Thread: National Precinct Alliance pulls out of Tea Party Convention

Appearance of an RNC hijacking

National Precinct Alliance pulls out of Tea Party Convention

By JB Williams
Sunday, January 24, 2010

Press Release

Amid growing controversy surrounding the Tea Party Convention to be held by Tea Party Nation (TPN) in Nashville next month, recognized national leaders of the precinct strategy, National Precinct Alliance (NPA), is announcing that they will not be attending the convention or hosting the precinct strategy workshop.

Several weeks ago, NPA was invited by TPN to host a workshop on their nationwide precinct strategy at the upcoming Tea Party Convention and NPA was originally pleased to teach convention goers how to correctly engage in self-governance at the local precinct level.

However, national NPA director Phil Glass states today—“We are very concerned about the appearance of TPN profiteering and exploitation of the grassroots movement reported over the last several days.â€

This is good. It should be kept out of the hands of corrupt politicians.

I was thinking the same thing, Captainiron and I agree with Glass, the people will figure it out.

Sorry, but the GOP like the Dems is bought and paid for by the global elites, and if folks let themselves get sucked into their ploys, it will continue to be business as usual in DC. And they will continue to be unhappy, or worse. The only way I would even consider working with the GOP is if there were enough Constitutionally minded candidates who will put their foot down and say NO to this absurd bs that's going on, and who are willing to tell the rest of the world to stuff it! Close down the borders, and put this train wreck back on the tracks. The only way is in numbers. If we can get the numbers we can make a difference, but putting a stop to the madness and the power brokers won't be an easy task. Even with the people in the House and Senate. There is still the Judiciary and the Executive to deal with.

Short of repeating what the Founding Fathers did, I can only hope to see some sort of change during my lifetime for the better.

Originally Posted by Hylander_1314

Sorry, but the GOP like the Dems is bought and paid for by the global elites, and if folks let themselves get sucked into their ploys, it will continue to be business as usual in DC. And they will continue to be unhappy, or worse. The only way I would even consider working with the GOP is if there were enough Constitutionally minded candidates who will put their foot down and say NO to this absurd bs that's going on, and who are willing to tell the rest of the world to stuff it! Close down the borders, and put this train wreck back on the tracks. The only way is in numbers. If we can get the numbers we can make a difference, but putting a stop to the madness and the power brokers won't be an easy task. Even with the people in the House and Senate. There is still the Judiciary and the Executive to deal with.

Short of repeating what the Founding Fathers did, I can only hope to see some sort of change during my lifetime for the better.

I think you're going to see the change, Hylander__1314, and my guess is that Republicans and Friends are going to be responsible for that change. Remember that the GOP is a political party of members. I'm a Republican and no global elite owns me. Some of the politicians in our party are bought up by the global elites but global elites don't own Republicans. We don't want their socialized health care, we don't want their free trade treason, we don't want their open borders, we don't want their "more immigration", their manipulating tax schemes or their fascist energy or gun-control. We want our economy protected, our borders and nation defended, our government services provided by Americans and paid for when all people in our country purchase new goods and services and pay a FairTax on the transaction.

We actually have a Plan, we just need to let people know what it is and ask them to help us get the power in 2010 to deliver it in 2011.

Of course no elite owns you personally. They don't have to. They only need to control the key players. And with the legislation that has taken place over the last 21 years, I have become more and more skeptical of the intentions of either side. Between George Bush and Daddy Bush, and their attacks on the Constitution directly, with legislation the directly undermined key elements that wiped out many safeguards like removing the "keystone" in a structure.

The dems never appealed to me, as I saw through their socialistic ideologies from a very early age. But if one looks at history closely, the radical republicans of the unCivil War era were as bad as the dems today.

So I try to stay optimistic, but actions speak louder than words, and the actions of the elcted are counter to what words they speak. I will need to see some drastic measures talen on behalf of the American Citizenry to be convinced otherwise. If I can see efforts to put us back on the path to liberty, and sound banking and business, I may not be so pesimestic on my outlook, but until that happens, I won't be fooled by anyone's rhetoric. Not even my own.

Originally Posted by Hylander_1314

Of course no elite owns you personally. They don't have to. They only need to control the key players. And with the legislation that has taken place over the last 21 years, I have become more and more skeptical of the intentions of either side. Between George Bush and Daddy Bush, and their attacks on the Constitution directly, with legislation the directly undermined key elements that wiped out many safeguards like removing the "keystone" in a structure.

The dems never appealed to me, as I saw through their socialistic ideologies from a very early age. But if one looks at history closely, the radical republicans of the unCivil War era were as bad as the dems today.

So I try to stay optimistic, but actions speak louder than words, and the actions of the elcted are counter to what words they speak. I will need to see some drastic measures talen on behalf of the American Citizenry to be convinced otherwise. If I can see efforts to put us back on the path to liberty, and sound banking and business, I may not be so pesimestic on my outlook, but until that happens, I won't be fooled by anyone's rhetoric. Not even my own.

I agree 100% Hylander. We must be very diligent and vigilant in these upcoming elections, seek actions not words and do a better job than we have at choosing the people who will represent and protect the liberty and well-being of Americans.

Thank you Judy. I appreciate your understanding. This is why I am very concerned over any new ideas to put more burden on us, We the People, until we get all the bad stuff struck from the books, and reduce the power and size of government, and get the states back up to the importance they had pre-WWI, where "States Rights", and the "Rights of the Citizen" are sovereign over any and all, especially national interference. And to a greater extent, international interference.

The only talk of the NAU in any of the 3 branches should be how to undo what has been done. Just as an example of course. And a way to repeal the Fed Res Act, and the unConstitutional 16th Ammendment, and the National Bank Act as these are key to our liberty to have them undone.

But again, these are just examples. But good ones that would do more for prosperity than anything else.

Even President Lincoln saw this mess coming an hundred years before it did:

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money Power of the Country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed."
Abraham Lincoln

Originally Posted by Hylander_1314

Thank you Judy. I appreciate your understanding. This is why I am very concerned over any new ideas to put more burden on us, We the People, until we get all the bad stuff struck from the books, and reduce the power and size of government, and get the states back up to the importance they had pre-WWI, where "States Rights", and the "Rights of the Citizen" are sovereign over any and all, especially national interference. And to a greater extent, international interference.

The only talk of the NAU in any of the 3 branches should be how to undo what has been done. Just as an example of course. And a way to repeal the Fed Res Act, and the unConstitutional 16th Ammendment, and the National Bank Act as these are key to our liberty to have them undone.

But again, these are just examples. But good ones that would do more for prosperity than anything else.

Even President Lincoln saw this mess coming an hundred years before it did:

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money Power of the Country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed."
Abraham Lincoln

That was always the concern of Republicans, Hylander. It's why our party was formed to begin with. The Republican Party wasn't formed just to end slavery, but slavery was the primary and top priority of the times, because how can we have a free Republic with 4,000,000 people held in bondage against their will? It was a cruel absurdity of horrific, monmental and abominable proportions, a correction Republicans believed important enough to fight, risk and die for. But there were other problems they saw and formed our party to stop. One was to stop free trade and protect our trade and economy, another was immigration controls to ensure we have adequate jobs to support our population, another was corporate monopolies which had to be stopped and another was improving the conditions, wages and safety of American Workers.

I think over the years and especially in recent years, we have gained memberships in our party of people who didn't really understand the philosophy and goals of the party they were joining. These were Democrats who switched parties to throw a barb at the Democrats and Independents who liked Ronald Reagan.

But Republicans who are descendants of Republicans who founded the party, fought the civil war, freed the slaves, passed the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the US Constitution, passed 5 US Civil Rights Acts, fought for equal rights for women, passed the first minimum wage laws, 40 hour work weeks, automatic overtime, child labor labors, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, fought against the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Federal Revenue Act of 1913 that established the infernal income-based tax system ... these were people who knew what was right and what was wrong ... these were self-less people who risked everything for the liberty and prosperity of the American People and succeeded with most of their goals. We failed to stop the Federal Reserve and the Federal Income Tax, but look around, we're still fighting to get rid of the Federal Income Tax because we know the damage to liberty and prosperity such taxes impose but until the FairTax was developed, we didn't have a good alternative that was politically viable. Now we do. Now we do.

Conservatives who want to label these long-time multi-generational Republicans "liberals" or "progressives" need to pause, stop, turn around and go back and read the platforms of the Republican Party starting with 1854 and tell us how many of those liberal progressive agendas you actually oppose. There won't be many. But there is a difference between Conservatives and Republicans and that difference is Republicans are fiscal conservatives but only moderately so, we support big initiatives and big ideas and have the been source of most of them like our inter-continental railroads, national parks and interstate highway system to name three big ones relating to our infrastructure and environment, but we aren't social conservatives, we believe in the wisdom and rights of the individual and don't believe society as a whole has any better grasp on the lifestyles of the American People, than individuals themselves.

Of course we support laws that protect each other from someone else's view of liberty that would tread on someone else's liberty and property, but that's about the end of it. In that sense, most of us are social libertarians.

So Republicans based on our history and platforms, goals and achievements, are social liberals and fiscal conservatives who both initiate and support the policies that enrich people with jobs and opportunities by controlling immigration, protecting our trade, funding government with voluntary tax mechanisms instead of mandatory tax schemes that redistribute income from those who earned it to those who didn't, and are always working big ideas to improve our physical and infrastructure systems that benefit everyone, not just a few PayPals and voting blocks.

And the vast majority of the 155 year history of the Republican Party for people who want to spend the time to acquaint themselves with it couldn't be more clear on that. We also get tired and take a rest now and then, the last one we took, we rested too long, so the Silent Majority of the Republican Party is waking up, taking their party back, and is hell bent on saving our country once again, not for political gain, since it's never been about political gain for Republicans. I think that's why so many Americans today don't know the real truth about the Republican Party, because Republicans never took the time to talk about it. But, we must, so people both within and outside our party, "know who we are, where we are and what we're doing", which is the same as always, trying to make our country a rock solid piece of real estate for the citizens of the US to enjoy their liberty and pursue their prosperity because when they do, the result is a sustainable nation with limited government and a low tax base, the essential foundations to the liberty we want to enjoy and the prosperity we hope to achieve for all Americans willing to pursue it.

As reguarding the 13th 14th and 15th Ammendments, you may want to see this: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p ... h&rclk=pti

The 14th Ammendment was one of the worst pieces pf legislation due to radical republicans like Thaddeus Stevens. He was a big backer of this ammendment, which in essense disovles state's rights. And it along with the 13th Ammendment gave for the first time congressional authority where none had existed prior, and with the backing of the Supreme Court, it has flourished. Not saying that the 13th Ammendment was wrong, as it is right. Slavery in a nation who's ideology is individual liberty, is just flat out wrong. There should not have been any need for either the 14th or 15th Ammendments, as with slavery being abolished, those who were held in bondage should have been afforded the same principals of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness as outlined in the Declaration. Without congressional interference.

Concerning the equal rights issue for women, Nicholas Rockefeller gave Aaron Russo an interesting reason behind it, which takes something that should be noble, and corrupts its pretense.

Start listenning for that part at about 42 minutes into it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msfxiodoMQQ

With fighting the Fed Res Act, there was concern and disdain on both sides of the fence on that one. One who was very vocal was Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. But there were many against it, even the likes of Henry Cabot Lodge. But how the Act was passed was very underhandedly done. There were 3 senators holding down the fort for the Christmas Holiday and congress hadn't adjourned "sine die", like they should have done, so the skids were greased as the 3 remaining senators were pro-banking senators, and it passed on a unanimous voice vote.

And all the warnings of the people who spoke out against it, have come to pass, or will in the future. Even Andrew Jackson warned against it after he killed the 2nd Bank of the United States which operated like the Fed Res does.

So all I say is be careful. The best way to find out if a candidate is for us the people or not, is to see if they belong to or are affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, or the Bilderberg / G20 organizations. Just finding that out will tell volumes.

Just knowing that will tell you who's side the person is on.