Thread: What`s your take on Obama’s $845 BILLION Global Poverty Ac

America why do we let dumb ones decide how to spend our tax money. These people we elect have a common tread, greed for themselves.

When someone says, "I am looking after the people," start watching and listening to the double talk for actions need to speak louder than words.

If there is a debate this Friday, I wonder if McCain will ask Obama about his proposed $845 BILLION Global Poverty Act in which he promises to tax hard working fathers living in Harlem, who can barely meet their own families financial needs, and will send this money to foreign countries, many of which hate America?

With all the talk about the $700 BILLION bail out of Wall Street, why has our establishment media [NBC, CBS, ABC CNN, MSNBC , The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc., ] not reported on Obama’s proposed $845 BILLION giveaway to foreign countries?


McCain should also ask Obama why he attempted to silence a talk show on WGN two times! See: WGN-AM again target of Obama Campaign. This is another story which our establishment media has ignored, one in which Obama tried to silence political speech.


JWK


``Change`` we can believe in if Obama is elected ---- tax our dollars and leave us with change.

For those who do not believe Obama is working to allow the United Nations to impose a 0.7 percent tax upon the gross national product of the United States, here are the facts.


Under Obama’s bill, the president is required to devise a "comprehensive strategy" to meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.


The ultimate aim of the Millennium Development project is to have the American Taxpayers submit to the United Nations imposing a tax upon them amounting to 0.7 percent of the GNP of the United States. In one report a UN panel asserts that membership on the UN Security Council “be required to fulfill international commitments to official development assistance, including the 0.7 targetâ€

Here's my thoughts:

Personally, I don't want to hear a word out of Obama's mouth about reducing Global poverty.

When they are asking us for $700 billion dollars, which we all know will NOT even come close to being the end of the money we're taken for, to allegedly prevent imminent financial collapse, Obama has no room to be expecting that we should be contributing one red cent to eliminating world poverty.

In case he hasn't noticed.....we have NO wealth left to redistribute.

Originally Posted by pjwishes

OOPS Sorry, didn`t know it would ruin the page
Also first link wrong.

Go here to shorten long urls.


http://tinyurl.com/

Under Obama’s bill, the president is required to devise a "comprehensive strategy" to meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.

PEOPLE IN POOR COUNTRIES HAVE TOO MANY KIDS. THATS WHY THEIR COUNTRY IS POOR AND THEIR PEOPLE ARE HUNGRY. INSTEAD OF GIVING THEM MONEY, TELL THEM TO STOP HAVING SO MANY KIDS.

Look what I just found!


Obama's Plan To Spend Billions Overseas


NRO: Democrat Rails At Billions Spent In War But Supports Bill That Would Mandate Billions More In Foreign Aid Each Year


Sept. 19, 2008


(National Review Online) This column was written by Andrew C. McCarthy.

[quote]
The Candidate of Hope is hoping that while he caterwauls about our lost billions, you won’t notice that he has already proposed the most jaw-dropping transfer of wealth in American history: taking nearly a trillion dollars out of the pockets of American taxpayers and doling it out to the world’s worst regimes through its most corrupt intermediary, the U.N.

The scam is better known as Obama’s Global Poverty Act. Sen. Joe Biden, , his trusty running-mate, recently tried to slam it through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ____

This week’s new and improved “let’s take care of Americans firstâ€