Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Rand Paul calls to revoke John Brennan's security clearance, asks if he's 'monetizing

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883

    Rand Paul calls to revoke John Brennan's security clearance, asks if he's 'monetizing

    Rand Paul calls to revoke John Brennan's security clearance, asks if he's 'monetizing' access

    By Brooke Singman
    1 hour ago

    Sen. Rand Paul called Monday for President Trump to revoke former CIA director John Brennan's security clearance, as he questioned whether the Obama-era spy boss was “monetizing” his access to sensitive information in his new role as a pundit.

    “Is John Brennan monetizing his security clearance? Is John Brennan making millions of dollars divulging secrets to the mainstream media with his attacks on @realDonaldTrump?” Paul tweeted early Monday.

    Brennan joined NBC News and MSNBC in February as a contributor and senior national security and intelligence analyst. A spokesperson for the networks did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment on Paul's tweet, which did not list any specific allegations.

    The Kentucky Republican, who last week jumped to Trump's defense as the president faced bipartisan criticism over his summit and press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin, followed up the original tweet by saying:

    “Today I will meet with the President and I will ask him to revoke John Brennan’s security clearance!”

    The White House did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.
    Senator on war of words between Donald Trump and John Brennan after ex-CIA director called the president's press conference with Putin 'treasonous' and U.S. obligations to Montenegro. #Tucker

    Paul’s tweets come as fellow congressional Republicans push for Brennan to testify on Capitol Hill regarding the investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with Trump campaign associates in the 2016 presidential election.

    The former CIA director has been a consistent and harsh critic of the president, blasting his performance with Putin in Helsinki as “nothing short of treasonous.”

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said Sunday that his committee was seeking a Brennan interview.

    “We have lots of questions for John Brennan and he will definitely be sought by the committees for an interview,” Goodlatte said on “Sunday Morning Futures.” “This is an extremely disturbing thing to see both he and [former FBI Director] James Comey, supposedly impartial government officials carrying out their jobs in very important areas in intelligence gathering and law enforcement, express the kind of extreme bias that they’ve shown—which I think reflects quite accurately what they were doing back in 2016.”

    Goodlatte was referring to a Wall Street Journal op-ed written by Kimberly Strassel which suggested that Brennan’s role in the Russia probe “is in some ways more concerning than the FBI’s.”

    “Mr. Brennan has taken credit for launching the Trump investigation,” Strassel wrote, adding that Brennan “took the lead on shaping the narrative that Russia was interfering in the election specifically to help Mr. Trump—which quickly evolved into the Trump-collusion narrative.”

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ng-access.html
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    San Bernardino, CA
    Posts
    1,810
    When their job ends, there should be no reason for them to retain access to secret information.

  3. #3
    Senior Member stoptheinvaders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    3,374
    Quote Originally Posted by jtdc View Post
    When their job ends, there should be no reason for them to retain access to secret information.
    Absolutely!

    Sarah Sanders said today, that Trump was considering revoking it.

    Why consider? just do it!
    You've got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-31-2017, 05:14 PM
  2. Rand Paul: We’re very lucky John McCain’s not in charge
    By Newmexican in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-19-2017, 08:08 PM
  3. House bill would revoke Clinton's security clearance
    By lorrie in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2016, 08:28 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-13-2012, 08:16 PM
  5. Homeland security advis. John Brennan's dereliction of duty
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-13-2010, 04:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •