Thread: Is A New Guard Rising?

Is A New Guard Rising?

March 8, 2013 by Bob Livingston

SCREENSHOT

Senator Rand Paul filibustered for 13 hours on Wednesday.

The contrast is as stark as can be. On one side, Senator Rand Paul holding up the Senate’s proceedings in order to get an answer to a simple question: “Can the President assassinate Americans on U.S. soil who do not pose an immediate threat?” On the other, Senator Lindsey Graham, after exiting a dinner with the President, calling it “paranoia” to even assume the President would use a drone to kill people in the United States, even though the Attorney General on at least three occasions — in letters and testimony — has not only refused to rule it out, but said “it is possible… to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and proper.”
If the Republican Party is to have a future, Paul (and Senators who joined him on the floor like Ted Cruz of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah and Jeff Flake of Arizona) are it. Old guard guys like Lindsey Graham — a neocon chicken hawk and serial exaggerator — and John McCain need to be swept aside. (For Graham, South Carolinians have a chance to do just that in 2014, and we’ll be helping you push the broom.)
During Paul’s almost 13-hour filibuster, the Twitterverse lit up with thousands of tweets using the hashtag #standwithrand. They mostly praised the fact that finally — FINALLY! — the GOP had a standard bearer (and maybe two or three more) willing to oppose the tyrannical thugocracy of the military-industrial complex, represented by President Barack Obama. Finally, there was a Senator defending the Constitution and the rule of law on behalf of the American people.
Even Senator Marco Rubio — whom I have been especially critical of regarding foreign policy and immigration — took a turn during the filibuster to defend the 5^th Amendment. Republicans John Cornyn, John Barrasso, Jerry Moran, Saxby Chambliss, Pat Toomey, Ron Johnson, Tim Scott and Mitch McConnell also dropped in, as did Democrat Ron Wyden, to support Paul.
Unfortunately, too many Republicans were absent. Apparently, Washington Wizard basketball and free meals with the Marxist In Chief were more important to them than liberty and the rule of law. But their absence was not nearly as despicable as Graham’s and McCain’s comments about the filibuster.
According to The Associated Press, Graham said the prospect of drones being used to kill people in the United States was “ridiculous” and called the debate “paranoia between libertarians and the hard left that is unjustified.”
Not to be outdone, McCain, Graham’s handler, went on the floor of the Senate Thursday and condemned Paul’s Wednesday effort as a “political stunt.”
“If Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously he needs to do more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids,” McCain said, adding: “I don’t think what happened yesterday is helpful to the American people.”
Graham and McCain represent the darker elements of the CINO (conservative in name only) faction of the GOP — those advocating total, perpetual war, who see enemies all around them and advocate for and enable fascism while calling it safety and democracy. Whether the lighter or darker elements win out in the internecine war developing in the Republican Party will determine whether it lives to challenge the Democrats in 2016 or goes the way of the Whigs.

Is A New Guard Rising? : Personal Liberty Digest?

Rand Paul’s Filibuster, Preserved For Posterity

March 7, 2013 by Ben Bullard

Still can’t get enough Rand Paul (R-Ky.)?
An hour-by-hour transcript of all 13 hours of the Senator’s epic filibuster Wednesday is now available at his website’s press release page.
The unaffiliated Daily Paul website also links to the transcript, in an easier-to-access list. Each link includes both the text and video of the filibuster, which Paul himself described Thursday afternoon as evincing a “major victory for American civil liberties.”
Perhaps Paul’s filibuster will start a movement among young libertarians; perhaps some erudite young scholars are already studying every word, culling salient statements of principle for codification into an abridged version. Watching the filibuster unfold in real time lent that sort of historic, “something’s happening here” kind of feel to the proceedings.
Then again, maybe it will all be forgotten amid tomorrow’s tangle of headline-grabbing fights, gaffes and grandstanding on Capitol Hill.
If so, at least The Atlantic has already codified the filibuster’s high points into Cliff’s Notes — you know, for posterity.

Rand Paul?s Filibuster, Preserved For Posterity : Personal Liberty Digest?

The Old Bulls vs The Young Whippersnapper

By Chicago Tribune March 8, 2013 6:55 am

Republican Sen. John McCain is pushing 80 now, but he still has those jaws and the Teddy Roosevelt teeth that look as if they could chomp through a baseball bat.

Yet no matter how vital his bite, the Arizona Republican is getting up in years. So he can't help but add to the litany of stupid things he's said.

We all say stupid things, but what came out of McCain's mouth the other day about fellow Republican Sen. Rand Paul's heroic filibuster on the Senate floor wasn't merely foolish.

It was Homeric in its stupidity.

Paul, a young libertarian whippersnapper from Kentucky, took to the floor for some 13 hours, arguing that the Constitution was sacred, and that President Barack Obama can't use drones to execute Americans without trial.

Paul's courage became a sensation. Tea party folks on the right and even some on the left were thrilled that someone would stand for civil liberties.

But McCain, crotchety establishmentarian that he is, wasn't impressed.

"If Mr. Paul wants to be taken seriously, he needs to do more than pull political stunts that fire up impressionable libertarian kids," McCain said. "I don't think what happened yesterday is helpful to the American people."

Impressionable libertarian kids?

Finally, the old establishment Republican bulls express their true feelings about young Americans who dare think the Constitution is worth keeping.

It sounds like the first shots in a war that the crotchety establishment types are destined to lose. And if they don't lose soon, the Republican Party is finished. It might as well just crawl up onto grandpa's bookshelf, plop down next to the Whigs and begin collecting dust.

"I will speak until I can no longer speak," Paul said at the outset of his filibuster. "I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court."

Radical stuff? Perhaps to modern America, the nation primed by the department called "Homeland Security" that pumps fear into the national heart as a means to increase its power.

It's happened so quickly -- under both Republicans and Democrats -- that we've grown numb to freedom lost. We've accepted cameras watching us on our streets and the airport guards eager to pat our private areas. And now there are flying robots in the skies that watch and kill.

But Paul said no. That must have sent an uneasy tingle up the president's leg. Because he changed course.

For weeks now, Obama's government had insisted he had the right to use drones and kill Americans without trial. Obama's drone-protecting grand vizier, Attorney General Eric Holder, made a fool of himself defending the idea.

Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, fixed Holder like a bug on a board. He asked Holder in committee if the Constitution allowed for killing Americans suspected of terrorism, even if they were merely sitting quietly in a cafe.

Holder kept weaseling, saying it wouldn't be appropriate. But Cruz didn't care whether it was appropriate. Cruz demanded to know if it was constitutional. Holder broke.

"Translate my 'appropriate' to 'no,'" Holder sighed. "I thought I was saying 'no.' All right? 'No.'"

On Thursday, the president had Holder write Paul a letter of surrender.

"Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?" wrote Holder to Paul. "The answer to that question is no."
The answer is "no"? Why did it take weeks for the White House to figure that one out?
In the spirit of bipartisanship, Obama's divine right of drones had support from Republicans like McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham.

A few months ago, they wanted to drop airborne troops into Libya. Now they just support robot death from the sky.

"I don't worry about (drones killing Americans)," Graham said. "Here's what I worry about: that al-Qaida has killed 2,958 of us and is going to add to the total if we let our guard down. And I will do everything in my power to protect this president -- who I disagree with a lot -- and future presidents in having an ill-informed Congress take over the legitimate authority under the Constitution and the laws of this land to be commander in chief on behalf of all of us."

Smooth answer. Nothing like campaigning against a know-nothing Congress on behalf of an imperial presidency.

But using fear talk in order to give the power of life and death to the federal security forces -- and their natural antipathy to individual freedom -- isn't remotely conservative.

It's statist.

Perhaps McCain and Graham hadn't yet digested the sumptuous peace dinner feast Democrat Obama put on for them and 10 other Republican senators at Plume, a fancy gourmet restaurant in Washington.

I checked the menu. Plume offers $85 meals, including Lobster "Thermidor" with a white wine saffron galcage and herbed baby potatoes; Moulard Duck Breast; and filet of beef with truffled potato mousseline, bone marrow and Madeira Jus.

And Rand Paul? As they feasted, he stood on his feet in the Senate, hour after hour, defending the Constitution and the rights of Americans not to be executed without trial.

He didn't have duck breast or bone marrow or whatever McCain chomped on with those choppers.
But he did get to wolf down a candy bar.
___
(c)2013 the Chicago Tribune

Visit the Chicago Tribune at Chicago Tribune: Chicago breaking news, sports, business, entertainment, weather and traffic - chicagotribune.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

A service of YellowBrix, Inc.

» The Old Bulls vs The Young Whippersnapper » Fresh Ink -- GOPUSA