Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member moosetracks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    3,118

    House lawmakers accept $3,300 pay hike

    House Lawmakers Accept $3,300 Pay Hike
    Jun 13 4:56 PM US/Eastern
    Email this story

    By ANDREW TAYLOR
    Associated Press Writer


    WASHINGTON


    Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that will increase their salaries to $168,500.

    The 2 percent cost-of-living raise would be the seventh straight for members of the House and Senate.

    Lawmakers easily squelched a bid by Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, to get a direct vote to block the COLA, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it.

    In the early days of GOP control of Congress, lawmakers routinely denied themselves the annual COLA. Last year, the Senate voted 92-6 to deny the raise but quietly surrendered the position in House-Senate talks.

    As part of an ethics reform bill in 1989, Congress gave up their ability to accept pay for speeches and made annual cost-of-living pay increases automatic unless the lawmakers voted otherwise.

    The pay issue has been linked to the annual Transportation and Treasury Department spending bill because that measure stipulates that civil servants get raises of 2.7 percent, the same as military personnel will receive. Under a complicated formula, the increase translates to 2 percent for members of Congress.

    Like last year, Matheson led a quixotic drive to block the raise. He was the only member to speak on the topic.

    "I do not think that it is appropriate to let this bill go through without an up or down vote on whether or not Congress should have an increase in its own pay," Matheson said.

    But by a 249-167 vote, the House rejected Matheson's procedural attempt to get a direct vote on the pay raise.

    The pay raise would also apply to the vice president _ who is president of the Senate _ congressional leaders and Supreme Court justices.

    This year, Vice President Cheney, House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Chief Justice William Rehnquist receive $212,100. Associate justices receive $203,000. House and Senate party leaders get $183,500.

    President Bush's salary of $400,000 is unaffected by the legislation.

    http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/13/D8I7ID800.html
    Do not vote for Party this year, vote for America and American workers!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,569
    Raises? For what? They are not doing their jobs. I think this needs to be changed. The American taxpayers should get to vote whether they deserve a raise. I do not get to give myself a raise. What a crock.

    I think I am going to tell my employer I voted myself a raise. They will laugh in may face

  3. #3
    Senior Member curiouspat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA. area!
    Posts
    3,341
    So they get a pay raise for treason, do they?

    GRRRRRRR!
    TIME'S UP!
    **********
    Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!

  4. #4
    mrmiata7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Unoccupied Savannah, Georgia
    Posts
    438

    Who ii in control?

    More tax payer dollars subsidizing traitors, seditionists and corporate johns. My military retirement and VA disability only increased by 40.00 a month. And they were debating on that before it was approved. Go figure.

  5. #5
    Senior Member crazybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Joliet, Il
    Posts
    10,175
    Doesn't this just tick you off?!!! There's a couple I would give a raise to. But as for the rest.......I think a drastic PAY CUT is in order not to mention the ones needing a pink slip.

    Seems to me it should be the tax payers who vote on whether they deserve a raise or not. Based on their performance. Isn't that what everybody else has to do? I mean when's the last time you took a count of hands amongst your fellow employees in the lunch room to see if you all wanted a raise? And then just GOT it! With the defecit as it is if it were any other business there would be tons of lay-offs not to mention some out-sourcing, maybe some pay decreases if you still wanted a job. Throw in some cuts in benefits too. These "servents" need to get off thier pampered butts and join the real world.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member butterbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,181
    Well, it HAS to be a cost of living raise, because its sure cant be based on their performance!
    RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  7. #7
    Senior Member vmonkey56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tarheel State
    Posts
    7,134
    Did they give themselves a pay raise this yes, 2008?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •