Thread: Agenda 21 Simplified: The Eradication of Private Property Rights

Freedom Outpost

Agenda 21 Simplified: The Eradication of Private Property Rights http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/ag...operty-rights/




Agenda 21 Simplified: The Eradication of Private Property Rights

David Risselada September 11, 2014
8 Comments

More and more people are awakening to the reality of U.N. Agenda 21, and here at "For Truths Sake," we are trying to the best of our ability to show you exactly what Agenda 21 is. It's a very complex subject that involves many different "agendas" in fact, and they all revolve around securing a one world government headed by the United Nations. To write one conclusive piece of the entirety of Agenda 21 would be an exhaustive effort even for the most dedicated writers. So what we decided to do was to highlight actual events in the U.S. and tie them back to the U.N. agenda showing you the actual source. For instance, today Dr. Fred wrote a piece on the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, which is actually an initiative being governed by the U.N. which attempts to portray the U.S. as a racist nation for the purpose of allowing themselves the opportunity to assert control and eliminate our sovereignty.
Agenda 21 is actually another term for "sustainable development," which originated at the Earth Summit in Rio back in 1992. The whole premise of Agenda 21 is based on the belief that the world's industrial powers are destroying the environment by causing "global warming" and only by radically altering the way we live can the planet be saved from our destructive selves. The aim is to eliminate private property rights, remove man's footprint from the rural parts of the world and herd them into the cities, control populations, and force us to live under their rule by ensuring all nations are completely disarmed. Many will balk at this; however, as I said before we intend to resort right to the source of U.N. materials which are out there in plain sight for all to see. This way, the most we can be accused of is misinterpreting what we are reading.
Let's start with the recent attacks we have seen against private land ownership in the United States more specifically, the way our cities are rezoning the land we own and exercising more and more power over it. Communism has a long history of denying people the right to own private property, in fact, the Soviet Union removed all farmers from their land and forced them into stacked apartment complexes in the name of preserving the environment and collectivism. The United States constitution guarantees the rights of individuals to own property because property ownership is the very vehicle in which private wealth is created.
The U.N., and the rest of today's communists are attacking the rights of property ownership precisely for that reason. They believe that when individuals own property, the wealth created by doing so is used for selfish reasons that only benefit the property owner, and thus, owning property only contributes to the creation and sustainment of poverty. Let's look at an excerpt from the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements-
Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.
Public control of land use is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievement of the long-term objectives of human settlement policies and strategies.
To exercise such control effectively, public authorities require detailed knowledge of the current patterns of use and tenure of land; appropriate legislation defining the boundaries of individual rights and public interest; and suitable instruments for assessing the value of land and transferring to the community, inter alia through taxation, the unearned increment resulting from changes in use, or public investment or decision, or due to the general growth of the community.

The U.N. believes that land ownership contributes to "social injustice," in other words it is unfair that some people own vast amounts of land while others own little. In order to rectify this, they are going to control all the land, tax you for owning it and redistribute the resources in order to achieve social equality. While many of these objectives may sound good, there is no way that the government can ensure total equality for everyone, and every time it has been tried, these governments have found it necessary to murder millions in order to achieve it. Which brings me to my next point.
While, on one hand, they are claiming to make everything equal for all, on the other, they are doing something quite different. Many people who are following this topic have come to accept that the global elite are seeking to control the world's populations. This very document, the U.N. Conference on Settlements, addresses this by pointing out the problems of excessive population growth.
World population growth-trends which indicate that numbers of mankind in the next 25 years would double, thereby more than doubling the need for food, shelter and all other requirements for life and human dignity which are at the present inadequately met;
If today's food requirements for a population of seven billion people are inadequately met, how will they provide for a population of fourteen billion? Well according to Alex Newman from the New American the U.N. has a plan on how to deal with the exploding population growth in Kenya. They intend to inundate the women of that country with propaganda about reproductive health, abortion and family planning in an attempt to convince them of the need to have fewer children, to help them meet their population objectives for Kenya of course. Doesn't that sound like something you would hear from some of our own politicians? Could it be possible that they are attempting to use birth control and abortion as a means of population control here in the U.S.? I think we can all speculate on the answer to that question.
In my next article I will focus on a subject that strikes to the heart of Americans with a bit more severity, the disarmament of the United States and why it is imperative for the implementation of Agenda 21.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.


http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/ag...operty-rights/

Freedom Outpost

Agenda 21 Simplified – The Standardization of Common Core - Freedom Outpost http://ow.ly/BsBAA




Agenda 21 Simplified – The Standardization of Common Core

David Risselada 1 hour ago
0 Comments

Hanging in the hallways of Northeastern State University's Broken Arrow Oklahoma campus are signs that state the following: Developing Global Citizens for the 21st century and a Sustainable Future. It's hard to believe because Oklahoma is said to be one of the most conservative states in the union; however, the state's universities are overflowing with hard-core leftists who are attempting to change the worldview of our younger generations.

I specifically remember the very last day of my last class right before graduation. We watched a video that was essentially describing the end game goals of UN Agenda 21, and their plans to use the wealth of the United States to redistribute to third world countries. The video was complete with blaming capitalism and gun owners (of course) for all of the world's problems and it was very convincing in its argument that America owed the world a "climate debt" because of our greedy, industrial society.
I found this very interesting because this was around the same time that Common Core was beginning to appear in the education arena. The point is that Common Core, and education in general, are vehicles through which UN's Agenda 21 will secure its own future.
There has been a big upheaval against Common Core education, mainly because of the national standardization and the ridiculous methods in which they teach math; however, I'm afraid many people don't see it for what it is: global collectivization.



The UN believes it essential that education be standardized across the world in order to get everyone on board with Agenda 21 (sustainable development). Truthfully, they won't have to convince anyone since the social sciences have mastered the arts of manipulating human behavior and made tremendous progress in learning how to indoctrinate people into a certain worldview.
The following is from the United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) website:
The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014) seeks to mobilize the educational resources of the world to help create a more sustainable future. Many paths to sustainability (e.g. sustainable agriculture and forestry, research and technology transfer, finance, sustainable production and consumption) exist and are mentioned in the 40 chapters of Agenda 21, the official document of the 1992 Earth Summit. Education is one of these paths. Education alone cannot achieve a more sustainable future; however, without education and learning for sustainable development, we will not be able to reach that goal.

There are a couple of important things to look at here. First, the very first sentence of the quote states that the UN seeks to mobilize the world's educational resources to create a more sustainable future. Not only were they successful in getting the majority of U.S. universities on board, they also have president Obama calling for the creation of a global education fund. While this was as early as 2008, I don't think many people realized the connection between Agenda 21, Common Core and Obama's inclination towards world socialism. To stress the significance of this further, I remind you of the collective, national standardization of Common Core and ask you to now think of that on global terms. They are seeking to turn our children into automatons who believe we need government to save us from global warming.
Second, if this isn't enough to convince you let me direct you to another UN document concerning education. The Dakar Framework Education For All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments clearly states on page 8, section six, that education is "the key" to the successful implementation of sustainable development programs. Now here comes the really good part, so brace yourself. They also refer to education as a fundamental human right and that all people should have access to free education. We all know that education is not a human right because it is not free. In order to have a free education, someone else has to pay for it.
This is where the document UN Conventions on the Rights of the Child comes into play. Liberals love this because they believe that it guarantees the rights of everyone to have a good education; however, it does way more than that. It puts all of the rights concerning education into the hands of the child and the government, parents no longer have a say. A free, state provided education is now a fundamental human right for young children and parents can be held criminally liable for failing to provide it in some parts of the world. This is significant when you consider the next part of the Dakar Framework:

We hereby collectively commit ourselves to the attainment
of the following goals:
(i) expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood
care and education, especially for the most vulnerable
and disadvantaged children;
(ii) ensuring that by 2015 all children, particularly girls,
children in difficult circumstances and those belonging
to ethnic minorities, have access to and complete, free
and compulsory primary education of good quality;

One of the primary goals of Marxism is to take a hold of children as early as possible and educate them into the ways of the state. Even here in the United States, the left tries to pass legislation that would put young children under the state's influence in programs like "Head Start." The left, having mastered the social sciences believes that they can shape an individual into becoming anything they want. This is best illustrated in the film "Agenda: Grinding America Down" when the narrator quotes Bertrand Russell, who believed free will could be driven out of an individual through education. The quote is quite telling regarding the overall attitude of the left towards individuality:
"The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black."

It is clear by looking at the stated goals of the UN and the efforts of U.S. schools and universities, that there is an effort to retrain us all into thinking we need government. The left is attempting to train us to believe that only the UN, set up as a global governing body, has the power and necessary resources to save humanity from ourselves. If you still doubt this please refer once again to the forty-five goals of the communist takeover of America. Here is goal number 11:
Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one world government with its own independent armed forces.

We can ignore this, but I believe to do so is to allow the left's agenda to come to fruition that much more quickly. Is that really what you want for America?
*Part three of a three-part series.

Part One

Part Two

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/ag...n-common-core/

CFACT

Should EPA take control of land that is anywhere near a ditch or puddle?
Share the facts at CFACT.org: http://www.cfact.org/2014/09/08/prop...al-water-rule/
Is that what Congress meant by "navigable waters?"




Property rights threatened by new federal water rule

September 8, 2014 by David Rothbard, 0 Comments



Did you know that the EPA is trying to regulate the water that runs through your backyard? This new rule may affect you more than you might think.

Categories

• Just the Facts Radio

Tags

• EPA
• Federal Government
• government control
• water regulations

About the Author: David Rothbard


David Rothbard is co-founder and President of CFACT.

http://www.cfact.org/2014/09/08/prop...al-water-rule/