Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48
Like Tree23Likes

Thread: Luongo: Democrats Begin Eating Themselves Prepping For 2020 "...because Bernie Sand

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368

    Luongo: Democrats Begin Eating Themselves Prepping For 2020 "...because Bernie Sand

    Luongo: Democrats Begin Eating Themselves Prepping For 2020



    "...because Bernie Sanders is a secret Kremlin agent..."

    Mon, 01/28/2019 - 14:40
    146 SHARES

    Authored by Tom Luongo,

    Ideological possession always ends in pogroms. When the leadership of the most powerful organization in the world is at stake nothing is off limits, especially for power-hungry Democrats.
    This is why we’re now seeing a concerted effort to smear Bernie Sanders just after he announced his Presidential campaign for 2020.

    The Democrats blame him for splitting the party in 2016 which allowed Trump to win.
    This, of course, is nonsense. Trump took up Bernie’s mantle of championing Hillary’s ‘deplorables’ and repackaged it as MAGA. Simply good marketing. And since she didn’t have a campaign and was seen as one of the architects of the policies which brought those people out for Bernie, handicapping the election was really easy.
    The response was predictable. The American left lost its collective mind in November 2016.
    Since then, to assuage their grief, they have latched onto the patently insane idea that Trump was an agent of the Kremlin. As Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has dragged on and on we’ve been given the pretty clear picture that it was Hillary and the rest of the DNC who concocted this story to get Trump removed from office.
    And failing that it would be an open wound to keep Democrats hopeful, Trump chasing his tail and any reforms he might make to the unreal levels of corruption in D.C. stymied.
    All of this in the hopes of ruining Trump for the Democrats to win in 2020. It was coldly calculated. The media was happy to oblige. And what’s next is the demonization of Bernie Sanders.




    Burning for Bernie

    Because Bernie Sanders is a secret Kremlin agent.
    You see, at some point in the past Bernie’s campaign manager worked with *gasp* Paul Manafort! And that makes him a suspect. Then he wouldn’t vote for sanctions and wasn’t for endless war with Russia.
    Caitlin Johnstone has a great article up detailing the insanity of the Bernie as Russian Spy story. She’s right that it is the delusional RussiaGate that has made this possible.
    Since it [RussiaGate] has no basis in facts or reality, the only way to keep alive a crisis that is made of pure narrative is to keep feeding it with more narrative. Anyone who has helped do that is partly responsible for the frenzied, hysterical environment we now see before us in which a Bernie Sanders campaign which hasn’t even begun yet is already being undermined by completely baseless allegations of Kremlin collusion.
    And Ms. Johnstone is also correct that Bernie himself, keeping his 2020 aspirations high, has helped the very thing being used to smear him now, RussiaGate.
    But, this smear campaign has a cause, and it isn’t just the lunatic Left smarting over the rejection of their lunacy by desperate, ten-toothed deplorables.
    Because the DNC are delusional enough to think that it was Bernie, like Ralph Nader in 2000, who cost the Democrats the presidency. It couldn’t have possibly been a terrible candidate, lack of message, and appearing as the party of the unelected oligarchy who were too busy strip-mining the country to notice that a lot of people were really angry about it.
    No. It was Bernie’s fault. Self-reflection is not a strong point of ideologues.
    You see, Bernie could have been a Manchurian Candidate all along as part of Putin’s nefarious plot to thwart the imperial aspirations of the anointed femi-Nazi Hillary.
    These are talking points created by the Clinton wing of the DNC to discredit Bernie by painting him with the guilt-by-association brush.
    There are few things in this life that made me laugh louder than this.
    But it is also very dangerous.
    Proxy Wars

    Turning the mob on Bernie is exactly the same type of thinking that led to funding the Mujahadeen to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980’s.
    It’s the same misguided planning that created ISIS to overthrow Assad. Use proxies to undermine your opponent. Accuse them of things patently untrue and raise suspicion of them and their motives.
    Then create an army of radicalized, frothing-at-the-mouth, unthinking lunatics to do your bidding on the battlefield. It doesn’t matter whether its the Syrian desert or the digital ones of Twitter and Facebook. What matters is keeping people hating The Other with an intensity that defies reason and ensures that no outside information makes it through the filter of the cult.
    Alinsky 101. And who is the chief Alinskyite of the DNC? Hillary Clinton.
    Make no mistake that’s because Hillary still thinks she can win a rematch in 2020.
    Still think Hillary isn’t running? So it’s just coincidence that days after Kamala Harris (D – Herself) announced her candidacy Willie Brown breaks his silence on their affair.
    This is prima facia evidence that the Democrats’ crazy has jumped the shark, however. In their single-minded quest to beat Trump the Clintons and their allies do not see the damage they are doing to not only the institutions they think they deserve to control but also to their own feathered nests.
    The problem here is the unintended consequences of unleashing forces you can’t control. Proxy wars (political or military) create knock-on effects that grow beyond you.
    They take on lives of their own. This is especially true among leftists who have rejected all other forms of limits on their behavior. They have been encouraged, by people like Clinton, to view culture as despotic.
    Pelosi calls walls immoral.
    New York has made infanticide a legal right.
    The MAGA hat is the new Swastika.
    It’s not about ideas anymore. It’s about purity. And the left turning on Bernie Sanders was already in full swing before Hillary mobilized a few of her media quislings.
    This mania leads to people becoming so insane they think it’s okay to incite violence against 15 year old kids for standing still and smiling inext to grown men act like jackasses in public while cheering on pre-pubescent transvestite drag queens.
    Do you think Hillary has the chops to navigate this insanity for a year and a half?
    She couldn’t handle Trump in 2016… or campaigning for that matter.
    Eat the Rich

    Your clue that things have reached that point is none other than everyone’s media darling, Marxist lunatic Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez.
    Machine Democrats lost seats in the primaries to ideologues like Cortez. She’s not stupid, folks. She’s Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton 30 years ago. And she’s going to run their playbook better than they ever did.
    Pelosi has no idea what she’s up against. She still thinks she’s got this under control. But she is in a fight for her political life with Trump over the border wall which he will win if he wants to.
    Because he’s laying the groundwork to declare the emergency after raking them over the coals politically. He can’t lose this fight to her now when he has all the tools to make it happen. She’s the one with no cards to play now that the government is back in business looting people.
    All it will take to beat her is a small cadre of Democrats to cross the line and cut a deal with Trump. He already offered a politically reasonable trade.
    Does anyone think AOC won’t lead a small insurrection against Nasty Nancy over this? Or, at least, demand even more concessions from the party vis a vis committee appointments.
    The Hildebeast

    Hillary is the queen of slash and burn politics. She is Emperor Palpatine without the charisma.
    And she’s also, like all generals, fighting the last war. Sending her media shock troops out against Bernie Sanders, a man already reviled for selling out to her in 2016, is an admission that she’s completely out of touch with the realities of 2019.
    What Hillary is missing is that the political calculus of her past is over. If you don’t speak for the people you cannot win today. She will not be able to remake herself into a populist. She is damaged goods at a fundamental level. The kids who voted for AOC will never vote for her.
    The Deplorables no matter how upset they are with Trump, if he stands firm on the wall and throws them some crumbs on foreign policy, will happily vote for him over her.
    Hillary’s not stupid, however. She knows the Democratic field is a puddle rather than a lake. So she is looking to destroy up front those candidates she thinks are the strongest.
    It’s why Fauxcahontas will get a pass because she’s a laughing stock and even more unlikeable than Hillary is.
    And that’s why Hillary’s throwing her hat in the ring now, via her proxies. But, between now and when she actually announces she will let her opposition Democrats fall on each other like zombies on the last corpse.



    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...-prepping-2020
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    A sorry group of Democrat presidential candidates

    The sudden transformation of the Democratic Party into a dogma-driven left-wing political enterprise has resulted in a wave of apologies and even abject groveling from candidates seeking the 2020 presidential nomination.


    January 28, 2019
    By Thomas Lifson

    The sudden transformation of the Democratic Party into a dogma-driven left-wing political enterprise has resulted in a wave of apologies and even abject groveling from candidates seeking the 2020 presidential nomination. Positions that were mainstream just a few years ago now demonstrate moral failures and worse, and they must be repudiated, else the would-be president will be repudiated by the loudest, angriest, best organized faction of the party.
    David Rutz of the Free Beacon has assembled a montage of the apologues of some of the announced candidates:
    The regrets include the following:
    Former Vice President Joe Biden, who has been mulling a run for months, expressed regret for the "big mistake" of supporting tougher sentences for drug possession in the 1980s and 1990s. ...
    Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D., N.Y.), has described herself as "callous" in her former immigration views and said she "couldn't have been more wrong" about her previous support for gun rights – she once sported an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association but now proudly has an "F." ...
    Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii), released a full apology video for her previous anti-LGBT views. ... [This was a true act of groveling – T.L.]
    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) was forced to apologize to women who alleged sexual harassment and pay disparities on his 2016 campaign, initially saying he was a "little bit busy" running around the country to be aware of the situation at the time[.]
    Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) said she took full responsibility for her past decisions that upset progressives as a prosecutor, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) acknowledged she was not a "person of color" while defending her decision to release a DNA test revealing scant Native American ancestry, and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who's never backed off his support for the "stop-and-frisk" program, acknowledged not all of his decisions in office were "perfect."



    Youtube Video https://youtu.be/PTZYnIVV_U8

    Watching the mass self-abnegation reminds me of the spectacle of China during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution that convulsed (and impoverished) that nation for a decade, starting in 1966. Officials, scholars, and almost anyone in a position of authority were forced to undergo self-criticism and repent of their adherence to the remnants of capitalism and feudalism. In China, this was a top-down movement, sparked by Mao Tse-tung's call to youth to rise up and attack his ideological enemies who resisted imposition of "true communism."
    Years later, I spoke to an eminent Chinese scientist with a Ph.D. from a major American university who returned to his native land in the early 1950s to serve China's development with his learning. During the Cultural Revolution, his American Ph.D. was regarded as proof of thoughtcrime, and he was badly beaten, with a noticeable limp, and paraded through the streets in a dunce cap while onlookers pelted him with rotten vegetables. Eventually, he was restored to his position because his knowledge was so needed, but he was a broken man.
    Unleashing the raging hormones of adolescent and post-adolescent youth was a horrible mistake, because excesses were inevitable, including murder and destruction of irreplaceable cultural artifacts.



    Red Guards then; social justice warriors now (public domain picture).

    The Democrats' version of a sudden ideological upheaval was also sparked from the top, in a sense. First, President Obama called for a "fundamental change" in our republic, only to be foiled in making his changes permanent by constitutional safeguards. The fact that his successor, Donald Trump, was able to undo much of the worst of it with his own pen and phone, plus his refusal to bow before the shibboleths of political correctness, had the same effect of mobilizing hysterical mobs, especially composed of youngsters under the baleful influence of propaganda in schools and colleges. But make no mistake: decades of propaganda coming from a deeply politicized educational system was the necessary pre-condition for this phenomenon.
    China crippled itself for decades following the Cultural Revolution, with economic output collapsing and mass deprivation. The ruin it experienced helped pave the way for opening relations with the outside world and the reforms of Deng Xiaoping.
    I have to wonder about the broader electoral appeal of a field of candidates who apologize to the most extreme elements of their party. We shall see.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...andidates.html
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Willie Brown admits it: Kamala Harris slept her way to the top

    Brown says that Harris was his 'girlfriend' and on multiple occasions helped boost the famous feminist and presidential candidate to the political top.


    January 27, 2019
    By Monica Showalter

    Kamala Harris, that vaunted self-righteous feminist candidate who's using her 'year of the woman' chops to challenge President Trump in 2020, has a little problem: She slept her way to the top.
    You know, the mistress thing, not exactly moving on up based on hard work or merit, that little advantage of good looks (President Obama called her the 'best-looking' state attorney general), employed to their optimal practical use. Her political patron, former lawyer to pimps, Mayor of San Francisco, and State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, admitted he helped her get her political start, writing in his bloggy San Francisco Chronicle column:
    Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago. Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker.
    And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco. I have also helped the careers of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and a host of other politicians.
    Now you know where we get these people from. Somehow Harris, who was in her late 20s or at most 30 when she dated the 60-year-old married Brown around 1994 did so because he was just so very irresistable. Here's how the San Francisco Chronicle reported it on Twitter:
    WILLIE BROWN: "I’ve been peppered with calls from the national media about my 'relationship' with Kamala Harris, particularly since it became obvious that she was going to run for president. Yes, we dated."https://t.co/xkzR0YhIl0
    — San Francisco Chronicle (@sfchronicle) January 26, 2019
    That of course, was in exchange for certain kinds of favors. Her rival, Democratic candidate Elizabeth Warren got her start playing fake Indian. Kamala went the old fashioned way, sleeping her way to the top. Democrats have some pool of candidates here in this 'it's our turn' year of the woman and out to Get Trump offerings.
    Willie Brown, of course, was California's most powerful politician, which might have had something to do with why Harris was out 'dating' the married man twice her age. And it's interesting because Brown, a former attorney for pimps in his pre-political days, seems to have a taste for the kind of women often seen in a positive light by pimps, such as this one - who represents Brown's taste in women. Not that it mattered that he was married, he's always had a girlfriend in the picture, according to the article. And well, Kamala was one of them.
    Other reports say that once Kamala got the office she wanted from Brown, she dumped him. Brown made a cutesy reference to Kamala saying she was going to ticket him for jaywalking, which sounds like overkill, probably the kind of statement someone with a guilty conscience would make, not wanting anyone to know about how she got her office. What's more, Harris has kept virtually all references to Brown out of her numerous memoirs on the market.
    Some feminist she is. She slept her way to the top and now it's out. It's actually not the first time it's been out, but since it's coming out now so early in the campaign, perhaps it was an inoculation shot, the way that candidate Donald Trump's team must have released the Melania Trump nude modelling shots to the New York Post to make it 'old news' so as to assure it would not become a campaign issue the day before the election.
    All the same, it's disgusting, and while Trump is no angel on the love front, at least he never offered sex for political favors, either to women or from women. He never cheated on someone's spouse to get himself some political power the way she did. So now that Harris is presented as a role model and antidote-to-Trump these days, is she going to encourage all the little girls out there by saying that getting a politically strong boyfriend is the way to make it big in politics now? One wonders.
    Let's hope she has to answer some questions about it from the Trump camp in what's sure to be a pious and hectoring political campaign.
    Image credit: Twitter screen shot from the San Francisco Chronicle.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...o_the_top.html
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Another Democrat talking about Medicare for all and free education

    Is Kamala Harris channeling Hillary Clinton?


    January 28, 2019
    By Silvio Canto, Jr.

    What exactly is different about Kamala Harris? What is she offering us that makes her stand out from the others singing the same tune?

    My guess is that Democrats may run into the same problem that they did with Mrs. Clinton in 2020, as Michael Graham pointed out:
    Despite the fact that she's been repeatedly referred to as "the female Obama," and that she formally announced her candidacy on Martin Luther King day, could it be that the most apt description of Democrat Sen. Kamala Harris in the 2020 POTUS race is... Hillary Rodham Clinton?
    The comparison comes from the fact that the 54-year-old former California Attorney General appears to be running on a Clinton-esque combination of identity politics and moderate Democratic policy.
    "The way Harris is likely to position herself on policy issues during the campaign – liberal as any candidate on noneconomic issues but not as liberal on economic issues as, say, Bernie Sanders – echoes Hillary Clinton's platform in 2016," writes Perry Bacon, Jr. at the FiveThirtyEight website.
    At the same time, Sen. Harris's embrace of identity politics is unabashed and beyond dispute.
    As I've said, 2020 is President Trump's to lose. A candidate like Senator Harris does not add much to Mrs. Clinton's 232 electoral votes.
    My point is that she will get every vote that went to Mrs. Clinton in 2016. However, she needs a bit more if she wants to defeat President Trump.
    Also, how will she perform under the microscope? Has she ever debated anyone outside California? What about foreign policy? What happens when she has to explain "Medicare for All"?
    What about her relationship with Willie Brown? What Democrat will bring that up in the primaries?
    Yes, Senator Harris will have everyone in the national media on her side. So did Secretary Clinton – and we know what happened on election night!

    P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...education.html
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5

  6. #6
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Beezer likes this.
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Big League Politics

    Willie Brown: My Ex-Mistress Kamala Harris Threatened To Indict Me



    bigleaguepolitics.com

    Willie Brown: My Ex-Mistress Kamala Harris Threatened To Indict Me - Big League Politics
    Beezer likes this.
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Kamala Harris wants to eliminate all private health insurance: Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., on Monday called for the elimination of all private health insurance in the U.S. and expressed her full support for the “Medicare for all” bill authored by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. via @foxnews



    foxnews.com

    Kamala Harris wants to eliminate all private health insurance
    Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., on Monday called for the elimination of all…
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    23,368
    Howard Schultz, ex-Starbucks CEO, calls Ocasio-Cortez's ideas 'misinformed,' 'un-American': Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who is seriously considering running a run for president as an Independent, called the billionaire-bashing ideas of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., “misinformed” and “un-American” at the first stop of his book tour Monday night in New York City. via @foxnews



    foxnews.com

    Howard Schultz, ex-Starbucks CEO, calls Ocasio-Cortez's ideas 'misinformed,' 'un-American'
    Beezer likes this.
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2019, 09:21 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-29-2018, 07:42 AM
  3. Democrats Begin "Massive Grass-Roots" Campaign Pushing Medicare-For-All
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-24-2018, 04:37 PM
  4. 75 Yr-Old Joe Biden Leads 2020 Democrat Presidential Poll – 77 Yr-Old Bernie in Seco
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-14-2018, 10:54 PM
  5. WND Feds Prepping for "Continuity" Hub?
    By ProudAmericanFamily in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-19-2007, 06:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •