Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By JohnDoe2
  • 1 Post By Shapka

Thread: Brexit Isn’t a Catastrophe. It’s an Opportunity.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Heart of Dixie

    Brexit Isn’t a Catastrophe. It’s an Opportunity.

    Brexit Isn’t a Catastrophe. It’s an Opportunity.

    BY: Aaron MacLean
    June 27, 2016 12:32 pm
    Always look on the bright side of life!'

    The hysterical tone dominating American coverage of the U.K.’s vote to leave the European Union is drowning out a necessary debate about how the results of the referendum can be turned to global advantage. The results of this rupture in the EU will not be universally good, and some, as in the case of short- or middle-term economic disruption and (likely) Scottish secession, will be very regrettable indeed.

    But come on. Brexit does not mark the unraveling of the post-war world order imposed by the United States, as the New York Times claimed over the weekend. The current form of the European community only came into being in 1993, a few years after said world order handily defeated the Soviet Union, with NATO, not the EU, playing the lead role. NATO still exists. Brexit is not likely to be “the greatest catastrophe of the 21st century,” an option that Brookings clickbaitily floats—indeed, would that it were so! Brexit was not chosen by a decisive margin of voters as an ignorant, emotional mistake, despite facile efforts to portray the decision as such. And a vote for Brexit was not in essence the same thing as a vote for Trump, despite the fact that both political phenomena are aided by right-wing populism, a very general common factor after which most similarities end. Even in purely economic terms, once the trauma of a transition is complete, Britain is extraordinarily well positioned to continue as a major global player, including in its trade with Europe, which is hardly going to cease. The U.K. has the world’s fifth largest economy. (Friendly, fraternal reminder to Scotland: not much of that is because of you.) Norway and Switzerland, neither a member of the EU, are hardly hellscapes, and Britain is substantially wealthier, more populous, and more influential than either of them.

    It is hard to avoid the impression that the negative coverage of Brexit in the American press itself represents the triumph of emotion over analysis. Many, if not most, writers on this subject are disappointed by the decisive rejection of the EU by the citizens of one of its leading members, because the true object of such a rejection is actually the dream of an inevitable transnational future. Elites in every western country have calmly explained to the rubes, over and over and over again, that patriotic pride and human association on the principle of the nation-state are irrational, self-harming behaviors. Turns out the people are not persuaded. The dream may not be dead, but it is certainly on hold. (And who knows? Maybe a positive outcome of all this will be a reorientation on the part of the EU, a scaling back of its intrusions into the sovereignty of its members such that other populist movements are robbed of their best arguments. Nah: even I’m not that optimistic.)

    For these elites, history moves in only the one, post-national direction, and so there is a real need for the consequences of Brexit to be catastrophic, for it to fail badly, one way or the other. There are even suggestions in Britain that, actually, the results of the referendum don’t have to be honored after all. You want to talk catastrophe? Let the last veil drop to reveal to the British people that they don’t really rule themselves at all: then you will have the ingredients for true political unrest.
    Better to conclude that what is done is done, and to plot calmly the best course ahead. There are real opportunities for cooperation with a reinvigorated nation-state with Britain’s wealth and healthy political traditions. Contrary to President Obama’s peevish assertion that Britain would go to “the back of the queue” in future trade negotiations (see ‘Transnational world, disappointment over rejection of’ to understand why he threatened such a policy) there is much to be said for the U.K. jumping to the head of the line. Because of the advanced nature of the British economy, such a deal promises all the benefits of economic cooperation, with none of the labor market race-to-the-bottom involved in deals with poorer nations. More trade with a close ally, but with little threat to working- and middle-class American jobs? Not seeing the downside, there.

    The next president would be wise to keep such opportunities in mind, and to consider the role the U.S. can again play as architect in a shifting global order. Not only can ties between America and Britain become closer, but closer economic and diplomatic cooperation between like-minded democracies around the world—generally, members of the British commonwealth, or like the U.S., former territories of the British empire—deserves a renewed look. Ignorant blood-and-soil populism need only be strengthened by this referendum if pouting elites self-destructively force that result. A very attractive alternative exists: a future in which friendly democracies draw closer, trade with fewer obstructions, and allow their citizens to enjoy wealth, security, and the self-respect that comes with sovereignty. It is a fundamentally different vision than the transnational dream: and a far more realistic, far more sustainable future.

  2. #2
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    European Knight likes this.

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.

    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here

  3. #3
    Senior Member European Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015

    VIDEO -- Brexit: What it Means to Have Our Freedom Back

    Brexit: What it Means to Have Our Freedom Back

    June 29, 2016 at 2:00 am

    For more than 40 years, the UK has followed EU regulations regarding trade deals, immigration laws and foreign policy decisions. In our latest video, Denis MacEoin, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute, discusses the negative impacts of EU control and the positive changes that are now possible. Moving forward, the UK will have the ability to decide its own laws and future.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Shapka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Staten Island, New York
    European Knight likes this.
    Reporting without fear or favor-American Rattlesnake

  5. #5
    Senior Member European Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015


    Goodbye Friend

    UK Prime Minister David Cameron announced his resignation after Britain voted to leave the European Union. It’s a loss for counter-radicalism.

    BY DAVID HARRIS Fri, June 24, 2016

    (Photo © DFID - UK Department for International Development)

    When British Prime Minister David Cameron announced June 24 he was quitting 10 Downing Street, the media focus was entirely on the effects of the UK referendum vote to leave the European Union.

    Cameron is a pragmatist. Yes, he is a Conservative member of parliament but he favors remaining in the EU. While it may seem counter-intuitive for a Brit who wants to remain in Europe, he is also one of the biggest supporters of the fight against Islamist extremism.

    He is a man who believes it is possible to have largely open borders and yet crack down on the fundamentalists who seek to impose sharia law on the West and worse still want to perpetrate acts of terror in Europe, the United States and other democracies.

    Cameron urged his peers to join his fight, including U.S. President Barack Obama:

    “Barack, you said it and you’re right — every religion has its extremists,” Cameron said nine months ago. “But we have to be frank that the biggest problem we have today is the Islamist extremist violence that has given birth to ISIL, to al-Shabab, to al-Nusra, al Qaeda and so many other groups.”

    Cameron delivered a keynote speech on Islamism in July 2015:

    “Simply denying any connection between the religion of Islam and the extremists doesn’t work, because these extremists are self-identifying as Muslims. The fact is from Woolwich to Tunisia, from Ottawa to Bali, these murderers all spout the same twisted narrative, one that claims to be based on a particular faith. Now it is an exercise in futility to deny that.”

    You can listen to that full speech here.

    The Eton and Oxford educated Cameron is by no means perfect. For example, he continued the UK’s strong relationship with Saudi Arabia, whose abuses of human rights are notorious. However, in the greater scheme of things, judging his six years as Britian’s top politician, one sees a man who cares dearly about this issue and has put British pounds where his mouth is in trying to free the UK – and indeed Europe – from the scourge that is Islamist extremism.

    Goodbye Friend

Similar Threads

  1. Sessions on Brexit: Now it's America's turn
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-26-2016, 01:51 PM
  2. Brexit: Why The Globalists Lost
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-24-2016, 09:41 PM
  3. Next: U.S. Might Follow Brexit’s Example
    By Jean in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-24-2016, 07:04 PM
  4. Do you know what Brexit is?
    By pkskyali in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2016, 01:04 PM
  5. The Truth About #Brexit
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2016, 09:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts