Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Judy

Thread: U.S. appeals court allows part of Texas law to punish sanctuary cities

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    81,575

    U.S. appeals court allows part of Texas law to punish sanctuary cities

    U.S. appeals court allows part of Texas law to punish sanctuary cities



    ReutersSeptember 25, 2017

    AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Monday issued a mixed decision on a Texas law to punish "sanctuary cities" by allowing a few parts of the law to take effect but blocking major parts of it.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit allowed the part of the Texas law that called on localities to abide by detainer requests from federal authorities to hold people in local jails to allow for checks of suspected U.S. immigration law violations.


    But the court left in place a lower court decision to block a part of the law that would punish local officials who criticized state policies on immigration enforcement.


    The appeals court has yet to render a full decision on the law.


    The Republican-backed law is the first of its kind since Republican Donald Trump became president in January, promising to crack down on illegal immigrants and localities that protect them. Texas is the U.S. state with the longest border with Mexico.


    In late August, Chief U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia in San Antonio found the legislation was unlikely to withstand constitutional scrutiny and blocked sections of the law just days before it was to take effect.


    While the case is on appeal, the Fifth Circuit allowed a part of the law to take effect that requires law enforcement agencies to “comply with, honor, and fulfill” any immigration detainer request issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

    It limited the decision by saying, "law enforcement agencies need not comply with or fulfill a detainer request when a detainee 'provide(s) proof' of lawful immigration status."

    The court left in place Garcia's block on parts of the law that would punish by up to a year in prison local officials for non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-appeals...185205184.html
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP


    Sign in and post comments.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    41,757
    Well, that's at least a little something moving in the right direction. Looking forward to the full decision.
    Beezer likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. Texas governor signs into law bill to punish 'sanctuary cities'
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2017, 12:47 PM
  2. Louisiana Republicans Move to Punish ‘Sanctuary’ Cities
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-13-2016, 07:21 PM
  3. MI. Bill would punish so called 'sanctuary cities'
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2015, 01:23 PM
  4. Rasmussen: Most Americans Want Feds to Punish Sanctuary Cities
    By Jean in forum Polls & Surveys About Illegal Immigration
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-29-2015, 11:13 AM
  5. A federal appeals court backed up an Arizona law to punish
    By dragonfire in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 09:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •