Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Fine Print: Warren DNA Test Did NOT Compare Against Real Native American DNA

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Fine Print: Warren DNA Test Did NOT Compare Against Real Native American DNA

    Fine Print: Warren DNA Test Did NOT Compare Against Real Native American DNA


    Published
    21 hours ago on
    Oct 15, 2018
    By
    Peter D'Abrosca



    U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released the results of a DNA test Monday to prove that she does indeed have Native American ancestry, which has not worked out as planned.

    “To make up for the dearth of Native American DNA, Bustamente used samples from Mexico, Peru and Colombia to stand in for Native American,” the Boston Globe reports aid.

    In other words, Warren’s DNA could be Mexican, Peruvian, Colombian or Native American, but the “scientist” behind the test simply assumed that if Warren possessed Mexican, Peruvian or Colombian DNA that she was indeed Native American. Needless to say, none of those three countries are America.

    The DNA test also proved that in any circumstance, Warren does not have enough Native American DNA to be considered American Indian by any tribe.

    Big League Politics reported:


    In order clear up this confusion, Warren released the results of a DNA test which show that that she is, at most 1/32nd Native American, and at least 1/1024th Native American, according to the Boston Globe. According to the article, somewhere between six and 10 generations ago, Warren has a Native American ancestor.We did the math and found that in any scenario, Warren is still not Native American enough to be considered American Indian by any tribe today. According to The Globe, if Warren’s “great-great-great grandmother was Native American, that puts her at 1/32nd American Indian.” One must be at least 1/16 Native American to be considered American Indian by tribes in the United States today, meaning that she is only meets 50% of the requirement to be considered Native American.For fun, we looked into Warren’s worst-case scenario – what if she is only 1/1024th Native American? In other words, what if Warren had a great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great who was Native American?Well, 1 divided by 1024 is .00097656, or .09%. That number divided by the 1/16th requirement (.0625 for my readers who are adept at mathematics) comes out to .015625, or only 1.5% of the requirement to be considered Native American today.

    Bottom line: Warren is still not a Cherokee Indian.

    https://bigleaguepolitics.com/fine-p...-american-dna/





    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    30,909
    Test results indicated she is certifiably 100% nuts!!!




    ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

    DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    More on Warren.

    12/06/17

    BUSTED: Elizabeth Warren’s CFPB Used Secret “Slush Fund” To Funnel Billions Into Left-Wing Causes

    by Joshua Caplan

    Was the real reason behind Senator Elizabeth Warren’s outrage over Mick Mulvaney’s appointment as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) about her own political survival?

    The New York Post’s Paul Sperry reports that the CFPB is engaged in a wide-variety of corruption.

    Everything from amassing secret ledgers to using penalties to ‘launder,’ funds into left-wing causes. Of course, because the CFPB operates independently of the U.S. Government, a full audit of the agency’s balance sheet have never been done. This sad reality may very well change under Mulvaney’s leadership.

    New York Post reports:

    Bounced business owners and industry reps from secret meetings it’s held with Democrat operatives, radical civil-rights activists, trial lawyers and other “community advisers,” according to a report by the House Financial Services Committee.

    Retained GMMB, the liberal advocacy group that created ads for the Obama and Hillary Clinton presidential campaigns, for more than $40 million, making the Democrat shop the sole recipient of CFPB’s advertising expenditure, Rubin says. […]

    Funneled a large portion of the more than $5 billion in penalties collected from defendants to community organizers aligned with Democrats — “a slush fund by another name,” said a consultant who worked with CFPB on its Civil Penalty Fund and requested anonymity.

    Reports of the CFPB awarding lucrative contracts to left-leaning organizations is nothing new.

    The CFPB awarded GMMB, the Obama-Hillary ad firm, a $14.7 million contract for “agency media and resource communication,” in June of 2017 and a $16 million payday to marketing materials about student loans and mortgages.

    “Most likely President Trump will not appoint a replacement until Mulvaney has exposed the corruption within it. That sunlight is toxic to Elizabeth Warren and can potentially be politically destructive to the Democrats.” wrote Sundance of Conservative Treehouse on November 27th.

    While the amount revealed pales in comparison to what is really ‘under the hood,’ it’s important to remember the CFPB’s activities are shrouded in mystery. Perhaps, not for long if the Trump administration gets its way.
    Warren may one day see the sunlight.
    https://www.alipac.us/f19/busted-eli...o-left-353187/
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Also...

    Elizabeth Warren Fails to Disclose $1.3 Million Line of Credit

    AP

    by MICHAEL PATRICK LEAHY
    27 Jan 2017

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has failed to disclose a $1.3 million line of credit provided to her by Bank of America, the Washington Free Beacon reports:
    Warren argued that financial disclosures are needed to ‘reveal potentially damaging information that may undermine fitness to serve’ and that nominees with ‘complex financial histories’ need to be ‘forthcoming and transparent.’ Warren, meanwhile, continues to skirt congressional ethics laws by failing to include a $1.3 million line of credit against her Cambridge, Massachusetts, home on financial disclosure forms.


    “Another example of this shady lady in action — she claims to fight for the downtrodden, but checks the box to claim minority status, takes zero-interest loans from Harvard to buy her mansion, says in 2012 that she doesn’t own stocks, only mutual funds, claims to be the ‘intellectual mother’ of the Occupy movement until it turns into a <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym></acronym></acronym> disaster — is anyone suprised by this latest?” Boston talk radio king Howie Carr tells Breitbart News.

    “Surely not Bernie Sanders, whom she refused to endorse!” Carr notes.

    The revelation of the existence of this previously undisclosed line of credit leaves Warren, who presents herself as a champion of the common people, vulnerable to charges of hypocrisy.

    Warren aggressively criticized Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on January 18 to become Secretary of Health and Human Services over the purchase of $2,700 in the stock of one company by the manager of his stock portfolio.

    “I’m just asking: Did you buy the stock, and then did you introduce a bill that would be helpful to the companies you just bought stock in?” she asked Price at the hearing.

    “The stock was bought by a direct… by a broker who was making those decisions. I wasn’t making those decisions,” he responded.
    “Was the stock purchased through an index fund? . . .Through a blind trust?” Warren asked, a question that was followed by this exchange:

    Warren: So, let’s just be clear. This is not just a stock broker — someone you pay to handle the paperwork. This is someone who buys stock at your direction. This is someone who buys and sells the stock you want them buy and sell.
    Price: Not true.
    Warren: So, when you found out that…
    Price: It’s not true Senator.
    Warren: What? Because you decide not to tell them? Wink, wink. Nod, nod. And we’re all just supposed to believe that?
    Price: It’s what members of this committee. It’s the manner in which members of this committee . . .
    Warren: I’m not one of them.

    The left-wing senior senator from Massachusetts, who is up for re-election in 2018, now has a political perception problem of her own related to personal financial dealings — the undisclosed $1.3 million line of credit, which suggests that she is very much “one of them.”

    This is not the first time Warren has been publicly labeled a hypocrite.

    In April 2012, during her successful campaign to win her Senate seat, the Boston Heraldreported that Warren had publicly claimed Native American status in reports given to two of her employers — first at the University of Pennsylvania Law School in the late 1980s, and then at Harvard Law School in the 1990s.

    Read the rest at.
    https://www.alipac.us/f9/elizabeth-w...credit-342820/

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. "Math Correction" Confirms Warren Could Be 1/1024th Native American
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 01-05-2019, 09:41 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 02:12 PM
  3. THE FINE PRINT OF THE SENATE BETRAYAL
    By LegalUSCitizen in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 08:25 AM
  4. It is all in the words Read the Fine Print
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2005, 09:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •