Thread: Government activating "FEMA camps" across U.S.

Just Two Days Ago Someone Sent Me This in My Email, Related to Discussion

Latest Terror Bill Just the Next Step Towards Tyranny and Fascism.

Consider the possibility that the people in power within the government, in Washington DC, and their business associates on Wall Street, have had a long term plan for obtaining and consolidating unlimited wealth and power, and that involves taking it away from the other 99% of the population.

They could not do this in one swift action, but, systematically and only after specific, large scale tragic events, like 9-11, they could pass bills and laws as a response to any and all attacks and disasters.
They use the "Problem, Reaction, Solution", Hegelian Dialectic.

Remember HR. 1955, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 Bill
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955
that they tried to pass four years ago?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_Radicalization_and_Homegrown_Terrorism_Pre vention_Act_of_2007

Looks like they are bringing it back.

The S.1867 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) bill
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1867
that is being pushed through now will accomplish what the HR 1955 bill was written for: to make dissent an act of terror, and end Posse Comitatus and Habeas Corpus, making the US a battleground for the war on terror, and allow soldiers to kill or kidnap US citizens.

Written into the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1867) is language that would take away the Bill of Rights that are there to protect US citizens from the government.
Read provisions 1031 and 1032, and ask yourself why the government needs to pass this bill when it already uses the PATRIOT Act I of 2001
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:H.R.3162:
the Domestic Security Enhancement Act,(Patriot Act II) of 2002
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Domestic_Security_Enhancement_Act_ of_2003&mobileaction=view_normal_site
the Homeland Security Act of 2003
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.5005.enr:
and the Military Commissions Act of 2006
http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdf
along with the traditional Constitution based rule of law, to fight crimes against the State?
In 2010, and 2011, President Obama signed bills extending the PATRIOT Act because is was due to expire (Sundown).
Coincidentally, the last signing took place right after the biggest Evil Doer, the monster who did 9-11, Osama bin Laden, was killed by the USA.

Now, anyone who questions the "official story" will become Enemies of the State.

It seems like they have systematically introduced bills and laws meant to restrict the citizens individual freedom and liberty while granting the government, and all agents of the government, from policemen, to soldiers, to judges, and politicians, more power over the citizens.
Every year since 9-11-01, they have passed some new law that they claim is there to fight terrorism, and protect this nation and all of it's citizens from Evil Doers, but in reality, it only takes away from us citizens, freedom and liberties that we all were born with, that the Bill of Rights legally protects.
If the latest bill to restrict our freedom is passed, then the FEMA Camps that most people refuse to admit exist, will officially be opened for business.
Who knows, the way most people are so complacent, and easily misled and controlled, they might just volunteer to relocate to one of these FEMA Camps, to help fight the never ending War on Terror.

The real tragedy is that 99% of the people don't know or care that this bill is being passed.

How do we fight tyranny and fascism when everyone around us is so complacent and apathetic?

The "FEMA Camps for US citizens" theory is looking more plausible and believable now.

REX 84 FEMA Camps Martial Law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?nomobile=1&v=Ug0IL7k3elQ

Open your eyes and take a stand before you lose your freedom.

Status of S. 1867 on
Dec 1, 2011:

This bill passed in the Senate by roll call vote 93-7.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote =00218

These two provisions, 1031, and 1032, of the S. 1867 NDAA National Defense Authorization Act,
http://equityjungle.com/2011/11/27/battlefield-usa-senate-ndaa-sec-1031-and-sec-1032/
will forever change the Constitution of the US, and it's Bill of Rights that are there to protect us citizens from the people in power within the government.

The day the President signs this Bill
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:
is the day the USA officially becomes a Fascist Dictatorship.

What were you doing on that day?

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

. . . You may ask, what does all this have to do with internment camps? Nothing . . .

That's kinda what I was thinking.

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

RELATED

FEMA Camps - Debunking FEMA Camp Myths - Popular Mechanics

www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mil ... ws/4312850

Apr 10, 2009 – This photo of a supposed FEMA concentration camp in Wyoming is ...

Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation:

Here are the top twenty media corporations in the U.S. according to mediaowners.com All but two of the following, #18 and #19 are not members of the Council On Foreign Relations.

1. Time Warner Inc.
2. Walt Disney Company
3. Viacom Inc.
4. News Corporation
5. CBS Corporation
6. Cox Enterprises
7. NBC Universal
8. Gannett Company, Inc.
9. Clear Channel Communications Inc.
10. Advance Publications, Inc.
11. Tribune Company
12. McGraw-Hill Companies
13. Hearst Corporation
14. Washington Post Company
15. The New York Times Company
16. E.W. Scripps Co.
17. McClatchy Company
18. Thomson Corporation
19. Freedom Communications, Inc.
20. A&E Television Networks

The Council On Foreign Relations and What It Has To Do With Corporate Control Of The News

What do Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer, Rupert Murdoch, Tom Brokaw and the late William F. Buckley have in common? They are all members of the CFR, The Council On Foreign Relations. The stated goal of the CFR is to manipulate the News to bring about a new world order or corporate control of everything. This is not some weird conspiracy theory, it is stated in their original charter. Who else belongs to the CFR, Disney's Michael Eisner and ABC's Thomas Murphy, Tom Johnson, CEO of CNN, Time Warner's Gerald Levine, and many, many more media CEO's who have merged their empires under the CFR's guidance.

Who Really Determines What You Will Or Will Not See On TV Or Read In The Newspaper?

In the early years of our democracy the "free press" was all that stood between greedy corporate interests, government corruption and you and I. While many newspapers were controlled by wealthy individuals such as William Randolph Hearst, who influenced the content of the news in his papers, a kind of journalistic "Hippocratic oath" seemed to prevail across the country as reporters and publishers at small papers usually chose to pursue the truth in reporting.

Local papers, TV stations and radio outlets were owned mostly by local individuals with an interest in their community. That began to change as a powerful institution known as the Council On Foreign Relations gained power and the trend toward total corporate media control rapidly accelerated during the Bush era with media consolidation.


Suddenly the old rule that one corporation could not own all of the town's news outlets was gone. Companies like Clear Channel Communications suddenly began to buy up every radio station, TV outlet and newspaper in major markets, effectively controlling everything that people read, watched and heard. The pattern of media consolidation has increased during the last eight years to the point that now only a few corporations control the news that we watch.


Just like the quote above, he who owns the media, controls the media. With such powerful platforms they are able to drown out independent media and control public opinion and government policy. There can be no freedom without freedom of the press and there can be no freedom of the press if only a few powerful corporations are allowed to own it.

http://www.whoownsthenews.com/