Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    97,505

    Judge tosses Wisconsin senator's health care suit

    Judge tosses Wisconsin senator's health care suit

    By M.L. JOHNSON 1 hour ago

    MILWAUKEE (AP) A federal judge on Monday dismissed a U.S. senator's lawsuit challenging a requirement that congressional members and their staffs to obtain government-subsidized health insurance through small business exchanges, saying the senator had no grounds to sue.

    Sen. Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, filed the lawsuit in January after the Office of Personnel Management decided months earlier that lawmakers and their staffs should continue to receive health care benefits covering about 75 percent of their premium costs after leaving the health insurance program for federal workers.

    Johnson said the decision would make him decide which staff members must buy insurance through an exchange, potentially creating conflict in his office.

    He also said it forced him to participate in a program that he believed was illegal and that it could make voters view him negatively because his staff received health insurance subsidies the general public did not.


    But U.S. District Judge William Griesbach said Johnson and a staff member who filed the lawsuit with him didn't have grounds to bring the suit.


    Johnson's belief that subsidies provided to lawmakers and their staffs are illegal isn't a strong enough reason to disqualify him from the rule put in place under the Affordable Care Act, Griesbach said. The judge also said Johnson failed to show voters would view him negatively if his staff received subsidized insurance.


    And, the judge said, Johnson could simply avoid the problem by failing to designate any employees as official congressional office staff, a classification that qualifies them for the benefit.


    Johnson expressed disappointment that the lawsuit was dismissed on "the legal technicality of standing" and not its merits.


    "Americans increasingly and correctly believe that their government in Washington is out of control, out of touch and lawless," he said in a statement. "By its decision today, the court has chosen not to address the important constitutional issues at hand."


    Johnson's spokeswoman, Melinda Whitemarsh Schnell, said he was discussing the decision with lawyers and deciding whether to appeal.


    The White House responded to a request for comment Monday by referring to remarks White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest made the day Griesbach heard oral arguments in the case. Earnest noted then that even some Republicans didn't agree with Johnson's decision to sue.


    "What the President believes is that the whole goal of the Affordable Care Act in the first place was to lower health care costs, to expand access to quality, affordable health insurance for every American, including those who were employed by small businesses," he said.


    The Affordable Care Act approved by Congress includes provisions that say the federal government can offer congressional members and staffers only health care plans that come through an exchange. It was meant to end generous subsidies to lawmakers and force them and their staffs into the same situation as uninsured Americans.


    But OPM tossed the issue back into lawmakers' laps, requiring them to designate which workers qualified as official office staff under the law.

    Others could continue under the old government health plan. OPM also ensured that premium subsidies would be available to lawmakers and staff who bought plans through an exchange.


    Johnson argued that OPM's decision essentially allowed the Obama administration to rewrite the law. He also said using small-business exchanges to serve congressional staffers constituted an illegal scheme because the federal government is a huge employer.


    But he told reporters after oral arguments on July 7 that he had designated "a majority" of his 40 or so staffers to go through the small-business exchanges.

    He said he bought private insurance for himself outside the exchanges.


    http://news.yahoo.com/judge-tosses-w...-politics.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    97,505
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Judge tosses suit against Obama health care plan
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-23-2011, 01:14 AM
  2. Neb. judge tosses illegal immigrant tuition suit
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-18-2010, 01:01 AM
  3. CA-Judge tosses sanctuary suit in S.F. killings
    By FedUpinFarmersBranch in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-27-2010, 04:06 PM
  4. TX-U.S. judge tosses out suit against border fence
    By American-ized in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-16-2009, 05:52 PM
  5. Judge tosses UN employee's sexual harassment suit
    By butterbean in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-30-2008, 09:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •