Thread: DOCUMENTS OF AMERICAN HISTORY-PAGE 406

212. SUMNER"S RESOLUTIONS ON THE THEORY OF SECESSION AND RECONSTRUCTION. FEBRUARY 11, 1862

Congressional Resolutions declaratory of the relations between the United States and the "territory" once occupied by certain States, and now usurped by pretended governments, without constitutional or legal right.
"Whereas certain States, rightfully belonging to the Union of the United States, have through their respective governments wickedly undertaken to abjure all those duties by which their connection with the Union was maintained; to renounce all allegiance to the Constitution; to levy war upon the National Government; and, for the consummation of this treason, have unconstitutionally and unlawfully confederated together, with the declared purpose of putting an end by force to the supremacy of the Constitution within their respective limits; and whereas this condition of insurrection, organized by pretended governments, openly exists in South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Virginia, except in Eastern Tennessee and Western Virginia, and has been declared by the President of the United States, in a proclamation duly made in conformity with an act of Congress, to exist throughout this territory, with the exceptions already named; and whereas the extensive territory thus usurped by these pretended governments and organized into a hostile confederation, belongs to the United States, as an inseparable part thereof, under the sanctions of the Constitution, to be held in trust for the inhabitants in the present and future generations, and is so completely interlinked with the Union that it is forever dependent thereon; and whereas the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, cannot be displaced in its rightful operation within this territory, but must ever continue the supreme law thereof, notwithstanding of the doings of any pretended governments acting singly or in confederation, in order to put an end to its supremacy:
Therefore --
1. Resolved, That any vote of seccession or other act by which any State may undertake to put an end to the supremacy of the Constitution within its territory is inoperative and void against the Constitution, and when sustained by force it becomes a practical abdication by the "State of" all rights under the Constitution, while the treason which it involves still further works an instant forfeiture of all those functions and powers essential to the continued existence of the State as a body politic, so that from that time forward the territory falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress as other territory, and the State being, according to the language of the law, felo-de-se, ceases to exist.
2. That any combination of men assuming to act in the place of such state, attempting to ensnare or coerce the inhabitants thereof into a confederation hostile to the Union is rebellious, treasonable, and destitute of all moral authority; and that such combination is a usurpation incapable of any constitutional existence and utterly lawless, so that every thing dependent upon it is without constitutional or legal support.
3. That the termination of a State under the Constitution necessarily causes the termination of those peculiar local institutions which, having no origin in the Constitution or in those natural rights which exist independent of the Constitution, are upheld by the sole and exclusive authority of the State.
4. That slavery, being a peculiar local institution, derived from local laws, without any origin in the Constitution or in natural rights, is upheld by the sole and exclusive authority of the State, and must therefore cease to exist legally or constitutionally when the State on which it depends no longer exists; for the incident cannot survive the principle.
5. That in the exercise of its exclusive jurisdiction over the territory once occupied by the States, it is the duty of Congress to see that the supremacy of the Constitution is maintained in its essential principles, so that everywhere in this extensive territory slavery shall cease to exist practically, as it has already ceased to exist constitutionally or legally.
6. That any recognition of slavery in such territory, or any surrender of slaves under the pretended laws of the extinct States by any officer of the United States, civil or military, is a recognition of the pretended governments, to the exclusion of the jurisdiction of Congress under the Constitution, and is in the nature of aid and comfort to the rebellion that has been organized.
7. That any such recognition of slavery or surrender of pretended slaves, besides being a recognition of the pretended governments, giving them aid and comfort, is a denial of the rights of persons who, by the extinction of the States, have become free, so that under the Constitution, they cannot again be enslaved.
8. That allegiance from the inhabitant and protection from the Government are corresponding obligations, dependent upon each other, so that while the allegiance of every inhabitant of this territory, without distinction of color or class, is due to the United States, and cannot in any way be defeated by the action of any pretended Government, or by any pretence of property or claim to service, the corresponding obligation of protection is at the same time due by the United States to every such inhabitant, without distinction of color or class; and it follows that inhabitants held as slaves, whose paramount allegiance is due to the United States, may justly look to the National Government for protection.
9. That the duty directly cast upon Congress by the extinction of the States is reinforced by the positive prohibition of the Constitution that "no State shall enter into any confederation," or "without the consent of Congress keep troops or ships-of-war in time of peace, or enter into any agreement or compact with another State," or "grant letters of marque and reprisal," or "coin money," or "emit bills of credit," or "without the consent of Congress lay any duties on imports or exports," all of which have been done by these pretended governments, and also by the positive injunction of the Constitution, addressed to the Nation, that "the United States shall guaranty to every State in this Union a republican form of government;" and that in pursuance of this duty cast upon Congress, and further enjoined by the Constitution, Congress will assume complete jurisdiction of such "vacated" territory where such unconstitutional and illegal things have been attempted, and will proceed to establish therein republican forms of government under the Constitution; and in the execution of this trust will provide carefully for the protection of all the inhabitants thereof, for the security of families, the organization of labor, the encouragement of industry, and the welfare of society, and will in every way discharge the duties of a just, merciful, and "paternal Government." These are the words of the Congress of l862, four years before the introduction of the "Fourteenth Amendment" which was a declaration of war against the very constitution the above resolution was supposed to have provided protection. Instead, it destroyed not only the Constitution but the freedom and way of life it was designed to protect. The Constitution guaranteed no such "paternal" government as would be provided by the traitors of Congress in 1862, and those who have been a part of that conspiracy to this date. The sovereign Citizens are the "paternal" creators of government, both state and federal. It is impossible for the child of the creator to be "paternal" to its own father.
By the above it can be seen that the lie was established to make the Citizenry believe that the Civil War was to be fought for the abolition of slavery and preservation of the Constitution. It was fought for neither cause, but for the destruction of the Constitution and enslavement of all "inhabitants." The "paternal" and the "welfare" parts of the resolution give us an insight of what was to come under the "new" government which would be established by the "Fourteenth Amendment."
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: ITS INTENT AND AFTERMATH
Since this country was established the international money changers had their eyes on the wealth of the Nation. Time and again their attempts at "federal" banking was thwarted by the true patriots in power who put the country and its Citizenry first in their services to their country, and the international thieves had a very difficult time in establishing (buying) their way into our government. Just prior to the Civil War machinery was on the drawing boards in this Nation which would make slavery obsolete, and in a few short years it would have ended without struggle and bloodshed. The money changers realized this and stepped up their efforts to gain footholds into the pockets of the American "doers." The Civil War eliminated the barriers previously encountered by the money changers and the "Fourteenth Amendment" was the key to all future doors to total control of this Nation and its riches. It was forced upon the Citizens of this Nation with the point of the bayonet, backed up with lies and deceit which has been carried through to the present time.
At the end of the Civil War state governments were reinstated in the South and remained so for a period of eighteen months, during which time the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified. In l866 the 14th Amendment was presented to the states for ratification, and, of course was defeated because of the eleven Southern states and the state of New Jersey refused to kowtow to the radicals in Congress. For this action a senator from New Jersey was ousted from Congress and the representatives from the eleven Southern states were refused further seating in the Congress. "Reconstruction" was then forced upon the "Rebel" states, legitimate governments being replaced by military commanders and their selected carpetbaggers and blacks. Of course, the Fourteenth Amendment was then presented to these unlawful governments and was considered "ratified."
On July 20, 1868, the Secretary of State for the United States of America declared that an insufficient number of states had ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to make it a part of the Constitution. During the following week the Congress of the United States, without constitutional power to do so, declared the Fourteenth Amendment a part of the Constitution. This in spite of the fact that representatives from eleven states had been removed from Congress and, therefore the right to vote on the amendment. The amendment was not presented to President Johnson for his approval/disapproval, nor were any of the other Constitutional requirements met. In short, this supposed amendment was forced upon the people at the point of the bayonet, and Congress has removed the right of the supreme Court of the United States to hear and rule on this issue to this date. This underhanded machination by the Congress would be thrown out by any and every court in the world which could hear it, and the Congress knew it. But what is on the surface is all that one sees. For the truth it is necessary to return to the resolution of Congress at the start of this paper. In their own words the Congress, by declaring war on the Constitution, instituted a new government in this Nation with its own citizenry. Item number one of their resolution explains this fact very thoroughly, to wit:
"Resolved, That any vote of succession or other act by which any State may undertake to put an end to the supremacy of the Constitution within its territory is inoperative and void against the Constitution, and when sustained by force it becomes a practical abdication by the State of all rights under the Constitution, while the treason which it involves still further works an instant forfeiture of all those functions and powers essential to the continued existence of the State as a body-politic, --- and the State being, according to the language of the law, felo-de-se, ceases to exist."
By the "Fourteenth Amendment" and other unconstitutional acts (removal of elected representatives and "reconstruction" to mention two) separated the Congress from the organic Constitution and, though they still pay lip service to that organic document, the federal Constitution now consists of Articles of Amendment XI through XXVI(I).
That it is a separate government there is no doubt. The U.S. Supreme Court (not to be confused with the Constitutional supreme Court of the United States) has ruled on numerous occasions what the new government is, and a few of these rulings will be quoted further on in this paper.
For those who may be unaware of the facts, Washington, D.C. is a State for political purposes. Further, there are now three entities known as the United States. In Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, under "United States" we find:
"This term has several meanings. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in family of Nations, it may designate territory over which sovereignty of United States extends, or it may be collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 65 S.Ct. 870, 880, 89 L.Ed. 1252."
The current United States (de facto) is the second as defined above, and its "territories" include (restricted to) Washington, D.C., Guam, American Samoa, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, bases, ports and naval yards ceded the U.S. by the states, and a few minor possessions which are claimed by the U.S. The Congress gets its powers of government for these territories from Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, and these governing powers cannot be extended over the states united (50 states). Where the United States(foreign government to each state) gets its authority to intervene in state's matters derives from the fact that each state has incorporated itself into the federal corporation, and each county (parish), city, and township have incorporated themselves into the state corporation, and all act under corporate rules instead of the common law instituted through the Constitution. They have, through these corporate entities, established corporate tribunals of arbitration which look after the "judicial" affairs of the corporation. There are no independent, constitutional courts as established under Article III of the Constitution in operation within the United States or its corporate territories, nor are there any state equivalents.
Although the political masses (federal, state, etc., corporations) have united in their efforts it must be remembered that the people are the power behind the Constitution, and the people cannot be forced into this corporate mass without their specific and knowing consent. When one accepts privilege from one of these corporate entities it is assumed by the "courts" that that person has joined the corporate mass and accepts its rules and regulations, whether the acceptance and its consequences were explained to that person at the time or not as required by law makes little difference to these "courts." No repudiation of a Citizen's rights could occur as above under the organic section of the Constitution, as Article III courts were available to the individual Citizen to zealously protect his unalienable rights. Most Citizens have forfeited their rights for the bowl of porridge provided by the communist state. (Social Security, Workman's Compensation, Health Care, Child Care, ad nauseum). We have seen in the first section where Big Brother was going to provide the "welfare of society" by the "paternal Government" and where that provision was part of the conspiracy which brought about the Civil War and the Fourteenth Amendment, which, of course, led to the communist government now in place in this Nation. In order to provide further proof to those who still doubt that the conspiracy did exist we must repeat and dissect that "amendment" and see what it means, and to whom it pertains.
ARTICLE (Amendment)14
Section l. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a State, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except foor participation in rebellion or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Now that we know what the "United States" (de facto) is, we can understand that this Fourteenth Amendment is a federal (feudal) Amendment and cannot pertain to the true Citizen (We, the People) of this Nation. Since it is the Citizen who makes government is it not his duty to "question" anything that government does, including the "public debt?" Remember that this "public debt" was mentioned in the Congressional Resolution of February 1l, 1862. As of July 10, l868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was "ratified" the debt issue had not surfaced, nor would it for another forty-five years (in l913) when the Federal Reserve Act was forced upon the people. The facts are being assembled here to show without doubt that a conspiracy to enslave the people of this Nation existed prior to the Civil War, included the Civil War, and all unconstitutional events leading to the socialist/communist government of today.
The purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was not only to establish a territorial government in this Nation but to force citizenship onto a people who were brought to this Nation in chains, and who had not a word to say about whether they accepted this citizenship or not. In short, the slaves were considered "war prizes" and were, in reality, not freed from slavery by the federal government or the Thirteenth Amendment, but their slave masters only changed - from private ownership to that of an outlaw government, which would eventually bring the true constitutional Citizenry under their whips. Congress cannot force its citizenship upon any white inhabitant of this Nation, and the United States Supreme Court as early as l967 has confirmed this.
"Aside from limitation of U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. l4, Congress has no general power, express or implied, to take away an American citizen's citizenship without his consent. Afroyim v. Rusk, N. Y. 1967, 87 S.Ct. 1660, 387 U.S. 253, 18 L.Ed.2d 757."
Most white Americans are under the impression that they are in fact "United States" citizens. They dutifully pay income taxes, Social Security and other taxes which are due only from United States citizens, and accept the other orders of a foreign government "United States" as if they were obliged to obey these unconstitutional commands. To emphasize the fact that federal amendments to the Constitution pertain only to "United States" citizens, the Sixteenth Amendment is a good example. When income taxation was introduced in Congress in 1897 it was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme Court of the United States because the territorial citizens had the rights of uniform taxation as did State Citizens. The Sixteenth Amendment authorized the taxation of United States citizens and resident aliens, and others drawing income from the United States or its corporations. This amendment did not, nor cannot bring this taxation on the state Citizen because it is prohibited by the organic Constitution, unless it meets the conditions of the organic constitution, and that is it be uniform.
Subjects of the Fourteenth Amendment, and territorial subjects are creations of Congress, and as such can be taxed out of existence. To tax is to have the power to destroy. Can it be imagined that the writers of the Constitution would place a document before the people for their ratification which could destroy them or their power to govern? It would be preposterous to think so. The true Citizens of this Nation are sovereigns, and are the power behind government. They are answerable only to their God, as He is their creator. Only the creator has the power of life and death over his creations, and the United States Congress are the creators of 14th Amendment and territorial subjects. Any white state Citizen who would knowingly cede his unalienable rights for slavery deserves all that the de-facto government can place upon him. The first Civil Rights Act passed by Congress on April 9, 1866 separates these two citizenships quite adequately, and was through the purported l4th Amendment:
"That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, ... are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States, and such citizens of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, shall have the same right in every State and Territory in the United States ... AS IS ENJOYED BY WHITE PERSONS," ... THIRTY NINTH CONGRESS, Sess. I. Ch. 31 (see also 14 Stat 27).
To further distinguish between the two obvious types of citizenship in this Nation the summarization in Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal. 43, 47 (l872) is hereby presented:
"It is claimed that the plaintiff is a citizen of the United States and of this State. Undoubtedly she is. It is argued that she became such by force of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, already recited. This, however, is a mistake. It could well be claimed that she became free by the effects of the Thirteenth Amendment, by which slavery was abolished, for she was no less a citizen than she was free before the adoption of either of these amendments. No white person ... owes the status of citizenship to the recent amendments to the Federal Constitution.
"The history and aim of the Fourteenth Amendment is well understood. That purpose was to confer the status of citizenship upon a numerous class of persons domiciled within the limits of the United States, who could not be brought within the operation of the naturalization laws because native born, and whose birth, though native, had at the same time left them without the status of citizenship. These persons were not white persons, but were, in the main, persons of African descent, who had been held in slavery in this country, or, if having themselves never been held in slavery, were the native-born descendants of slaves."
The corporate tribunals posing as "courts" in the state and federal jurisdictions refuse to accept the fact that two types of citizenships exist in this Nation, and they make every effort to force their administrative rules upon those not subject to these rules. Their "codes", "statutes", "regulations", and other "law" applicable to Fourteenth Amendment "subjects" cannot be imposed upon a state Citizen, nor do State's rights apply to Fourteenth Amendment subjects:
"United States citizenship does not entitle citizens to rights and privileges of state Citizenship." K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P. 545. "Citizenship of the United States does not entitle citizens to privileges and immunities of citizens of a state, since privileges and immunities of citizens of one are not the same as the other."
It is very important for those persons holding public office who think they are United States citizens, and are compelled to performance by the Fourteenth Amendment to familiarize themselves with U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549, 23 L.Ed. 588; The Slaughter house Cases, 83 U.S. 395, 407; and Cross v. Board of Supervisors of Elections, 22lA. 2d 431, which read:
"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state."
Every state of the Union is in itself a "country", a sovereign, and an alien to the United States, as they are to each other except as provided otherwise by the Constitution. P.L. l00-702, [102 Stat. 4672-4673], Sec. 1022; 28 USC 297(b). And that is a "foreign corporation" to the United States: 20 C.J.S. 1786; In re Merriam, 36 N.E. 505, 14l N.Y. 479, affirmed 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed. 287.
Since the United States Congress has no power to force citizenship (outside the Fourteenth Amendment) upon any person, all white persons born within one of the fifty states (outside federal jurisdiction) is a state Citizen, and cannot automatically become a United States citizen.
