Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    North Carolina

    Feinstein And Harris Would Like To Pick Trumpís Judicial Nominees For Him

    Feinstein And Harris Would Like To Pick Trumpís Judicial Nominees For Him

    JAZZ SHAWPosted at 9:21 am on November 20, 2018


    There are some tense negotiations getting underway in the Senate, specifically on the Judiciary Committee when it comes to some more of President Trumpís judicial nominees. Or at least two California Democrats would like to think so. Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris have sent a request to the White House in hopes of cutting a deal whereby they will agree to a couple of Trumpís nominees to the Ninth Circuit if he will, in turn, nominate a couple of people from their list. (Washington Times)

    Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, both members of the Judiciary Committee, called on the White House Monday to make a deal to fill court vacancies.

    The two California senators asked Pat Cipollone, tapped to be the acting White House counsel in October, to broker a deal over three 9th Circuit Court of Appeals positions.

    ďWhile we continue to oppose the slate of nominees the White House put forward on October 10, we remain hopeful that you will work with us to reach a bipartisan agreement in a timely manner,Ē they wrote.

    The desire for a deal is certainly understandable, and arrangements such as this have been made regularly over the years, particularly when control of the Senate and the White House are split between the parties. But if youíll forgive me for being so rude as to point this out, thatís not the case these days. Perhaps nobody stopped by to let Feinstein and Harris know about the results of the midterms, but the Democrats actually lost seats in the upper chamber. That means there are still going to be 21 members of the Judiciary Committee and eleven of them will be Republicans. With the departure of Jeff Flake, there will be even fewer headwinds for Trumpís nominees to make it out of committee.

    So why would the President have to make a deal on any of the nominees? There was a time when things were more friendly in the Senate, but now the Democrats rarely cast a vote in favor of any of Trumpís candidates. He doesnít exactly owe them a great deal of courtesy in these matters.

    And letís consider the deal theyíre looking for. In exchange for agreeing to support the appointment of Judge James Rogan (who Trump picked), they want him to have Judge Lucy Koh nominated and confirmed for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Sheís a District Judge for the Northern District of California who was appointed by Barack Obama at the request of Boxer and Feinstein. She is perhaps best known for telling some attorneys for Apple that they ďmust be smoking crackĒ during one proceeding. She was approved for her current position with 90 votes in the Senate, but as I said, that was a different time and Republicans generally gave Obamaís nominees a pass.

    If the President actually starts wheeling and dealing with these two then there must be something going on under the surface that weíre not being told. There are plenty of fine conservative candidates out there for these positions, and given the treatment that Trump has received from Democrats in the Senate over his nominees thus far, there seems little reason that heíd start handing out presents to the minority party now. The GOP has the votes to move Trumpís nominees out of committee and past a floor vote. All the Democrats can do is slow them down them for a while.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    No deal with these snakes!

    Drain the swamp!


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-13-2018, 02:20 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-19-2017, 01:52 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-06-2016, 01:57 PM
  4. CA primary could pick 'birther' to face Feinstein
    By JohnDoe2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 12:03 PM
  5. Judicial Watch Investigates Senator Feinstein
    By Jean in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2007, 05:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts