything?

I noticed that you made a distinction between "foreign-born non-citizens" and illegals, then lumped them all together. I believe by the former, since a clear distinction of status was made, you were referring to LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. There is a world of difference between the two. If you had any inkling what Legal immigrants go through to be in this country, and the pride the vast majority have in this country, you would retract that statement. Legal immigration has ALWAYS been an important part of American culture. Knowing this, the illegals are constantly trying to blur the line between Legal Immigrants and Illegal Aliens. For those of us who want our laws to be enforced, blurring this line could be detrimental to our cause. ALIPAC stands for AMERICANS for LEGAL IMMIGRATION. Those who are against all immigrants only strengthen the accusations of xenophobia and racism. Our current laws do not allow Legal Immigrants immediate citizenship. There are waiting periods followed by years of qualifications. That does not make these people anti-US or anti-law enforcement because they have not yet reached the point where they can apply for citizenship. Many of them are more American than we are. Before making statements that the other side can use against us, might I suggest a little thought and/or research be put into your comments?

Since Vortex is realtively new here we'll give him/her a little time to adjust. At Alipac we welcome those who have honored our laws and have gone through the time consuming legal channels to get here and to respect our country. These "permanent legal residents" are very proud to be here and are in the process of becoming citizens. These are the types of citizens we want. I'm sure this was just a misspeak.

Originally Posted by Gogo

Originally Posted by cayla99

Originally Posted by vortex

What else it is it these foreign-born non-citizens and illegals do when they get in trouble, except blame the American law enforcement when they get questioned about anything?

I noticed that you made a distinction between "foreign-born non-citizens" and illegals, then lumped them all together. I believe by the former, since a clear distinction of status was made, you were referring to LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. There is a world of difference between the two. If you had any inkling what Legal immigrants go through to be in this country, and the pride the vast majority have in this country, you would retract that statement. Legal immigration has ALWAYS been an important part of American culture. Knowing this, the illegals are constantly trying to blur the line between Legal Immigrants and Illegal Aliens. For those of us who want our laws to be enforced, blurring this line could be detrimental to our cause. ALIPAC stands for AMERICANS for LEGAL IMMIGRATION. Those who are against all immigrants only strengthen the accusations of xenophobia and racism. Our current laws do not allow Legal Immigrants immediate citizenship. There are waiting periods followed by years of qualifications. That does not make these people anti-US or anti-law enforcement because they have not yet reached the point where they can apply for citizenship. Many of them are more American than we are. Before making statements that the other side can use against us, might I suggest a little thought and/or research be put into your comments?

Since Vortex is realtively new here we'll give him/her a little time to adjust. At Alipac we welcome those who have honored our laws and have gone through the time consuming legal channels to get here and to respect our country. These "permanent legal residents" are very proud to be here and are in the process of becoming citizens. These are the types of citizens we want. I'm sure this was just a misspeak.

Thank you Gogo, you are right.

Vortex, if I came down hard on you, I apologize Occasionally, I let my emotions rule. This was one of those occasions.