Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Hybrid View
-
07-04-2019, 03:11 PM #1The reason for apportioning both representatives and direct taxes was explained as follows by Madison in the Federalist Papers, that it “…will have a very salutary effect.” Madison observes in this paper . . . “Were” the various States’ “share of representation alone to be governed by this rule, they would have an interest in exaggerating their inhabitants. Were the rule to decide their share of taxation alone, a contrary temptation would prevail. By extending the rule to both objects, the States will have opposite interests, which will control and balance each other, and produce the requisite impartiality.” See Federalist No. 54
Our communist/socialist states like California want to swell their population size with illegal entrants so they can increase their representation in Congress. But they do not want to pay their apportioned share of the federal tax burden as intended by our founders.
JWK
The Democrat Party Leadership has been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadership freed democrat owned
-
07-04-2019, 03:45 PM #2
Thank you JWK!
Get it to Trump
ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM
DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL
-
07-04-2019, 05:08 PM #3Additionally, Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution specifies that an “actual Enumeration” shall be done every 10 years “in such manner as [Congress] shall by Law direct.” By law [see 13 U.S.C. §141(a)], Congress has delegated to the Commerce secretary the authority to conduct the decennial enumeration “in such form and content as he may determine” and authorizes him “to obtain such other census information as necessary.”"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges' views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." -- Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
The bottom line is, Congress delegated to the secretary almost unlimited authority to conduct the census required by the Constitution. Our Supreme Court, i.e., Justice freaken Obamacare Roberts is usurping policy make decision authority by second guessing the wisdom of asking the question: “Is this person a citizen of the United States?”
JWK
Similar Threads
-
MSM distorts, by omission, the purpose for having a census!
By johnwk in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 04-23-2019, 03:10 PM -
Socialist state officials to sue Trump over census Citizenship Question
By johnwk in forum General DiscussionReplies: 25Last Post: 04-04-2018, 01:54 AM -
In America: Communist, Socialist, Progressive = Democrat
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 10-27-2010, 07:09 AM -
College Democrats are Socialist (Communist)
By dragons5 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-01-2008, 04:42 AM -
Gilchrist Blasts Omission of Immigration Question on Survey
By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & ReportsReplies: 7Last Post: 11-12-2005, 07:44 AM


3Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote

Black Pigeon Speaks | How Britain Was Trained to Accept Its Own...
07-08-2026, 10:05 PM in General Discussion