Thread: US-Mexico Merger Opposition Intensifies

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=50981

U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies
Some see secret efforts to scrap dollar, end U.S. sovereignty, combine nations

By Joseph Farah
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – Are secret meetings being held between the corporate and political elites of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to push North America into a European Union-style merger?

Is President Bush's reluctance to control the border and enforce laws requiring deportation of foreigners who enter the country illegally part of a master plan to all but eliminate borders between the U.S., Canada and Mexico?

Does the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America include a common currency that would scrap the dollar in favor of what some are calling the "amero"?

It may be the biggest story of the 21st century, but few press outlets are telling it. In fact, until very recently, few in the U.S. were aware of the plans and even fewer denouncing what appears to be the implementation of an effort some have characterized as "NAFTA on steroids."

But opposition is mounting.

CNN's Lou Dobbs

Perhaps the most blistering criticism has come from Lou Dobbs of CNN – a frequent critic of Bush's immigration policies.

"A regional prosperity and security program?" he asked rhetorically in a recent cablecast. "This is absolute ignorance. And the fact that we are -- we reported this, we should point out, when it was signed. But, as we watch this thing progress, these working groups are continuing. They're intensifying. What in the world are these people thinking about? You know, I was asked the other day about whether or not I really thought the American people had the stomach to stand up and stop this nonsense, this direction from a group of elites, an absolute contravention of our law, of our Constitution, every national value. And I hope, I pray that I'm right when I said yes. But this is -- I mean, this is beyond belief."

What has Dobbs and a few other vocal critics bugged began in earnest March 31, 2005, when the elected leaders of the U.S., Mexico and Canada agreed to advance the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

No one seems quite certain what that agenda is because of the vagueness of the official declarations. But among the things the leaders of the three countries agreed to work toward were borders that would allow for easier and faster moving of goods and people between the countries.

Coming as the announcement did in the midst of a raging national debate in the U.S. over borders seen as far to open already, more than a few jaws dropped.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo. and the chairman of the House Immigration Reform Caucus as well as author of the new book, "In Mortal Danger," may be the only elected official to challenge openly the plans for the new superstate.

Responding to a WorldNetDaily report, Tancredo is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of the government office implementing the trilateral agreement that has no authorization from Congress.

Tancredo wants to know the membership of the Security and Prosperity Partnership groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.

Jim Gilchrist, co-founder of the Minutemen, welcomed Tancredo's efforts.

"It's time for the Bush administration to come clean," Gilchrist said. "If President Bush's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

Phyllis Schlafly, the woman best known for nearly single-handedly leading the opposition that killed the Equal Rights Amendment, sees a sinister and sweeping agenda behind the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.

"Is the real push behind guest-worker proposals the Bush goal to expand NAFTA into the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, which he signed at Waco, Texas, last year and reaffirmed at Cancun, Mexico, this year?" she asks. "Bush is a globalist at heart and wants to carry out his father's oft-repeated ambition of a 'new world order.'"

She accuses the president and others behind the effort of wanting to obliterate U.S. borders in an effort to increase the Mexican population transfer and lower wages for the benefit of U.S. corporate interests.

"Bush meant what he said, at Waco, Texas, in March 2005, when he announced his plan to convert the United States into a 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America' by erasing our borders with Canada and Mexico," she said. "Bush's guest-worker proposal would turn the United States into a boardinghouse for the world's poor, enable employers to import an unlimited number of 'willing workers' at foreign wage levels, and wipe out what's left of the U.S. middle class. Bush lives in a house well protected by a fence and security guards and he associates with rich people who live in gated communities. Yet, for five years, he has refused to protect the property and children of ordinary Arizona citizens from trespassers and criminals."

That's unusually harsh criticism of a Republican president from one of Ronald Reagan's most loyal supporters.

At least one of the nation's daily newspapers has officially weighed in in opposition to the mysterious plans for closer cooperation in security, commerce and immigration between the three North American nations.

Recently, the Pittsburgh Tribune Review questioned the unchallenged momentum toward merger.

"Will Americans trade their dead presidents for Ameros?" the newspaper asked in an editorial last month.

The paper chided efforts at replacing the U.S. and Canadian dollars and Mexican peso with "the amero" – a knockoff of the euro – along with the building of "a looming NAFTA-like superstate." Citing the meeting between the three national leaders at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, in March 2005, the editorial warned: "Canadians, Mexicans and Americans who value the sovereignty of their respective countries should be concerned."

The Tribune Review editorial saw synergy between the plans of the national leaders and the ambitious agenda of the Council on Foreign Relations – seen by many as a kind of secretive, shadow government of the elite. The CFR issued a bold report in the spring of 2005, shortly after the joint announcements in Waco by Bush and his counterparts.

"The Council on Foreign Relations published a report in May -- "Building a North American Community" -- calling for, among other things, redefining the borders of the three nations, creating a super-regional governance board and the North American Paramilitary Group to ensure that Congress does not interfere with whatever the trilateral union feels like doing," said the paper. "Must the Bush administration happily sacrifice every shred of American sovereignty for the greater good of the New World Order?"

In fact, the CFR report is a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

Some see it as the blueprint for merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico. It calls for "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."

The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for efforts to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for efforts to "harmonize entry screening."

In "Building a North American Community," the report states that Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23, 2005, at that meeting in Waco, Texas.

Alan Burkhart, who describes himself as a free-lance political writer, cross-country trucker "and proud citizen of one of the reddest of the Red States – Mississippi," is another critic seething over these plans that seem to have a life of their own – with little or no real public debate.

"As time passes, American corporations will find it unnecessary to move their facilities out of the country," writes Burkhart. "Our already stagnant wages will be just as low as those of Mexico. The cultures of three great nations will be diluted. Our currency will be replaced with the 'Amero.' And, we’ll be one giant step closer to the U.N.’s perverse dream of a one-world government."

The Amero is not a new concept. It was first proposed by the Fraser Institute, a Canadian think tank, in a monogram titled "The Case for the Amero" in 1999.

Last month, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America made one of its most visible and public moves since it was first announced last year. In Washington, on June 15, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Mexican Economy Minister Sergio Garcia de Alba and Canadian Minister of Industry Maxime Bernier joined North American business leaders to launch the North American Competitiveness Council. It was a major development that showed the March 2005 meeting was no fluke – and that the plans announced by the three national leaders then were continuing to take shape. The NACC was first announced by Bush, Harper and Fox.

Made up of 10 high-level business leaders from each country, the NACC will meet annually with senior North American government officials "to provide recommendations and help set priorities for promoting regional competitiveness in the global economy."

Officially, the council has the mandate to advise the governments on improving trade in key sectors such as automobiles, transportation, manufacturing and services. The three countries do more than $800 billion in trilateral trade.

Gutierrez said the Bush administration is determined to develop a "border pass" on schedule despite worries about its implementation. The new land pass is to be in effect for Canadians, Americans and Mexicans by Jan. 1, 2008.

The U.S. executives involved in the NACC include: United Parcel Service Inc. Chairman Michael Eskew; Frederick Smith, chairman of FedEx Corp.; Lou Schorsh, chief executive of Mittal Steel USA; Joseph Gilmour, president of New York Life Insurance Co.; William Clay Ford, chairman of Ford Motor Co.; Rick Wagoner, chairman of General Motors Corp.; Raymond Gilmartin, CEO of Merck & Co. Inc.; David O'Reilly, chief executive of Chevron Corp.; Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of General Electric Co.; Lee Scott, president of Wal-Mart Stores Inc.; Robert Stevens, chairman of Lockheed Martin Corp.; Michael Haverty, chairman of Kansas City Southern; Douglas Conant, president of Campbell's Soup Co. and James Kilt, vice-chairman of Gillette Inc.

The concerns about the direction such powerful men could lead Americans without their knowledge is only heightened when interlocking networks are discovered. For instance, one of the components envisioned for this future "North American Union" is a superhighway running from Mexico, through the U.S. and into Canada. It is being promoted by the North American SuperCorridor Coalition, or NASCO, a non-profit group "dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America."

The president of NASCO is George Blackwood, who earlier launched the North American International Trade Corridor Partnership. In fact, NAITCP later morphed into NASCO. A NAIPC summit meeting in 2004, attended by senior Mexican government officials, heard from Robert Pastor, an American University professor who wrote "Toward a North American Community," a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

Pastor also was vice chairman of the May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force entitled "Building a North American Community" that presents itself as a blueprint for using bureaucratic action within the executive branches of Mexico, the U.S. and Canada to transform the current trilateral Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America into a North American union regional government.

GOOD POST SKIPPY thank you!

The concerns about the direction such powerful men could lead Americans without their knowledge is only heightened when interlocking networks are discovered.

"As time passes, American corporations will find it unnecessary to move their facilities out of the country," writes Burkhart. "Our already stagnant wages will be just as low as those of Mexico. The cultures of three great nations will be diluted. Our currency will be replaced with the 'Amero.' And, we’ll be one giant step closer to the U.N.’s perverse dream of a one-world government."

Not much time actually deadline to have this operational is 2010. It is not in fact one step closer it IS the one world government. Each continent is a zone controlled by the U.N. (front for IMF) and each what is now president or prime minister would become a governor of the region. (Actually they are in fact just that right now.) But the constitution has not been anihilated. At least as far as my research has taken me. I wonder sometimes.

Then the money changes, when the "new" constitution (already written) is agreed to the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights will be completely superceded by a friggen corporation THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN INC registered trademarks U.S.A. U.S. etc which has overthrown the sovereign continental United States of America ( a service government for the people, by the people and of the people.)

Yes there are two United States. One the people believe to be functional and under the Constitution and one that is a corporation that's been gradually implimenting the one world order for decades.

K I'm outta here have a great day everyone. Skippy you DID great

WONDERFUL! This is outstanding news

I'll be sending this one around the country!!

I have forwarded this article to all I know as well as the radio talk stations in my area.

added to homepage

http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=N ... e&sid=1340

Here's another tidbit from the Magic City Morning Star in Maine. This is a great article on what can happen and who the treasonous culprits are.

To End Illegal Immigration, Just Erase Our Borders
By William Jud
Jul 7, 2006, 19:41

A Conceptual Model is a wonderful organizing and predictive tool.

Think of a Conceptual Model as the picture printed on a jigsaw puzzle. When you see the picture, you know where the individual puzzle pieces fit.

President Bush and the U.S. Senate are dragging their feet on stopping and deporting Illegal Aliens (not Illegal immigrants) who are swarming into our nation, mainly across the US/Mexico border. Why is this? Is this part of a larger pattern?

This official inaction is in spite of strong opposition to Illegal Aliens by 80% of U.S. citizens, including opposition by LEGAL immigrants from Mexico.

One becomes an Illegal Alien by illegally crossing a national border and illegally staying in the nation on that side of that border.

Folks in the White House and the U.S. Senate hatched a plan to end the problem of Illegal Aliens crossing our borders. Their plan is, Erase Our National Borders.

If there are no borders between these United States, Mexico, and Canada, then there can’t be any illegal border crossings. It’s like official praise for your contribution to end Global Warming greenhouse gas emissions because your car is broken and you cannot drive. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said he wants a similar continental borderless organization for a Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR).

This bit of official Washington D.C. stupidity and deception is a puzzle piece.

The Conceptual Model tells you where that piece fits, and what the finished puzzle will be.

For many years, the United Nations has agitated for Nations Without Borders. On the first day of a recent U.N. meeting, a huge map of the nations of the world was shown behind the speakers’ platform. On Day Two, many of the national borders had faded. On Day Three, national borders were gone.

All that remained was an image of the entire world. All nations were merged into a New World Order, ripe for plundering and corruption by United Nations Socialist World Government.

President Bush and his Presidential father, and former President Clinton, and several other recent Presidents, are ardent supporters of the New World Order. This is a direct violation of their Presidential Oath of Office to “… Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Can you say Treason?

President Bush, Mexican President Fox, and (former) Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin met at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, on 23 March 2005. The meeting concerned the Security And Prosperity Partnership Of North America Agreement (SPP).

In May 2005 the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published a report, Building A North American Community, as a blueprint for combining Mexico, the United States, and Canada into a North American Union, under NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), and patterned after the European Union. The CFR report was produced by the Independent Task Force On North America in cooperation with the Canadian Council Of Chief Executives and Mexico’s Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internationalies.

The U.S. Dollar and Canadian and Mexican currency are to be phased out and replaced with the Amero, similar to Euro currency.

Mid-term, the goal is to create a Western Hemisphere Community combining all of South, Central and North America into one geopolitical and trade unit under control of United Nations Socialist World Government. Long-term, the entire world is to come under control of the United Nations. Individual present nations, including the United States of America, will become U.N. client States. Have any elected officials asked you whether you approve of this Plan?

Can you say TREASON?

Mexico, the U.S., and Canada are to be connected by a ten-lanes superhighway and multiple railroad lines (see map at www.nascocorridor.com). Kansas City will have an Inland Port of Trade officially designated as Mexican Soil (territory). Note that the nascocorridor map has no national borders.

The proposed North American Union is to have its own government, and will be self-governing. The new North American Union government will have jurisdiction over, and eventually supersede, our U.S. Congress and U.S. Constitution, and our State Legislatures and State Constitutions. A new North American Union court system will have jurisdiction over, and eventually supersede, our Supreme Court.

Can you say TREASON?

The Conceptual Model is United Nations’ Agenda 21. That is a U.N. plan to Rule The World. United Nations Socialist World Government will have absolute power and control. Enablers of this United Nations Socialist World Government Plan within the U.S. government are Traitors to these United States and to We The People U.S. Citizens.

“Absolute power,” Lord Acton noted, “corrupts absolutely.”

Returning to the jigsaw puzzle analogy, Bush Administration and Senate foot-dragging on Illegal Migration, Social Security lifetime retirement pay for Illegal Aliens, Hispanic contractor preferences on federal construction projects, amnesty, massive future legal immigration, free food stamps, free education, free social services and medical care for Illegal Aliens, and those other abominations proposed in the recent Senate bill (S. 2611) on immigration, are individual puzzle pieces. The Conceptual Model shows where to place those pieces in context, and what the completed puzzle picture will be.

Can you say TREASON?

President Bush and members of Congress would never have been elected if they had told We The People of their Plan to dissolve these United States, erase our borders, give away our national wealth, willingly accept Mexico’s excess and excessive population and corruption, and replace our U.S. Constitution and Representative Republic form of government with United Nations Socialist World Government.

TREASON! TREASON! TREASON!

Fortunately, national elections are coming in a few months. It is time for general government and legislative housecleaning. Throw out everyone who has been in Congress more than two terms in the Senate and six terms in the House of Representatives. Purge Congress and the bureaucracy of Socialists, Environmentalists, Communists and Collectivists.

This coming election may be our last chance to save these United States of America as a free, proud and independent nation.

Throw out everyone who has been in Congress more than two terms in the Senate and six terms in the House of Representatives. Purge Congress and the bureaucracy of Socialists, Environmentalists, Communists and Collectivists.

Can we keep Tancredo, Hayworth and Steve King?


AND yes I can say TREASON

TREASON!

Bump to the top !!

I'm sorry...I know I don't understand a lot about these things.
Why can't we impeach the president???

Originally Posted by JAK

I'm sorry...I know I don't understand a lot about these things. Why can't we impeach the president???

It's because Congress is controlled by the President's political party and the President's political party is, for the most part, controlled by the same corporate interests who are funding the proposed merger of the US, Canada and Mexico. Add to that mix the fact that there are still a lot of Americans who believe George W. Bush is the only thing standing between them and terrorist attack from Osama bin Laden. What has got to happen now is a whole lot of consciousness-raising. The average Joe has got to realize that all Republicans are not patriots. We've got to find a way to sound these people out and discover where their true allegiances lie. Then we've got to rid our electoral system of corruption (no small feat) and use our votes to put true patriots in Congress.