On July 27, 1868, only ten days after the Fourteenth Amendment was declared "ratified," the (then) United States Congress enacted the "Expatriation Act" which guarantees any United States citizen the right to expatriate himself freely, and defined the acts of expatriation. In Mandoll v. Acheson, App. D. C. 1952, 73 S.Ct. 135, 344 U.S. 133, 97 L.Ed. 146, we find:
"Native born citizen who acquired derivative dual citizenship was not required to elect American citizenship upon attaining majority in order to retain such citizenship and did not lose his United States citizenship by foreign residence long continued after attaining his majority."
And in Coumas v. Superior Court in and for San Joaquin County, 1948, 192 P. 2d 449, 31 Cal. 2d 682, the court ruled:
"The doctrine of "expatriation" in fullest sense involves natural and inherent right of person to depart from his country of origin and absolve himself from allegiance thereto on identifying himself with another political community through naturalization."
The "United States", through its enforcement of its corporate interests upon the states through political and economic blackmail, can control the effect of those "privileges" extended to the states, but these privileges cannot confer United States citizenship upon those who have not knowingly and with intent denounced their state citizenships, and been naturalized by that political entity to which they have expatriated themselves, and domiciliary action is a requirement for such expatriation, as is shown above. While all United States citizens are Nationals of this Country, all Nationals are not United States citizens. Under Chapter l2 (21) of Title 8, U.S.C., it be noted that: "The term "National" means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state." To become a United States citizen, the state citizen must make his intentions known as required by law, not just "assume" he is such citizen. Under Section 1421 of Title 8, U.S.C., it gives jurisdiction to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States, and paragraph (d) of this section reads: "A person may be naturalized as a citizen of the United States in the manner and under the conditions prescribed in this subchapter, and not otherwise." As was intended by the founding fathers, all state citizens were also American Citizens, which then "American" and "United States" Citizens were one and the same. Creation of the new "United States" through the Fourteenth Amendment changed this and now the two are not synonymous. This can be verified through the U.S. Tax Regulations and Title 26, U.S.C.. Also, the term "State" (when capitalized) means "The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, or the Virgin Islands of the United States." (See subparagraph (36) of Chapter 12, Section 1421 of Title 8, U.S.C.).
It is incumbent upon all Americans who are interested in their country and their posterity to deny the de facto "United States." The consequences of the l4th Amendment, as was planned in the conspiracy, are many and devastating. It has removed our organic Constitution and replaced it with a document of totalitarianism, and now, with the One World Government which it espouses, brings this Nation under complete alien domination. The United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and all other related international movements and institutions (such as the Federal Reserve System) are now owned and governed by a small group of individuals who have usurped the monetary systems of the world.
The head of the I.M.F. is none other than the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. He is paid directly from the funds of the I.M.F. and, in realty, has no connection with the states United.
Under the guise of the 14th Amendment the judicial branch of our government has been replaced with corporate panels of lackeys of the traitorous Congress. The American has no intermediary between himself and the traitorous de facto government. The United States has, in fact, bankrupted this Nation and now expects the Americans to bail them out with their sweat. How much more can we take before we say "enough!?" There are many states whose legislatures are awakening to the "facts" but it may be too late. Anyone elected to the office of President must be screened for compliance to the New World Order and if he does not pass muster then he will not be elected. Both mainline political parties are bought and paid for, from dog-catcher to President, before they even enter office. The Political Action Committees (most of which are owned and governed by the internationalists) pay the election fees of all political aspirants, and this is another unconstitutional result of the unconstitutional 14th Amendment. Under this so-called Amendment the government can and do take your children, your wealth, your health, and your religion, and you have no recourse - none.
There is no doubt that the Fourteenth Amendment was a sham, violates every moral aspect concerning state sovereignty, was never ratified as mandated by the Constitution, and is, therefore null and void and is inapplicable to state Citizens of all states United. Even to those "new citizens" which the l4th Amendment was supposed to create could, and have, made issue as to its application to them, in as much as they had absolutely no say in its "ratification," except the very few who were appointed to fill the vacancies created in the South when the military brought in Congress' "reconstruction."
But this is their argument, and their duty to present their objections, if there are sufficient numbers to do so, to their Congress, and have the matter settled in their "courts." That government (United States) is as alien to the states United as are France, Spain, Italy, Russia, or any other sovereign state on this Planet.
As explained in their own words, Congress in 1862 explained what constituted war against the Constitution, and the consequences (secession from privileges and immunities provided by that document) incurred by such acts. These very acts the Congress did from 1866 to l87l, initially, and then from l871 to the present date, to fulfill the intentions presented in the resolution of February 11, 1862. These acts of war against the U.S. Constitution after 1871, to mention a few, was the abrogation of Article III of that Constitution, by removing Article III powers from the federal judges, thereby destroying the Republican form of Government guaranteed by Section 4 or Article IV of the Constitution. That Congress destroyed the intent of the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution by bringing multitudes of unqualified aliens into this Nation in order to keep that liberal party in power for the existence of this Nation. That Congress ceded the monetary system of this Nation into the hands of private internationalists in violation of Article I, Section 8, and forced the states to abrogate their mandates in Article I, Section 10 of that Constitution making only gold and silver coin as a tender of payment of debts. That Congress has forcibly taken the God-given heritage due the Posterity of this Nation, and reduced it to the status of the slaves they took as war prize. The violations committed by that body of thieves are too numerous to calculate, and the treasons that Congress has committed earns each and every member guilty of this treason a place in infamy and the sentence of which that treason carries.
CITIZENSHIP OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
Every public official, whether it be federal or state, is required to take an Oath of Office before he is officially seated, to uphold the Constitution of the "United States." Since all Officials are under corporate jurisdiction of the United States, they are mandated to obey its corporate rules and regulations. How would it be possible to do both if the United States still recognized the entire Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment? Again, we go back to the intent and purpose of the Civil War and its Fourteenth Amendment, and that was to create a new and separate government. If one doubts that this split has not taken place try arguing "Constitutional rights" in any court of the land and see how far you get. These, so called, courts are set up to hear facts, not law or rights. Also, every state has in its Constitution that every public official (elected, at the minimum) be a "United States" citizen.
In Louisiana, this requirement is carried in Section 2 of Article IV, Constitution of the "State" of Louisiana, and reads:
"To be eligible for any statewide elective office, a person, by the date of his qualification as a candidate, shall have attained the age of twenty-five years, be an elector, and have been a citizen of the United States and of this state for at least the preceding five years."
If an Official is white, and is born within a state and outside the jurisdiction of the federal government, then it is not possible that the "Official" is a "United States" citizen unless he has been naturalized, (as has been shown by extractions from Title 8, U.S.C.). All white state Citizens are automatically American Citizens but they are not automatically "United States" citizens. Only colored persons holding elective office in the corporate setup are legally elected officials, as they are automatically United States citizens from birth if they are born in this country. All whites, who are state Citizens and yet claim United States citizenship on the election qualifying records, have committed a crime by submitting false information to election Officials.
"State Citizens" are "American Nationals" in addition to their state citizenship. This is automatic and has always been. Section 1408 of Title 8, U.S.C. reads as follows:
Nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth "Unless otherwise provided in section 1401 of this title, the following shall be Nationals, but not citizens, of the United States at birth:
"(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
"(2) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are Nationals, but not citizens, of the United States, and have had a residence in the United States, or one of its outlying possessions prior to the birth of such person;
and" ...
Sub-paragraph (1) above pertains to those persons born in Guam, American Samoa, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, or one of its acquired possessions, such as military and naval bases, etc.. State Citizens are defined in sub-paragraph (2), as they are born outside the United States and the outlying possessions. It has been shown that 51101(21) of Title 8, U.S.C. gives the term "National" as meaning a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. It is important here to notice that a small (s) on "state" when used by the United States means "a state of the Union." When it is referring to one of its "States", it is always capitalized. The next paragraph "(22)" of this same Section will clarify the other definition of "National."
"(22) The term "National of the United States" means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States."
If state Citizens are not included in this latter definition, then who are they referring to? They are the Indians, Eskimos, and possibly a few others who cannot be brought into "United States National" status because of their race. It may be appropriate here to mention the fact that there are no more "Indians not taxed" in this country. They have all been brought within the jurisdiction of the United States.
For those real hard-core or die-hard cases who still refuse to accept these citizenship facts, it would behoove them to go to the U.S. Tax Regulations and Title 26, U.S.C., which is the guide used by all in income tax matters. While these documents are very difficult to read (and are made so intentionally and for obvious reasons), one fact can be derived from reading just a few Chapters.
There are only three types of people listed in those documents who are of interest to us, and they are;
"(1) United States Citizens",
"(2) Resident aliens", and "(3) Non-resident aliens." Non-resident aliens are those people who go from the states United into Washington (or one of its possessions to work) and draw their income from the "United States" (and foreigners residing there outside the diplomatic corps). It also includes servicemen and women and their dependents where ever they are stationed. The first two (Citizens of the United States and Resident aliens) are the taxpayers mentioned throughout the tax codes. Non-resident aliens are non-taxpayers unless they have income derived from a source within the United States, (and that includes any Corporation of which the United States owns over fifty percent, such as Tennessee Valley Authority, and numerous others). "AMTRACK" is another possession of the "United States."
State citizens are non-resident aliens to the United States (as previously mentioned). The reason these state Citizens pay income and Social Security taxes is because they either have income from within the United States or they have volunteered to pay the taxes through the W-2 Forms or the 1040 Forms of the IRS. Social Security "taxes" are a "Class 5 gift tax," but like income taxes, once you volunteer to pay these taxes by filing the Forms, you are stuck until such time as you withdraw yourself from this "volunteer" status. Be advised that it is most dangerous to your well being to foolishly stop paying these taxes until such time as you know and understand how to do it.
The federal prisons are full of persons who thought they knew, but didn't.
This is an appropriate point to end this paper, for the last paragraph above was the reason for the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, and the "United States." The United States today is a mere entity of the United Nations and the Federal Reserve System is but one of the financial institutions of the United Nations. The Federal Reserve creates "money" out of thin air, loans it to the "United States" for huge interest rates, and it is paid by the sweat of the American people.
The near four trillion "dollars" owed the Federal Reserve and countries, such as Japan, Germany, etc., carries with it an interest payment that is breaking the backs of the American people. Those really responsible for that debt (United States citizens and Resident aliens) cannot question the debt. Is that not the plan of February 11, 1862? Even with the non-taxpayers paying in their money monthly and annually, the debt can never be repaid. "Debt" subsidized "money" must be borrowed over and over again to make the system work. For instance, if the United States stopped borrowing from the Federal Reserve for one year the "Fed" would cease to exist (or at least foreclose on the security put up by the United States) and that is the property and bodies of every soul in this Nation. If this isn't bad enough, when we get bogged down in the "United Nations" we will be forced to feed the World (as if we aren't doing that now). The American people must like being led into slavery as they keep the traitors in power, year after year, from the time of the Civil War. The only way out of this quagmire is to wipe the political slate clean, oust every politician in power, and start anew. Then insert safeguards in the Constitution to ensure that the situation which exists in this Country today never occurs again, and this can be done by having a rotating watchdog over Congress, with the power of ouster for any who even thinks of debauching the Constitution. There are ways of stopping the criminal actions of then Congress but all the people must be fed up with it enough to stop it. Until then they deserve what they earn.
http://www.theawaregroup.com/preludeto14th.htm

Totally, worth a couple of readings in an American's life-time

But it will take sometime to digest and understand total content here.

All comments are welcome to help with this.....

By the above it can be seen that the lie was established to make the Citizenry believe that the Civil War was to be fought for the abolition of slavery and preservation of the Constitution. It was fought for neither cause, but for the destruction of the Constitution and enslavement of all "inhabitants." The "paternal" and the "welfare" parts of the resolution give us an insight of what was to come under the "new" government which would be established by the "Fourteenth Amendment."

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void.

It is incumbent upon all Americans who are interested in their country and their posterity to deny the de facto "United States." The consequences of the l4th Amendment, as was planned in the conspiracy, are many and devastating. It has removed our organic Constitution and replaced it with a document of totalitarianism, and now, with the One World Government which it espouses, brings this Nation under complete alien domination. The United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and all other related international movements and institutions (such as the Federal Reserve System) are now owned and governed by a small group of individuals who have usurped the monetary systems of the world.

This is an appropriate point to end this paper, for the last paragraph above was the reason for the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, and the "United States." The United States today is a mere entity of the United Nations and the Federal Reserve System is but one of the financial institutions of the United Nations. The Federal Reserve creates "money" out of thin air, loans it to the "United States" for huge interest rates, and it is paid by the sweat of the American people.