http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06...children-died/






Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died

veteranstoday.com
Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died By Jim Fetzer (with Sofia Smallstorm and Paul Preston) "I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the


Friday, June 13th, 2014 | Posted by Jim Fetzer
Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died

Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died

By Jim Fetzer (with Paul Preston as interviewed by Sofia Smallstorm)

“I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag”--Paul Preston

Paul Preston

Sofia Smallstorm, who produced and directed the documentary, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which many regard as the best video study of the Sandy Hook event, recently interviewed a Los Angeles school expert, Paul Preston, about Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired.
Governor Malloy had held a press conference that day, explaining that he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen, which raised the question, what “something like this” did he mean? Had he been told a school shooting massacre would take place? or a drill that would be presented as a real event, which appears to be what took place?
Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source. Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S. Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration, who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that:
(1) it had been a drill;
(2) no children had been killed; and,
(3) it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda.
Given his background of 41 years in the California public school system (from custodian to district superintendent) and having served as a teacher, coach, vice-principal and principal before retiring in 2012 as the superintendent of two charter schools, I thought what he had to say about Sandy Hook deserved widespread dissemination.
So when did a two-hour show on Revolution Radio, “False Flags (9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing)” on 30 May 2014, as the third segment, I included the second 30-minutes of Sofia’s interview with Paul Preston, which is archived on “The Real Deal” and can be heard here:
Because Preston is also highly trained in school safety issues and had himself organized drills of many kinds, including active-shooter drills, what he has to say is especially telling. He has a website of his own at www.Agenda21Radio.com, which he created to alert listeners to the peirls Agenda 21.
Transcript of 30-minute clip of Sofia Smallstorm interviewing Paul Preston


Transcription by Jeannon

S = Sofia Smallstrom
P = Paul Preston
S – Welcome back everyone to the Speed of Light on the Pure Momemtum Network. This is Sofia Smallstorm and we’re listening to a very interesting discussion – Paul Preston, school principal, school safety consultant, teacher, coach, and superintendent. He has been in the California system for 41 years. He is now retired.
So Paul, let’s continue. Can we get a little bit into Sandy Hook now and what set off your antenna about it?
P – Well, you know I’ve been involved in many many situations at schools that have been, you know, emergency type situations and was involved even to some degree with the Columbine situation in that we had an individual who as trying to blow up the school, our school, at the time. In a similar fashion to what was a predicted bomb threat that occurred at Columbine thee days before the Columbine shooting, and that’s how we kind of got in touch with the Columbine people. They got in touch with us because it turned out to be a similar neo-Nazi group that was related to the Trench Coat Mafia, of all people.
And so learning and watching ad seeing all these incidences play out, all these school shootings, I took an enormous interest in because we were doing a study trying to determine because the neo-Nazis we had been working with in our school along the same time of the Columbine incident were telling us that there was going to be some big event take place. And so our staff, myself, we all wanted to sit down and figure where this was all going to and we studied a lot of the Nazi websites and so on, and we figured out that yes, something big was going to happen.
Well then Caolumbine happened. So we watched with a lot of intensity and under with my own circumstances and also with watching the videos and replays of the other active shooter situations, I became sort of a specialist in that and applied it to my own active-shooter training that I was doing and conducting with my own people.
S – Right. And now can we get in to Sandy Hook?
P – Well yes. Of all the hundreds of hours that I spent watching these scenarios and investigating and reporting on them on my radio show, the first thing I noticed when I heard about Sandy Hook when I turned on the TV like everybody else …now I have always told everybody when you’re seeing these things play out in real time, the best news reporting is what’s happening in real time – that day of, you know, the moments that are around the incident. But document for yourself what’s going on because you’ll never see it again.
And the first thing that caught my eye as I was watching everything play out was the lack of intensity with which people were moving and that really disturbed me. It hit me within the first few minutes, watching the video, the helicopters flying around and so on. Things just didn’t seem to be right, like I would always understand in an incident command system. People weren’t rushing around. People weren’t panicking. They ran that one guy off into the woods and then they arrested him. They took him away and there was no connectedness to that.
I was also wondering why all the emergency equipment wasn’t around the school. And I didn’t see any students either and that really bothered me.
S – So, it was almost like too slow motion for a real event. Not enough panic. Not enough chaos. You had mentioned chaos earlier being a part of these real situations. And a lot of support people rushing around like press and police but not running fast enough, not running with intensity and alarm and panic and concern, I think.
P – None of that was there.
S – Yes. So all right, and then what did you start thinking?
P – Well, just within the first 10 or 15 minutes, it just all looked too staged to me, and I know about staging these things since I’ve staged a number of them. And, like I said, then you stage something there’s a complete lack of intensity as you would have in a real scenario when there’s panic really taking hold of people and they’re really afraid and they’re screaming and yelling and so on.
But the one thing that really bothered me was where were the kids. You know they had how many hundreds of kids there at the school. I didn’t see them.
S – Right
P – And there was lack of accounting for them.
And right away – and I’ll juxtaposition this with the situation that happened in Pennsylvania. You saw the kids right away. I know it’s a high school, but you know, you saw the kids right away and you saw their plan of evacuation of the school unfolding.
Now this is where it really falls apart with Sandy Hook for me. I saw…I saw no evidence of a real plan of student evacuation taking place. And that stuck to my head like crazy when I was in the moments watching this whole thing play out in real time.
S – That’s very interesting. No evidence of a real plan. Because only someone…I mean everybody had their own response to it. Some of us were already clued in from previous kinds of situations. All this has got to be not what they’re telling us it is. But you come from the industry, the business, and you felt that there is… I would say you knew … It probably was not even a feeling. It was like, you know, set in stone in your head. Where’s the plan? I don’t see the plan playing itself out. Right?
P – I saw same of your evacuation centers and I saw some of your colored tarps on the ground, the colored taps and so on, but even that pretty odd because normally if you have the tarps out there…in every active shooter situation you have ever see, there’s somebody on the tarp or there’s been some help that’s been given to somebody when somebody has been wounded, but none of that was even evident. And I don’t see anybody trying to rush to anybody’s help at all in a mass casualty situation.
See, when you don’t see that…I mean…I’ll go back to the example that I have before about the 13 who overdosed. We had people everywhere, and we had people everywhere until everybody was safe, which was 35, 40 minutes, almost an hour. And that was never happening there at Sandy Hook. You didn’t see the mass of people doing that.
S – Yes, it’s more like the press filled in for that missing element. The press sounded more concerned and panicked on TV as they reported but the actual participants were not so …And se got, you know, long after the fact we got the supposed 911 calls, we got various people giving their versions of it on television as they got interviewed. But we didn’t see it on the ground. And so how long did you watch it for? Over a period of days, weeks? And what were your thoughts?
P – You know, I make it a study. I study these things intensely, and what really, what really put me over the top was the next morning with Robbie Parker going out there, and I saw that clip as it happened. And I said there’s something really wrong here.
And that’s when I started thinking about the …the actors. You can actually rent these actors out. In fact that put these things up for training all the time.
And I just said ‘this is not…first of all, his demeanor was terrible. I would never go out…and I know sometimes this happens but…to send a parent out to talk to the press in that fashion about the daughter that he just lost. None of that seemed to be appropriate. None of it seemed to fit. And his behavior with the smiling laughing thing and getting into character that you could see. I said ‘ hmmm, I’m not buying this. I’m just not buying it.’
S – Yes, I know. Very few other people did. So, did you contact anyone? Did you speak to anyone? I don’t mean officially but in your own network of friends.
P – Yes.
S – And what were their thoughts.
P – Almost everybody was unanimous that it was a false flag.
S – And when did you start looking it up on the Internet because I think people started posting immediately. You know, they were making YouTubes. The community began to express online. So when did you start looking into all of that?
P – We–a side note to this is that I have a lot of sources in and around and in that area. I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag.
S – Now these are quasi-official… what kind of sources are these?
P – Let me say that there are the sources that are very close to this administration who knows what’s going on.
S – Really. So they are really like almost insiders then?
P – Oh yes.
S – And they all….they say it was a false flag because they figured it out like you did, or they had actually factual knowledge of such..
P – They had factual knowledge of such. That’s part of the plan.
S – I see. And so how much were they willing to tell you, and what else were they willing to tell you? Anything?
P – Oh, they told me quite a bit, and some of it I can’t reveal to you, but it fits the narrative of the anti-gun movement and the disarmament of America and that’s what the focus was.
S – And you realized that that’s part of the broader picture? That’s the Agenda 21 society?
P – Absolutely.
S – So do you want to tell us a little but about that or do you want to stick with the Sandy Hook material? I’ll let you decide.
P – Well, let’s go ahead with the Sandy Hook material and then we can jump into that.
S – OK, so we’re past Robbie Parker now, and what about the funerals? You must have known then that …Did you have any concept about victims or no victims, et cetera?
P – Well, that whole thing was pretty shaky. What was really starting to filter in in the system and was just confirming what I was already being told about these charity sites that had been developed. By the way, they were put up the day before the shooting. And I had gotten some screen shots, and I had confirmed with my sources. Some of them were thinking that it was a very sloppy operation actually.
But there were reassurances to me that there really were no victims and that everything’s being staged.
And of course the funerals to me…you go and look at the whole funeral process. It looked like they were all staged, from the Robbie Parker one in Utah, or the Sarah Parker one with the Parker family.
And then I started getting information from people that actually had attended that funeral who lived in Utah and said that was something very funny about it.
S – Now I would like to ask you whether your sense is that these are real families even, or are they patched together?
P – Well, you know, that’s a good question because, you know, the thing that rolls around in my head, you know, the actors type of thing, you know. You know because you can put families together and these acting programs will do that under certain training scenarios. And so, it’s a good question. It really is a fair question to ask whether or not they were real families.
S – And then of course because they continue to speak and organize and be called upon to comment, they have to be formed into these family groupings over time. And remain grouped like that whether they are truly married or not.
You know, here’s one thing that I noticed. When you see a couple, if they seem really like an odd couple, then that kind of strikes you as weird. And I saw that. I saw a very odd coupled-ness with lots of these Sandy Hook families. It seemed to me, why would this person marry this person and live with them? They’re so totally different. That happens sometimes but in this content it really jumped out at me…myself anyway. I didn’t know if you noticed that…
P – It’ different to say, you know, when you saw them together whether they are natural families or not. That’s…I’m suspicious of that. And like I say, I’m suspicious because I know that you can put these families together, you know, with some of these acting companies out there. And that just kind of blends in with what I was already being suspicious about.
And so, there’s a lot of things that would go into the details of examining this. And I’ve see a lot of the pictures and so on, and some of the pictures don’t match up, especially the one of the Parkers in the White House. And it looks like to me that’s Sarah Parker sitting there that’s, you know, supposed to be a victim.
S – There’s no Sarah Parker…
P – Which one is it…maybe it’s not the Parker…
S – Oh, you mean with Obama…
P – Yes, right.
S – Emily or Madeline …those are the two order sisters, and a lot of people felt that that was Emily Parker leaning on Obama.
P – Yes, that was Emily Parker…
S – Have you seen the Super Bowl video?
P – Yes, I have seen that.
S – Well, there is a girl who looks a lot like an older Emily Parker in that video. So if that was Emily at the White House, or actually I think…I don’t know if it was at the White House…but with Obama, she couldn’t be six in one picture and then just a month or two later, twelve or thirteen.
P - Right.
S – That’s where we have to make a decision.
But what did you think of all the photographs of the children? Did you notice anything – the portraits that we were shown that these were the victims? Did you notice anything about those portraits?
P – No, other than some of the malformations of different parts of their bodies – seemed to be a pretty obvious thing.
The whole thing …when you take a look at the totality of this, in my opinion, it’s very sloppily done.
S – Why would it have been sloppily done though?
P – Well, you know, when …and again, it’s kind of like sometimes there’s order that comes out of chaos. And when you have these chaotic situations, people want to put things back together as best they possibly can to feel more comfortable or to recover from it. And I didn’t see any of that. I don’t know if that makes any sense to anybody. People don’t want to have that chaos. They want to heal. They want to come back together. They want to solve a problem so that they can move forward.
And that’s part of what happens when you do these drills is that you take a day or so and you talk about what happened so that you can improve upon and make it better. People do that naturally even when there’s chaos and there’s an emergency situation because they want to seek normalcy again.
I didn’t see the same kind of emotions, if you will, or the same kind of communications between parents, kids, that you would normally see in these situations. It just didn’t look…it looked phony to me.
S – So you mean the community itself, they did not try to repair in the organic way…?
P – I would say that is true, from the parents to the kids, to the entire community.
S – What do you think of this privacy issue that has been bandied about by the authorities, that all the privacy needs to be respected, and you can’t reveal this or that…?
P – That to me just adds more fuel to the fire because that’s not what you do in the normal situation of an incident command system. You get the facts out because you know oftentimes when you get the facts out, you’re also looking for criminal behavior, and the more information that you can get out that that’s way, the better.
And I’m certainly not buying the notion that the parents weren’t allowed to see the kids.
S – The bodies, identifying the…
P – I just…that to me…that should be a red flag to anybody who has looked in to Sandy Hook. The parents weren’t allowed to do that. What’s up with that.
S – And what did you think of the coroner’s behavior at his press conference?
P – Well there’s many things about him. I just …I …first of all, I didn’t understand why all of a sudden there’s 26 bodies and then there’s no coroner or doctor who’s looked at the bodies and they’re declared dead. And then all of a sudden the coroner comes out and everybody says that there was an automatic gun or a handgun that was used, and the coroner, on his own, comes out and says ‘oh no, that was an AR15 that was used.’
So there’s a lot of confusion, you know, about that coroner, his report, his reporting out. Nothing seems very clear and concise to me. And you know I would argue that, you know, as I looked at him and watched what was going on, he seemed to be just answering question on the fly without a lot of knowledge behind the questions.
S – And this suggested to you that this was a sloppily created event?
P – Absolutely.
S – And would you say that that was because of the portent of the whole thing that they…there were people involved in this…let’s say Dr. Carver, the coroner, who had some idea, if it was a scripted event, it was going to go big, and really big? So do you think that the sloppiness of it was because in being organized, it’s very difficult to juggle how people are going to perform given that they know how big this thing could get?
P – Well, you know, what happens is that you…if you’re going to do these things and carry it through with the lie, everybody’s got to be telling the same lie at the same time all the time.
And I think with my judgments about the parents and the kids, and seeing them lie, I was seeing a big lie being perpetrated right in front of me because nothing seemed to be consistent. And like you said, which I thought was interesting, is that oftentimes the media would fill in a lot of the blanks for you.
A classic example of the blanks comes up when you talk about where are the kids that are evacuating the school. There were helicopters that were circling overhead. They certainly would have been able to show, you know, hundreds of kids exiting the school.

That was never shown. But you did see a picture out in a parking lot, which by the way if you take a long look at this picture of all these kids being led out, about 15 or 20 kids being led out by teachers and adults from this parking lot, if you take a look at the parking lot from the aerial views, you can see that there are different cars in the parking lot in that area. So obviously that was done during some sort of drill. That’s my opinion. And it didn’t match with what was going on at the time. So nothing is matching in real time for me. That’s just another thing.
But where are the kids? Where were the kids? They weren’t present. They just weren’t there. So that’s the kind of stuff that wasn’t worked out and, you know, they were doing things on the fly. That’s why I say…I would say it was very amateur, very amateurish as to what was going on.
S – Which is surprising because in the powers that would have designed this thing – that it would be so amateur – but…
You are familiar with the character, Gene Rosen?
P – Gene Rosen – which one was …?
S – Gene Rosen was the man who was very close to the school and he took the kids in and offered them juice and cookies, and he gave many different…he recounted his rescuing or fielding these kids differently in many interviews. So can you comment on that?
P – I can comment on this because this points to this proves my point that these kids …did they get off a bus? Where did they go? OK, I think that one of the stories was that the kids got off the bus and they made their way to his house, and there was all this panic or whatever was going on. OK, there’s something really wrong with that picture to begin with.
First of all, when you’re doing these scenarios and this school had to have been trained for this because FEMA requires these trainings, and if you’re getting safety monies from the federal government, which every school does, they have to follow the proper protocols and that’s the proper release of the students to their parents.
S – Right. He said, that children showed up on his lawn and they were with a bus driver, in one story. In another story, they were just there by themselves and they were repeating babbling that there teacher was dead. So what…would the protocol be that the children…the children, according to the story, left the school on their own.
P – Well, that to me, that’s very suspicious in and of itself.
S – Right, I mean the cops had not gotten there in the first five minutes. Apparently some of them could still hear shooting going on, and how did the kids get out and just run down the road, you know?
P – All that seems to be …and again, I want to go into the thing about the incident command system, evacuation, walk-outs and so on. None of that fits that protocol. None of it.
The story of Gene Rosen or any of that stuff — None of that fits. That to me is just more evidence that there were no students other than the actor students that were there.
S – Then what was the purpose of having the Gene Rosen player?
P – Diversion.
S – From what?
P – A diversion from the other realities going on and to add more hype about the story. It’s the same thing about the guy that was chased through the woods. You know, they had a couple of guys that were chased through the woods. What were they all about?
And there were no answers about any of that, about where they came from and even my people couldn’t come up with an answer about that. Some of my people say it was very sloppily done.
S – These are your insider people, right?
P – Right.
S – Now did you see any of the videos of the people circling through the firehouse?
P – Yes.
S – And did that strike you …what did you think of that?
P – Well, I had already come to my conclusion that this was a drill, and again, being very suspicious of the Obama administration, Diane Feinstein, Second Amendment issues, using Agenda 21 in particular, I had not see that for quite some time afterwards, maybe a couple of weeks after.
We were engaged in our own things that we were doing in terms of investigations and stuff like that. We’re pretty intense about what we’re doing here on Agenda 21 Radio, and we have some very highly placed sources of information that comes to us and which we’re very grateful for.
I, for one reason or another, hadn’t seen that video maybe two or three weeks until after the incident.
There’s more evidence right there because what in the world were all those people doing there to begin with? You see, if you’re doing an incident command situation, there’s a place for those people and those people can be moved on rather than seeing that circus that was going on, which is what that was. That was all staged.
S – Right. And these were far too many adults, no children whatsoever, no panic. And to me the people that were there-–they weren’t dressed for December. So some people have suggested that that particular drill, the circling in and out of the firehouse, took place a lot earlier, and it matches the time frame and the clothing of the children evacuated from the school. They did not have their coats.
And I was going to ask you, is it normal when there’s an emergency for the teacher to evacuate the children without letting them get their coats, or would they take the extra time and say ‘children go put your goats on as fast as you can.’ How does that work?
P – Well no. If there’s a signal to get them out of the building, and there’s always a signal of some sort to get them out of the building safely, they go directly out. Period. End of subject
And if they can get their coat, that’s great, but the safety thing is to get them away from where there potentially is a threat and that would be the key thing. And again, you pointed to something else and I brought this up earlier about the drill that we used to run and people would always, you know, screw up the drill because they would knock on the door in an active shooter situation and the teacher would open the door.
Well, you know, how does that all play out? I was looking at things pretty much in real time within minutes of news being broadcast as it was happening from a helicopter. Now I am a real-time kind of guy. So I’m looking at maybe 15 minutes into the shooter, maybe 20 minutes into the shooter situation. I’m looking at clear video of the campus and so on. I’m not seeing anything happening.
Where are the kids? The kids aren’t there.
S – Right.
P – And they should be released or what’s going on with them?
S – And there were some people said that they were in closets for up to four hours. That doesn’t make any sense either.
P – That does not many any sense to me because what happens, and again it goes back to the police, and back to Columbine, they will go in and check every nook and cranny. And quite frankly, I know how that’s done. We used to do that. We always used to look and check to see where people were.
S – Right. And you would not miss large adults hiding in small closets.
And the idea of Katelyn Boyd and some of these teachers bundling up all their kids into the bathroom and having a few sit on the toilet…I even heard the toilet roll holder, my god, that’s pretty tough to do even for a six year old. But what do you think of that? That doesn’t make sense to me.
Sofia Smallstorm, “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 dimensions”
P – Well, you know, we tell people in an active shooter situation to seek…to hide or …if there is a shooter there to take the challenge. We used to do these things where we had these dummy books and we’d bring in an active shooter as the stage person and throw books at them, you know, because that really throws them off. You’re taught those kinds of little techniques to throw the active shooter off.
But I can imagine some people getting holed up in a closet or something like that if they haven’t been able to lock the door. And that’s one of the things we tell our people all of the time. Lock the door. And we made sure in all schools, and all schools should have the, the doors should have the inside key on them, you know, so you can use an inside key on them also as we could on the outside.
S – So we have a couple of minutes left at this first hour. Do you have anything to say about Adam Lanza – fiction, non-fiction, real?
P – Well, just on the surface of it, and again I would throw out I’m highly specialized trained in drugs and alcohol recognition, obviously looks like he has some meds onboard just by the look. But you know if you couch that along the same lines that that this may be a fictional event, that he’s a fictional character, which fits his description of what I see there.
And of course if you’re doing a fictionalized event like this, you want to have the most crazed individual that you can have looking at you through the picture there, and that’s exactly what you have. That’s my speculation. I think that’s what they wanted. That’s what they did.
And he has a history and what is the history? We’re not real clear on the history. You know, first of all, they found out that he’s got his brother’s driver’s license. Then there’s some confusion. And you know it one of these kind of scenarios that just didn’t quite fit.
And as a school person that to me was one of the big pieces of evidence. Why does he have his brother’s license? And then they made contact his brother that I guess was in Jersey some place, wherever he was, and there was an investigation. That all seemed to be tracking with me as a distraction about what was really happening at the school.
See, the more they under this situation… this is just my speculation – the more they could distract from the actual Sandy Hook school site itself and stage things away from there, the more they could sell the story of Sandy Hook on the whole.
S – That’s a very very good point, Paul. Excellent. And we should add that the mug shot that they gave us of Adam Lanza was very painterly. It wasn’t even a photo, and it did have that, you know, ghoulish expression on it to make us think this is a real lunatic.
But we are now at the end of our first hour and I really really thank you, Paul Preston, for being with us. And we will take up a second hour discussion in the Members Section. So this is Sofia Smallstorm thanking everyone for listening to this first hour and please do come to PureMomemtum.net and join us for the second hour in the Members Section with Paul Preston, 41 years in the public schools and someone who has been through a lot of staging of drills and has a lot of drill understanding and experience.

Related Posts:


Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=306087
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by Jim Fetzer on Jun 13 2014, With 95323 Reads, Filed under Of Interest, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.




COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback


63 Comments for “Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died”


  • ptwang June 15, 2014 - 8:05 pm

    Seems a lot of commenters are shills but for those who aren’t – here’s a tip, don’t go to the debunk sites or videos first, there’s always a large number of issues with the story they don’t even bring up but you wouldn’t recognise that without first becoming familiar with the claims of it being a staged event.
    Log in to Reply

  • jglassel. June 15, 2014 - 3:51 pm

    At about .35 of the camouflaged pants man video above, you can see the door to a shed wide open as the camouflaged men run past.
    At about 50 of Raw New Footage, the cops, SWAT or whoever are breaking into the shed “clearing” it and leaving the door open.
    It just seems weird that the camouflaged men would be running past an area already “secured.”
    Curious. There appears to be no shortage of ways into the woods. An actor late for work?
    Log in to Reply

  • LC June 15, 2014 - 10:56 am

    Thank you Prof. Fetzer;-
    GREAT NEWS
    & best Fathers Day present for every father that NO children died in Sandy Hoax or other similar drills. -lc
    GREAT NEWS!!!
    Log in to Reply

  • Mile Hi Life June 15, 2014 - 9:58 am

    Shills will NEVER understand that the more they spread their filth, the MORE credence they give to the accused False Flag. How do you State-sponsored shill even live with yourselves? Must take a long-assed shower every night to wash off all that scum. That said, keep on keepin’ on because whenever the next “event” happens, I’ll know which way to look due to the “dislikes” given BEFORE the story EVEN has legs.
    Maybe this really IS the most transparent Administration ever, because WE can see right through them!!
    Anyone doubting the U.S. government sponsors and trains these trolls don’t have to take MY word — you can hear it straight from the horses mouth… https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIza0WODBhQ
    Log in to Reply

  • Mogga June 15, 2014 - 8:25 am

    “Something like this might happen, which raised the question, what “something like this” did he mean?”
    Something like a heavily armed lunatic going into a school and murdering people. It’s not as if it’s unprecedented in the USA. Interpreting this to mean some kind of staged event is pure speculation, or, as “truthers” call it…..proof.
    Log in to Reply


    • Jim Fetzer June 15, 2014 - 8:44 am

      Did you bother to listen to my discussion of “False Flags” which is embedded in the article? If he had been told that “something like that” meant the slaughter of children in a Connecticut public school, sure, as the governor of the state, he would have taken steps to insure it did not happen. But he didn’t do that. The only option is that he was told that a drill would take place that would be presented as a live event, which is precisely what happened. I am sorry, but you really have not thought this through.
      Log in to Reply


      • dirtus napus June 15, 2014 - 9:26 am

        Have you made the connection to New Town (Port Arthur shooting) to Newtown, Conn?
        Same scenario- mental defective, same rifle, (Car-15 found in the house fire and had been previously destroyed in such a way it could never be fired again). Again we have an invalid moving like a top Oper, hitting everything from the hip rapidly and never missing. The shooter in Tasmania was seen multiple times getting headshots at 30 yards without aiming and hardly raising the rifle to his chest. The police communication was heard by witnesses “better get your boy outta there, we’re torching the house”.
        Both seminal, 1 worked, 1 hasn’t yet. And now all the Kenyan can talk about is the model of OZ gun control- by fiat this time…
        In their
        read more ...
        Log in to Reply



  • Ed Chiarini June 15, 2014 - 6:55 am

    http //wellaware1.com/artwork/large/drama.jpg
    Parker is Tony Hawks son.
    You can see Carver in the latest Los Vegas Shooting hoax http //wellaware1.com/artwork/small/ice-man-again.jpg
    And see the rest of the actors that NOW Jim says are present, but bashed me when I told it to him during my interview. http //wellaware1.com/fairfield.shtml
    Log in to Reply

  • Allesandro June 15, 2014 - 6:42 am

    So, lets look back briefly, about a year ago there was an announcement of a change in how PROPAGANDA is used against American citizens. Before the change it was suppose to be a line in the sand, NO propaganda was to be used on U.S. citizens. Then the change saying it is now O.K. for the Government to lie to it’s citizens. Then we have all these suspicious incidents, killings, some fictional some not. The Government lies to us ,just as they said they would (otherwise why the change). In fact they set-up the incidents to push for gun grabbing because they know a whole lot of illegal, murderous, treasonous activity is leaking out every day, and as it does they fear retribution from an armed citizenry.
    So these acts and the lies that follow
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • bahmi June 15, 2014 - 4:18 am

    Fervent disbelievers come in two categories. Paid shills and unpaid shallow thinkers. The latter are not necessarily unpatriotic, they are heavily influenced by TV and other questionably produced sources of “information”, while the former are on somebody’s payroll to utter disinfo.
    Disbelievers are certainly not all trolls, they may just have information underloads. I notice that names are often omitted, and protection of one’s sources can also be a primer to lying. I don’t think it’s germane to speak with disdain regarding those who lack critical thinking skills. After all, why tax yourself by doing legitimate research when you can be shouting out your feelings and emotions instead? After all, the heart never lies, right?
    Log in to Reply

  • ptwang June 15, 2014 - 3:39 am

    Those saying Sandy Hook was real – why are you here? If I believed it was real, I wouldn’t spend so much time trying to convince others, that’s just weird – I’d have to be in on the charade or be paid to do that.
    Log in to Reply


    • Rory Morrissey June 15, 2014 - 9:44 am

      It probably would be better not to waste our time on trolls. But it’s hard not to respond when someone lashes out so ridiculously at something as painful as the Sandy Hook tragedy.
      On the other hand, it has been over a year now, why are you hoaxers still going on about something you don’t even believe happened? You don’t have to live with the pain, you can just move on to the next most relevant thing. It’s weird…I mean if I were you…I’d have to be in on the charade or be paid to do that.
      Log in to Reply


      • ptwang June 15, 2014 - 7:40 pm

        Sandy Hook is just part of a bigger picture, it has to be stopped and we want to see justice. Bottom line, we care – most other people are just too selfish to bother.
        Log in to Reply



  • jmreeves June 14, 2014 - 6:59 pm

    It is ‘late at night’ (actually I just got up (in more ways maybe)
    So They Admitted it was all street theatre?
    Please pardon me, I’ll get back after a few pounds of coffee (just kidding)
    But Holy Shit..
    John
    Log in to Reply

  • ptwang June 14, 2014 - 5:58 pm

    Yes Sandy Hook was staged and nobody died but it’s harder to prove than other events – shouldn’t you expose the easier ones first and work your way up? eg. the use of dummies as victim and shooter at LAX and the multiple cases of injuries appearing on people long after the bombing in Boston. (Brassard family etc)
    Log in to Reply


    • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 6:41 pm

      Just go back and read my last half-dozen articles about Sandy Hook. It’s already blown apart. LAX was too simple to bother with. I am worried about your methodology. Can’t you accept that Sandy Hook has been exposed as a hoax–about as permanently and definitively as these things go?
      Log in to Reply


      • ptwang June 14, 2014 - 10:31 pm

        I can but not many have the patience to look at everything required to make the same determination. The problem is that most issues with the story have other ‘possible’ alternative explanations when looked at in isolation. Compare that with something more cut and dry like a 5 second video showing irrefutable faked injury, it just may be easier to snap people out of their trance.
        I guess I’m just saying that as long as we can convince the brainwashed masses of ANY of these events being staged, the flood gates should open to expose the rest and there may be easier routes than Sandy Hook – most people don’t seem to want to spend even a few minutes looking at this stuff.
        Log in to Reply

      • Ed Chiarini June 15, 2014 - 1:56 am

        Funny Jim how you demonize me when I told you this back during our interview, but now you are on board with it. hummm what gives?
        Log in to Reply


    • Mogga June 15, 2014 - 8:29 am

      They’re “here” because they are offended by subhumans trampling on the memories of murdered children in order to further their own agenda.
      Log in to Reply


      • Jim Fetzer June 15, 2014 - 8:46 am

        I can’t believe you are such a gullible sap. They are here because exposing this charade is threatening to the local, state and federal government. As I explain in the program you apparently have not heard, Eric Holder, Attorney General, visited with the Governor and his Lt. less than a month before Sandy Hook. He appears to be the person who “spoke to” Gov. Malloy. Something is wrong when, after all the proof that has been adduced, you cling to a fantasy, which has been so thoroughly exposed.
        Log in to Reply



  • patmac June 14, 2014 - 4:58 pm

    Several more shooters were reported by a number of Columbine Students. What about the fact that dozens of Sandy Hook homes hadTitle transfered for zero dollars on Christmas Day in 2009. Many of the People involved recipients these homes. Also several Parents of so called victims won state lottery more than once
    Log in to Reply

  • Stewart Ogilby June 14, 2014 - 4:44 pm

    Why are we belaboring the Sandy Hook nonsense? Anybody with an IQ above 100 can figure out it was phony if they spend on it a fraction of the time they spend watching TV. Of course, it is predictable that the masses won’t do that due to the upsetting aspect of cognitive dissonance. Please, Mr. Fetzer, let’s not all fall for one of the several motives for staging Sandy Hook, that of distracting those with curious minds from their 9/11 nonsense and exposing the TV networks. That would destroy their primary weapon, television news. How about moving on from the deliberately flawed stuff and cut to the heart of their manipulation?.
    Log in to Reply


    • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 4:49 pm

      Perhaps nothing you have ever posted has been more convincing that you are some kind of mediocrity who does not appreciate proof. You seem to think that, if you decide something is the case, then “That’s it!” I am sorry, but your intimation that this is a distraction from 9/11, especially when I continue to publish about that and other vital issues of our time, has no basis in fact and is itself a serious distraction. We have here proof after proof that Sandy Hook was a hoax–including confirmation from Obama officials to boot! So take your nonsense elsewhere. You appear to have nothing to contribute here.
      Log in to Reply


  • wjabbe June 14, 2014 - 3:46 pm

    The totally corrupt and secret non-investigation by all authorities of the Sandy Hook Shootings is why there is public confusion about the truth of what actually transpired. Because of the secrecy and patent violations of many years of criminal investigation precedents, any uncertainty must place all official claims in doubt. Talk and hot air are cheap. The public demands and deserves hard proof of government claims, not just meaningless unproved and unsubstantiated likely lies.
    There is no, zero, physical proof that any person died that day. No pictures of dead victims; no pictures of the inside of the school buildings; no pictures of blood or body parts; no pictures of dead bodies in caskets before burial. The crime scene has been destroyed
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • Gabriel Snike June 14, 2014 - 2:48 pm

    Oh, John Aaron………PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Drama will convince very few of us. That being said, looks like you have a few nibbling on the worm attached to your drama hook. i expect more from people who might read here. The world is full of drama and drama is what plays the fiddle for the masses.
    Log in to Reply



  • Toby June 14, 2014 - 2:05 pm

    There has to be tons of photo’s and video of the scene. Modern redaction can protect privacy. Where are they? There should be one of each person killed at least and a hundred photo’s.
    This could be put to bed if the miles of video that obviously would accompany so many deaths is made public. It would be the respectful thing to do by BOTH sides of this.
    They should be verifiable which would be rather easy, since they would be law enforcement/coroner and have identifiable landmarks.
    I have respect for the families, but this deserves to have more proof made public. It would be horrific and not so easily staged, not that much blood and destruction.
    Log in to Reply


    • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 2:15 pm

      OF COURSE! They can’t produce photos or film BECAUSE IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. I am sorry, Toby, but you need to give this just a little more thought. Are you unaware that the final reports from the Connecticut authorities do not even include the names, ages or sex of the alleged victims? I think you need to get up-to-speed. Read “Top Ten Reasons Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax”, which is still in the top 10 of the TOP 50 MOST READ ARTICLES.
      Log in to Reply


      • williammartin June 14, 2014 - 2:32 pm

        Awesome post and I watched the big video. While watching I noticed also something interesting. John Woodall MD on his Linked-IN page is tied to the Middle East’s Ottoman Empire and Uganda (Child Soldiers)
        See ***http //www.linkedin.com/pub/john-woodall-md/b/1b9/509
        It is just too odd that throughout the Hospital, his life/service that they are all tied to Unity Projects.
        Thanks for bringing this up.
        *Biblical warnings* Never go full shure-ity greeting your fellow man with a handshake.*
        I could not help but constantly think that this SYKEWAR was being done to American’s and by American’s. FAIL!
        Log in to Reply

      • Toby June 14, 2014 - 3:21 pm

        Jim, I used to have trust in government but that has dissolved slowly as I have found fraud and betrayal of public trust at every level.
        I would like to see more documentation of the legal pressure applied for public access to the video and photo’s that would obviously accompany a real investigation. Please publish your requests for public information and the replies given.
        Log in to Reply


        • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 3:26 pm

          Already done! I can’t believe you are unaware of the 16 questions that Wolfgang Halbig has put to the authorities in Connecticut, which they will not answer, including phone calls not returned and FOIA requests with no response. I will post a list of the articles about Sandy Hook I have published here on Veterans Today, but some you need to read include “Wolfgang Halbig heads to Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook” and “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”. You need to keep up on Sandy Hook.
          Log in to Reply


          • Toby June 15, 2014 - 9:37 am

            I read them and think there can be other avenues since so many public agencies are involved.
            http //www.ct.gov/foi/cwp/view.asp?a=3171&Q=531378#ObtainRecords
            http //www.jud.ct.gov/lawlib/Law/foi.htm






  • Gabriel Snike June 14, 2014 - 2:04 pm

    It is simply FASCINATING to see all the govt. paid shills trying to destroy and discredit this interview, this information, and this site for running this. You do not typically see any where NEAR this amount of EFFORT literally being DUMPED BY THE TRUCKLOAD in the comment section.
    THAT IS ANOTHER DEAD GIVE AWAY!!!!!!!! Fascinating! Simply effing fascinating to watch.
    Of course this entire Sandy Hook crap was a staged false flag drill. Anyone with an IQ of 60+ saw that immediately. This was so sloppily put together and carried out, even as a drill, that it is a blatant example of incompetence.
    Those of you who are here “protesting” this article because of some pathetic reason or other…….DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME OR BREATH DOING
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • Mike Kay June 14, 2014 - 11:42 am

    Dr. Fetzer,
    Speaking personally, I appreciate your efforts to keep this issue front and center. It is quite obvious that the powers that be, and their lackeys, really are working overtime to bury this thing before all the truth comes out.
    What I find particularly interesting, is that those who support the government position cannot refute any of the testimony presented. They follow a narrow protocol, unleashing tirades and gnashing teeth while offering no proof to support their position. This is in itself suggests an agenda.
    Whenever one seeks to discredit a position, one illustrates the failures of the evidence to support this position, but we never see this, do we? Rather we are treated to lots of profanity, personal attacks, and blanket
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • joe chuy-medina June 14, 2014 - 10:18 am

    heard and watched a u tube where the St Police chief said, when questioned about who cleaned up the blood and effluvium, that it was not needed. “there was carpeting on the floor.”
    that explains that. works for dog and cat pee, too.
    I have read Jim’s stuff for years, and read everything with a suspicious mind. yet, I have not had cause to disagree so far. as someone mentioned, it is intellect over emotion.
    Log in to Reply

  • Ignotzle June 14, 2014 - 9:39 am

    Can anyone tell me why Wolfgang Halbig’s incredible efforts to expose the same are being ignored here?
    Log in to Reply


    • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 9:55 am

      You must not read Veterans Today very often. I have several recent articles about Wolf and traveled with him to Newtown. See, for example, “Wolfgang Halbig heads for Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/24/wolfgang-halbig-heads-to-newtown-for-the-truth-about-sandy-hook/ and “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/09/the-newtown-school-board-meeting-and-the-meaning-of-silence/ Now we have yet another school safety expert confirming Wolf’s conclusion that Sandy Hook was a hoax.
      Log in to Reply


      • Ignotzle June 14, 2014 - 10:04 am

        I realize that and watched the vid from Newtown. I just find it odd that his work is totally ignored in this article. Just my take. You must know I am here quite often. We have locked horns pretty voraciously in the past.
        Log in to Reply


        • Jim Fetzer June 14, 2014 - 12:10 pm

          It’s not about Wolf. It’s about Paul Peterson. His testimony complements and supports Wolf’s views. I publish a lot about Wolf. I went to Newtown with him. You are lost in your obsession with Wolf, not Sandy Hook. This is among the most important articles ever published on Sandy Hook. Get over it!
          Log in to Reply


          • Ignotzle June 14, 2014 - 12:27 pm

            I simply asked a question, but you decided to attack me. It was unnecessary, but typical to anyone who questions you. Thank you.






  • DaveE June 14, 2014 - 9:30 am

    This is great, we seem to be on the cusp of a major awakening taking place. I just wish people would stop using the term “Nazis” for the scumbags that do these various false-flags, however. They have a lot more in common with Joe “The Little Jew” Stalin than with his professed enemy, Adolf Hitler.
    But nevermind, it’s a minor point right now. The real point is that people are starting to wake up to and unravel all the various Jew-lies we’re bombarded with, like 9/11, Sandy Hook (“The Bloomberg Blitz” I call it…..) and so many others.
    Someday we’ll get around to exposing the big-fat-Jew-lie of WWII and who we really fought for (Stalin) but in the meantime, I’ll settle for some 9/11 truth and Sandy Hook truth.
    Log in to Reply


    • Yehuda_Abraham June 14, 2014 - 9:54 am

      I was just about to post something similar. I listened to the interview right up to the point he started blubbering about “neon-nazis”, and how they talked to some “neon-nazis” and looked at “neon-nazi” websites and saw there was something going to happen.
      My ar$e. Where are these “neon-nazi” websites where the “neon-nazis” advertise they are going to blow up a high school? And some 17 year old Jew ( Dylan Klebold) is a “neon-nazi”? Give me a break.
      Log in to Reply

    • ptwang June 14, 2014 - 10:40 pm

      After reading justice4germans.com and other sites I agree with this but it’s hard not to get caught up in the “US/EU supports violent Nazi’s in Ukraine!” meme simply to combat the western propaganda.
      Log in to Reply


  • Chandler June 14, 2014 - 8:34 am

    Brilliant!! We Americans have become tunas, and will accept the government bait as it is thrown at us. Now, where are the millions of dollars donated? A few got rich off this pathetic scheme. If we all had Mr. Fetzer’s backbone and patriotism, this government would fear us, instead of we cowering to them. No parents or public officials, one smiles, laughs, makes jokes, or snickers like this coroner, it they are facing a real tragedy involving the mass killing of children. This one video of this hulking “ah shucks” coroner convinced me of this entire hoax. I already had critical doubts, but that did it for me.
    My compliments to VT, and its staff, and the author for his dedication and determination to expose the truth.
    This is the purpose,
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • jake gittes June 14, 2014 - 7:28 am

    I thought it looked fake the first time I saw it, too. The coverage seemed “controlled” as if cameramen were only focusing on limited areas. I’ve shot lots of action photography and you don’t continuously point at one area where hardly anything is going on. I also wondered where were the wide shots of activity, people scrambling. It looked artificial.
    Later I saw more photos of “families” arriving/departing the scene. Again, as someone who has shot lots of action, the body language didn’t look right. One man was walking with a pre-school-aged girl riding on his shoulders, his purported wife walking along side them. They looked like they were sauntering toward an afternoon family event, like an outdoor music festival, not like a dangerous shooting.
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • JS June 14, 2014 - 6:34 am

    I highly recommend Paul Preston’s comments about paying attention to the media reports in real time, as the initial event is happening. YES! That’s where you will see the screwups, before they have a chance to fix them. I have done a lot of drills, too. In my case, I heard about Sandy Hook on the radio, went home and put on the TV, on CNN and then Fox News. I almost immediately noticed what Paul noticed, the lack of panic. Then I noticed something else that was completely surreal. The Fox commentators were smiling, sneering, shaking their heads, etc. as they were talking and showing the footage, all inappropriate if this were real, and they WANTED the viewers to see that. I got the impression they were reading a script under protest. I got the message, all
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply


    • JS June 14, 2014 - 6:41 am

      Events rarely happen when it’s convenient for us to spend time watching TV news reports. But you can always press the Record button, and save the whole thing for playback later.
      Log in to Reply

    • Gabriel Snike June 14, 2014 - 2:18 pm

      Absolutely correct JS. I too have participated in more drills than I care to recall. Everything about this Sandy Hook fiasco screams DRILL BABY DRILL!
      Hooking the emotions of the American people who have become incapable of using their intellect has been honed to a fine art……..and, it works every time. People in this country are simply incapable of seeing reality and recognizing that their “government” is the most corrupt entity on the planet. How many MILLIONS of people have died as a direct result of the criminality of this government? We Americans are so pathetically stupid and naive about our government that we have become the laughing stock of the
      world.
      So, all you govt. paid shill whores, you can go home now. “We aint buying any.” All
      read more ...
      Log in to Reply


  • JS June 14, 2014 - 5:13 am

    The interview of Paul Preston is very good.
    Log in to Reply

  • etominusipi June 13, 2014 - 10:21 pm

    if sloppy, how intentionally sloppy? though Dr Carver may be as good a pathologist as his name suggests, to a Scottish person wain carver might have grisly subliminal associations. but his press conference acting was as poor as his script. was a minor humiliation inflicted on him (remember Chuck Hagel) because he had made a nuisance of himself at an earlier planning stage? the bathetic patsy Gene Rosen was also humiliated. the Robbie Parker clip seemed a quasi-official leak of the fact that Sandy Hook was not for real. but after clawing back expenditure on bribes and actors fees with money collected from the public the manipulators can sit back and study the internet dissemination of information about a public-myth hoax. no kids are dead. quite angelic,
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply

  • Preston James, Ph.D June 13, 2014 - 10:10 pm

    Bingo. Prof. Fetzer and his associate shred another thinly veiled staged False-Flag attack. yes, no dead kids, no dead teachers, no dead Lanzas, in fact no real Lanzas at all, all created as virtual computer based imaginary persons.
    There is no statute of limitations on Fraud and some day (hopefully soon) lying scumbag Lt. Vance needs to be charged with making terroristic threats against investigative journalists. This is a serious felony and he needs to be charged, arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison for at least 10 years. This whole Sandy Hook fraud involves numerous other felonies too, and could take down a significant portion of the local and state governments and put many in jail where they belong.
    All the phony victims families should be
    read more ...
    Log in to Reply


    • JS June 14, 2014 - 6:14 am

      Hear, hear. Just as Al Capone was brought down by finances, these guys could be taken down under RICO.
      Log in to Reply


      • JS June 14, 2014 - 6:48 am

        I think the fastest results, as always, will come from a civil lawsuit. If I had sent the “victims” and the town even one red cent, I would sue them for fraud. But I didn’t donate money. Those who did donate, need to file a class action lawsuit. Come on, there has to be a hungry lawyer willing to take this one. Also, there was federal and state taxpayer money spent on bilking us all. I’m not sure how taxpayers could sue but, again, I’m sure there’s a hungry lawyer somewhere who could take this on.
        Log in to Reply


        • Preston James, Ph.D June 14, 2014 - 8:46 am

          Yes, JS that is a brilliant idea. Hopefully the naive true believers in every Controlled major mass Media propaganda will wake up and seek redress with a large class action lawsuit. It has been estimated that the funds defrauded from the public and the taxpayers may approach 50 million USD.
          Log in to Reply


          • dave mann June 14, 2014 - 9:22 am

            Preston James – I’ve seen some peculiarities with the Columbine event – what looks like a dummy being dragged out and dumped on the lawn – the security cam footage anomalies – are you prepared to assure us that event was bona fide and as advertised. It may not be a crystal clear fake – like Sandy Hook – but those were the days when things were not as scrutinized as they are today. ???






  • wolf June 13, 2014 - 9:50 pm

    Wayne’s world;
    “…uh but this probably is the worst I have seen or uh the worst uh that I know of any of my colleagues having seen and uh that all the more makes me uh ah proud and and grateful to our staff who uh uh to a man have uh have just uh behaved uh most professionally uh uh uh and and strongly and um I hope uh I hope they and I hope uh the people of Newt-town uh don’t have it crash on their head later…but…uh…”
    –Wayne the ‘Carver’…from press conference December 15, 2012
    Guess what Mr Fetzer…it’s crashing.
    Log in to Reply

  • stephanaugust June 13, 2014 - 9:19 pm

    A provocative question comes into mind. For what are active shooter drills or anti terror drills good for when the majority is done by perpetrators connected to governments?
    Log in to Reply



  • Howard T.Lewis III June 13, 2014 - 9:16 pm

    This series of false and actually violent inroads by the Bush criminal cabal and The City of London should be halted by as expedient as possible and as efficiently as is physically possible. Empathy should never be considered a weakness or abused by sons of bitches and miscreants or other genetic slag as has occupied the White House over the past several administrations. The City of London owns and controls the nationwide corporate news media and I advocate termination of their ownership of these businesses and institutions at once..
    Log in to Reply


    • ani June 13, 2014 - 9:35 pm

      Have You viewed the Snordster video on VT “NSA Spying Never Catches Israel…”?
      Very seriously worth watching.
      Log in to Reply


      • Howard T.Lewis III June 14, 2014 - 7:31 pm

        Yep. People should believe this important piece of news that I break here. Satanists actually sacrifice innocent people, in a tradition observed by royal houses of Europe and the Vatican for centuries. In 1989, the Utah Attorney general took 45 statements from 60 witnesses who came forward as personal witnesses and victims of blood sacrifice. I, myself, have seen one video confiscated from a satanic cult in a midwest town featuring the stabbing murder of a young teenager as a sacrifice. It was real. If victims are needed to push their agenda, victims will be provided by the willing minions of her Satanic Majesties or by whoever the cult leader succeeds in arranging. If Sandy Hook victims’ bodies are demanded for examination, they will be provided, if not placed in the coffins
        read more ...
        Log in to Reply


    • ani June 15, 2014 - 8:22 pm

      Howard it was your words
      -Empathy should never be considered a weakness or abused by sons of bitches and miscreants or other genetic slag as has occupied the White House over the past several administrations. The City of London owns and controls the nationwide corporate news media and I advocate termination of their ownership of these businesses and institutions at once..-
      which prompted my June 13 reply.
      Empathy and sensitivity are two characteristics that are typically and o too successfully decimated by TPTB.
      Your tenacity, persistence and righteous rage are to be respected and translated into action.
      Log in to Reply


  • Howard T.Lewis III June 13, 2014 - 9:10 pm

    This series of false violent inroads by the Bush criminal cabal and The City of London should be halted by as expedient as possible and as efficiently as is physically possible.
    Log in to Reply



You must be logged in to post a comment Login



Join Our Daily Newsletter
WHAT'S HOT




  1. The Neoconservative/Neo-Bolshevik Chickens Have Come Home to Roost
  2. Russia stops supplying unpaid-for gas to Ukraine: Moscow
  3. Worldwide Financial Criminal Network Revealed Part2
  4. Worldwide Financial Criminal Network Revealed Part1
  5. NEO – Japanese Sanctions against the Russian Federation
  6. The Truth Behind D-Day
  7. Iraq, America and The Lobby
  8. Israeli regime favors Iraq partition
  9. Uri Avnery – A Coup? Nonsense!
  10. ISIL vs. Israel: two sides of the same coin
  11. National Grieving or Unveiling of Police State Canada?
  12. Killing Rats
  13. NEO – Freeport In Indonesia not Free
  14. Iraq Alert !
  15. US Preparing Iraq Air Strike Support Options for Obama
  16. Top Heavy Salaries and Dead Weight Administrators
  17. Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died
  18. Terrorists assault world’s sanity
  19. VetLikeMe Weekly June 12
  20. Dark Matter and Energy is really Love and the Urge to Unite








Veterans Today Poll

When will the New World Order One World Government officially be announced?
  • 1-25 years
  • 25-50 years
  • 50-100 years
  • 100-200 years
  • 200 years plus
  • Never





Hot Trends

9/11 afghanistan Agent Orange aipac Allen L Roland bush cheney cia dod dod contracts Egypt false flag Gaza GI Bill gordon duff Gulf War gulf war veterans Iran iraq israel Libya Middle East military mossad netanyahu obama pakistan palestine PTSD russia Stephen Lendman Syria Terrorism Top Ten va VA News veteran news Veterans Veterans' Affairs Veterans' Health Veterans' News Veterans Benefits Vietnam war zionism

Archives


Featured Columnists





Money News Now







TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS WEEK









© 2014 Veterans Today. All Rights Reserved. Veterans Today Network - Log in - - Mobile Site


Print

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06...children-died/