Page 3 of 38 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 379
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE???

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Mark Levin On Cavuto: Hillary Clinton Is Obama In A Dress

    video at link below

    http://conservative50plus.com/blog/m...d95c16-3065713

  2. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    A Benghazi Memorial in DC? Posted on August 21, 2013 benghazi-2 This is quite interesting and amazing. Liberals are coming up their scandal at every turn, but the facts keep coming out all the time. This memorial will help keep their lies exposed for the world to see. Check it out: The American people and the families of the four fallen American heroes may never get justice. But don’t despair! The truth will ultimately prevail! A Benghazi memorial will soon rise from the corrupt soil of Washington, D.C. Obama and Clinton will have no choice but to come face-to-face with their treachery. More importantly, this monument will stand as a reminder of Democrat corruption to future generations for centuries to come. A 3D rendering of the proposed sculpture. A 3D rendering of the proposed sculpture. Greg Marra, the artist who created the statue for fallen Navy SEAL, Chris Kyle, has already begun working on the memorial to commemorate the 4 fallen in Benghazi. The statue depicts the artist’s vision of the incident: one man praying, another behind the two fallen Navy SEALS—men who fought for over 20 hours against impossible odds.

    Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2013/08/a-benghazi-memorial-in-dc/#dVZ6WvKJedgP1kEG.99





    What difference does it make Hillary? What difference does it make Obama????? The difference is that we will never forget!!!! The difference is that this is not a scandal this is treachery!!!!!


  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    Benghazi a Year Later: The Cover-up Continues Posted on August 21, 2013


    Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2013/08/...0fg7Kmc8vKc.99






    Benghazi a Year Later: The Cover-up Continues Posted on August 21, 2013 ObamaHillaryLyingtoAmericaLibya2 Obama and his whole team should be in jail for what they did here. Check it out: We’re coming up on the one-year anniversary of Benghazi, and pressure is on John Boehner to do something. Could we have some investigations into this? It’s going the opposite way, actually. Again from The Daily Beast. I mean, this is Tina Brown, you know, gossip maven. This is her website. “Secretary of State John Kerry has determined that the four State Department officials placed on administrative leave by Hillary Clinton after the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi do not deserve any formal disciplinary action and has asked them to come back to work at the State Department starting Tuesday.” Now, these are the four people, you remember, they testified, they were put on administrative leave by Hillary. They got paid during this entire time. So this was nothing more than a show. It was nothing more than optics. It was nothing more than the regime trying to make people think that they were taking it seriously, when they take this no more seriously than what we’ve learned at the IRS and the scandal there. The whole thing’s a cover-up. The whole thing is optics. The whole thing is a distraction. Now, let’s put aside for the moment whether these people were scapegoats or not. What it means is that not one single person has been punished for what happened in Benghazi, not one person. If there was ever an event where heads should have rolled, that is it.


    Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2013/08/benghazi-a-year-later-the-cover-up-continues/#KXF5x0fg7Kmc8vKc.99

    http://conservativebyte.com/2013/08/...-up-continues/


  4. #24
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Hillary’s Infamous Benghazi Outburst given new meaning

    By Shoebat Foundation on August 24, 2013 in Blog, General

    It appears some Special Ops personnel have indicated that intelligence about the Benghazi attacks given to Hillary last November wasn’t acted on. Before the attacks, pleas for increased security weren’t acted on either. Hillary’s January outburst may shed some light on all of this because the “what difference… does it make?” moment occurred two months after being given that intelligence.

    Even Hillary Clinton’s Accountability Review Board (ARB), headed by Thomas “I schmoozed with the Muslim Brotherhood in Qatar this past June” Pickering, acknowledged lapses. The problem was that the dead Ambassador bore the brunt of the responsibility for his own death and not one State Department employee faced consequences.



    Hillary: Did Special Ops personnel giver her infamous outburst additional meaning?

    Now, with no suspects in custody, it appears that Special ops personnel, whose job is to provide intelligence on the ground in Benghazi right now, are being pulled out of the region… for good.

    Via Fox News:
    Special operators in the region tell Fox News that while Benghazi targets have been identified for months, officials in Washington could “never pull the trigger.” In fact, one source insists that much of the information on Benghazi suspects had been passed along to the White House after being vetted by the Department of Defense and the State Department — and at least one recommendation for direct action on a Benghazi suspect was given to President Obama as recently as Aug. 7.

    Meanwhile, months after video, photo and voice documentation on the Benghazi suspects was first presented to high-level military leaders, the State Department and ultimately the White House, prison breaks in the country have eroded security. U.S. special forces have now been relegated to a “villa,” a stopover for the operators before they’re shipped out of the country entirely.

    “We put American special operations in harm’s way to develop a picture of these suspects and to seek justice and instead of acting, we stalled. We just let it slip and pass us by and now it’s going to be much more difficult,” one source said, citing 1,200 prisoners escaping two weeks ago. “It’s already blowing up. Daily assassinations, bi-weekly prison escapes, we waited way too long.”

    A common refrain from investigators and echoed by State Department leadership since 9/11/12 has been that attacks like the one in Benghazi never happen again. Yet, it appears that State is handling the investigation in a way quite similar to how it handled requests for security beforehand:
    The special operators are starting to get frustrated at the lack of action, and Fox News has been told by multiple sources that one special forces leader “literally yelled” at former Libyan Chief of Mission William Roebuck “and told him, ‘so you’re willing to let these guys get away with murder?’”

    The outburst was “met with crickets,” the sources said.
    This inaction appears to have been taking place for several months, dating back to when Hillary Clinton was still Secretary of State:
    Fox News reported earlier this year that American forces had identified suspects by the end of November 2012, and reported on their whereabouts to Roebuck last January, yet no action was taken. They returned again in January to identify and locate these same suspects after being requested to do so by military leaders. In the months since, the operators in the region have been sitting in de facto standby, despite the Justice Department charges being filed. {emphasis ours}
    January, huh? Isn’t that when Hillary testified in front of two congressional committees? In fact, the aforementioned claims seem to directly coincide with the now infamous, convoluted, and telling exchange during Clinton’s testimony. When talking about what motivated the attacks, Hillary suggested it didn’t matter and then proceeded to declare that it was her job to find out. Pay attention to what she says right after, “What difference, at this point, does it make” and also keep in mind why this is the most memorable exchange of those hearings; Hillary lost her cool and inadvertently spoke the convoluted truth:



    Did she admit in this exchange that while figuring out what happened was her job, she had no interest in doing that job because it didn’t make any difference? When someone tasked with investigating murders thinks the motives for those murders makes no difference, that doesn’t just point to coverup but also to culpability:

    “What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again.”

    Based on the reports from these Special ops guys, the behavior of the Obama administration seems to mirror Clinton’s inherently paradoxical statement. It’s the administration’s “job” to figure out what happened but they demonstrate no willingness to do that job.

    Why?

    Because, well, what difference does it make?

    Back to the Fox News report:
    The men tell Fox News their mission was to capture or kill the suspects in question, and they briefed the acting U.S. ambassador in Libya and the senior CIA representative in the country. The men were told both Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and an under secretary were briefed about their information and their ability to capture or kill those responsible. Still, they did not get approval from the Department of Defense or the White House.

    {emphasis ours}

    Again, if these claims are correct, Clinton was informed about the whereabouts of the suspects in the Benghazi attacks but responded in a way similar to how her underlings responded to requests for security before the attacks – with silence. To put it more bluntly, it would appear that she responded by refusing to do her job to “figure out what happened” after the attacks.

    A few weeks ago, on August 7th, it was reported that a ‘lead’ suspect named Ahmed Abu Khattala had been charged, along with other unnamed co-conspirators. The timing of these indictments, when coupled with CNN’s expose on Khattala, smelled a bit suspicious as well.
    Ain’t it also a bit strange that before we have these suspects in custody, those tasked with helping to apprehend them are being pulled out of the region?




    http://shoebat.com/2013/08/24/hillar...n-new-meaning/
    kathyet2 likes this.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Following Syria's Devastating Chemical Weapons Attack, Will Media Remember Hillary's Touting of 'Reformer' Assad?

    Published: 8/26/2013 1:07 PM ET

    Subscribe to Scott Whitlock
    By Scott Whitlock







    Even though it's August of 2013, Hillary Clinton's possible 2016 presidential bid has already been heavily hyped by journalists. Yet, it seems that these same reporters aren't interested in exploring aspects of Clinton's job as Secretary of State. One such comment not getting attention is her 2011 labeling of Bashar al-Assad, the man almost certainly behind a devastating chemical weapons attack, as a "reformer." Between 500 and 1000 people are dead after last week's gassing.
    On the March 27, 2011, Clinton insisted, "There’s a different leader in Syria now. Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer." (The Washington Post gave this remark three Pinocchios. Clinton later backtracked.) Yet, ABC, NBC and CBS have not reexamined the comments in the wake of the attack or its accuracy.
    The Post explained Clinton's statements and subsequent spin:
    Hillary Clinton is known for making provocative statements, but few have generated such a firestorm as her comment last week that the president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, may be a reformer. She made her remarks after "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer noted that Assad’s late father had killed 25,000 people during an uprising against his regime. Clinton responded by noting that the son was now in power and he was a "different leader."
    Lawmakers and columnists quickly condemned her remarks. So two days later Clinton tried to deflect the criticism by telling reporters she was only referencing "the opinions" of lawmakers who had met with Assad and that she was not speaking for the administration. But then she added: "We’re also going to continue to urge that the promise of reform, which has been made over and over again and which you reported on just a few months ago – I’m a reformer, I’m going to reform, and I’ve talked to members of Congress and others about that, that we hear from the highest levels of leadership in Syria – will actually be turned into reality."
    ...
    In fact, Clinton’s remarks gave a highly misleading impression — that there was general consensus by experts on Syria in both parties that Assad was a reformer, even though Clinton’s own State Department reports label him otherwise.


    On November 18, 2011, then-ABC correspondent Jake
    Tapper pushed Clinton on her "reformer" comment: "You at one point seemed to have optimism that Assad was a reformer." Clinton appeared to concede to her original implication, allowing, "We had hoped so. We heard what Assad said about what he wanted to do for reform. But when it came to it, he responded as we have seen, very violently."

    ABC dismissed the complaints of the "rattled" Republican Party for objecting to a planned 2016 miniseries, among other coverage for the election three years and three months away. Yet, the network has failed to revisit the "reformer" remark.
    On July 27, 2012, National Review recounted several politicians who have offered hopeful comments about Assad. Noah Glyn wrote of Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and others:
    In 2007, Nancy Pelosi, over strong objections from the State Department, visited Syria, and said, "The road to Damascus is a road to peace." Senator John Kerry predicted that "Syria will change as it embraces a legitimate relationship with the United States."
    ...
    A WikiLeaks document revealed that Kerry told the emir of Qatar in November 2010 that Assad is a man who "wants to change" and that Israel should cede the Golan Heights to the Syrians "at some point."
    Hillary Clinton is the former Secretary of State and a possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate. Nancy Pelosi is a powerful member of Congress. John Kerry, the current Secretary of State, has praised Assad as a "man who wants to change."
    In covering the horrific chemical weapons attack, as well as how the U.S. should proceed in the future, it would be nice if journalists could focus on how Clinton and other administration officials have previously viewed the situation.
    -- Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

    http://mrc.org/biasalerts/following-...llarys-touting



    Now they are trying to change the story to make it as though she is a good guy!!!! She isn't she backed Obama to the hilt!!!! So tell me Hillbilly "what difference does it make"
    Last edited by kathyet2; 08-29-2013 at 10:32 AM.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    I'll get you my pretty....



    AirborneSapper7 likes this.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    AirborneSapper7 likes this.

  8. #28
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #29
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696



    "What difference does it make?"
    kathyet2 likes this.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Judicial Watch, Inc.


    SHARE to help us!





Page 3 of 38 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •