Thread: Bush Moves Toward Martial Law

This was forwarded to me. I have not had a chance to research it yet. I think it bears research.



http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e


Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
Frank Morales

October 26, 2006

In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision
which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually
encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so
by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the
President's ability to deploy troops within the United States. The
Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the
Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict
prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With
one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those
prohibitions.

Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act
of
2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on
October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the
President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops
anywhere in
America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the
consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress
public disorder."

President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that
he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a
sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and
detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home,
preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember,
the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is
precise; the term is "martial law."

Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon
another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled,
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section
333,
"Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal
law"
states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including
the
National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce
the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster,
epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or
incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United
States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to
such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or
possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in)
maintaining public
order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection,
domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

For the current President, "enforcement of the laws to restore
public
order" means to commandeer guardsmen from any state, over the
objections
of local governmental, military and local police entities; ship them off
to another state; conscript them in a law enforcement mode; and set them
loose against "disorderly" citizenry - protesters, possibly, or
those
who object to forced vaccinations and quarantines in the event of a
bio-terror event.

The law also facilitates militarized police round-ups and detention of
protesters, so called "illegal aliens," "potential
terrorists" and other
"undesirables" for detention in facilities already contracted
for and
under construction by Halliburton. That's right. Under the cover of a
trumped-up "immigration emergency" and the frenzied
militarization of
the southern border, detention camps are being constructed right under
our noses, camps designed for anyone who resists the foreign and
domestic agenda of the Bush administration.

An article on "recent contract awards" in a recent issue of the
slick,
insider "Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security
International"
reported that "global engineering and technical services powerhouse
KBR
[Kellog, Brown & Root] announced in January 2006 that its Government
and
Infrastructure division was awarded an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite
Quantity (IDIQ) contract to support U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the event of an emergency."
"With a
maximum total value of $385 million over a five year term," the
report
notes, "the contract is to be executed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers," "for establishing temporary detention and
processing
capabilities to augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations
(DRO) - in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S.,
or to support the rapid development of new programs." The report
points
out that "KBR is the engineering and construction subsidiary of
Halliburton." (3) So, in addition to authorizing another $532.8
billion
for the Pentagon, including a $70-billion "supplemental
provision" which
covers the cost of the ongoing, mad military maneuvers in Iraq,
Afghanistan, and other places, the new law, signed by the president in a
private White House ceremony, further collapses the historic divide
between the police and the military: a tell-tale sign of a rapidly
consolidating police state in America, all accomplished amidst ongoing
U.S. imperial pretensions of global domination, sold to an
"emergency
managed" and seemingly willfully gullible public as a "global
war on
terrorism."

Make no mistake about it: the de-facto repeal of the Posse Comitatus Act
(PCA) is an ominous assault on American democratic tradition and
jurisprudence. The 1878 Act, which reads, "Whoever, except in cases
and
under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of
Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse
comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both," is the only
U.S.
criminal statute that outlaws military operations directed against the
American people under the cover of 'law enforcement.' As such, it has
been the best protection we've had against the power-hungry intentions
of an unscrupulous and reckless executive, an executive intent on using
force to enforce its will.

Unfortunately, this past week, the president dealt posse comitatus,
along with American democracy, a near fatal blow. Consequently, it will
take an aroused citizenry to undo the damage wrought by this horrendous
act, part and parcel, as we have seen, of a long train of abuses and
outrages perpetrated by this authoritarian administration.

Despite the unprecedented and shocking nature of this act, there has
been no outcry in the American media, and little reaction from our
elected officials in Congress. On September 19th, a lone Senator Patrick
Leahy (D-Vermont) noted that 2007's Defense Authorization Act contained
a "widely opposed provision to allow the President more control over
the
National Guard [adopting] changes to the Insurrection Act, which will
make it easier for this or any future President to use the military to
restore domestic order WITHOUT the consent of the nation's
governors."

Senator Leahy went on to stress that, "we certainly do not need to
make
it easier for Presidents to declare martial law. Invoking the
Insurrection Act and using the military for law enforcement activities
goes against some of the central tenets of our democracy. One can easily
envision governors and mayors in charge of an emergency having to
constantly look over their shoulders while someone who has never visited
their communities gives the orders."

A few weeks later, on the 29th of September, Leahy entered into the
Congressional Record that he had "grave reservations about certain
provisions of the fiscal Year 2007 Defense Authorization Bill Conference
Report," the language of which, he said, "subverts solid,
longstanding
posse comitatus statutes that limit the military's involvement in law
enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare
martial law." This had been "slipped in," Leahy said,
"as a rider with
little study," while "other congressional committees with
jurisdiction
over these matters had no chance to comment, let alone hold hearings on,
these proposals."

In a telling bit of understatement, the Senator from Vermont noted that
"the implications of changing the (Posse Comitatus) Act are
enormous".
"There is good reason," he said, "for the constructive
friction in
existing law when it comes to martial law declarations. Using the
military for law enforcement goes against one of the founding tenets of
our democracy. We fail our Constitution, neglecting the rights of the
States, when we make it easier for the President to declare martial law
and trample on local and state sovereignty."

Senator Leahy's final ruminations: "Since hearing word a couple of
weeks
ago that this outcome was likely, I have wondered how Congress could
have gotten to this point. It seems the changes to the Insurrection Act
have survived the Conference because the Pentagon and the White House
want it."

The historic and ominous re-writing of the Insurrection Act,
accomplished in the dead of night, which gives Bush the legal authority
to declare martial law, is now an accomplished fact.

The Pentagon, as one might expect, plays an even more direct role in
martial law operations. Title XIV of the new law, entitled,
"Homeland
Defense Technology Transfer Legislative Provisions," authorizes
"the
Secretary of Defense to create a Homeland Defense Technology Transfer
Consortium to improve the effectiveness of the Department of Defense
(DOD) processes for identifying and deploying relevant DOD technology to
federal, State, and local first responders."

In other words, the law facilitates the "transfer" of the
newest in
so-called "crowd control" technology and other weaponry
designed to
suppress dissent from the Pentagon to local militarized police units.
The new law builds on and further codifies earlier "technology
transfer"
agreements, specifically the 1995 DOD-Justice Department memorandum of
agreement achieved back during the Clinton-Reno regime.(4)

It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the
American people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration;
with the president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the
war Iraq, and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term
elections, the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is
particularly worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture
to, in effect, declare himself dictator.

Source:

(1)

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/091906a.html and

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200609/092906b.html See also,
Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, "The Use of
Federal
Troops for Disaster Assistance: Legal Issues," by Jennifer K.
Elsea,
Legislative Attorney, August 14, 2006

(2)

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill+h109-5122

(3) Journal of Counterterrorism & Homeland Security International,
"Recent Contract Awards", Summer 2006, Vol.12, No.2, pg.8; See
also,
Peter Dale Scott, "Homeland Security Contracts for Vast New
Detention
Camps," New American Media, January 31, 2006.

(4) "Technology Transfer from defense: Concealed Weapons
Detection",
National Institute of Justice Journal, No 229, August, 1995, pp.42-43.

:: Article nr. 27769 sent on 27-oct-2006 03:18 ECT

:: The address of this page is :
www.uruknet.info?p=27769

:: The incoming address of this article is :
towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/

:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Uruknet .

Isn't Warner also on the CFR?

Just like in chess, Bush and his globalist traitorous cohorts are putting the pieces in place so that when the NAU scheme blows wide open, he can declare "checkmate" and the American people will have no recourse but to accept this.

I didn't understand your post, this was taken from an IRAQ article , posted in Iraq, How come this refer to United States

Isn't it refering to MARCIAL LAW IN IRAQ

Originally Posted by minnie

I didn't understand your post, this was taken from an IRAQ article , posted in Iraq, How come this refer to United States

Isn't it refering to MARCIAL LAW IN IRAQ

No Minnie, Bush signed these into law here. That is just the paper that the story came from. I am certain it is in other lesser known papers as well. MSM wont publish stories like this.

President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and
detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home,
preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember,
the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is
precise; the term is "martial law."

Welcome to AMERIKA

Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act
of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on
October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the
President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops
anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

And I'm sure he would use this on ILLEGALS DEMANDING RIGHTS. Nope it will be used on Americans.

Originally Posted by jp_48504

Originally Posted by minnie

I didn't understand your post, this was taken from an IRAQ article , posted in Iraq, How come this refer to United States

Isn't it refering to MARCIAL LAW IN IRAQ

No Minnie, Bush signed these into law here. That is just the paper that the story came from. I am certain it is in other lesser known papers as well. MSM wont publish stories like this.

President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and
detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home,
preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember,
the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is
precise; the term is "martial law."

Welcome to AMERIKA

[quote:1mhvwxxu]
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act
of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on
October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the
President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops
anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

And I'm sure he would use this on ILLEGALS DEMANDING RIGHTS. Nope it will be used on Americans.[/quote:1mhvwxxu]
JP
can you pull a copy of the documents?

H.R.5122
www.house.gov/hasc/HR5122(v2).pdf

www.whitehouse.gov/omb/legislative/sap/ ... 2sap-h.pdf

www.ngb.army.mil/LL/reports/07/hr5122.pdf

H.R.6166
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h.r.6166

www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-6166

www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/HR-6166-Bill.pdf



Will that help sis?

Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon
another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled,
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section
333,
"Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal
law"
states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including
the
National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce
the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster,
epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or
incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United
States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to
such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or
possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in)
maintaining public
order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection,
domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

I could not find this section 1076 in HR 5122. Sis or jp, did you find it?

A BIG Thanx, JP!!

I can put this to very good use

THe article was sent to me buy someone else.

Originally Posted by Kate

Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon
another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled,
"Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies." Section
333,
"Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal
law"
states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including
the
National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce
the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster,
epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or
incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United
States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to
such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or
possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in)
maintaining public
order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection,
domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

I could not find this section 1076 in HR 5122. Sis or jp, did you find it?

KATE
I've not looked yet.....won't be able to go over it until the election work is completed. We must have accurate, verified info in order to use this properly or we'll just hurt ourselves in the long run.

PLEASE keep this bumped up so that we can tackle it when time's freed up? Thanx, Kate!
{do remind me if it should slip my mind}

.