Pro-Illegal Kagan Writes Anti-AZ Brief

Hearings Begin Today

ALERT: Kagan played a major role in the administration's Supreme Court filing in May challenging a 2007 Arizona law that had "no legal basis".

This case could likely be heard by the Supreme Court, it is imperative that we know the extent of Kagan's involvement in writing the brief, as well as the rationale behind her direct contravention of the letter of the law.

The Senate confirmation hearings that begin TODAY 6/28 should make Kagan endure a week's worth of harsh questions by the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Kagan should be grilled on her views of the law and her judicial philosophy.

But will it really happen or just be a liberal love fest?

TELL, WRITE AND FAX EVERY SINGLE SENATOR TO FILIBUSTER KAGAN TODAY!!!

Obama and Kagan To Attack Arizona Immigration Law?

Direction Of Immigration Enforcement May Be Decided By Kagan Court!

Arizona's immigration law hangs as the biggest constitutional question in the news today.

Obama has threatened to use federal "preemption" -- arguing that the state's law illegally intrudes on immigration enforcement, which is a federal responsibility.

If Solicitor General Elena Kagan is confirmed to take the seat of Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court, she will likely be confronted with a constitutional challenge to Arizona’s immigration law.

Is Obama trying to end run Congress again with a direct conflict of interest by having the Supreme Court and possibly Kagan rule on the Arizona Immigration Law since it is a case that she will have filed for Obama?

The direction of immigration enforcement may be decided by a Supreme Court that Kagan will rule on.

Kagan has issued opinions on two separate cases which shed some light on how she has approached the immigration issue.

Kagan’s approach to immigration cases appears to hold that illegal aliens — regardless of their status — are fully protected with citizens' rights by the U.S. Constitution.

The timing could not be worse to be having Kagan "fast-tracked" on to the SCOTUS, as Solicitor General Elena Kagan has consistently avoided controversial issues that come before the U.S. Supreme Court, and her record is opaque.

That will change when the potential Supreme Court nominee files a brief providing the administration’s views of the Arizona immigration law.

Now would seem to be a good time to inquire, of a potential Supreme Court member, about the constitutionality of this new law.

Arizona's new immigration law has generated an enormous national backlash, with critics alleging that it is unconstitutional.

But numerous other states like Pennsylvania and Rhode Island are now proposing similar laws to arrest illegal alien criminals.

The Department of Justice says it's considering a lawsuit against Arizona for that very reason.

Suddenly, the authority to demand citizenship papers has become one of the top constitutional issues on people's minds.

Democrats will avoid the controversial issue.

Liberals oppose the law vocally but senators know that asking Obama’s nominee about Arizona is risky and gives Kagan the opportunity to say something that will blow up into controversy.

Kagan will likely duck the question, as she herself noted in a 1995 book review on Supreme Court confirmations, nominees can easily evade pointed legal questions by claiming the subject is either too vague “without a specific case at hand, preconceived notions shouldn't be airedâ€