Thread: Trump not ruling out MILITARY TAKEOVER of Greenland | 01/10/2025

Trump not ruling out MILITARY TAKEOVER of Greenland

01/10/2025 // Belle Carter // 200 Views

Tags: big government, Canada, Denmark, diplomatic relations, Donald Trump, economic steps, Elon Musk, geopolitics, Greenland, Gulf of America, Gulf of Mexico, military force, military takeover, Mute Egede, Panama Canal, politics, sovereignty

• U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has refused to rule out military or economic measures to acquire Greenland and regain control of the Panama Canal, signaling a dramatic shift in U.S. foreign policy priorities.
  
  
• Trump's comments sparked international concern, particularly from Denmark and Panama, who have rejected his proposals, while supporters, such as Elon Musk, have expressed support for his ideas.
  
  
• Greenland, home to a significant U.S. military base, is strategically positioned on the shortest route between North America and Europe, with Trump describing it as an "absolute necessity" for U.S. national security.
  
  
• Trump's push for the Panama Canal highlights the ongoing debate over sovereignty and has been met with strong resistance from the Panamanian government.
  
  
• The broader implications of Trump's expansionist agenda raise concerns about potential diplomatic fallout and the strain on U.S. relations with key allies, as the world watches the future of U.S. foreign policy under his leadership.

In a bold and unconventional move, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has refused to rule out military or economic measures to acquire Greenland and regain control of the Panama Canal, signaling a dramatic shift in U.S. foreign policy priorities.

On Tuesday, Jan. 7, at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, Trump framed these ambitions as critical to U.S. economic and national security. His comments have sparked international concern, particularly from Denmark and Panama, who have firmly rejected his proposals.

Greenland, the world's largest island, is between the Atlantic and Arctic oceans. It is home to a significant U.S. military base and is strategically positioned on the shortest route between North America and Europe. Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in purchasing Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for U.S. national security.

"People really don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up because we need it," Trump said during the press conference. His comments were met with a swift rebuke from Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who reiterated that Greenland is "not for sale" and "belongs to the Greenlanders."

Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark since 1979, has been moving toward greater autonomy. Greenlandic Prime Minister Mute Egede recently called for independence from Denmark in a New Year's speech, citing historical grievances and a desire for full equality.

"It is now time for our country to take the next step," Egede said, suggesting a potential independence referendum coinciding with parliamentary elections in April.

Trump's push to acquire Greenland has also drawn support from influential allies, including tech mogul Elon Musk, who posted on social media platform X that Greenlanders "want to be part of America" and would be "most welcome." However, such assertions have been met with skepticism, as Greenland's population of 57,000 has shown little interest in becoming part of the United States.

Trump vows to regain control of Panama Canal
Trump also vowed to regain control of the Panama Canal, a vital waterway that connects the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The canal, which was handed over to Panama by former U.S. President Jimmy Carter in 1977, remains a symbol of Panama's sovereignty.

(Related: Trump vows to reclaim Panama Canal, saying it belongs to America.)

In December, Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino firmly rejected Trump's claims, stating that "every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belongs to Panama, and it will continue to be so." Trump's refusal to rule out military or economic coercion to achieve his goals has raised alarms in Panama and beyond, with critics warning of potential diplomatic fallout.

Trump's comments on Tuesday also included a proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America," a move he described as having a "beautiful ring" and being "appropriate." While the proposal appears symbolic, it reflects Trump's broader tendency to redefine geopolitical boundaries and assert U.S. dominance.

Additionally, Trump suggested turning Canada into a U.S. state, criticizing American spending on Canadian goods and military support. He called the U.S.-Canada border an "artificially drawn line" and signaled a willingness to impose tariffs on Denmark if it resisted his offer to purchase Greenland.

Trump's expansionist rhetoric echoes historical U.S. efforts to acquire strategic territories, such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Alaska Purchase.

However, critics point out that the potential implications of his proposals are far-reaching. Acquiring Greenland or the Panama Canal would require unprecedented diplomatic and economic maneuvers, likely straining U.S. relations with key allies.

As Trump prepares to take office, his comments on Greenland, the Panama Canal and the Gulf of Mexico have ignited a global debate about the future of U.S. foreign policy. While his supporters may view these proposals as bold steps to secure America's economic and national security, critics warn of the risks of alienating allies and undermining international norms.

As the world watches, one thing is clear: Trump's presidency is poised to challenge the status quo in ways that could reshape the global geopolitical landscape.

Watch this Fox News report about Trump saying buying Greenland is a "necessity."

This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:
Trump warns U.S. could take over Panama Canal if Panama continues to impose "rip-off" passage fees on American ships.
Trump threatens to retake control of Panama Canal, combat Chinese influence and unfair treatment to American companies.
Migrant crossings through deadly Darien Gap down 40% amid crackdown by Panama government.

Sources include:
RT.com
Reuters.com
EuroNews.com
Brighteon.com

Trump not ruling out MILITARY TAKEOVER of Greenland – NaturalNews.com

The Svalbard Global Seed Vault is a secure backup facility located on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen in the Arctic Svalbard archipelago. It stores more than one million seed samples from genebanks around the world, serving as a long-term safety backup for crop diversity and global food security123. The vault is designed to safeguard seeds in the event of a global crisis and prevent crop species from going extinct43.

A Visit To The Doomsday Vault - CBS News



Mar 20, 2008 · Norway paid for construction, Bill Gates paid for the shipping, and seeds from nearly every nation on earth are locked inside. Svalbard may seem a strange place to build an ark for plants.

President Trump knows about the Seed Vaults; he also knows what Bill Gates is doing to the Food Supply.

As soon as people figure out Bill Gates has a massive heirloom Non-GMO seed vault and the Same time giving Livestock Clot shots so you end up consuming the Lethal cocktail in your burgers.

People are going to loose it; but its already too late.

Might be best to get another Jim Jones Cocktail Clot Shot and get it over with.

Originally Posted by Airbornesapper07

President Trump knows about the Seed Vaults; he also knows what Bill Gates is doing to the Food Supply.

During his Presidential campaign, Mr. Trump did NOT mention ANY of the following:

- Acquiring the Country of Greenland
- Reacquiring the Panama Canal
- Changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America
- Acquiring the Country of Canada

Why?

+ Greenland is a country rich in natural resources. It is quite large in size. With Mr. Trump's tariff threats, David DuByne (Adapt 2030) has said some key minerals needed for tech are under threat to NOT be shipped to the USA by China ... Perhaps these reasons are leading to the acquisition of the Country of Greenland in addition to the reasons given by Airborne below.

Originally Posted by GaiaGoddess

During his Presidential campaign, Mr. Trump did NOT mention ANY of the following:

- Acquiring the Country of Greenland
- Reacquiring the Panama Canal
- Changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America
- Acquiring the Country of Canada

Why?

+ Greenland is a country rich in natural resources. It is quite large in size. With Mr. Trump's tariff threats, David DuByne (Adapt 2030) has said some key minerals needed for tech are under threat to NOT be shipped to the USA by China ... Perhaps these reasons are leading to the acquisition of the Country of Greenland in addition to the reasons given by Airborne below.

Canada and Greenland are heavily Vaxxed, 2-3 shots; big Die off expected.... it was a Genocide and Land Grab all in one

Trump is laying claims to these Country's to keep the Satanists from getting them

Russia sees Trump’s Greenland proposal as MILITARY THREAT, as Russia stealthily carries out their military objectives in the arctic

01/10/2025 // Lance D Johnson // 740 Views

Tags: arctic military presence, chaos, Cold War, Dangerous, deception, Greenland, imperialism, military strategy, national defense, national security, NATO, natural resources, peace, Psychological Warfare, Russia's military strategy, Russian motivations, stability, WWIII

• President-elect Donald Trump’s proposal to acquire Greenland has been met with firm rejections from Denmark and Greenland, as well as warnings from Russia about potential military threats.
• Greenland’s strategic location in the Arctic makes it a focal point for U.S. national security interests, particularly in countering Russia’s growing military presence and advanced hyper sonic missile capabilities.
• The Arctic region is rich in natural resources and emerging shipping routes, making it a critical theater in the new Cold War between global powers.
• Russia has emphasized its commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Arctic while warning against U.S. efforts to strengthen its position at the expense of other nations.
• What military objectives is Russia carrying out in the arctic, for them to see the US as a military threat?

Russia views annexation of Greenland to the US as a MILITARY THREAT

In a move that has reignited geopolitical tensions, President-elect Donald Trump’s proposal to acquire Greenland has drawn sharp reactions from Denmark, Greenland, and Russia. The Arctic island, rich in natural resources and strategically positioned, has become a flashpoint in the growing rivalry between the United States and Russia. Trump’s assertion that “ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity” for U.S. national security has raised concerns about the militarization of the Arctic and the potential for conflict in a region increasingly seen as a new Cold War battleground.
Greenland, the world’s largest island, is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. Its vast expanse and proximity to the Arctic make it a critical asset for any nation seeking to dominate the region. The Arctic is not only a repository of untapped oil, gas, and rare earth minerals but also a rapidly changing landscape due to melting ice, which is opening new shipping routes and access to resources.
Russia has been particularly active in the Arctic, bolstering its military presence and developing advanced hyper sonic missiles like the Oreshnik, which can travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5. These missiles are nearly impossible to intercept with current defense systems, posing a significant threat to U.S. national security. Andrey Kartapolov, chairman of Russia’s State Duma Defense Committee, warned that U.S. control of Greenland could provide a “springboard for America in a future hypothetical intercontinental clash.”
“Greenland occupies a very large area in the Arctic and gives direct access to the Arctic, so for us it would not be the best option,” Kartapolov told RIA Novosti. His comments underscore the high stakes of Arctic geopolitics, where control over territory could determine the balance of power in a future conflict.
Denmark and Greenland push back against U.S., but could become sitting ducks as Russia advances in the arctic

The idea of selling Greenland has been firmly rejected by both Danish and Greenlandic officials. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated unequivocally, “Greenland is not for sale and will not be in the future either.” Greenland’s pro-independence Prime Minister, Múte Bourup Egede, echoed this sentiment, declaring, “We are not for sale, and we will not be for sale.” However, Greenland could become sitting ducks, as Russia advances its military objectives into the arctic.
Greenland, which was granted home rule by Denmark in 1979 and the right to declare independence through a referendum in 2009, has its own ambitions for self-determination. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen emphasized that Greenland’s future should be determined by its people, not external powers. “We fully recognize that Greenland has its own ambitions. If they materialize, Greenland will become independent, though hardly with an ambition to become a federal state in the United States,” Rasmussen said.
Trump’s proposal has also been criticized as impractical and provocative. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev described the idea as “over the top and eccentric—and totally unworkable.” Even within the U.S., the proposal has been met with skepticism, with many viewing it as a relic of 19th-century imperialism rather than a viable 21st-century strategy.
Russia’s arctic ambitions and the new Cold War

The Arctic has become a critical theater in the new Cold War, with Russia, the U.S., and other Arctic nations vying for control over resources and strategic positions. Russia has invested heavily in Arctic infrastructure, including military bases and icebreakers, and has warned against NATO’s increasing military activity in the region.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov emphasized Russia’s commitment to maintaining peace and stability in the Arctic. “We are present in the Arctic zone, and we will continue to be present there,” Peskov said. “We are interested in maintaining an atmosphere of peace and stability in the region and are ready to cooperate with all countries of the world in the name of this peace and stability.”
However, Russia has also made it clear that it will not tolerate efforts by the U.S. to strengthen its position at the expense of others. Vladimir Barbin, Russia’s ambassador to Denmark, warned that “an attempt to strengthen U.S. national security at the expense of other countries… will be taken into account by Russia in its military planning.”
Russia’s defensive statements should make US and European officials consider that Russia does have motivations in the Arctic that should be strategized and defended against.
Sources include:
RT.com
NaturalNews.com
RT.com

Russia sees Trump’s Greenland proposal as MILITARY THREAT, as Russia stealthily carries out their military objectives in the arctic – NaturalNews.com

Michael Yon and Mike Adams cover Trumps designs on Panama and Greenland, Chinas tactics, wildfires as

Michael Yon and Mike Adams cover Trump’s designs on Panama and Greenland, China’s tactics, wildfires as sabotage instruments and more

Michael Yon and Mike Adams cover Trump’s designs on Panama and Greenland, China’s tactics, wildfires as sabotage instruments and more - Brighteon.com

Denmark to bolster Arctic defense with new military airbase in Greenland

01/20/2025 // Willow Tohi // 540 Views

Tags: Arctic, border security, Denmark, Greenland, military, military base, military readiness, national security, Russian threat, self-defense, strategic location, Trump, violence, weapons tech, White House, WWIII

• Denmark plans to build a new military airbase in Kangerlussuaq, Greenland, to enhance its Arctic and North Atlantic defense capabilities. This follows renewed U.S. interest in the region and growing geopolitical tensions.
• The airbase will accommodate up to 94 personnel, serve as a hub for Danish F-35 fighter jets and long-range drones, and protect critical infrastructure. The project is estimated to cost over $150,000 for new aircraft alone.
• Denmark's move reflects a shift towards a more proactive military presence in the Arctic. This comes in the wake of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's statements regarding Greenland's strategic importance, despite the U.S. embassy denying plans to expand its military presence on the island.
• Greenland's strategic location makes it a focal point for global powers. Russia has also expressed interest in the Arctic, increasing the region's vulnerability to potential threats due to the lack of comprehensive airspace monitoring.
• Denmark's efforts to assert sovereignty and strengthen its defense capabilities must balance the interests of its closest ally, the United States, with the aspirations of Greenland's population for greater autonomy or independence. This delicate balancing act highlights the complex dynamics in the region.

Denmark is set to strengthen its Arctic and North Atlantic defense capabilities with the construction of a new military airbase in Greenland, according to a confidential report from the Danish armed forces. The move comes amid growing geopolitical tensions in the region and follows renewed U.S. interest in the strategically significant island.
The 22-page report, drafted in September 2024 and obtained by Danish state broadcaster TV2, outlines plans to establish the airbase in Kangerlussuaq, a settlement located approximately 300 kilometers north of Greenland’s capital, Nuuk. The facility is expected to serve as a hub for Danish F-35 fighter jets and long-range drones, enhancing the kingdom’s ability to monitor and defend its Arctic territories.
"The base will be especially required to receive Danish fighter jets (F-35) to periodically stay and land in Kangerlussuaq due to periodic readiness to repel attack and protect sovereignty, as well as show force ... within the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark," the report stated.
The project, estimated to cost over $150,000 for new aircraft alone, will accommodate up to 94 personnel and is designed to safeguard critical infrastructure, including undersea cables, power plants and oil storage facilities. Additionally, Denmark plans to establish a mobile military base in Greenland, which can be relocated using transport aircraft, and expand the Arctic Command headquarters in Nuuk by adding 58 personnel to its current staff of 70.
A strategic shift in the Arctic

The decision to bolster Greenland’s defenses reflects Denmark’s acknowledgment of its limited capabilities in identifying and responding to threats in the Arctic, North Atlantic and Baltic Sea regions. The report emphasizes the need for a more proactive military presence in the Arctic, despite Denmark’s official policy of maintaining the region as a zone of low tension.
"Although Denmark’s official policy is to avoid military conflicts, preserving the Arctic as a zone of low tension, the military command recommends a more active offensive presence in the future," TV2 reported, citing the document.
The move also comes in the wake of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s recent remarks about the strategic importance of Greenland. In December, Trump called U.S. control of the island an "absolute necessity" for national security, sparking a diplomatic row with Denmark. Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has repeatedly stated that it is not for sale.
"We have neglected for many years to make the necessary investments in ships and in aircraft that will help monitor our kingdom, and that is what we are now trying to do something about," Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen told journalists earlier this month.
Geopolitical implications and regional tensions

Greenland’s strategic location makes it a focal point for global powers, particularly as melting ice opens new shipping routes and access to untapped natural resources. The U.S. already maintains a permanent presence at the Pituffik air base in northwestern Greenland, which plays a critical role in the U.S. ballistic missile early-warning system.
However, the U.S. embassy in Copenhagen has denied plans to expand its military footprint on the island. "There are no plans to increase the United States' current military presence in Greenland," a spokesperson told Reuters. "We will continue to work closely with Copenhagen and Nuuk to ensure any proposals meet our common security needs."
Meanwhile, Russia has also expressed interest in the Arctic, with the Kremlin describing the region as part of its "zone of strategic national interests." Analysts warn that the lack of comprehensive airspace monitoring in Greenland leaves the region vulnerable to potential threats.
"There is no real monitoring of the airspace in Greenland; it is largely a free-for-all," said Jens Wenzel, an analyst at Nordic Defense Analysis.
A delicate balancing act

For Denmark and Greenland, the situation represents a delicate balancing act. While Denmark seeks to assert its sovereignty and strengthen its defense capabilities, it must also navigate the interests of its closest ally, the United States, and the aspirations of Greenland’s population, many of whom favor greater autonomy or outright independence.
"They're walking a tightrope," said Lin Alexandra Mortensgaard, a Greenland expert at the Danish Institute for International Studies. "It's a balance between representing an autonomous territory and representing a sovereign state while still taking the requirements of Denmark's closest ally seriously."
As Denmark moves forward with its plans, the Arctic remains a region of growing strategic importance, with global powers vying for influence. The new airbase in Kangerlussuaq marks a significant step in Denmark’s efforts to secure its position in this increasingly contested frontier.
Sources include:
Sputnik.com
Tass.com
Reuters.com

Denmark to bolster Arctic defense with new military airbase in Greenland – NaturalNews.com

TO GREENLAND