Thread: NAACP'S FOUNDERS WERE WHITE SOCIALISTS!

Can't understand what the big flap is over Rachael Dolezal. White socialist started the NAACP.

NAACP'S FOUNDERS WERE WHITE SOCIALISTS!

by Dr. Melvin Johnson



The actual founding members of the NAACP include (L-R) Mary White Ovington (founder), Morefield Storey (1st president), Joel Spingarn (2nd president), and John Dewey, co-founder of the ACLU. Each was essentially socialist in philosophy and seized the opportunity to advance the socialist-progressive movement by incorporating the black struggle and anti-racism efforts during the early 1900's.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is scheduled to speak at the NAACP Convention being held at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas, but has already been criticized by liberals and leftists as being "too white" to talk with blacks. Although the much-revered organization has fought valiantly over the past 100+ years against racial discrimination primarily against blacks, many of its so-called supporters and even leaders have failed to "practice what they preach" at nearly every hand. Most recently, an undercurrent and sideshow theme comes along with Mr. Romney's visit. An important thing to note is as always, the message comes first from a small group of whites who then push the agenda and fan the flames... and before you know, the entire general assembly on the floor is mimicking the same. Don't be surprised to then see the news reporters interviewing some of the convention attendees voicing the same.

Several key and influential liberals have formed a group that has put together a video portraying Romney as an "out of touch" white man getting advice on what to say to the convention's participants. The video satire claims that blacks don't like Romney, who they say is so white that he makes "Wonder Bread look like pumpernickel." The Washington Examiner reports that a news release expresses the notion that these liberals plan to use such videos to "say things that Democrats are afraid to say, connect with young voters- many of whom are alienated by today's political climate, and give smart and insightful voices an opportunity to contribute to the debate."

However, the NAACP and the entire history of the organization has been somewhat cloudy and hidden in plain sight! A small number of the organization's masses have no idea that it was not founded by blacks as most people generally believe. in fact, most believe that W.E.B. Dubois (a staunch believer in communism, and admirer of Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin) was the founder. The NAACP was actually and primarilly founded by a group of white socialists and a handful of blacks! As always, Marxists have taken advantage of desperate groups of humanity in order to further its cause. Thus, when it came to the formation of the NAACP, the white opportunists converged with black desperation in order to create a force designed to not only confront the apartheid, Jim Crow culture of tthe era, but to also further the notion of an empowered working class that controlled all aspects of ownership and production!

The four individuals shown played significant roles of leadership, influence and outcome within the organization and the African American community itself.

• Mary Ovington White- joined the Socialist Party in 1905; NAACP founder and executive secretary;
• Morefield Storey- First president of the NAACP; primary battle was against American imperialism;
• Joel Spingarn- Second president of the NAACP; a liberal Republican who became a Progressive;
• John Dewey- influential member of the board; known as the Father of Progressive Education (Note: there is an unholy alliance between the NAACP and the public education system because of the John Dewey legacy ; co-founder of the ACLU with Jane Addams;

Today's video propaganda producers seekiing to manipulate Mr. Romney's visit to the NAACP convention include Cliff Chenfield, co-founder of Razor &Tie; Eric Burns, former president of the George Soros financed group Media Matters for America; Michael Wolfson, former AOL officer and co-founder of theknot.com. This group is rouunded out with Andrew Zipern, former New York Times journalist. Again, they are also white, apparently focused upon the need to make sure that the black people atttending the NAACP convention not forget that Gov. Romney is a rich, white racist!

So this poses a couple of quesions for the leadership of the century-old organization: Is it truly supportive of the advancement of "colored people" or only certain colored people? OR was the NAACP actually formed by the white socialists as a means to infiltrate the African American community (including churches) and use it to incubate and the Marxist ideology.

Based upon the current agendas and positions, the orgiinal founders are successfully making their marks!

http://blogs.christianpost.com/think...ialists-10757/

Was the NAACP Formed By Female Republicans?


Posted on September 26, 2014 | in Stories | by bja
Was the NAACP Formed by Republicans, and More Specifically Female Republicans?

I have seen several claims on Facebook pages that the NAACP was founded by Republicans, and more specifically Republican Women.

NAACP was founded by 9 people, 6 men and 3 women.

Founded Feb. 12. 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest, largest and most widely recognized grassroots-based civil rights organization. Its more than half-million members and supporters throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, campaigning for equal opportunity and conducting voter mobilization.

Founding group

The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln’s birth.

But who were the people who founded the NAACP? Read on!


W. E. B. Du Bois

Socialist, Black Male.
Du Bois was a member of the Socialist party from 1910 to 1912 and always considered himself a Socialist. In 1948 he was cochairman of the Council on African Affairs; in 1949 he attended the New York, Paris, and Moscow peace congresses; in 1950 he served as chairman of the Peace Information Center and ran for the U.S. Senate on the American Labor party ticket in New York. In 1950-1951 Du Bois was tried and acquitted as an agent of a foreign power in one of the most ludicrous actions ever taken by the American government. Du Bois traveled widely throughout Russia and China in 1958-1959 and in 1961 joined the Communist party of the United States. He also took up residence in Ghana, Africa, in 1961. [1]
Denounced republicans and urged blacks to withdraw their support from the Republican party. [2]

Ida B. Wells

Black Woman, Republican
Ida B. Wells’s parents were active in the Republican Party during Reconstruction. Her father, James, was involved with the Freedman’s Aid Society and helped start Shaw University, a school for the newly freed slaves (now Rust College) and served on the first board of trustees. It was there that Ida B. Wells received her early schooling, but she had to drop out at the age of 16, when tragedy struck her family. Both of her parents and one of her siblings died in a yellow fever outbreak, leaving Wells to care for her other siblings. Ever resourceful, she convinced a nearby country school administrator that she was 18, and landed a job as a teacher. [3]

Archibald Grimké

Black Male, Democrat, former Republican.
Grimke had begun to feel that the Republicans were no longer concerned about rights for African-Americans, and in 1886 he left the party. His mentor Codman had become a Democrat by this time. Grimke supported a Democratic candidate who ultimately lost the gubernatorial race. Although he chose to remain an Independent, he worked for Democratic candidates in 1887 and 1888. He received the Democratic party’s nomination for state representative in 1888, but lost by several hundred votes. With Codman’s support, Grimke was nominated to be consul to the Dominican Republic in 1889, but the nomination by an outgoing president died in the Senate. Archie stayed involved in politics over the next few years, speaking out on issues that affected African-Americans and working for the Democratic party. [4]

Henry Moskowitz

White Male, Progressive Party
Oscar S. Straus, Progressive candidate for Governor, selected a campaign manager yesterday. His choice fell on Dr. Henry Moskowitz, scholar and settlement worker, with much practical experience in civic movements but little knowledge of politics. Dr. Moskowitz is President of the Downtown Ethical Culture Society. [5][6]

Mary White Ovington

White Woman, Socialist
Influenced by the ideas of William Morris, Ovington joined the Socialist Party in 1905, where she met people such as Daniel De Leon, Asa Philip Randolph, Floyd Dell, Max Eastman and Jack London, who argued that racial problems were as much a matter of class as of race. She wrote for radical journals and newspapers such as, The Masses, New York Evening Post, and The Call. She also worked with Ray Stannard Baker and influenced the content of his book, Following the Color Line (1908). [7]

Oswald Garrison Villard

White Male, Conservative Democrat
In 1912 Villard supported Woodrow Wilson in his campaign for the Presidency. At that time Villard was chairman of the board of directors of the NAACP, and the task of convincing its Negro members that a candidate of southern birth would concern himself with the protection of Negro rights was a formidable one. [8]
Villard was also a founder of the American Anti-Imperialist League which favoredindependence for the territories captured in the Spanish-American War. To furtherthe cause, he worked to organize “a third ticket” in 1900 to challenge William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley. His was joined in this effort by several keyveterans of the National Democratic Party in 1896.Not surprisingly, Villard made apersonal appeal to Grover Cleveland, a hero of the gold Democrats, to be thecandidate.Cleveland demurred asserting that voters no longer cared what he had tosay. [9]

William English Walling

White Male, Socialist Republican, later left the party [10]
He was a founder of the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, the Women’s Trade Union League, the Social Democratic League, and the NAACP. [11]

Florence Kelley

White Woman, Socialist
Kelley was born into a Pennsylvania Quaker and Unitarian family with a strong commitment to abolitionist and women’s rights activism. After reading through her father’s library and graduating from Cornell, Kelley studied law and government at the University of Zurich, joined the German Social Democratic party [12]

Charles Edward Russell

White Male, Socialist Party
The Uprising of the Many (1907) and Lawless Wealth (1908) summed up some of the reasons why he joined the Socialist party. His writings earned him a national reputation. He campaigned for governor, mayor, and U.S. senator in New York State. In 1916 he declined the Socialist party’s presidential nomination. [13]

References:

[1] http://www.naacp.org/pages/naacp-history-w.e.b.-dubois
[2] http://www.oberlin.edu/external/EOG/...iagaramain.htm
[3] http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stor...ple_wells.html
[4] https://www.usca.edu/aasc/grimke.htm
[5] http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstrac...6F9C946396D6CF
[6] http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...4_0_14295.html
[7] http://www.naacp.org/pages/naacp-his...White-Ovington
[8] http://archive.org/stream/oswaldgarr...0hume_djvu.txt
[9] http://www.reference.com/browse/oswald+garrison+villard
[10] http://www.charlottenaacp.com/Founde...the-NAACP.html
[11] http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/naacp/fo...rly-years.html
[12] http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/kelley.html
[13] http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Ch...d_Russell.aspx

http://www.mythdebunk.com/naacp-form...e-republicans/

Let's not leave anything out. I think the last of the "Blue Dog Democrats" disappeared in the 2010 elections.
Democratic and Republican Ideologies Undergo Dramatic Role Reversal

by RICH RUBINO on JUNE 14, 2013

The Democratic and Republican Parties have undergone a long transition from their founding ideological principles. The Democrats started out as the conservative party but are now the liberal party, and the Republicans were once the liberal party but are now the conservative party.

The Democratic Party we know today evolved from the conservative Democratic-Republican Party of the 1790’s. The first contested Presidential election was in 1796. The Democratic-Republican Party nominated the conservative Thomas Jefferson as their first presidential nominee. Party members were anti-federalists who favored state sovereignty, free markets, a decentralized federal government, and an originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and the attendant Bill of Rights. The Democratic-Republican Party also supported the institution of slavery.

Democratic President Martin Van Buren presided over the panic of 1837, and during that time he was steadfastly opposed to using the government as a means of employing workers on public works projects. In fact, during this economic depression Van Buren literally sold the federal government’s tool supply so that the government could not use the tools for public works projects. This ideological mindset is diametrically opposite of the economic stimulus proposals that contemporary Democrats now support and advocate for, especially during periods of economic morass.

Similarly, the Republican Party has also experienced significant ideological alterations. Founded in 1856, it was the liberal counterweight to the conservative Democratic Party, opposing the expansion of slavery, supporting more money for public education, and advocating a more liberal immigration policy.

The original liberal bent of the Republican Party is especially evidenced by the 1888 Presidential election where Republican Benjamin Harrison was elected President by advocating a liberal platform. He favored expanding the money supply, expanding the protective tariff, and allocating munificent funding for social services. Harrison lost his re-election bid in 1892 to Democrat Grover Cleveland, who advocated a conservative platform, including maintaining the gold standard, reducing the protective tariff, and supporting a lassie faire approach to government intervention in the economy.

Then in 1896 as the country was mired in another depression, there was a move afoot in the Democratic Party to abandon the conservative orthodoxy of Van Buren and Cleveland, and to undertake a radically different ideological approach. To the chagrin of the Democratic high command, the party took a leap of faith when it nominated the 36-year-old firebrand populist William Jennings Bryan. Nicknamed “The Great Commoner,” Bryan advocated a liberal platform. He opposed the gold standard, advocated an interventionist role for the government in the economy, and supported an expansion of the money supply. He was the first liberal to win the Democratic Party Presidential nomination. This represented a radical departure from the conservative roots of the Democratic Party.

In response to the nomination of Bryan by the Democrats, the Republican Party countered by straying away from its liberal beginnings and nominating the moderate-conservative Ohio Governor William McKinley, who, like Harrison, was a proponent of a strong protective tariff, but who, unlike Harrison, favored the Gold Standard. This incensed many old-line progressive Republicans. Some even defected to the Democratic Party to support Bryan. McKinley won handily and was re-elected in a rematch with Bryan in 1900.

The paradigm of the Democrats being the center-right party and the Republicans being the center-left party remained for much of the nineteenth century. However, this all changed when the Democrats nominated William Jennings Bryan, ushering in a transitional era where both parties had a significant liberal and a significant conservative bloodline.

Nomination battles within both parties were usually battles between conservative and progressive wings of each party. In 1912, the Progressive former President Theodore Roosevelt challenged the more conservative incumbent President William Howard Taft for the Republican Party nomination. Though Taft won just one primary, Massachusetts, he garnered the Party’s nomination by winning enough delegates at the Republican National Convention in Chicago. Roosevelt, who won nine Republican primaries, bolted the party and formed the Progressive Party, a.k.a. the Bull Moose Party, and won 86 electoral votes in the General Election. Taft won just eight Electoral Votes. The Democratic nominee, New Jersey Governor Woodrow Wilson, mustered 435 Electoral votes and won the Presidential Election in a landslide victory.

Similarly, in 1924 there was opposition from the progressive wing of the GOP when conservative Calvin Coolidge pocketed the Republican Presidential nomination. Coolidge, who assumed the Presidency on the death of Warren G. Harding in 1923, was challenged for the Republican nomination by U.S. Senator Hiram Johnson (R-CA). Johnson defeated Coolidge in the South Dakota primary, but failed to garner much electoral traction. With the Democrats also nominating a conservative, John W. Davis, disgruntled Progressives in both major parties deserted their nominees and supported the newly formed Progressive Party, which nominated Republican Robert M. La Follette Sr. for President and Democrat Burton Wheeler for Vice President. The ticket won a formidable 16.6% of the popular vote. Twelve liberal Republican U.S. House members supported the La Follette Candidacy and were expelled from the Republican caucus by conservative U.S. House Speaker Nicholas Longworth (R-OH).

Liberals and conservatives had an uneasy cohabitation in both parties. In the South, opposition to Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society emanated from what came to be known as “the conservative coalition,” consisting of conservative (mostly Southern) Democrats and Western Republicans.

In their 1976 bid for their respective party’s nomination, Republican Ronald Reagan and Democrat George C. Wallace fought for the same conservative voters. After Wallace lost the Democratic Primary in Florida and his chances at securing his party’s nomination were dim, the Reagan campaign ran an advertisement urging Wallace supporters to cross over and vote for Reagan in the Republican Primary. A voter appearing in the advertisement intones: “I’ve been a Democrat my whole life, a conservative Democrat. As much as I hate to admit it, Wallace can’t be nominated, Ronald Reagan can.”

Since that time, there has been a gradual ideological homogeneity within both parties. Conservative Democrats and Liberal Republican were either defeated for re-election, retired from office, or became Republicans.

Over the last decade we have witnessed the near end of progressive Republicans. This is evidenced by the defeat of U.S. Representatives Connie Morella of Maryland and Christopher Shays of Connecticut, and by the egressing from the GOP of former U.S. Senators James Jeffords of Vermont and Lincoln Chaffee of Rhode Island, both liberal Republicans.

The final nail in the coffin for conservative Democrats occurred in 2010 when the three most conservative Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives (Bobby Bright (AL), Walt Minnick (ID), and Gene Taylor (MS)) lost their re-election bids. All three representatives voted against President Barack Obama’s Stimulus Plan, the Cap-and-Trade legislation, and the Health Care Reform package.

With the stock of liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats nearly depleted, the Republican Party is now the conservative party and the Democratic Party is now the liberal party. This is an ideological reversal. The U.S. now mirrors many parliamentary systems in that the ideological outliers are de-minimis. Outliers who get elected are also usually the most electorally vulnerable in that they invariably represent states and Congressional districts inhospitable to their party’s ideology. The Republican Party, once the liberal party is now the conservative Party. The Democratic Party, once the conservative party is now the liberal Party. The ideological role reversal is now complete.

http://politi-geek.com/2013/06/democ...role-reversal/

Bill Whittle - Racism - Democrats and Republicans switch sides?




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwqhoVIh65k