Thread: WILL RON PAUL AUTHORIZE AN AUDIT OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMAR

WILL RON PAUL AUTHORIZE AN AUDIT OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY?







By: Devvy
January 10, 2008

© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com

While the political pundits chatter on about the shocking "upset" in the New Hampshire primary between Marxist Hillary Clinton and 'No Change' Barack Obama, there is a storm brewing regarding the vote count for Congressman Ron Paul.

Regular readers of my column know I have been on the vote fraud issue since 1993. It is real and has dominated our elections since the late '60s. While the corporate media flunkies have been diligent in their efforts to marginalize and crush Dr. Paul's run for the White House the past several months, his support has swelled and along with it, the necessary cash to run a viable campaign. [See this excellent DVD on vote fraud "Hacking Democracy"]

Those of us who have followed the events taking place in this country the past couple of decades are fully cognizant of how the shadow government operates behind the curtain and feeds the peasants (you and me) what they want the people to know and make sure via technology, that enough of their kind are "elected" to higher offices and stay in office. Over the past eight years, I have watched the anger and activism over vote fraud continue to grow as more and more Americans have finally come to the realization that the ballot box no longer belongs to we the people.

This presidential election, and I say this after being in the trenches full time for 18 long years, this is our last hope of putting a true man of the U.S. Constitution and freedom in the White House. These primaries are critical because the delegates to the Republican National Convention this summer which will pick the GOP candidate are being pledged during this process. That's why every single vote counts and it's our right to have every vote counted.

Iowa was a dismal affair with Dr. Paul allegedly coming in fifth place with 10%. As I wrote in my last column, in several counties in Iowa, Dr. Paul pulled in 35%, 14%, 15%, 21% and several with 12% of the vote. Of course, that didn't make the "news" on any cable or "mainstream" network. I didn't believe the final count because I know better. The machines are in control and the powerful elites who rule our lives intend to install their new puppet in the White House regardless of what we the people want.

While I don't follow vote fraud activist, Jim Condit, a friend sent me a link to a piece written by Condit regarding the efforts in Iowa to get an open vote, how they were kicked in the teeth by the GOP heavies and the problems they encountered. What he describes is what I encountered in 1996 when I ran (GOP) for Congress: the local and state machine cared nothing for the truth, only how many backsides they could kiss in their quest to climb the political ladder to power. Believe me, I experienced and watched it first hand. After that primary I walked from the GOP because I could no longer support a party that cared nothing for this country or the truth, only whose boots they could spit and shine making them feel important in their magniloquent little worlds.

I found these comments particularly disturbing in Condit's recounting of events: "3. Right after the hour radio show, -- so many irate Iowans called the Iowa GOP headquarters demanding to know why they were using the discredited Diebold machines, that the Iowa GOP made an appeal to the Ron Paul paid staff in Iowa to send out an email asking Ron Paul supporters to quit calling GOP headquarters! The email, sent out by RP paid staff member, Jeff Frazee, to Ron Paul supporters was nasty; it told them to “Stop itâ€

I hope he does. We already have proof of one precinct that gave him 0 votes when he did have several.

We need to get the voting fraud taken care of before we get stuck with the masters, clinton or mccain.

New Hampshire hand count of votes is VERY different from that of the Lie Boldly machines

RON PAUL SHOWN ACTUALLY LOSING VOTES ON CNN LIVE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDQNBD5DclQ
RON PAUL VOTE COUNT SHOWN ACTUALLY DECREASING WITH TIME

Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=749
By zooamerica | January 9, 2008

This would have placed Dr. Paul in 3rd place, just as the polls were showing before the primary…

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23643

The computer counted votes are the problem.

Not a single hand count township showed less than 10%
Supposedly, Ron Paul got 8% - this does not make sense.
They have paper ballots but the optical scan machines are done by, you
guessed it, Diebold. Because of bad press in the past their name is now
"Premier".

richmond is hand count 34% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lyman is hand count 28.7% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Orange is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Harts location is hand count 25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
wentworth is hand count 24% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
goshen is hand count 17.68% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
marlow is hand count 16.6% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
cornish is hand count 14.8% for dr. Paul…100% reporting
Rumney is hand count 14.5% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
croydon is hand count 14 % for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
dorchester is hand count 13.89% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
effingham is hand count 13% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
albany is hand count 12.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
antrim is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
south hampton is hand count 12% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
sullivan is hand count 12.61% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
troy is hand count 12.21% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mason is hand count 11.88% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
newport is hand count 11.45% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
charlstown is hand count 11.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Allenstown is hand count 11.16% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
bristol is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
warren is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Strafford is hand count 11% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
washington is hand count 11.02% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
lancaster is hand count 10.9% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
springfield is hand count 10.6% for Dr.Paul…100% reporting
wilton is hand count 10.37% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
Northfield is hand count 10.3% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting
mont vernon is hand count 10.25% for Dr. Paul…100% reporting

Fraud in New Hampshire? S.C. to use voting machines banned in other states,
says Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire.

Chris Whitmire may be reached at
803 734-9060 CWhitmire@elections.sc.gov

If contact with Chris Whitmire results in no action, Gov. Mark Sandford may be contacted at 803 734-2100 mark@gov.sc.gov

I say let them all re count
That way Paul can get the votes he wants...


Since the best he could have done was a high 5th the re count won’t win him any more or less delegates

Greg, you don't seem to understand. If they can do this to Paul, they can do it to any candidate.

I want this proven and corrected before we get stuck with a Democratic candidate or McCain, Huckabee, Guliani as our new President !!!! I want my vote to count.

Originally Posted by Dianne

Greg, you don't seem to understand. If they can do this to Paul, they can do it to any candidate.

I want this proven and corrected before we get stuck with a Democratic candidate or McCain, Huckabee, Guliani as our new President !!!! I want my vote to count.

I understand just fine

Let em recount it

The Diebold programmer is a convicted felon. Votes were not counted. Obama was slated to win this state. Ron Paul was slated to come in third again.

when they do recounts, they do them for all. All by hand and they need to be closely watched. I heard that the Hillary people were kicking out poll watchers.

It's not about Ron Paul or any other candidate - it's about the cornerstone of a government of the people - our vote.

We have long realized there is a 'little' skullduggery in every election.
Now it seems, they aren't even going to try to convince us it is fair.

GREGAGREATAMERICAN says:

Since the best he could have done was a high 5th the re count won’t win him any more or less delegates

I guess you know this for a fact, huh.

Originally Posted by GREGAGREATAMERICAN

I say let them all re count
That way Paul can get the votes he wants...


Since the best he could have done was a high 5th the re count won’t win him any more or less delegates

WRONG!!!