Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,516

    What`s your take on Obama’s $845 BILLION Global Poverty Ac

    The bill would require our president "to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."

    The bill would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7% of our gross domestic product on foreign handouts above what we already contribute around the globe.

    NOTE:
    This figure of 0.7% was codifed in a United Nations General Assembly Resolution and states:

    In recognition of the special importance of the role which can be fulfilled only by official development assistance, a major part of financial resource transfers to the developing countries should be provided in the form of official development assistance. Each economically advanced country will progressively increase its official development assistance to the developing countries and will exert its best efforts to reach a minimum net amount of 0.7 per cent of its gross national product at market prices by the middle of the Decade

    But the real frightening part of the bill is its "Millennium Development Goal" which is also mentioned in a declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium Assembly and Summit in 2000 that called for the "eradication of poverty" by "redistribution (of) wealth and land," cancellation of "the debts of developing countries" and "a fair distribution of the earth's resources" i.e. from each [meaning the U.S. Taxpayer] according to their means, to each [meaning the rest of the world] according to their needs.

    Keep in mind this is Obama’s plan, and it would enslave the American Taxpayer to third world nations, and it is also supported by his running mate Biden! Do we really want these World Class Marxists in charge of our government?

    Calendar No. 718
    110th CONGRESS
    2d Session
    S. 2433


    [Report No. 110-331]
    To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.


    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

    December 7, 2007


    Mr. OBAMA(for himself, Mr. HAGEL, and Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MENENDEZ,Mr. BIDEN, Mr. DODD, Mr. FEINGOLD, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SMITH, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations (View The Full Text Here)
    WAKE UP AMERICA! This is not the change we want.

    JWK



    If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon a federal government check, we can then buy their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s working population enslaved to pay the bills ____ our Marxist Democrat Party’s game plan, a plan to establish a federal plantation on American soil and send its wealth abroad.

  2. #2
    Senior Member vmonkey56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tarheel State
    Posts
    7,134
    More New World Order.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386


    Two words:


    TAX REVOLT!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member millere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,297

    Re: What`s your take on Obama’s $845 BILLION Global Povert

    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk
    But the real frightening part of the bill is its "Millennium Development Goal" which is also mentioned in a declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium Assembly and Summit in 2000 that called for the "eradication of poverty" by "redistribution (of) wealth and land," cancellation of "the debts of developing countries" and "a fair distribution of the earth's resources" i.e. from each [meaning the U.S. Taxpayer] according to their means, to each [meaning the rest of the world] according to their needs.

    [Report No. 110-331]
    To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.
    Obama supports a "guest worker program" when we already have 23 so you know something is up. Many voters don't know this so they think guest worker programs are something new and reasonable. A guest worker program would keep the border open with bogus biometric and tamper proof ID's which are easy to forge so you know that that is how we will achieve ""redistribution (of) wealth and land," which means nothing more than amnesty for current and future illegal aliens under some new 'United Nations' umbrella organization. e.g., they are not undocumented immigrants, they are 'resource and development partners'.

    Most of the raised tax money for the "Millennium Development Goal" will probably go toward shady government jobs for relatives with titles like "Director of Northern Hemisphere Operations for the Elimination of Racism and Xenophobia Against Global Migrants" which will come with annual paychecks in excess of $500,000. Massive amounts of money in the "Millennium Development Goal" budget will be given to lawyers so that 'nativist' Americans who "complain too much" can be bought up on charges of hate crimes and jailed or sent to 'voluntary' work camps. Read George Orwell's 1984. "Millennium Development Goal" is nothing more than Soviet Politics in America.

    And don't forget that taxpayers will see their taxes shoot up to pay for this. And, of course the big joke is the "cancellation of the debts of developing countries" but American taxpayers would not have their's forgiven, oh no.

  5. #5
    Senior Member IndianaJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,235
    Mr. OBAMA(for himself, Mr. HAGEL, and Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MENENDEZ,Mr. BIDEN, Mr. DODD, Mr. FEINGOLD, Ms. SNOWE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. SMITH, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill;
    We are NOT a nation of immigrants!

  6. #6
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,516

    Re: What`s your take on Obama’s $845 BILLION Global Povert

    Quote Originally Posted by millere
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk
    But the real frightening part of the bill is its "Millennium Development Goal" which is also mentioned in a declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium Assembly and Summit in 2000 that called for the "eradication of poverty" by "redistribution (of) wealth and land," cancellation of "the debts of developing countries" and "a fair distribution of the earth's resources" i.e. from each [meaning the U.S. Taxpayer] according to their means, to each [meaning the rest of the world] according to their needs.

    [Report No. 110-331]
    To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

    Most of the raised tax money for the "Millennium Development Goal" will probably go toward shady government .
    You don't know how right you are!

    From the text of the bill


    (9) At the summit of the Group of Eight (G- nations in July 2005, leaders from all eight participating countries committed to increase aid to Africa from the current $25,000,000,000 annually to $50,000,000,000 by 2010, and to cancel 100 percent of the debt obligations owed to the World Bank, African Development Bank, and International Monetary Fund by 18 of the world's poorest nations.

    (10) At the United Nations World Summit in September 2005, the United States joined more than 180 other governments in reiterating their commitment to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals by 2015.

    JWK


    If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon a federal government check, we can then bribe them for their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s working population enslaved to pay the bills ____ our Marxist Democrat Party’s game plan, a plan to establish a federal plantation and send America's wealth to foreign lands.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    164
    I could be wrong, but wasn`t the World Bank supose to help poverty? Well this is just another lie to take all our money for the NEW WORLD ORDER.

    What is the World Bank?
    In 2004 the World Bank provided $20.1 billion for 245 projects in developing countries worldwide, with its finance and/or technical expertise aimed at helping those countries reduce poverty.
    We live in a world so rich that global income is more than $31 trillion a year. In this world, the average person in some countries earns more than $40,000 a year. But in this same world, 2.8 billion people—more than half the people in developing countries—live on less than $700 a year. Of these, 1.2 billion earn less than $1 a day.
    To read more go to this link

    http://tinyurl.com/4o69bj

    for other questions on the world bank go here

    http://tinyurl.com/4ml7a9
    No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.
    Abraham Lincoln

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    164
    OOPS Sorry, didn`t know it would ruin the page
    Also first link wrong.
    No man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.
    Abraham Lincoln

  9. #9
    Senior Member judyweller's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Maryland, Alleghany County
    Posts
    688
    Another reason NOT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA.

  10. #10
    Senior Member millere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,297
    Quote Originally Posted by pjwishes
    In this world, the average person in some countries earns more than $40,000 a year.
    Alan Greenspan was a huge fan of immigration for the purposes of lowering American salaries. That unelected official was against the American middle-class. In a frightening future scenario those making $40,000 a year will be told that they have to give their jobs to people from other countries willing to do them for only $8 an hour. Some of this is already happening today and I shudder to think what an Obama/United Nations partnership will bring in that direction. Under Socialism everyone gets poorer while the corporate elites and their government cronies get rich.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •