Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,457

    Utah Citizens Win in House (anti-NAU resolution)

    Utah Citizens Win in House

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/

    By Ann Turner
    Published: 2007-03-06

    Ann Turner is a former school administrator who now spearheads citizen activism in the Utah legislature.

    The Utah House of Representatives on February 6 passed a resolution urging U.S. withdrawal from the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America by a lopsided vote of 47 to 24. The resolution became bottled up on the Senate side, however, and never made it to the Senate floor prior to the legislature adjourning on February 28.

    This resolution was introduced in the House by Representative Steven Sandstrom. In an interview with The New American, Rep. Sandstrom was asked how he learned about the SPP, the planned NAFTA Superhighway, and other activities intended to create a North American Union. He responded, "It was members of the John Birch Society in my district who made me aware of this issue. Then I did my own research and found a lot of information outside the JBS material and realized that it was real and what a growing problem this was."

    When asked what factors contributed most to passage of the resolution, he reflected, "The thing that has helped the most was the educating of other legislators with the facts. Initially many of my colleagues didn't believe it was real, but with the facts they began to realize that it not only is real but that we are following the same pattern as the European Union. The promoters of an EU-style North American Union in this country began with NAFTA and then CAFTA, then they tried to get the FTAA passed and when that didn't work, they have now proposed the SPP, mirroring the process of the EU."

    When asked what the greatest opposition to passage of the resolution was, he said, "First of all it was a lack of understanding, people thinking this was no big thing or that it was some sort of conspiracy theory, that was my greatest obstacle." Rep. Sandstrom sees the passage of this resolution as the beginning of a groundswell that will spread across the nation. He enthused, "I have been contacted by legislators from across the nation who have wanted to do this same thing in their states. I have heard from Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Wyoming, and other states wanting to do this same thing. Washington will have to listen, and this is the only way to defeat the SPP — through movements like this across the nation, through education. No one would accept this if they knew what it was, another European-type Union for the Americas."

    Later, when it appeared that the House-passed resolution would not be allowed to make it to the Senate floor for a vote, where it likely would have passed, Rep. Sandstrom lamented that "there are powerful forces working against us" — a reference to pressure from Washington.

    Laying a Firm Foundation

    Enabling Sandstrom to do his job were citizens throughout the state who had laid the foundation of understanding with their own representatives in the legislature. Committees were formed to coordinate their efforts. Letters were written to the legislators; information about the issue was made available through phone calls, e-mails, and letters to the editors of local newspapers, magazine advertisements, and calls to local talk radio. Concerned citizens contributed time and financial support to the effort. The grass-roots efforts created a framework of understanding within the legislature and the community at large.

    Mrs. Kay Garske, a John Birch Society chapter leader, explained how some of the accomplishments were achieved. Having recently been a candidate for a seat in the Utah House of Representatives, Mrs. Garske had come to know her incumbent opponent, who ended up being reelected. In a remarkable show of tenacity, Mrs. Garske brought a packet of information about the resolution to the capital with the intention of speaking with Rep. Jackie Biskupski (her recent opponent) about supporting the resolution.

    After calling Rep. Biskupski out of session in order to speak with her, Mrs. Garske gave her a concise presentation of the information. Rep. Biskupski then decided that she would vote to get the resolution out of the Rules Committee and on through the legislative process. It passed unanimously out of the Rules Committee.

    When the resolution made it to the Government Operations Committee, Mrs. Garske was one of eight citizens who testified in favor of the resolution. In her testimony she related that she was born in England and remembered well the promises made to the people there concerning the European Union, formerly known as the Common Market. "They promised that England would flourish and it didn't happen," she said. "My friends and relatives now mourn their loss of sovereignty and independence. Those same promises are now extended to the United States, and we can expect the same results." The resolution passed unanimously out of the Government Operations Committee and was placed on the Third Reading Calendar.

    U.S. Senator Robert Bennett (R) of Utah, like so many other so-called conservative politicians, has made it clear to his constituents that he supports the plans for the SPP. In a letter dated June 22, 2006, written to a constituent, the senator stated:

    On March 23, 2005, President Bush met with Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and launched the SPP initiative. This initiative helps coordinate the efforts of the United States, Canada, and Mexico to protect North America against terrorists and other security threats while reaffirming our commitment to work together to create an open, prosperous economy. The SPP builds upon previous agreements with Mexico and Canada. It does not curtail our sovereignty in any way, nor does it create a single, North American government.

    At the Utah legislative session in January 2007, Senator Bennett spoke to the House of Representatives. During a question-and-answer period, Rep. Glen Donnelson, who cosponsored the resolution and who is chairman of the Government Operations Committee, asked Sen. Bennett what he knew about the SPP and the proposed NAFTA Superhighway. In front of the entire Utah House of Representatives Senator Bennett denied any knowledge of the Security and Prosperity Partnership or the proposed NAFTA Superhighway. It seems that the senator had a momentary lapse in memory.


    Speaking with The New American after the Government Operations Committee meeting, Mrs. Gail Rezika, leader of the Utah Eagle Forum, related a personal interview with Senator Bennett in his Washington, D.C., office in November of 2006. When he was asked about the SPP and the construction of the Kansas City Port of Entry, which would have Mexican customs officials working at a facility in Kansas City inspecting goods arriving from Mexico, he responded that it was the "way of the future."

    Opposition on the National Level

    Fortunately this "way of the future" referred to by Senator Bennett is currently being opposed on the national level by House Concurrent Resolution 40, which was introduced by Representative Virgil H. Goode, Jr. (R-Va.). H. Con. Res. 40 has six cosponsors. This measure says in conclusion:

    be it resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), that — (1) the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System; (2) the United States should not allow the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) to implement further regulations that would create a North American Union with Mexico and Canada; and (3) the President of the United States should indicate strong opposition to these acts or any other proposals that threaten the sovereignty of the United States.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,855
    This is huge news!!

    State after state is following. They are becoming aware of the SELL OUT OF AMERICA by way of the ILLEGAL INVASION supporters.
    They are realizing that our sovereignty is threatened as it has been in no other time in history!!!

    By the State legislatures becoming aware of the SPP, they then must be forced to take a firm stand on the big sucking sound created by the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION.

    The two go hand in hand.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675
    Great news Utah!!!!!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by CCUSA
    Great news Utah!!!!!
    Wonderful news for those of us who live in Utah.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •