Thread: IMMIGRATION HARD LINERS LOST REALLY BAD ON LAST ELECTIONS:

Originally Posted by guesswhonewpilg

I don't think the numbers and what was seen on last election can be called a joke; Actually the joke was on the hard liners. Thanks for repplying to my post anyway. New Pilgrim

New pilgrim? lol, you are a joke.

As a resident of Pennsylvania I can say that Santorum's defeat had very little, if anything, to do with his position on the immigration issue.

Iraq was the big issue around here. Santorum was seen as very supportive of Bush and people are dissatisfied with the situation in Iraq; therefore, they voted for Casey. There were other issues, also, having nothing to do with immigration. Casey ran as a "conservative" Democrat and his father was a very popular governor in Pennsylvania.

TROLL ALERT WITH NOTHING OF VALUE TO CONTRIBUTE

See, I dont care if you agree with me, but being stupid is, well just stupid.

New pilgrim certainly does have creative ways to keep getting back here on ALIPAC. Get a life new pilgrim...

Nice try, but that propaganda has been debunked so many times, it's not worth the effort to re-hash it again. It only takes one point to destroy the argument......Hayworth lost in Arizona.....BUT, at the same time, some of the toughest propositions against illegals were passed by HUGE margins with 48% of the Hispanic vote approving them. You can't have it both ways, people want the illegal problem solved and not by legalization. A big part of Hayworth's lose was the Abramhoff lobby scandal. Of course, Bush was the driving force behind all the Republican loses.

Frank Sharry knows all this, but he is counting on people who can't reason or have no logic to buy into his drivel!

You can go back to your Nintendo now! :P

Originally Posted by sippy

New pilgrim certainly does have creative ways to keep getting back here on ALIPAC. Get a life new pilgrim...

Not so creative Sippy: I only happen to use a wireless laptop, so when one of my IPs is banned I just choose a different acess point. About getting a life, I do have one: a very busy one: with wife, children, work (lots of work, believe me), etc, etc, etc... Do you guys really think that I don't visit this site more often because " I was hopeless banned"? .
Nah... About being a troll with nothing to contribute, how can you call troll a person that has the true of the facts to disagree on your ideas?

We know you are a troll because YOU DO NOT HAVE the facts. Many of the officials that lost did not lose due to their stance on immigration.

They lost because of their lack of inaction on immigration and many other issues since the Reps had control of both houses from 94.

Originally Posted by sippy

New pilgrim certainly does have creative ways to keep getting back here on ALIPAC. Get a life new pilgrim...

Yes s/he does, but isn't at all creative with this post. The OBL's came out with this the day after the elections, which we all knew they would. Come up with something new Pilgrim.

Why can't you guys debaate someone that disagree on you without ofending? Is it just the level of the ALIPAC people or what??? Not that that hurts me, but it sounds very very unclassy for you guys (and girls).

Why can't you guys debaate someone that disagree on you without ofending? Is it just the level of the ALIPAC people or what??? Not that that hurts me, but it sounds very very unclassy for you guys (and girls).

Whats wrong, no one to fight with over on your other site.

In my opinion, you are not here to debate, you are here to harrass.

What did you think of all of those ID stealing illegals getting busted yesterday?