Thread: Federal ruling could limit water for Californians

Federal ruling could limit water for Californians

Regulating rivers to protect fish may cost millions

By Michael Gardner
U-T Sacramento Bureau
2:00 a.m. June 5, 2009

SACRAMENTO — Escalating the conflict between fish and people, a powerful federal agency yesterday ordered a new round of safeguards for endangered species that could cost millions of dollars and further drain the state's already over-tapped water supply.

The decision, which will likely be challenged in court, is aimed at protecting Chinook salmon, steelhead and green sturgeon that migrate and spawn along major Northern California rivers: the Sacramento, American and San Joaquin.

The National Marine Fisheries Service also based its sweeping action on the need to protect Southern Resident killer whales, which rely on salmon for food.

There will be no immediate effect on water deliveries out of the Sacramento delta because the fish have already run the river courses this summer, according to Maria Rea, a supervisor in the federal agency's Sacramento office.

Also, the order was crafted to provide “leewayâ€

Feds release Calif. plan to protect chinook salmon

Posted 3m ago
By Jason Dearen, Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — Federal regulators on Thursday released a court-ordered plan to help struggling chinook salmon that includes opening California dams and restricting pumping, prompting howls of protest from state officials because it will further reduce the amount of water available to farms and urban areas.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has "provisionally accepted" the findings of the National Marine Fisheries Service and will "implement actions required to meet the needs of the listed species," said Don Glaser, regional director for the bureau, which manages some of the dams involved. Glaser said the bureau will not formally accept the findings until staff reads the entire 800 pages of the opinion.

The fisheries service had to redo its salmon management plan for the upper Sacramento River and Shasta Reservoir after a federal judge in Fresno threw out its previous plan last year. U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger found that allowing Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water pumps and dams to continue operating as they have would threaten the imperiled species.

The fisheries service estimates that state and federal water regulators will lose 5 to 7% of the already limited water they have to manage under the new plan. Pumping restrictions this year due to another protected species, the delta smelt, already have meant a 17 to 20% reduction in water supply, said Ted Thomas, a spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, California water regulators and Central Valley lawmakers immediately criticized the new plan, saying it would limit the amount of water pumped to farmers and Southern California residents and place an undue share of the burden on the valley's economy.

The plan "puts fish above the needs of millions of Californians and the health and security of the world's eighth-largest economy," Schwarzenegger said in a statement. "The piling on of one federal court decision after another in a species-by-species approach is killing our economy and undermining the integrity of the Endangered Species Act."

The Westlands Water District, which supplies irrigation to the giants of agriculture in the fertile San Joaquin Valley, said it would join with others to file a lawsuit challenging the fisheries service's findings.

"If it were allowed to stand, this ... would be a death sentence for large parts of California's economy. Communities in the San Joaquin Valley are already experiencing 40% unemployment rates," Fresno-based Westlands, the nation's largest water district, said in a statement.

State officials argued that a multi-species approach — one that combines the court-mandated water pumping restrictions for the delta smelt with salmon and other species protections — would be the best way to achieve habitat and conservation while maintaining a reliable water source.

California is trying to eventually do that. State officials said Thursday they are working to draft a long-term plan to preserve species and ecosystems in the delta that would also set guidelines for pumping levels that meet federal and state wildlife laws.

Fall-run chinook salmon populations returning to the Central Valley to spawn have declined steeply over the past seven years, down to about 66,000 salmon adults returning to the Sacramento River in 2008 from more than 750,000 adult salmon in 2002.

The decline of fall, spring and winter-run salmon — which return from the sea to lay eggs in their native freshwater habitat — is blamed on a lack of water and increased water temperature caused by the vast series of pumps and canals used to move the precious resource around.

The fisheries service determined that the current water pumping operations by the federal Central Valley Project and the State Water Project need to be changed to protect a number of endangered or threatened species including winter and spring-run chinook salmon, Central Valley steelhead, green sturgeon and killer whales, which feed on salmon.

The opinion said the dams and pumps trap out-migrating juvenile salmon in the delta, where they can die before they reach the sea. Fishermen groups and environmentalists have argued for years that salmon need more water for an uninterrupted transit through the delta.

Representatives for commercial fishermen, who have not been able to fish for two seasons because salmon have been so scarce, applauded the plan.

"All these people, all these small communities on the coast of California depend on these salmon for their livelihoods," said Larry Collins, a San Francisco-based fisherman and vice president of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations.

"Everybody needs these fish. We've got to put water back in the river," he said.

Associated Press writer Garance Burke in Fresno contributed to this report.
-----------------------------------------------------------
You can post a comment on the USA TODAY Online site at this link:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/en ... lmon_N.htm

enough for 660,000 homes a year.

Well consider this the first demand for costs associated with allowing more than 660,000 families of Invaders into your state. Continue to allow over population by an Invasive Species and this problem will only become more costly.