Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Tx-Border fence may threaten access to Rio Grande

    July 12, 2008, 10:27AM
    Border fence may threaten access to Rio Grande


    By CHRISTOPHER SHERMAN
    Associated Press


    MISSION — For months the federal government's border fence plans in South Texas have been attacked by land — property owners, wildlife advocates, land conservationists — but the next wave of opponents could come from the water — and they're carrying paddles.

    Kayakers and canoeists will descend on the lower Rio Grande for events this fall aimed at raising the river's profile as a recreation hub and drawing attention to the impact the border fence could have on river access.

    But before promoters can establish the Rio Grande — especially the lower sections near large border cities — as another option on Texas' long list of rivers, they must fight a decades-old stigma.

    Paddlers share the river with Border Patrol agents patrolling in bullet-proof vests and smugglers of drugs and people. But on the water, they're hardly noticeable as the river twists and turns through farm fields and wildlife preserves, but it is the violent perception that persists.

    Even though it forms Texas' 1,255-mile border with Mexico from El Paso to the Gulf of Mexico, most of the Rio Grande — with the notable exception of Big Bend National Park — is a forgotten river in the minds of tens of thousands of recreational paddlers in the state.

    In a recent letter to Roma Mayor Rogelio Ybarra, Texas Rivers Protection Association President Tom Goynes expressed his support for the planned river festival and his concern about the border fence. But perhaps most telling was the clear illustration of how novel the idea of using the lower Rio Grande was even for people dedicated to the state's rivers.

    "It has come to our attention recently that the Lower Rio Grande is indeed a safe and legal place to paddle, and that rights for all U.S. citizens to do so are guaranteed by the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo," Goynes wrote. "It's ironic that we only learned that the resource was available to us as a result of the government's plans to take it away."

    Los Caminos del Rio, a nonprofit based in McAllen, recognizes that its Healthy Living Festival planned for Nov. 1 — to capitalize on any attention the border could receive before the national election three days later — is unlikely to affect the 85 miles of border fence slated for completion in Texas this year.

    While not backing off its fence plans, the Border Patrol supports Los Caminos's efforts to get more people on the river.

    Dan Doty, spokesman for the local Border Patrol sector, said "the more eyes we have out there the better job we can do."

    Doty said he's thinking of buying himself a canoe to explore the river. "It's a great place for recreation; it's a beautiful, beautiful river."

    For Los Caminos del Rio, more legal activity on the river — kayaking, canoeing, fishing — will discourage the illegal smuggling activity. When people raise safety concerns, executive director Eric Ellman points to the Friends of Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge who have been giving canoe tours for years without incident. He also points out that Los Caminos del Rio has had hundreds of people on the river in the past couple years without any problem.

    Even those predisposed to believe in the river and its safety sometimes find themselves fighting back the Rio Grande's stigma in their own minds.

    In "The Tecate Journals: Seventy Days on the Rio Grande," Keith Bowden recounts his canoe journey on the river from El Paso to the Gulf of Mexico in the winter of 2004. Bowden wrote that every time he thought about passing the large Mexican border city of Reynosa across the river from Hidalgo, Texas, he grew apprehensive because of the violent reputation.

    Instead, all he encountered was a group of kids rough-housing in the river who were curious about his trip; and at the other end of town, a man too insistent in asking for a ride across the river to find work.

    Still, Bowden thinks drawing people to the lower Rio Grande will be a "hard sell."

    "I don't think most Americans have any interest in the river," Bowden said. "They view it as the province of smuggling."

    Bowden said he thinks it will be easier to convince Mexicans because there is already a tradition of using the river for recreation.

    And so far it has been.

    Economic development officials in Mexican border cities, including Reynosa, are coordinating with Los Caminos del Rio. Last month, the small Mexican city of Camargo held its first kayak outing — complete with a beer sponsor — where attendees paddled from the Rio Grande up a tributary into the center of town.

    Already, anyone traveling the river is more likely to see people on the Mexican shoreline — fishing, swimming, boating. There are more public access points and people tend to see it more for what it is — a river. Someone has even opened a water skiing academy upriver from Mission on the Mexican side.

    Aleida Flores Garcia is trying to get something going on the U.S. side as well, but the border fence could kill it.

    She and her husband, Jorge Garcia, have been working on their property along the river in Los Ebanos for years. They've cleared brush, put in a park and built a boat ramp. They plan to build a large thatched pavillion and hold fishing tournaments and dances. Garcia recently incorporated her business as the La Paloma Ranch Retreat.

    But the federal government has sent her a condemnation letter. The border fence is planned to run across her property leaving most of it in the no man's land between the fence and river.

    Garcia has a lawyer and is fighting the government, but other challenges have so far been unsuccessful.

    "I need to fight for this little town," she said. "The nature itself is just too beautiful to be blocked by a wall."

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/met ... 84742.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    But the federal government has sent her a condemnation letter. The border fence is planned to run across her property leaving most of it in the no man's land between the fence and river.

    Garcia has a lawyer and is fighting the government, but other challenges have so far been unsuccessful.

    "I need to fight for this little town," she said. "The nature itself is just too beautiful to be blocked by a wall."
    We wouldn't need a wall if we cut off ALL possible ways for illegal aliens to make a DIME in the US.

    If our government grew some BALLS and did the following:

    Interpret the 14th amendment the way it was meant to be. 2 illegal aliens do NOT beget a legal citizen.

    Cut off ALL access to social programs for IAs and any kids they have, whether born here or in the home country.

    NO medical care

    NO education

    NO food stamps

    NO housing vouchers

    NO WIC

    STOP providing anything in any foreign language.

    NO JOBS!

    NO DUAL citizenship.

    ENFORCE THE DAMN LAWS!

    Illegals come here for the money and freebies, they do NOT come here to work!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    It has come to our attention recently that the Lower Rio Grande is indeed a safe and legal place to paddle, and that rights for all U.S. citizens to do so are guaranteed by the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo," Goynes wrote. "It's ironic that we only learned that the resource was available to us as a result of the government's plans to take it away."
    LOL! These people will say or do anything to keep that fence from being built! First, i'm pretty sure the Treaty of Guadalupe did not have any provisons concerning the recreational use of the Rio Grande. But I will read it again just to be sure. Any judge who buys this argument should be subjected to a madatory drug test!

    Next, the Treaty of Guadalupe was signed 160 years ago and yet you have only "recently" discovered the Rio Grande is a "safe place to paddle?" LOL...Ok, whatever you say Goynes.

    Finally, the only ones going to be doing any paddling on the dirty and often polluted Rio Grande river (where it crosses into mexico and where the border is concerned) are those who are "paddling" across that river to illegally enter the United States.

    I'm quite certain the Treaty of Guadalupe did not convey any rights to those desiring to enter this country in violation of Federal immigration law.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •