Thread: WILL RON PAUL AUTHORIZE AN AUDIT OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMAR

Originally Posted by GREGAGREATAMERICAN

Originally Posted by Dianne

Greg, you don't seem to understand. If they can do this to Paul, they can do it to any candidate.

I want this proven and corrected before we get stuck with a Democratic candidate or McCain, Huckabee, Guliani as our new President !!!! I want my vote to count.

I understand just fine

Let em recount it

You're clueless Greg. But I was too at one time. You've got to wake up and smell the coffee.

At the moment, there's disagreement between the Paul grassroots movement and the official campaign. It's the people who are demanding a recount. NOT the official campiagn. I think HQ is concerned about people (like yourself) who are going to view this as sour grapes. At the moment, they seem to be willing to let things go like Kerry in Ohio. They don't want to rock the boat.

However, if more evidence comes up (like now a second town is suspect - Greenville), then I don't see how they could continue to ignore it.


- The New Hampshire town of Sutton admits that it voided every vote Ron Paul received. The Congressman got 31 votes and yet due to a "human error," Sutton reported zero votes for Ron Paul. How "human error" can explain not counting 31 votes in succession for one single candidate is beyond the pale and Ron Paul's campaign should ask for a recount across New Hampshire immediately.

As soon as people went public with the fact that their votes in Sutton had not been counted, other districts where Paul had supposedly received zero votes, such as Greenville, suddenly changed their final tallies and attributed votes to the Congressman.

Going into New Hampshire Ron Paul was polling in the early teens and was a strong bet to take third place behind McCain and Romney. Four days before the vote, Rasmussen had Paul at 14% - a significant lead over Huckabee on 11% and Giuliani on 8% - and yet Ron Paul finished with just 8%. Proof of clear vote fraud, allied with the fact that Paul's numbers show a 6% swing from normally accurate pre-polling forecasts, clearly indicate chicanery was at hand, especially considering the fact that Paul lost those crucial few percentage points to Giuliani as a reuslt of electronic Diebold voting machines which are known to be wide open to tampering and fraud.

Going purely on hand-counts, which as we saw in Sutton were by no means angelic but at least harder to cheat on than Diebold voting machines without getting caught, Ron Paul would have won 15% of the vote and finished third. This figure would have more accurately correlated to the pre-primary polls rather than the ridiculous 8% he was eventually given.

Numerous districts reported totals of anything up to 22% for "other candidates". What on earth does this black hole of "other candidates" mean? How can one vote for a candidate that is not on the ballot without spoiling the ballot paper? The district of Lisbon reported 22.5% votes for this mysterious "other" candidate, while in the large district of Londonderry, the "other" candidate received 10%. Many are now alleging that these "other" votes were merely siphoned from Ron Paul to keep his final number low.

Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody's idea of a sick joke?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ja ... _fraud.htm

Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody's idea of a sick joke?

3 Planes went down on 9/11, what are the statistical odds of this happening in the election?

I'm surprised everyone isn't outraged.

This isn't about Ron Paul or who would get more votes.

It's about rigging an election - next time it might be 'your guy' they want to stop.

This is big - it really is.

Originally Posted by nntrixie

I'm surprised everyone isn't outraged.

This isn't about Ron Paul or who would get more votes.

It's about rigging an election - next time it might be 'your guy' they want to stop.

This is big - it really is.

Exactly. It has t o be done right. Otherwise we do not have a voice and we do not live in a constitutional republic.

Originally Posted by jp_48504

Rudy Giuliani, the 9/11 candidate who beat Ron Paul thanks to the aid of a 3% swing on Diebold voting machines, received 9.11% of the vote in three different towns. Coincidence or somebody's idea of a sick joke?

3 Planes went down on 9/11, what are the statistical odds of this happening in the election?

Ok Jim I trust you
Show me where this info about Rudy and 3% and 9/11 is coming from...

I heard that after 911 somebody in New York played 911 and won the lotto with the number 911… Is this they same type of scam Paul’s people are trying to get across

Check the new Hampshire Primary results from the state records. You can also see it here and thousands of other places.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/giuliani_nh_911.html

Originally Posted by jp_48504

Check the new Hampshire Primary results from the state records. You can also see it here and thousands of other places.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/giuliani_nh_911.html

Is that the site Your gettng the info from ?

Many other sites show differnt numbers

I am not arguing here
I want to see a recount

But I want to se a CCN or a RNC results posted on our Forum stateiing this info

If the thing was rigged I want the riggers to face the piper just like every one else would

I saw the site from New Hampshire with the official numbers. I'll find it for you later. If you cannot handle the truth, I understand. It is overwhelming for those who are waking up to the reality in which we live.

You are welcome to contact them yourself. They have not put them on their web site for some reason or another.

Location: State House, Room 204, Concord, N.H. 03301
Phone: 603-271-3242 Fax: 603-271-6316
Email: Elections@sos.state.nh.us
http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/index.htm

Originally Posted by jp_48504

I saw the site from New Hampshire with the official numbers. I'll find it for you later. If you cannot handle the truth, I understand. It is overwhelming for those who are waking up to the reality in chich we live.

You are welcome to contact them yourself. They have not put them on their web site for some reason or another.

Location: State House, Room 204, Concord, N.H. 03301
Phone: 603-271-3242 Fax: 603-271-6316
Email: Elections@sos.state.nh.us
http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/index.htm

Hold on here
Back the band wagon up my admin friend...

I HANDEL TRUTH JUST FINE…
I simply say
FIND THE TRUTH FIRST….


There are about 13 counties in New Hampshire where Mr. 9/11 received 9% , with less 100% reporting and 9% with 100% reporting....

If any one cares to look
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/candidates/

I will say it again
If there is something found rotten in demark then bring it to light and lets get the recount going

I’m not arguing that something might be or could be wrong.
I would like to see a creditable news source sighting exacta for instances before I jump on the band wagon