Thread: 911: Reasons Why 9/11 could have been an Inside Job

911: Reasons Why 9/11 could have been an "Inside Job"


by Robert Bridge
Russia Today - 2009-09-09



9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

Before attempting to identify “nine hundred and eleven reasons why 9/11 was an inside jobâ€

Can you say, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama

Tyranny of global-corporate-fascism = Global-Conquest, Global-War, Global-Famine and Global-Death will eventually bring to all of us

The "Bushwacking" of a once proud culture, now having been reduced to shame and denial by these criminals through the historic arc of: the JFK, RFK and MLK assassinations, which have yet to be fully resolved, the expansion of the NSA and CIA under Bush, the theft of the 2000 election in Florida by the Bushes, the engineering of the 9-11 attacks on NYC, yet to be addressed on a basic scientific level, the subsequent shredding of the US Constitution, the Geneva Conventions and International Criminal treaties, the illegal invasion and destruction of Iraq and subsequent criminal profiteering and embezzlement of billions which have yet to be accounted for, the death of 100's of thousands of innocent people, false imprisonment and torture for a contrived "Terror war"-- the list of crimes is almost beyond the comprehension of the human mind, let alone the broken hearts of widows and orphans."

Quote:
"Eventually the PNAC, whose members went on to fill top positions in the Bush administration (Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Armitage, Dick Cheney, John Bolton, Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld, to name just a few)."

It seems no coincidence that many of the so-called "Neocons" are of the same religious and cultural heritage (Wolfowitz, Abriams, Armitage, and Perle above), because I think 9/11 was all about oil and Israel. Dick Cheney is the former president of Haliburton in TX, a company intimately involved in both the oil and construction businesses, and also was instrumental in bringing Rumsfeld in as Sec. of Defense. Israel has so much influence within the U.S. government anyway, and it is no large leap for them to "attach" the interests of Israel to what is the apparent intent of Western oil companies to use the U.S. government and military to establish as much control as possible of oil production in the Middle East and around the Black Sea in the former Soviet Union, while, as this article mentioned, reducing any nation which gets in its way physcially to rubble and its citizens back to darkness and poverty. (as in the case of Iraq).

However, this growing movement to "centralize" control unfortunately is not confined to the political Right. It is obvious that the Obama Administration is searching for a similiar domestic "crisis" (such as a massive outbreak of H1N1 flu which has so far failed to materialize) as a reason to establish their own agenda with more power concentrated with the federal government in Washington. By coincidence, Saul Alinsky, Obama and Hillary Clinton's intellectual mentor,and many advisors surrounding Obama share the same religious and/or cultural heritage as many of the "Neocons", although they are of the Left rather than the Right.

I read Winston Churchill supported the "Zionist Movement" to establish a separate Jewish state because he hoped this would direct the unrelenting political involvement of Jews in European polictics --which already had resulted in Marxism and the rise of Communist Russia--outside of Europe.

Seeing a re-run of "Judgment at Neuremberg", it was impressive to hear Maximillian Schell, who portrayed the defense attorney for the accused German justices, speak with anger and bitterness of the "American industrialists who were happy to help Germany re-arm before the war". Unhappily, what we seem to be doing in the Middle East seems to be a some terrible combination of "anger over the holocaust" directed toward people who were entirely innocent of causing it combined with a take-over control of Middle Eastern oil supplies.

Haliburton's construction subsidiary KBG has made (literally) uncounted large sums of money "building" and "rebuilding" structures in Iraq, and now in Afganistan, where they are often blown up as soon as they are finished. I guess deliberately bombing a country and then "rebuilding it" is a "Reverse Marshall Plan".