Thread: Pirate's Cove | Your Fault: Warming Brings Heavy Snow To Greenland Or Something

Pirate's Cove

Trump Admin Cancels $2.3 Billion In Funding To Harvard

By William Teach April 15, 2025 – 10:30 am

Will Harvard learn a lesson? Do they even understand what the lesson is?



Harvard University
@Harvard
·
Follow

“No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.” - President Alan Garber



harvard.edu
The Promise of American Higher Education
No government—regardless of which party is in power—should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue

1:35 PM · Apr 14, 2025

Probably not

Harvard rejects Trump demands, gets hit by $2.3 billion funding freeze
Harvard on Monday rejected numerous demands from the Trump administration that it said would cede control of the school to a conservative government that portrays universities as dangerously leftist.
Within hours of Harvard taking its stand, the administration of President Donald Trump announced it was freezing $2.3 billion in federal funding to the school.
The funding freeze comes after the Trump administration said last month it was reviewing $9 billion in federal contracts and grants to Harvard as part of a crackdown on what it says is antisemitism that erupted on college campuses during pro-Palestinian protests in the past 18 months.
On Monday, a Department of Education task force on combating antisemitism accused America’s oldest university of having a “troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges – that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws.”
The exchange escalates the high-stakes dispute between the the Trump administration and some of the world’s richest universities that has raised concerns about speech and academic freedoms.

Does Harvard actually want to die on the hill of defending Jew hatred? Apparently so. And the lesson is that private entities shouldn’t be taking large sums of government money if they do not want the government to have a say in their operations.

Harvard President Alan Garber wrote in a public letter on Monday that demands made by the Department of Education last week would allow the federal government “to control the Harvard community” and threaten the school’s “values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge.”

Of, course, again, those operations are Jew hatred and supporting a US designated terrorist group. Defending students and staff who are calling for killing Jews and Americans. Who are calling to destroy Israel and America. Is that the knowledge Harvard is defending?
And, yeah, the federal government shouldn’t be giving private institutions taxpayer money, but, hey, that’s what happened thanks to Democrats in Congress working with Democrats at schools like Harvard. Kinda backfired, eh?

Trump Admin Cancels $2.3 Billion In Funding To Harvard - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Warmists Trying Hard To Push Loss And Damage

By William Teach April 15, 2025 – 3:56 pm

Instead of making their own lives carbon neutral, they just want government in charge of doing this

Why Loss and Damage is essential for climate action in new NDCs
Anchoring losses and damages in the new round of national climate plans can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature, and must not be overlooked. (snip through meaningless cult talk)
Current national climate plans – known as Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs – are intended to be ‘roadmaps’ for addressing climate change by sharply reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building resilience. But these plans are nowhere near ambitious enough to do that. The consequences are that climate risks are increasing, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is escalating. (snip)
“Anchoring losses and damages in NDCs can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature. It can provide countries with a more comprehensive climate response, and ensure that the most vulnerable communities can be assisted,” he says.
Countries can take four simple steps to ensure that Loss and Damage is effectively reflected in their plans, says Chamling Rai.
First, countries must define loss and damage in the national context. It is important for countries to include a definition of loss and damage in their national context in their NDC.

Important to whom? A doomsday cult? Or, something more nefarious?

Second, countries must describe the specific losses and damages that are already happening. It is also recommended that projected losses and damages related to different sectors or geographies based on different greenhouse gas emission and temperature-rise scenarios be included where possible.
Third, countries must highlight ongoing initiatives being undertaken to avert, minimize and address losses and damages. These may include institutional frameworks, policies, on-the-ground implementation and financing measures. It is also an opportunity to highlight how the lack of global ambition to finance mitigation and adaptation actions exacerbates country losses and damages.
Finally, countries must include specific contributions on loss and damage.

Loss and damage is really the latest claptrap meant as a way to do two things. First, take money from the producing nations and spread it around the 3rd world shitholes. Second, none of this can all happen without massive government control of the citizens. That’s the only way it occurs. Where you go, what you eat, where you live, how you live. The government must know everything about everyone and ever company. It’s another stealth attempt at authoritarianism, which is the backbone of the climate cult.

Warmists Trying Hard To Push Loss And Damage - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Newsome Signs $2.8 Billion More To Cover Medicaid Gap Due To Illegals

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 6:45 am

The People’s Republik Of California apparently has nothing better to do with the taxpayer money than give insurance to illegal aliens



Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
·
Follow

NEW: Gavin Newsom is asking for a $2.8 billion BAILOUT for CA’s Medicaid program after he opened it up to illegals. This is on top of a $3.4 billion loan issued last week. This marks nearly $6.2 billion in just a few weeks. Why should taxpayers fund Medicaid for illegals?

Watch on X

9:29 AM · Apr 15, 2025

California OKs $2.8B to close Medicaid funding gap after expanding immigrant coverage

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation Monday to close a $2.8 billion budget gap in the state’s Medicaid services and ensure coverage through June for 15 million people, including immigrants, who receive health care via the program.

Whoa, whoa, wait, June 15th? $2.8 billion? For two months? Really? Can you imagine how much help for homeless Americans that could provide?

The legislation is part of the state’s solution to solve the $6.2 billion hole in the state’s Medicaid budget. It comes a year after California launched an ambitious coverage expansion to provide free health care to all low-income adults regardless of their immigration status. The expansion is costing far more than the state projected and could force the Democratic governor and Democratic lawmakers to reevaluate future coverage for millions of people. (snip)
The state hasn’t said how many people have enrolled through the expansion. Last year, the state projected that about 700,000 state residents who are living in the U.S. illegally would gain full health coverage to access preventive care and other treatment.

Um, wouldn’t this violate federal laws about assisting those unlawfully present in the U.S., particularly 8 U.S.C. § 1324? Besides that the money could significantly help Californians who are US citizens? And this is all on Democrats. They run the PRC government.

Newsome Signs $2.8 Billion More To Cover Medicaid Gap Due To Illegals - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Experts Warn There Is A Serious Flaw In The EV Market Forecasts Or Something

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 7:00 am

Can you guess what the issues are?

Experts uncover alarming flaw in EV market forecasts that could hit buyers hard: ‘This is our best attempt’
A new report from Princeton University highlights a serious threat to America’s clean transportation future — and it could spell bad news for jobs, investments, and EV buyers nationwide.
Researchers at Princeton’s ZERO Lab found that if Inflation Reduction Act tax credits and Environmental Protection Agency clean car standards are repealed, electric vehicle sales could plummet. By 2030, the report estimates EV adoption could fall nearly 40% below current projections.
Without these policies, the share of new EVs sold would shrink from 40% to just 24% by the end of the decade. The fallout wouldn’t stop there — the study also warns that up to 100% of planned EV factory expansions could be canceled, and up to 72% of battery manufacturing capacity could become redundant by 2025.
These aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet — they represent real jobs and opportunities in communities across the U.S., as well as real, tangible means of driving down air pollution that is bad for human health and slowly but consistently traps more heat in the atmosphere. Not to mention that EVs, while more expensive upfront, save money each year on lower fuel and maintenance costs such as no oil changes.
“This is our best attempt to survey available quantitative forecasts and develop an outlook on US EV sales,” explained the study’s project leader, Jesse D. Jenkins in a statement. “The report is also the only analysis I’m aware of to date that draws the connection to US manufacturing as well.”

Got that? Without massive amounts of government money the business is going to damned near collapse. Really, what will be left will be the few reasonably priced EVs and the expensive ones, because most middle and working class people won’t bother purchasing. There are no subsidies or anything for standard gas and hybrid vehicles, yet, they still sell. If government money goes away for installing home chargers who will bother except rich folks? Remember, it was only a year ago that the majority of EV buyers made between $150K to $300K.

Rolling back these credits could undo that progress and leave communities — many of which are already building factories and training workers — without the clean energy jobs they were promised. And while EVs help reduce harmful pollution that worsens asthma and respiratory illness, pulling back support could make it harder for families to afford these healthier, lower-maintenance vehicles.

Without that government money the industry will barely be able to survive. This is the very definition of Socialism from Political Theory 101.If an industry cannot survive without massive government money than it is not a viable business. ICE cars NEVER needed a tax incentive. ICE car demand grew because the US consumer viewed it as a value product.

Experts Warn There Is A Serious Flaw In The EV Market Forecasts Or Something - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Elitist Harvard Standing Ground Against Trump Or Something

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 10:30 am

Nothing says standing your ground like supporting Jew hatred, Hamas and Islamic extremism, and the destruction of America.

Why Harvard is standing its ground against Trump
The oldest and wealthiest university in America — long a training ground for cultural elites — is quickly becoming a face of the resistance to President Donald Trump.
Harvard University vowed this week to fight a wide-ranging set of demands from the Trump administration, pitting the biggest name brand in American higher education against the White House and setting up a remarkable clash of power that could wind up in court.
The fight is quickly escalating. Federal officials have frozen more than $2 billion in grants to the university after it refused to comply with policy changes requested by the Trump administration, including to crack down on student protests, change admissions and hiring practices and submit to government audits. Trump on Tuesday suggested on social media that Harvard could lose its tax-exempt status and instead “be Taxed as a Political Entity.”
Harvard, fueled by a massive endowment valued at more than $53 billion and a powerful alumni network, is now uniquely positioned to become the most prominent U.S. institution yet to actively fight Trump’s efforts to bend elements of American civil society to his will.

Court? Why court? They can simply not take federal money. They get enough from donors. But, they got used to that sweet, sweet, strings free money from Los Federales….well, Harvard was expected to take the Democrat line in what they say and what they publish and vote Democrat. It’s a dual parasitic relationship, much like with public unions. They just never thought that this relationship could be targeted by an opposition administration. Unfortunately for them, they allowed anti-Jew and pro-Hamas demonstrations to rage on their campus and became visible.

“Politicians have traditionally, bottom line, been proud of the fact that American higher education was the envy of the world,” said Thomas Parker, a Harvard alum who is a senior associate at the Institute for Higher Education Policy, a Washington-based advocacy organization. “It is unprecedented for the view to be the opposite.”

Taking a line of Jew hatred and support for Islamic extremism makes them proud?

Harvard now must decide whether to negotiate with the Trump administration or fight back in court. The university is being represented by two lawyers with significant street credibility on the right: William A. Burck, who has represented many Trump allies in legal disputes, and Robert Hur, a Harvard alum who authored a report on former President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents that conservatives cited as evidence of his mental decline during the 2024 campaign.

Fight back? Again, for what, taxpayer money they do not deserve? They can simply say “keep it” and move on with their Jew hatred. And things like racism in choosing students. Which is also against federal law. Even for private institutions.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that Harvard “has not taken the administration’s demand seriously.”
“All the president is asking is, don’t break federal law, and then you can have your federal funding,” she said. Leavitt added that Trump “wants to see Harvard apologize” for “the egregious antisemitism that took place on their college campus against Jewish American students.”

Realistically, Los Federales shouldn’t be funding private colleges with taxpayer money to start with. If you take the money, though, it means the feds have a say in operations. Of course, the feds have a say when it comes to admission and hiring practices per law regardless of being private. And all those education laws passed by Democrats means the feds have a say when there is rampant Jew hatred on campus. Remember, Harvard was sued by students

“Jewish students are bullied and spat on, intimidated, and threatened, and subject to verbal and physical harassment,” the lawsuit said.

That would be a violation of federal education laws. And when it is institutionalized, and the school is only taking token steps to stop it.

Elitist Harvard Standing Ground Against Trump Or Something - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Say, Why Aren’t Churches Talking About Global Boiling?

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 3:32 pm

Maybe because that’s not what churches are for?

Why Aren’t We Talking About Climate Change in Church?
While nearly 90% of Christian religious leaders believe climate change is real and human-caused, most rarely discuss it with their congregations. A new study shows this silence has consequences—many church members underestimate their pastor’s views, and conversations about climate action stall. Yet we are uniquely called and positioned to lead. This piece from Blessed Tomorrow urges clergy and lay leaders alike to speak out, teach, and preach on creation care. Support and training are available for those ready to start. Click here to read the full article on Blessed Tomorrow.

Let’s see that article

Religious Leaders Are Silent About Their Beliefs
We are living in a climate changed world which is impacting everything we care about, from people and places devastated by climate disasters, to our health, food, economy, and more. Holy Scriptures remind us that the earth is sacred, (Psalm 24, Colossians 1.15-20, Genesis 1) and we are called by God to care for it. ecoAmerica’s research shows that 72% of Americans are concerned about climate change, (1) and yet, among those who attend religious services at least monthly, U.S. Catholics indicate that climate change is not discussed frequently from the pulpit and 41% say there is no discussion of climate change. (2)
While at the same time, almost 90% of Christian religious leaders at the head of a congregation believe in anthropogenic (human caused) climate change. A study published in March 2025 titled Most Christian American religious leaders silently believe in climate change, and informing their congregation can help open dialogue (3) showed only about half ever discuss climate change with their congregations, a quarter speak publicly about climate change once or twice, and only 5% discuss it more than once a month.
Katharine Hayhoe says that the most important thing we can do about climate change is to talk about it. (4) Congregational religious leaders are uniquely positioned to make a positive climate impact as 2 out of 3 Americans believe they have a high ethical standard and are directly impacted by their local church leadership. When faith leaders silence themselves on climate change, it contributes to member’s hesitancy around discussing climate change with each other:

You get the point. But, they miss that church is a place to talk about The Bible. About God. Jesus. Those associated. And, then Exodus 20

1 Then God spoke all these words:
2 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; 3 you shall have no other gods before me.
4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, 6 but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.

A doomsday cult should not be operating in a church. They should not be worshiping the tenants of a doomsday cult. Bowing to the climate gods. If they are yammering about a climate cult’s beliefs in church they are putting other gods before Him. If these leaders in churches are interested, do it outside of church. They’d still be breaking their oaths to God.

Say, Why Aren't Churches Talking About Global Boiling? - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

UK Government Looks To Suck CO2 Out Of The Sea

By William Teach April 19, 2025 – 7:00 am

The whole thing starts with imprecise and cultish terminology

Project to suck carbon out of sea begins in UK
A ground-breaking project to suck carbon out of the sea has started operating on England’s south coast.
The small pilot scheme, known as SeaCURE, is funded by the UK government as part of its search for technologies that fight climate change.
There’s broad consensus among climate scientists that the overwhelming priority is to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the chief cause of global warming.
But many scientists also believe that part of the solution will have to involve capturing some of the gases that have already been released.

If we’re talking about CO2, carbon dioxide, term it that way. Calling it carbon is horseshit

These projects, known as carbon capture, usually focus either on capturing emissions at source or pulling them from the air.
What makes SeaCure interesting is that it is testing whether it might be more efficient to pull planet-warming carbon from the sea, since it is present in greater concentrations in water than in the air.

You know, what could possibly go wrong? Also, is the CO2 concentration now higher than it was during previous Holocene warm periods?

The project is trying to find whether removing carbon from the water might be a cost effective way of reducing the amount of the climate warming gas CO2 in the atmosphere.
SeaCURE processes the seawater to remove the carbon before pumping it back out to sea where it absorbs more CO2.

Is it removing CO2 or just carbon, which could end up over-oxygenating the oceans?

The Seacure project has £3m of funding from the government and is one of 15 pilot projects being backed in the UK as part of efforts to develop technologies that capture and store greenhouse gases.

UK Government Looks To Suck CO2 Out Of The Sea - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

NPR Missing The Woke Climate Pope

By William Teach April 21, 2025 – 3:00 pm

Remember, NPR is a completely neutral “news” outlet. And they would never use the death of the Pope to push the climate cult

Pope Francis focused on climate change as the planet continued to get hotter
In addition to being the spiritual leader of about 1.4 billion Catholics, Pope Francis advocated for taking action on climate change. That’s not surprising for a pontiff who was the first to take the name of St. Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals and ecology.
Over his 12 years as the head of the Catholic Church, Francis repeatedly raised the problem of human-caused global heating from burning fossil fuels and he encouraged people—including world leaders—to do something about it.
His 2015 encyclical brought an influential voice into the global discussion, just as leaders were finalizing an important agreement in Paris, which aimed to address the problem. And as humans continued to heat the planet with pollution from fossil fuels, Francis’ missives became progressively more urgent. Researchers felt these writings boosted Francis’ prominence as a climate advocate, though they appear to have largely failed to change people’s minds about climate change. Still supporters say he brought together science, morality and faith in new ways for his church.

I prefer not to speak ill of the dead so quick, but, Pope Francis seemed more concerned with things other than The Bible, Jesus, and protecting and spreading Christianity. He seemed super concerned about the climate scam to the point where he seemed to worship the gods of the cult, violating the 1st Commandment. Environmental protection is one thing: taking the positions of a doomsday climate cult is something else, and seems to violate that whole “false idols” thing.

Francis’ climate encyclical inspired several Catholic climate groups to form, including The Global Catholic Climate Movement, which is now called the Laudato Si’ Movement.
“All around the world, you saw all of these people reading the encyclical, writing letters to the editor, posting on social media, forming discussion groups in their parishes,” says Rebecca Elliott, senior director for strategy and special projects at Laudato Si’ Movement.
The nonprofit group says it has worked in 140 countries and trained about 20,000 community leaders it calls “animators,” people who put into practice the ideas Francis has advocated. “They’re educating the next generation in care for creation. They’re planting trees. They’re holding litter cleanups. They’re doing mobilizations and marches to advocate for better policies,” Elliott says.

Are they teaching Catholicism and the teachings of Jesus? Or the golden calf of global boiling?

Landrum says Francis likely will be remembered as an “advocate for climate change” and as “an environmental pope.” While he may not have changed many conservative minds, she says, “I think that he did plant a flag, and to say that climate change mitigation is consistent with socially conservative values and with Catholic values.”

Well, he won’t be remembered as someone who cared about Catholicism.

NPR Missing The Woke Climate Pope - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

Lefty Preppers Don’t Need Guns For The Coming Climate Collapse

By William Teach April 21, 2025 – 7:00 am

If the climate crisis was truly real, wouldn’t guns be something people would need as the world goes Mad Max? I know I’d want them

‘All of his guns will do nothing for him’: lefty preppers are taking a different approach to doomsday
One afternoon in February, hoping to survive the apocalypse or at least avoid finding myself among its earliest victims, I logged on to an online course entitled Ruggedize Your Life: The Basics.
Some of my classmates had activated their cameras. I scrolled through the little windows, noting the alarmed faces, downcast in cold laptop light. There were dozens of us on the call, including a geophysicist, an actor, a retired financial adviser and a civil engineer. We all looked worried, and rightly so. The issue formerly known as climate change was now a polycrisis called climate collapse. H1N1 was busily jumping from birds to cows to people. And with each passing day, as Donald Trump went about gleefully dismantling state capacity, the promise of a competent government response to the next hurricane, wildfire, flood, pandemic, drought, mudslide, heatwave, financial meltdown, hailstorm or other calamity receded further from view. (snip)
For many years, Steffen worked as an environmental reporter. He wrote several acclaimed books that explored technological solutions to the climate crisis, served as “futurist in residence” at the design firm IDEO, and taped a couple Ted Talks, gradually gaining a reputation as one of the foremost thinkers on the sustainability circuit. Meanwhile, he watched in horror as the window for action narrowed and governments and institutions dithered. “I still find it staggering and heart-rending that we blew this so badly,” he said in an interview.

It’s not to believe in doom when you continuously listen to messages of doom, right? If you’re predisposed to believe in coming climate doom. I mean, I read a lot of zombie books (most movies and TV shows are terrible), but, I’m not predisposed to believing it will actually happen, even with a really good explanation, such as 28 Days Later (BTW, looking forward to 28 years later, but, how can they have survived? They weren’t actually dead, and 28 Weeks Later shows those infected with Rage to have died from starvation, and explains it).
Let’s jump through a few paragraphs of prepper history

Not all of them are conservatives. Liberals make up about 15% of the prepping scene, according to one estimate, and their numbers appear to be growing.

What are they doing?

One private Facebook group dedicated to preparedness for liberals has more than tripled in size since the election. Here, one finds no tradwife panegyrics, gun porn or “TEOTWAWKI” (the End of the World as We Know It) merch. Instead, participants offer advice on maintaining one’s online anonymity under a potential fascist regime, advocate the stockpiling of anxiety meds and reading material (ahead of expected bans), and debate the moral dilemma of buying a first aid kit from a company that caters to law enforcement. Liberal preparedness podcasters and newsletter writers I spoke to also reported a notable uptick in subscribers since Trump’s election.

Too much to unpack in that paragraph. You do it in your mind. The article keeps going and going. These people will be lost if disaster actually comes.

Lefty Preppers Don't Need Guns For The Coming Climate Collapse - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove

Pirate's Cove

NY Times Fearmongers Over State Dept “Memo” That Rubio Calls “Fake News”

By William Teach April 21, 2025 – 6:45 am

The Times isn’t the only one publishing this, but, they are the biggest outlet

Trump Administration Draft Order Calls for Drastic Overhaul of State Department
A draft of a Trump administration executive order proposes a drastic restructuring of the State Department that includes eliminating almost all of its Africa operations and shutting down embassies and consulates across the continent, according to American officials and a copy of the document.
The draft also calls for cutting offices at State Department headquarters that address climate change and refugee issues, as well as democracy and human rights concerns.
It was not immediately clear who had compiled the document or what stage of internal debates over a restructuring of the State Department it reflected. It is one of several recent documents proposing changes to the department, and internal administration conversations take place daily on possible actions.
Some of the ideas have been debated among U.S. officials in recent weeks, though it is unclear to what degree they would be adopted or how active the draft is, officials said.

Weird how no one is mentioned by name.



Marco Rubio
@marcorubio
·
Follow

This is fake news. The ⁦@nytimes⁩ falls victim to another hoax.



nytimes.com

Trump Draft Order Would Drastically Overhaul U.S. State Department
The draft executive order to be signed by President Trump would eliminate Africa operations and shut down bureaus working on democracy, human rights and refugee issues.

8:10 AM · Apr 20, 2025

Of course, the Times doubles down with their second line

Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote a short comment on social media after this article was published, calling it “fake news.” There are no indications that Mr. Rubio or his top aides have signed off on the document, though they have been working on a reorganization of the State Department.

There’s no indication because they haven’t. You read Rubio’s tweet, right? Now, I really wouldn’t be surprised if they are in the process of shutting down all the climate scam stuff, and significantly restricting immigrants from America hating countries and those that will cause problems. Nor should we expect a large number of “refugees” to be brought into the U.S. while Trump is president. Shutting down most operations in Africa? Yeah, that’s horseshit.

The purpose of the executive order is to impose “a disciplined reorganization” of the State Department and “streamline mission delivery” while cutting “waste, fraud and abuse,” according to a copy of the draft order obtained by The New York Times. The order says the department is supposed to make the changes by Oct. 1.

The non-existent EO? Though, I wouldn’t be surprised if they were going to change operations so that most of the US aid and money wouldn’t be wasted, that it would go to the people who need it, rather than the politicians, elites, and warlords in Africa.
Anyhow, it’s a pretty long article for something Rubio called fake news.

NY Times Fearmongers Over State Dept "Memo" That Rubio Calls "Fake News" - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove