Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
04-19-2017, 06:49 PM #1
Forget Sanctions: Exxon Would Like Access to Russian Oil Anyway
Forget Sanctions: Exxon Would Like Access to Russian Oil Anyway
Robbie Gramer and Emily Tamkin
Foreign Policy Magazine April 19, 2017
4 Comments
Because Russia just doesn’t loom large enough already in Washington. More
With the simple submission of a technical sanctions waiver, oil giant Exxon Mobil created a potential PR headache for the White House. On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported Exxon is seeking a greenlight from the U.S. government to bypass sanctions on Russia and resume doing business with the country’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
It’s hard to imagine how the optics could be worse. One of the biggest of the many scandals plaguing Trump’s White House is the FBI investigation into whether his campaign coordinated with Russian intelligence to tip the election in his favor. An unverified dossier alleges that Rosneft may have played a role in the Russian election meddling. And Secretary of State Rex Tillerson happens to be the former Exxon CEO — who before becoming America’s top diplomat had lobbied the Obama administration to ease sanctions that hamstrung Exxon’s business in Russia.
The State Department is one of several government agencies that will oversee Exxon’s waiver application, though a State Department spokesman told the Wall Street Journal Tillerson (who received the Russian Order of Friendship in 2013) is recusing himself from any decisions relating to Exxon for two years.
The sanctions were put in place in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea. The sanctions prevent U.S. companies from dealings with Rosneft involving technology transfer, and also target Rosneft chief — and Putin confidant — Igor Sechin.
Under Tillerson’s leadership, Exxon paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to lobbying groups to argue against U.S. sanctions and he personally met with senior Obama White House officials a dozen times to discuss sanctions on Russia (though he assured Congressional leaders at his confirmation hearing in January he “never lobbied against sanctions personally” and “to [his] knowledge, Exxon never directly lobbied against sanctions.”) Exxon figures the sanctions, which have forestalled exploration in places like the Russian Arctic, cost it at least $1 billion.
Exxon is apparently trying to get U.S. permission to drill in the Russian Black Sea; if it doesn’t drill an exploratory well this year, it could lose the concession. But existing sanctions aside, Exxon’s efforts now to get access to deepwater, offshore oil fields is a little curious given the big global oil supply glut and still-cheap prices. Deepwater projects, like the one Exxon is trying to get going, generally need oil prices closer to $70 a barrel to be economic; crude oil has spent months in the $50 a barrel range. (Exxon’s other sanctions-stalled project with Rosneft, in the chilly Kara Sea, would be an even dicier proposition at these prices.)
But under the terms of its agreement with Rosneft, Exxon’s Black Sea play could expire if it doesn’t act soon, so it presumably wants to keep the proverbial pilot light on so they’re ready to pounce when prices rebound.
Another reason could be sheer competitive pressure. The European Union is granting sanctions waivers to its own companies, including Italian oil company Eni, to explore cooperation with Russia in the Black and Barents Seas, even while the sanctions freeze out U.S. firms.
“Exxon is worried it could get boxed out of the Black Sea by the Italians,” one person briefed on the Exxon waiver told the Journal.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/forget-sa...205200454.html
NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
04-19-2017, 10:02 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 4,815
Should we be surprised that our trump appointed sos, former exxon ceo, is maneuvering with the russians when oil is involved?
The russians will benefit the most with "global warming" as they have VAST territory with oil - it will be so much more $$$$ beneficial for them to be able to drill in more moderate climate temps - and tillerson is right there.
It has been known since the vietnam war that climate can be controlled by what airplanes can spray into the air. Documentation exists of planning rains to benefit our mission there. Makes you wonder if our frozen tundras are being 'heated up" for $$$$ a reason.
-
04-21-2017, 04:44 PM #3NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
Clinton Collected Millions In Russian Cash Before Approving Russian Uranium Deal
By lorrie in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 03-01-2016, 08:43 AM -
Obama Threatens More Sanctions Against Zimbabwe Over Russian-Platinum Deal
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 10-07-2014, 07:00 AM -
Russian Forces to Provide “Security” At US Events -FEMA signs deal with Russian Emerg
By AirborneSapper7 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 9Last Post: 08-17-2013, 03:23 AM -
Eleven Russian Warships To The East Mediterranean: NATO, Russian naval-air buildup
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 07-11-2012, 11:13 PM -
Never forget the truth of 9/11 – Do forget the endless rew
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 09-11-2009, 03:20 AM
Laura Loomer - Woke up this morning to a @nytimes article...
03-27-2024, 11:36 PM in General Discussion