Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member butterbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,181
    I will send lots of emails to both Udall and Bennet. This bill needs to stop!
    RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #12
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    Without a public option, without an expansion of Medicare and without other significant changes that stand the greatest chance of holding down surging costs, the Senate's legislation would leave working Americans pretty much where they are today: facing the prospect of double- digit inflation in insurance premiums for as far as the eye can see.
    But the best way to bring that about is to foster greater competition among insurers. We support a public option because we believe it would challenge insurers to price their premiums more attractively and to apply pressure on providers to control costs.

    Not so fast. Too many conservative Americans do not want a public option because it could wipe out existing insurance plans held by over 70% of us. We shouldn't concede to the liberals like MoveOn and Maxine Waters and many other sharks in the House.

  3. #13
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ShockedinCalifornia
    Without a public option, without an expansion of Medicare and without other significant changes that stand the greatest chance of holding down surging costs, the Senate's legislation would leave working Americans pretty much where they are today: facing the prospect of double- digit inflation in insurance premiums for as far as the eye can see.
    [quote:1e9py8ps]But the best way to bring that about is to foster greater competition among insurers. We support a public option because we believe it would challenge insurers to price their premiums more attractively and to apply pressure on providers to control costs.

    Not so fast. Too many conservative Americans do not want a public option because it could wipe out existing insurance plans held by over 70% of us. We shouldn't concede to the liberals like MoveOn and Maxine Waters and many other sharks in the House.[/quote:1e9py8ps]

    I posted the article to show that Liberals are not happy with Obama healthcare, not to say we agreed with the reasoning.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •